Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 2006 Mar 16;573(Pt 3):571–593. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.106534

Mechanisms of anabolic androgenic steroid inhibition of mammalian ɛ-subunit-containing GABAA receptors

Brian L Jones 1, Paul J Whiting 2, Leslie P Henderson 1
PMCID: PMC1779744  PMID: 16543268

Abstract

GABAergic transmission regulates the activity of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons in the preoptic area/hypothalamus that control the onset of puberty and the expression of reproductive behaviours. One of the hallmarks of illicit use of anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) is disruption of behaviours under neuroendocrine control. GnRH neurons are among a limited population of cells that express high levels of the ɛ-subunit of the GABAA receptor. To better understand the actions of AAS on neuroendocrine mechanisms, we have characterized modulation of GABAA receptor-mediated currents in mouse native GnRH neurons and in heterologous cells expressing recombinant α2β3ɛ-receptors. GnRH neurons exhibited robust currents in response to millimolar concentrations of GABA and a picrotoxin (PTX)-sensitive, bicuculline-insensitive current that probably arises from spontaneous openings of GABAA receptors. The AAS 17α-methyltestosterone (17α-MeT) inhibited spontaneous and GABA-evoked currents in GnRH neurons. For recombinant α2β3ɛ-receptors, 17α-MeT inhibited phasic and tonic GABA-elicited responses, accelerated desensitization and slowed paired pulse response recovery. Single channel analysis indicated that GABA-evoked events could be described by three open dwell components and that 17α-MeT enhanced residence in the intermediate dwell state. This AAS also inhibited a PTX-sensitive, spontaneous current (open probability, ∼0.15–0.2) in a concentration-dependent fashion (IC50 ≈ 9 μm). Kinetic modelling indicated that the inhibition induced by 17α-MeT occurs by an allosteric block in which the AAS interacts preferentially with a closed state and promotes accumulation in that state. Finally, studies with a G302S mutant ɛ-subunit suggest that this residue within the transmembrane domain TM2 plays a role in mediating AAS binding and modulation. In sum, our results indicate that inclusion of the ɛ-subunit significantly alters the profile of AAS modulation and that this allosteric inhibition of native GnRH neurons should be considered with regard to AAS disruption of neuroendocrine control.


Anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) are synthetic derivatives of testosterone that are valuable therapeutic agents, but whose clinical use has been overshadowed by illicit self-administration of supratherapeutic doses. In contrast to physiological levels of endogenous steroids, which are in the nanomolar range (for review, see Shahidi, 2001), serum levels of AAS have been estimated to reach micromolar concentrations in human subjects who abuse them (Masonis & McCarthy, 1995; Wu, 1997; Daly et al. 2001). One of the hallmarks of AAS use is disruption of puberty and of the expression of normal reproductive behaviours (for review, see Clark & Henderson, 2003). These behaviours are regulated by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons located in the preoptic area/hypothalamus which are under a tonic inhibitory tone exerted by GABAA receptors (for review, see Herbison et al. 1991; Moenter et al. 2003). A critical and unaddressed question is whether AAS alter GABAergic control of GnRH neurons and thus neuroendocrine regulation.

The native GABAA receptor is a pentameric ionotropic transmembrane protein for which 16 different receptor subunit genes (α1–6, β1–3, γ1–3, δ, ɛ, π and θ) and numerous alternatively spliced mRNAs have been identified in mammals (for review, see Whiting et al. 1999). The ɛ-subunit shows a highly restricted pattern of expression (Davies et al. 1997; Whiting et al. 1997; Moragues et al. 2000; Sinkkonen et al. 2000) and in rodents is enriched in the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus, the medial preoptic area (mPOA), the septum and the amygdala (Moragues et al. 2000, 2002, 2003; Sinkkonen et al. 2000; McIntyre et al. 2002); all regions intimately involved in the generation of reproductive behaviours (for review, see Clark & Henderson, 2003). Of particular relevance, virtually all GnRH neurons in the preoptic region express marked levels of this subunit (Moragues et al. 2003).

Recombinant receptors composed of α1β3ɛ- or α2β1ɛ-subunits are both spontaneously active and gated by GABA (Neelands et al. 1999; Davies et al. 2001; Maksay et al. 2003; Wagner et al. 2005). All reports to date indicate that ɛ-containing receptors are not sensitive to nanomolar concentrations of high-affinity benzodiazepine (BZ) binding site agonists (Davies et al. 1997, 2001; Whiting et al. 1997; Thompson et al. 1998; Neelands et al. 1999; Maksay et al. 2003), but micromolar concentrations of BZs have been reported to inhibit these ɛ-containing receptors (Maksay et al. 2003; cf. Neelands et al. 1999), potentially at a separate low-affinity site. The ability of anaesthetics and anaesthetic neurosteroids to potentiate ɛ-containing channels has been somewhat controversial (Davies et al. 1997, 2001; Whiting et al. 1997; Thompson et al. 1998), but the percentage potentiation elicited by these modulators has been shown to be inversely proportional to the level of ɛ-subunit expression in recombinant systems (Thompson et al. 2002). Similarly, expression of the ɛ-subunit in native neurons has been correlated with diminished sensitivity to BZs (Kasparov et al. 2001), neurosteroids (Jorge et al. 2002) and anaesthetics (Irnaten et al. 2002; Sergeeva et al. 2005).

Anabolic androgenic steroids are both structurally and functionally distinct from the neurosteroids (for review, see Lambert et al. 1995, 2003; Clark et al. 2004). The AAS 17α-MeT acts as a positive modulator of currents elicited by application of millimolar GABA to recombinant α2β3γ2-receptors, but is without effect on such currents elicited at α1β3γ2- or α2β3δ-receptors. Conversely, 17α-MeT potentiates tonic currents elicited by micromolar concentrations of GABA at α1β3γ2-receptors, but is without effect on tonic currents produced by stationary levels of micromolar GABA at α2β3γ2-receptors. Thus the profile of allosteric modulation elicited by this AAS is dependent upon both subunit composition and the concentration/duration of GABA exposure (Yang et al. 2002, 2005; Clark et al. 2004). GnRH neurons are highly heterogeneous in GABAA receptor subunit expression (Sim et al. 2000; Todman et al. 2005). While the complement of surface receptors in GnRH neurons is not known, the preferential expression of α2- and β3-subunits in the preoptic area/hypothalamus (Wisden et al. 1992; Herbison & Fénelon, 1995; Pirker et al. 2000; McIntyre et al. 2002; Penatti et al. 2005), coupled with the abundant expression of the ɛ-subunit in GnRH neurons (Moragues et al. 2003), suggests that α2β3ɛ-receptors are likely to constitute an important receptor class in these cells.

Assessments of GABAergic control of GnRH neurons have been facilitated by the generation of lines of transgenic mice in which green fluorescent protein (GFP) is expressed from the GnRH promoter (Spergel et al. 1999; Suter et al. 2000; Han et al. 2004). Here, we have taken advantage of one of these transgenic lines (Suter et al. 2000) to assess how the commonly abused AAS 17α-MeT modulates GABAA receptor-mediated phasic and spontaneous currents in GnRH neurons. To further define the mechanism of AAS action at ɛ-containing receptors, we have assessed modulation by 17α-MeT of both GABA-gated and spontaneous currents through recombinant α2β3ɛ-receptors to characterize how these abused steroids may influence GABAergic activity in GnRH neurons.

Methods

GFP-GnRH transgenic mice and primary neuron preparation

GFP-GnRH mice were generously provided by Dr Suzanne Moenter (Department of Medicine and Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA). In these mice, a portion of the mouse GnRH promoter was used to drive expression of enhanced GFP (Suter et al. 2000). Briefly, a portion of the mouse GnRH promoter (−3446 to +23) was used to drive expression of a transgene consisting of the B intron of rabbit β-globin as a splice donor/acceptor, the coding sequence for enhanced GFP and the polyadenylation signal from human growth hormone. The line was generated in a CBB6 strain, and 99.5% of neurons expressing GFP were found to be GnRH positive (Suter et al. 2000). For experiments performed here, mice were killed with a rising concentration of CO2, decapitated, and their brains removed directly into an artificial cerebral spinal fluid (ACSF; mm): 124 NaCl, 2.4 CaCl2, 10 d-glucose, 5 KCl, 1.3 KH2PO4, 1.3 MgSO4 and 24 NaHCO3, superfused with 95% O2−5% CO2. The brain was transected coronally at the level of the optic chiasm, and 400 μm slices were made in this oxygenated ACSF from the rostral portion of the brain using an Electron Microscopy Sciences OTS-4000® vibroslicer (Hatfield, PA, USA). Slices were transferred to a sterile 100 mm Petri dish containing 5 ml of Hibernate-A (BrainBits, Springfield, IL, USA), a Mops-buffered medium designed for use in ambient O2, which was supplemented with 1 × B27 (Invitrogen Corp., Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Regions containing the mPOA were dissected and incubated in a solution of 2 mg ml−1 papain (Worthington Biochemical Corp., Lakewood, NJ, USA) in Hibernate-A at 30°C for 30 min. Tissue was then treated with 1.2 U μl−1 Dnase I type II (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St Louis, MO, USA) and triturated, and the resulting cell suspension was centrifuged for 2 min at 450 ×g. The supernatant was decanted, the pellet was resuspended in Neurobasal-A medium (Invitrogen Corp.) supplemented with B27, and the cells were plated onto plastic dishes and maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2 for at least 1 h prior to recording.

All animal care procedures were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Dartmouth. Procedures were performed to minimize the use of animals and any pain or discomfort to them, and are in agreement with the guidelines and recommendations of the National Institutes of Health and the American Veterinary Medical Association.

Recombinant GABAA receptor cDNAs and expression in heterologous cells

Transfections and cell maintenance

Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK) 293 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) were grown on tissue culture dishes (BD Falcon, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (Invitrogen Corp.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen Corp.), 2 mm l-glutamine, 50 IU ml−1 penicillin and 50 μg ml−1 streptomycin (all from Mediatech Inc., Herndon, VA, USA) at 37°C and in 5% CO2−95% O2. Constructs encoding the rat β3- and γ2L- and the human α2-subunits were kindly provided by Dr Stefano Vicini (Georgetown University Medical School, Washington, DC, USA). The human ɛ-subunit cDNA was provided by Dr Paul Whiting (Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Harlow, UK). HEK293 cells were transiently transfected according to Yang et al. (2002, 2005) at equal ratios of 0.8 μg of each plasmid using the Lipofectamine PLUS® protocol (Invitrogen Corp.) for HEK293 cells. The pGreenLantern plasmid (Invitrogen Corp.) was cotransfected (0.8 μg) to permit selection of transfected cells expressing GFP with fluorescence optics. After transfection, cells were maintained in culture medium containing 20 μm bicuculline methiodide (Sigma-Aldrich Co.), which promoted cell survival, and recordings were made approximately 24–48 h after transfection.

Mutagenesis of GABAA receptor cDNAs

The mutant G302S GABAA receptor construct was engineered from the cDNA encoding the human ɛ-subunit subcloned into the pCDM8 expression vector (Invitrogen Corp.) using the QuickChange System (Stratgene, La Jolla, CA, USA) and according to the manufacturer's instructions. Numbering of the amino acid 302 refers to position relative to the start of the mature peptide. Mutant DNA was amplified by transformation of XL1-Blue supercompetent cells, transformed colonies were identified, and plasmid DNA was isolated using the Qiagen MiniPrep system (Valencia, CA, USA). Successful mutations were identified by sequencing in both forward and reverse directions using SP6 and T7 primers, respectively. Primers were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA).

The ɛ(G302S) primers were: forward, 5′-CTG ACC ATG ACC ACG TTG AGC ACC TTT TCT CG-3′; and reverse, 5′-CGA GAA AAG GTG CTC AAC GTG GTC ATGGTC AG-3′.

Data acquisition and analysis

Pipette fabrication and general recording conditions

Patch pipettes used for all recordings were fabricated from borosilicate glass (Sutter Instrument Co., Novato, CA, USA). Typically, electrodes used for whole-cell recordings had open tip resistances between 3 and 5 MΩ. Data were acquired and analysed using an EPC-9 patch clamp amplifier and HEKA Pulse software (Instrutech Corp., Port Washington, NY, USA). Whole-cell and nucleated patch recordings were made at room temperature (22–24°C) with a pipette solution containing (mm): 140 CsCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 Hepes, 5 EGTA and 4 Mg-ATP (pH 7.2, with CsOH). A bath solution composed of the following (mm): 130 NaCl, 6 KCl, 2 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, 10 Hepes, 10 D-glucose and 10 sucrose (pH 7.4, with NaOH) was used for all recordings.

Ultrafast perfusion

GABA and other modulators were applied to the patch using the LSS-3100 High Speed Positioning System (Burleigh Instruments Inc., Fishers, NY, USA) and a double-barrelled length of theta-glass (Sutter Instruments Co.; tip diameter 100–120 μm) as previously described (Yang et al. 2002, 2005). Open tip currents showed that the 10–90% of the peak on- and off-response was achieved in less than 1 ms. Fast perfusion of transfected HEK293 cells was made using nucleated outside-out patches. Fast perfusion of primary neurons was made using the whole-cell configuration because these acutely isolated cells did not tightly adhere to the dish surface, which made patch excision difficult. All primary neurons were of small diameter, were bereft of major processes following dissociation and had comparable surface area to nucleated outside-out patches, with an average capacitance of 4.6 ± 0.2 pF for the GnRH neurons and 6.9 ± 0.4 pF for the nucleated outside-out patches from HEK293 cells. For experiments examining modulation of GABA-evoked responses, modulators (17α-MeT or zolpidem) were present in both streams from the theta-glass in order to pre-equilibrate the patches. When switching between control, drug and wash conditions, or between different concentrations of modulators, a minimum of 2 min was allowed to elapse to ensure full solution exchange. The ultrafast perfusion set-up was plumbed with Teflon® tubing (Small Parts, Inc. Miami Lakes, FL, USA).

Dish perfusion

For experiments examining the effects of AAS on currents induced by tonic exposure to GABA, HEK293 cells were transfected and replated at low density, and recordings were made in the whole-cell configuration 5–8 h after replating. Modulators were applied to the bath by gravity flow from a series of manually controlled reservoirs connected with polyethylene tubing to a low volume perfusion manifold (Automate Scientific, San Francisco, CA, USA). Dish fluid volume was kept low (< 500 μl) to minimize total solution exchange time (∼20 s).

Single channel recordings

Single channel activity was acquired based on the methods of Steinbach & Akk (2001). Briefly, recordings were made in the on-cell configuration with a pipette solution containing (mm): 125 KCl, 20 TEA-Cl, 10 MgCl2, 0.1 CaCl2, 10 d-glucose and 10 Hepes (pH 7.4, with KOH) at a pipette potential (Vpip) of +80 mV. In separate experiments, resting potentials measured in HEK293 cells immediately after establishing a whole-cell configuration were found to be −20 to −40 mV. Therefore we assume that the total membrane potential for experiments in the cell-attached configuration was −100 to −120 mV. When GABA or allosteric modulators were used, they were dissolved in the pipette solution. Patch pipettes for single channel recording had resistances of ∼8–10 MΩ. Recordings were filtered at 10 kHz and stored to VHS tapes at 100 kHz using a VR-10B pulse code module (Instrutech Corp.). For subsequent analysis, recordings were digitized at 50 kHz using Acquire software (Bruxton Corp., Seattle, WA, USA). Single channel events were detected after digital filtering to 3 kHz using the half-amplitude detection algorithm in QuB (http://www.qub.buffalo.edu), and event files were exported for analysis using TacFit software (Bruxton Corp.). The system dead and rise times were filter-limited (60 and 111 μs, respectively), and the distributions of dwell times were corrected for spuriously short events according to Colquhoun & Sigworth (1995). Analyses were restricted to portions of the recording with no evidence of multiple concurrent channel openings within 500 ms. Subconductance openings (which may have gone undetected using the 50% threshold) accounted for only a small percentage (< 2%) of events detected by the experimenter. Events collected from several patches under the same conditions were pooled before dwell time analysis. Dwell time distributions were fitted using a maximum-likelihood procedure employing correction for missed events (Colquhoun & Sakmann, 1985). Additional kinetic components were added until there was no significant change in the log-likelihood of the fit (Colquhoun & Sigworth, 1995). Assessment of closed duration dwell components were well fitted by four or five components where the longest closures (τ3 through τ5) may reflect closure of one receptor followed by sojourns to an open state of a different receptor, as well as long-lived desensitized states of a single receptor. Because these alternatives cannot be differentiated without knowledge of the numbers of channels in the patch (Colquhoun & Sakmann, 1985), long closures are likely to be underestimated. Bursts of openings that exclude these longest-lived closed states are, however, believed to reflect the activity of a single receptor (Sakmann et al. 1980; Colquhoun & Sakmann, 1985; Gibb &Colquhoun, 1991, 1992; Akk et al. 2001; Steinbach & Akk, 2001; Akk & Steinbach, 2003). Bursts were identified as groups of openings separated by a critical duration (Tcrit= 17 ms) defined by the method of equal misclassifications (Colquhoun & Sakmann, 1985) such that short and intermediate gaps (closed times represented by τ1 and τ2) were classified as being within a burst (Colquhoun & Sakmann, 1985; Gibb & Colquhoun, 1991, 1992). The resulting burst distributions were fitted as described for open dwell time distributions.

Spectral analysis

For spectral analysis, recordings were digitized at 100 kHz through a 6 kHz Butterworth filter, and 250 sweeps of 4096 points each were captured. The fast Fourier transform (FFT) of each sweep was calculated after applying a tapered cosine window, and the resulting 250 individual power spectra were averaged. Both control and AAS spectra were readily fitted with two Lorentzian (1/f2) components (Colquhoun & Hawkes, 1977; Korn & Horn, 1988). Time constants (τi) were calculated from corner frequencies (fc) by: τi= 1/(2πfci).

Kinetic modelling

Simulation of channel activity was used to determine kinetic transitions altered by AAS. Models were solved using Q-matrix techniques applied to non-stationary conditions (Colquhoun & Hawkes, 1977, 1995) using programs written (Brian L. Jones) in MatLab 6.1 (The Math Works; Natick, MA, USA; Yang et al. 2002, 2005). For spontaneous currents, the effects of 17α-MeT were simulated using a simple three-state kinetic scheme (in the absence of AAS) parameterized directly with microscopic rates estimated from macroscopic current data (see Fig. 7): a slowly equilibrating, non-conducting resting state (R) and rapidly equilibrating closed (C) and open (O) states. The rates connecting R to C (1/τRelax and 1/τTail; 0.43 and 0.39 s−1, respectively) were derived from the measurements of relaxation of peak inhibition and decay of the tail current. Closing rate (α) was estimated at 2564 s−1 from spectral analysis. Opening rate (β) was adjusted to 900 s−1 to provide an equilibrium open probability, Po, of 0.15. The model provided a qualitatively accurate fit to the data for a wide range of estimates of Po (0.15–0.5). To model the effects of 17α-MeT, a fourth AAS-bound state (B) was added. Blocking and unblocking rates (kblock= 2.1 × 105m−1 s−1; kunblock= 2.8 s−1) were obtained from the macroscopic data.

Figure 7. Kinetic assessments of macroscopic currents suggest that 17α-MeT promotes inhibition of spontaneous openings by an allosteric block.

Figure 7

AC, ultrafast perfusion was used to apply a maximally inhibitory concentration of 17α-MeT (100 μm). A, representative response illustrating the relaxation of inhibition during a 10 s application of 17α-MeT (τrelax= 2.7 ± 0.3 s; n = 8) and the rebound current following cessation of 17α-MeT application (τtail= 2.5 ± 0.2 s; n = 8). B, currents elicited by progressively longer applications of 17α-MeT (0.5–32 s) were characterized by asymptotically increasing tail currents. C, time course of this increase in Itail expressed as the percentage of Iholdversus the duration of exposure (τrebound= 2.8 ± 0.6 s, n = 6–7 per point). D, representative currents elicited by 1000 ms pulses of 17α-MeT (1, 3.16, 10 and 31.6 μm). The onset of inhibition could be described by a single exponential component (τblock) that was dependent on [17α-MeT]. The decline in inhibition was fitted as a double exponential with one component (τunblock) that describes release from the blocked state (B; see F) and a second fixed component (τtail) that describes relaxation to the resting state (R; see F). E, linear regression indicated that the rate of inhibition (1/τblock) was dependent on concentration (slope = 2.1(1) × 105m−1 s−1; intercept = 2.8 ± 0.3 s−1; r2 > 0.98). The concentration dependence of unblocking (1/τunblock) was minimal, and the slope of the fit was constrained to zero (intercept = 2.7 ± 0.2 s−1, n = 5–7 cells per point). F, macroscopic spontaneous current data could be modelled with a simple kinetic scheme parameterized directly with rates estimated from macroscopic current data that included a non-conducting and slowly equilibrating closed or resting state (R), a rapidly equilibrating closed state (C), an open state (O), and an AAS-bound and non-conducting blocked state (B). The rates connecting R to C (1/τrelax and 1/τtail; 0.43 and 0.39 s−1, respectively) were derived from the measurements of relaxation of peak inhibition and decay of the tail current. Closing rate (α) was estimated at 2564 s−1 from spectral analysis (see Fig. 8). Opening rate (β) was adjusted to 1300 s−1 to provide a Po of 1.5–0.2. Blocking and unblocking rates were obtained from data as illustrated in D and E (kblock= 2.1 × 105m−1 s−1; kunblock= 2.8 s−1). The three simulations shown are for AAS durations and concentrations of 10 s at 100 μm (G), 0.5–32 s at 100 μm (H) and 500 ms at 10, 31.6 and 100 μm (I) to simulate data shown in A, B and D, respectively.

Drugs

Stock solutions of zolpidem (N,N-6-trimethyl-2-(4-methylphenyl)-imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-acetamide), 17α-MeT (17α-methyl-4-androsten-17β-ol-3-one) and picrotoxin (PTX; Sigma-Aldrich Co.) were made with cell culture grade dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) as the solvent and were diluted to achieve a final bath concentration ≤ 0.01% DMSO. Control experiments demonstrated that DMSO up to 0.1% had no effect on current properties (data not shown). Bicuculline methiodide (BMI; Sigma-Aldrich Co.) was prepared as an aqueous solution and kept frozen until time of use.

Statistical analysis

Values are reported as means ± s.e.m. For each cell, current parameters in the presence of a modulator (17α-MeT or zolpidem) were calculated as the percentage of the parameters measured under control conditions, and statistical significance was assessed using one-way two-tailed student's t tests. One-way ANOVA was used to establish the significance of differences measured under more than two experimental conditions; subsequent pairwise multiple comparisons were performed with student's t tests using the Bonferroni post hoc correction. For direct comparisons of dose–response and binding rate curves, two-way ANOVA with factors of receptor types and concentrations followed by a Bonferroni post hoc correction were used. This method allowed for model-free comparison of these data. This method of analysis is a useful adjunct to comparison of parameters derived from fitting of the empirically derived Hill equation, since the dose–response relationship described by the Hill equation is unlikely to apply to the gating mechanisms of real ion channels (Colquhoun, 1998). The uncertainties reported with parameters derived from curve fitting procedures are the s.e.m. values recovered from the fitting process. One- or two-sample two-tailed independent student's t tests were performed to determine significance between the responses of different combinations of modulators unless otherwise specified.

Results

Properties of GABAA receptor-mediated currents in GnRH neurons

GABA-evoked responses in GnRH neurons

To determine the properties of GABAA receptor-mediated currents in native GnRH neurons, whole-cell recordings were made from acutely dissociated fluorescent neurons derived from a transgenic mouse expressing GFP under the GnRH promoter (Suter et al. 2000). All animals used in these studies were males between the ages of postnatal days 20 and 30. To mimic the time course and concentration parameters of synaptic release, 1 mm GABA was applied for a brief duration (3 ms) using ultrafast perfusion. This application protocol elicited currents from GnRH neurons that were characterized by an average peak current (Ipeak) of −2500 ± 500 pA, a maximum current density (σmax) of −580 ± 90 pA pF−1 and a total charge transfer (Qtot) of −180 ± 20 pC (n = 15) (Fig. 1). Currents deactivated with a tri-exponential decay well described by time constants τ1= 13 ± 1 ms (43 ± 3% contribution to Ipeak), τ2= 78 ± 6 ms (48 ± 3%) and τ3= 357 ± 34 ms (11 ± 1%). Decay could also be summarized by a single weighted time constant, τw= 75 ± 7 ms (n = 15; Fig. 1).

Figure 1. GABAA receptor-mediated currents in GnRH neurons.

Figure 1

A, GFP-GnRH neurons in a 100 μm slice through the mPOA of a male mouse at postnatal day 20. B, representative current evoked by a 3 ms application of 1 mm GABA to a dissociated GnRH neuron (VH=−60 mV). C, dissociated GFP-GnRH neuron in the absence of GABA displayed tonic currents that were blocked by PTX and 17α-MeT (500 ms applications), but were unaffected by bicuculline methiodide (BMI).

Spontaneous responses in GnRH neurons

In the absence of GABA, a baseline holding current (Ihold) of 70 ± 20 pA was evident in ∼70% of dissociated GnRH neurons (n = 7; holding potential, VH=−60 mV). Baseline holding currents were reduced by 68 ± 19 pA (10 ± 4 pA pF−1) by the non-competitive GABA antagonist, PTX (100 μm). The competitive antagonist of the GABA binding site, bicuculline methiodide (BMI; 20 μm), was without effect on Ihold (Fig. 1). The strong antagonism of this current by PTX, but not by bicuculline, is consistent with the pharmacology and biophysical properties of a conductance mediated by spontaneous openings of unliganded GABAA receptors containing the ɛ-subunit (Maksay et al. 2003; Fig. 1).

Inhibition by AAS of GABAA receptor-mediated currents from GnRH neurons

As noted above, other well-studied allosteric modulators of the GABAA receptor have paradoxical effects on responses mediated by ɛ-subunit-containing receptors. To assess AAS modulation of currents that are likely to reflect activity of ɛ-subunit-containing GABAA receptors in GnRH neurons, the effect of a high concentration of 17α-MeT (10 μm) on Ihold was compared to that of a maximally effective concentration of PTX (100 μm) in the same cell. Application of 17α-MeT diminished Ihold by 42 ± 20 pA (10 ± 4 pA pF−1). When the effects of PTX and 17α-MeT were compared within individual cells, the ratio of antagonism of Ihold produced by 10 μm 17α-MeT to that produced by 100 μm PTX was 0.4 ± 0.2 (n = 3). These data indicate that 17α-MeT acts as a negative modulator of the spontaneous current in GnRH neurons. While this negative modulation may reflect AAS action at ɛ-subunit-containing receptors, the extensive heterogeneity in GABAA receptor subunits expressed in GnRH neurons, especially in juvenile mice (Sim et al. 2000; Todman et al. 2005), introduces variability in assigning properties of AAS modulation in these primary neurons to any specific class of receptor. To better understand the mechanisms by which inclusion of the ɛ-subunit affects AAS modulation, experiments were subsequently performed on recombinant α2β3ɛ-receptors expressed in HEK293 cells.

Properties of macroscopic currents mediated by recombinant α2β3ɛ-receptors

Concentration–response parameters for currents elicited by GABA from α2β3ɛ-receptors

Application of GABA elicited concentration-dependent responses from recombinant α2β3ɛ-receptors with an EC50 of 3.9 ± 0.9 μm and a Hill slope of 0.52 ± 0.05 (n = 4; VH=−60 mV; Fig. 2 and Table 2). While there are no published data for α2β3ɛ-receptors, these values are in general agreement with those reported for α1β3ɛ-receptors (EC50 of 0.8 μm; Hill slope of 0.8; Neelands et al. 1999) and for α2β1ɛ-receptors (EC50 of 11.2 μm; Hill slope of 1.1; Davies et al. 1997). The apparent affinity of GABA for α2β3ɛ-receptors was higher than that observed for α2β3γ2L-receptors (EC50 of 17 ± 1 μm; Yang et al. 2005). The lower EC50 of α2β3ɛ- versusα2β3γ2L-receptors is in keeping with a role for the ɛ-subunit-containing receptors in mediating extrasynaptic and tonic conductances that would most probably be activated in response to low concentrations of GABA.

Figure 2. Phasic and tonic responses elicited by GABA from recombinant α2β3ɛ-receptors.

Figure 2

A, representative currents elicited by perfusion of a 62.5–1000 ms application of 0.1 μm to 10 mm GABA. B, concentration-response relationship for currents elicited by 125–1000 ms pulses of GABA from 0.1 μm to 10 mm. For each cell, the Ipeak of each current was normalized to the maximal response for that cell. Values represent 4 cells per point.

Table 2.

Properties of current responses and modulation by 17α-MeT for wild-type and G302S receptors

α2β3ɛ α2β3ɛ(G302S)
Responses to GABA
 EC50 (μm) 3.9 ± 0.9 1.0 ± 0.2
 Hill slope 0.52 ± 0.05 0.9 ± 0.2
 σmax (pA pF−1) −120 ± 40 −180 ± 60
Modulation of spontaneous current by 17α-MeT
 σ (pA pF−1) −13 ± 4 −24 ± 3
 IC50 (μm) 8.7 ± 3.0 15.8 ± 3.4
 Hill slope 0.77 ± 0.14 0.68 ± 0.05
Binding parameters for 17α-MeT
kblock (m−1 s−1) 2.1(1) × 105 1.70(1) × 105
kunblock (s−1) 2.8 ± 0.3 4.4 ± 0.1
Kdm) 13 26

Values represent means of 5–7 cells for each concentration–response parameter, 18–20 cells for estimates of σ of spontaneous current, and 4–9 cells for 17α-MeT binding parameters. Numbers in parentheses are s.e.m. for the least significant digit in the rates.

To assess AAS effects on α2β3ɛ-receptors under conditions that mimic synaptic release, 3 ms pulses of 1 mm GABA were applied. This agonist protocol elicited currents that activated rapidly with an Ipeak of −1200 ± 230 pA, a σmax of −205 ± 26 pA pF−1 and a Qtot of −87 ± 15 pC. Currents deactivated with a tri-exponential decay with time constants τ1= 12 ± 2 ms (33 ± 4%), τ2= 64 ± 14 ms (40 ± 3%) and τ3= 175 ± 9 ms (28 ± 4%). Overall current decay was described by a single time constant (τw) of 79 ± 6 ms (n = 10; Fig. 3A). These deactivation parameters are similar to those that described decay of currents elicited from primary GnRH neurons (see above: spontaneous responses in GnRH neurons). Zinc inhibition of α1β1-receptors is dramatically diminished by inclusion of the ɛ-subunit (IC50= 0.24 for α1β1-receptors versus 41.9 μm for α1β1ɛ-receptors; Whiting et al. 1997). In the present experiments, we also found that inhibition by 10 μm zinc was marked for responses elicited from cells transfected with α2 and β3 cDNAs alone, that this inhibition was diminished in cells transfected at a ratio of 1:1:0.1 (α23:ɛ cDNA) and that it became insignificant at a transfection ratio of 1:1:1 (response amplitudes not different from those in the absence of zinc; data not shown). These data suggest that α2β3-subunit-containing receptors are largely absent in cells transfected at a 1:1:1 ratio and that the fast component of decay in these cells reflects the kinetics of α2β3ɛ-receptors.

Figure 3. Modulation by AAS of GABA-dependent currents through α2β3ɛ-receptors.

Figure 3

A, representative currents showing the response elicited by a phasic (3 ms) application of 1 mm GABA and the inhibition of Ipeak induced by application of 1 μm 17α-MeT. The inhibitory effect of the AAS was reversible (Ipeak during wash > Ipeak during AAS) and Ipeak returned to control levels when scaled for the run-down of the response that occurs in response to prolonged (10–30 min) application of 1 mm GABA alone (not shown). B, representative responses to stationary application of 1 μm GABA and 1 μm 17α-MeT, demonstrating reversible inhibition of Itonic by this AAS. C, graphic representation of the effects of 1 μm 17α-MeT on parameters of currents elicited by brief (3 ms) pulses of 1 mm GABA (phasic: Ipeak, Atot, τw, τ1–3,%τ1–3) and steady-state application of 1 μm GABA (Itonic). *P < 0.05, significantly different from control values.

Modulation by AAS of phasic responses mediated by α2β3ɛ-receptors

The AAS 17α-MeT (1 μm) induced a modest, but nonetheless significant, and reversible inhibition of currents elicited by phasic (3 ms) application of 1 mm GABA. Specifically, 17α-MeT reduced Ipeak (to 84 ± 4% of control values, P = 0.006) and Qtot (to 76 ± 6% of control values, P = 0.003; Fig. 3A and C). With respect to decay kinetics, 17α-MeT significantly decreased τ1 (to 78 ± 3% of control values, P = 0.01), but also increased percentage τ2 (to 116 ± 2% of control values, P = 0.04; n = 8), which resulted in no significant effect on the overall time course of decay as indicated by τw (94 ± 3% of control values, P = 0.1; Fig. 3A and C).

Modulation by AAS of tonic responses mediated by α2β3ɛ-receptors

Other positive allosteric modulators of GABAA receptors have been shown to enhance GABA-evoked tonic conductances mediated by δ-subunit-containing receptors selectively (Stell et al. 2003; Wei et al. 2004). For experiments performed here, tonic current was defined as the GABA-activated current elicited by sustained (bath) application of GABA that does not include any contribution from spontaneously opening α2β3ɛ-subunit-containing receptors. Bath application of a low concentration of GABA (1 μm) resulted in tonic currents (Itonic) from recombinant α2β3ɛ-subunit-containing receptors of −670 ± 120 pA (n = 8; Fig. 3B). One micromolar 17α-MeT significantly inhibited these tonic currents (to 82 ± 3% of control values, P = 0.003, n = 8; Fig. 3B and C). In contrast, 1 μm 17α-MeT was without effect on tonic currents elicited by 1 μm GABA from α2β3γ2L-receptors (103 ± 9% of control values, P = 0.79, n = 7), consistent with previous results (Yang et al. 2005). This concentration of 17α-MeT was also without effect on tonic currents elicited by 10 μm GABA, which represents a concentration of agonist that is predicted to produce a fractional response at α2β3γ2L-receptors equivalent to 1 μm GABA at α2β3ɛ-receptors (data not shown). The high-affinity BZ site agonist zolpidem (1 μm) also induced a small but significant inhibition of Itonic from α2β3ɛ-subunit-containing receptors (to 90 ± 3% of control values, P = 0.02, n = 6). This is in contrast to the potentiation of Itonic from α2β3γ2L-receptors by 1 μm zolpidem (to 453 ± 46% of control values, P < 0.001).

Modulation by AAS of desensitization, paired pulse recovery and high-frequency responses mediated by α2β3ɛ-receptors

To determine whether AAS alter desensitization of α2β3ɛ-subunit-containing receptors, the effect of 17α-MeT on currents produced by 500 ms applications of 1 mm GABA was studied (Fig. 4). GABA-evoked currents activated quickly with a 10–90% rise time of 2.1 ± 0.2 ms (n = 10) and were described by an average maximal current (IGABA) of −1230 ± 240 pA, a σmax of 210 ± 31 pA pF−1 and Qtot of − 39 ± 32 μC (n = 10). Current desensitization was biphasic in seven out of 10 cells exposed to GABA, with a fast component, τdes-f= 29 ± 11 ms (23 ± 6%) and a slow component, τdes-s= 521 ± 85 ms (76 ± 6%). For the three cells that showed monophasic desensitization, decay was well described by τdes-s. Overall desensitization was described by a single weighted time constant of deactivation (τdes) of 410 ± 80 ms (n = 10; Fig. 4AC). The ratio of steady-state to peak current under these conditions was 34 ± 6% (n = 10).

Figure 4. Anabolic androgenic steroid alters the kinetics of GABA-induced desensitization and slows paired pulse recovery.

Figure 4

A, currents evoked by 500 ms application of 1 mm GABA show significant desensitization. Exposure to 1 μm 17α-MeT reduces Ipeak and accelerates desensitization without altering deactivation. B, currents from A normalized to peak illustrate acceleration of desensitization. Inset: deactivation of representative currents elicited by 500 ms pulses of GABA in the presence and absence of 17α-MeT scaled to the current level immediately before the end of application show no differences in kinetics. C, bar graph summarizing AAS-induced changes in deactivation and desensitization parameters. Desensitization during the pulse could be described by a fast (τdes-f) and a slow component (τdes-f) or a single weighted time constant, τdes. Current deactivation following the pulse could also be described by a fast (τoff-f) and a slow (τoff-s) component or a single weighted function (τoff). D, AAS effects on recovery to paired responses. Insets show representative currents elicited by paired 3 ms pulses of 1 mm GABA in the presence and absence of 1 μm 17α-MeT. Comparison of the recovery time course of the second response in the paired pulse protocol shows that 1 μm 17α-MeT slows response recovery. Percentage recovery of the second pulse (% Recovery), as assessed by (Ipeak2− onset2)/(Ipeak1− onset1) × 100, was plotted as a function of interpulse interval and described by two exponential components with time constants, τr1 and τr2. Pulses with delays of 25–12 800 ms were used for analysis, but currents are only displayed to 3200 ms for clarity. E, exposure to 1 μm 17α-MeT inhibited the response to repetitive stimulation, significantly decreasing Qtot. *P < 0.05, significantly different from control values.

Of the 10 cells that were examined exposed to 500 ms pulses of 1 mm GABA, application of 1 μm 17α-MeT was successfully carried out in eight cells. Application of 1 μm 17α-MeT significantly shortened the 10–90% rise time in all eight cells (to 83 ± 4% of control values, P = 0.007), reduced Ipeak in seven of eight cells (to 71 ± 9% of control values, P = 0.02) and accelerated desensitization in all eight cells (τdes= 60 ± 8% of control values, P = 0.002) by accelerating the rate of slow desensitization τdes-s (to 60 ± 9% of control values, P = 0.005; Fig. 4AC). Current deactivation following 500 ms applications of GABA was biphasic, described by a fast and a slow time constant, τoff-f and τoff-s, respectively, or by a single weighted time constant, τoff (135 ± 8 ms; Fig. 4C). Exposure to 1 μm 17α-MeT had no effect on deactivation following the pulse for currents produced in response to prolonged application of 1 mm GABA (P > 0.4 for all, n = 8; Fig. 4B and C).

Paired 3 ms applications of 1 mm GABA with varied interpulse intervals were used to assess the effect of 17α-MeT on the time course of recovery between successive applications of GABA. Ten paired applications with delays from 25 to 12 800 ms (doubling at each interval) were collected. The time course of recovery was bi-exponential with time constants of τr1= 95 ms (85%) and τr2= 2660 ms (15%; n = 10; Fig. 4D). Reponses recovered to 100% of the initial peak amplitude by 12 800 ms. Analysis of recovery curves by two-way ANOVA permitted a model-free comparison of AAS-induced changes in response recovery and indicated that 17α-MeT produced significant slowing of recovery (F1,9= 4.43, P= 0.04, n= 7–10 per point) by increasing τr1 to 109 ms (155% of control values) and τr2 to 2450 ms (120% of control values; Fig. 4D).

Recordings made from native GnRH neurons indicate that these cells are subject to a high frequency of GABAA receptor-mediated synaptic inputs (Sim et al. 2000; Nunemaker et al. 2003). To determine whether AAS exposure might alter overall charge transfer arising from high-frequency phasic responses mediated by ɛ-subunit-containing receptors, HEK293 cells expressing α2β3ɛ-receptors were exposed to trains (10 pulses, 3 ms in duration and 25 ms delay) of 1 mm GABA. This protocol produced an average net charge transfer during the train (Qtot) of −4 ± 4 μC. Exposure to 1 μm 17α-MeT produced a significant decrease in Qtot (to 64 ± 10% of control values, P = 0.01, n = 7) (Fig. 4E). This suggests that 1 μm 17α-MeT would have a net antagonistic effect on high-frequency phasic transmission mediated by ɛ-subunit-containing GABAergic synapses which may alter the episodic firing patterns observed in GnRH neurons (Sim et al. 2000; Nunemaker et al. 2003).

Properties of spontaneous current mediated by α2β3ɛ-recombinant receptors

Anabolic androgenic steroids administered in vivo, even at low doses, have been shown to diminish the release of luteinizing hormone (LH) dramatically (Bronson et al. 1996). The presence of a PTX-sensitive, bicuculline-insensitive current in GnRH neurons suggests that spontaneously active GABAA receptors may play an important role in regulating the activity of these native neurons and their control of pituitary LH release, and thus may also be an important target with respect to AAS action. To determine how AAS interact with spontaneously active ɛ-subunit-containing GABAA receptors, we first characterized the properties of spontaneous currents mediated by α2β3ɛ recombinant receptors and subsequently examined the effects of 17α-MeT on these currents.

Baseline Ihold(−240 ± 40 pA; −31 ± 7 pA pF−1; VH=−60 mV) was evident in all cells expressing α2β3ɛ-receptors (n = 10; Fig. 5). Picrotoxin (100 μm; 500 ms) reversibly antagonized Ihold (by 65 ± 7%). The portion of Ihold antagonized by PTX reversed at −0.3 ± 1 mV, consistent with the predicted reversal potential for Cl under our recording conditions, and showed subtle outward rectification with a ratio of 1.24 ± 0.08 for Ihold(+60mv):Ihold(−60mV) (Fig. 5D; n = 10). Taken together, these data indicate that Ihold arises from spontaneous openings of GABAA receptors expressed in the HEK293 cells.

Figure 5. Recombinant α2β3ɛ-receptors in HEK293 cells open in the absence of GABA.

Figure 5

A, recombinant α2β3ɛ-receptors were activated by 1 mm GABA, but also displayed a notable level of spontaneous current in the absence of GABA that could be blocked by 100 μm of the non-competitive GABAA antagonist, PTX. Blockade of spontaneous openings appears as an outward deflection in Ihold(VH=−60 mV). B, voltage steps from −60 to +60 mV in control saline (bath) or in saline supplemented with 100 μm PTX (+PTX) show that application of PTX is associated with a decrease in Ihold at all potentials. C, membrane conductance at all potentials is decreased by 100 μm PTX. D, in solutions containing symmetrical chloride concentrations, Ihold reverses at ∼0 mV (Vr). Collectively, these observations indicate that Ihold arises from unliganded openings of GABAA receptors.

To determine what percentage of the expressed GABAA receptors contributes to Ihold, estimates of the proportion of α2β3ɛ-receptors open at equilibrium (Po) in the absence of GABA were determined in two ways. First, assuming that the population of receptors that open spontaneously can also be activated by GABA, the ratio of maximal IGABA plus Ihold (=Imax) to Ihold can provide an estimate of Po for spontaneously opening GABAA receptors. Prolonged (500 ms) applications of 1 mm GABA elicited currents from cells expressing α2β3ɛ-receptors that were characterized by an average amplitude (IGABA) of −1200 ± 200 pA (VH=− 60 mV; n= 10). Assuming that IGABA elicited by 1 mm GABA reflects a Po of ∼0.8, as determined from our kinetic modelling of macroscopic current data for responses to 1 mm GABA by α2β3ɛ-subunit-containing receptors (data not shown) and consistent with previous studies of activation of γ2L-subunit-containing GABAA receptors by 1 mm GABA (Jones & Westbrook, 1995; Akk et al. 2001), IGABA at a maximal Po= 1.0 would be predicted to be −1500 pA and Imax would represent this value plus the contribution from the spontaneous current (Imax= 1740 pA) and thus a ratio of Ihold:Imax of 0.14. No detectable spontaneous current was present in untransfected HEK293 cells or those transfected with α2 and β3, but not ɛ, subunit cDNAs, although the latter expressed appreciable GABA-induced currents, indicating that functional GABAA receptors were present. Therefore, we believe that all of Ihold can be attributed to spontaneous openings of α2β3ɛ-receptors and that the ratio of Ihold:Imax therefore provides an estimate of Po for spontaneous α2β3ɛ-receptors of 0.14. That 100 μm PTX does not provide a complete inhibition of Ihold for recombinant α2β3ɛ-receptors in HEK 293 cells is consistent with previous reports of recombinant α1β3ɛ-receptors expressed in oocytes (Maksay et al. 2003).

An approximation of Po can also be made from spectral analysis of channel noise (Colquhoun & Hawkes, 1977). In the power spectra of channel noise from recombinant α2β3ɛ-receptors, the contribution of the 0.39 ms component, which we believe corresponds to the apparent mean channel open time, is 21 ± 3% (Fig. 8C). Data from these two approaches suggest that the Po for unliganded α2β3ɛ-receptors is ∼0.15–0.2.

Figure 8. Anabolic androgenic steroid does not alter channel open dwell time.

Figure 8

A, representative spontaneously opening single channel currents (downward deflections) recorded in the on-cell configuration (Vpip=+80 mV). Most events are < 1 ms; attenuation of peak amplitude by filtering is evident. B, noise currents recorded in the presence or absence of a maximally inhibitory concentration of 17α-MeT (100 μm), which decreased mean current level and variance. C, power spectra for AAS and control conditions. Both control and AAS spectra were well described by two Lorentzian components (τf and τs). D, bar graph summarizing changes in spectral parameters. Anabolic androgenic steroid did not induce a change in the time constant of either the fast (τf) or the slow time constant (τs), but did decrease the absolute power of both components (Sf and Ss). *P < 0.05, significantly different from control values.

Modulation by AAS of spontaneous current mediated by recombinant α2β3ɛ-receptors

Bath application of 17α-MeT produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of Ihold with an IC50 of 15 ± 7 μm and a Hill slope of 0.61 ± 0.07 (Fig. 6). Analysis of concentration–response data acquired using rapid agonist perfusion provided an IC50 of 8.7 ± 3 μm and a Hill slope of 0.77 ± 0.14; differences that most probably reflect the better resolution of peak responses with the more rapid method of agonist application. The ratio of inhibition produced by a high concentration of 17α-MeT (10 μm) versus a high concentration of PTX (100 μm) was 0.58 ± 0.03 for recombinant α2β3ɛ-receptors; a value similar to that observed in native GnRH neurons (0.4 ± 0.2, see above: spontaneous responses in GnRH neurons).

Figure 6. Dose–response relationship for AAS inhibition of spontaneous GABAA receptor-mediated current.

Figure 6

A, representative current trace showing dose-dependent inhibition of spontaneous current by 17α-MeT. To control for variability in this spontaneous holding current (Ihold), the peak of inhibition was normalized to that produced by a saturating concentration of PTX (100 μm). B, when fitted with the Hill equation, these data gave half-maximal inhibition (IC50) of 15 ± 7 μm and a Hill slope of 0.61 ± 0.07. Values represent 5–7 cells per point.

Two notable kinetic features of modulation of Ihold by 17α-MeT were apparent in these records. First, even in the continued presence of this AAS, the peak of inhibition relaxed to a lower level. Second, removal of 17α-MeT produced a large, resurgent tail current (Itail; Figs 6A and 7A and B). Kinetic assessments of the changes in peak inhibition during the application of 17α-MeT and in the decline of Itail following the application of 17α-MeT provided estimates of the time constant for the relaxation of peak inhibition (τrelax) of 2.7 ± 0.3 s (n = 8) and of the time constant describing the decline in Itailtail) of 2.5 ± 0.2 s (n = 8; Fig. 7A). In experiments where 17α-MeT was applied for variable durations, the amplitude of Itail increased asymptotically with the duration of application, and the relationship between pulse duration and Itail amplitude could be described by a single exponential (τrebound) of 2.8 ± 0.6 s (Fig. 7B and C). That τrelax and τrebound are effectively identical suggests that the ‘extra channels’ that open following removal of drug and give rise to the resurgent Itail come from the same reservoir of closed channels that feeds the relaxation of peak inhibition (τrelax). Furthermore, these data suggest that 17α-MeT may act by causing receptors residing in a stable, slowly equilibrating resting state (R) to move to a blocked state (B), from where transitions to the open state (O) are more likely to occur than are transitions to the open state from the resting state (Fig. 7F and Discussion).

To examine the dynamics of inhibition of Ihold by 17α-MeT, the rates of inhibition and relaxation of peak inhibition were assessed at 1, 3.16, 10 and 31.6 μm 17α-MeT (500 ms). The onset of inhibition was fitted as a single exponential (τblock; Fig. 7D). For concentrations less than 1 μm, the signal-to-noise ratio of the recordings was inadequate for curve fitting. For other concentrations, the rate of relaxation of inhibition was assessed by fitting the decline in inhibition (Itail) with a double exponential function with one component (τunblock) that described release from the blocked state and a second component (τtail) that described relaxation to the resting state (Fig. 7E). This procedure allowed the unblocking rate to be disentangled from the rate of relaxation of Itailtail). The dependence of the rate of blocking (1/τblock) on concentration was described by a linear relationship with a slope of 2.1(1) × 105m−1 s−1 and an intercept of 2.8 ± 0.3 s−1 (r2 > 0.98; Fig. 7E). The concentration dependence of unblocking (1/τunblock) was minimal, and the slope of the fit was constrained to zero, producing an intercept of 2.7 ± 0.2 s−1 (Fig. 7E). A simple bimolecular binding mechanism implies that the slope of the blocking rate curve is the binding rate (kblock) and that the intercept of the blocking rate curve is the unbinding rate (kunblock; Newland & Cull-Candy, 1992; Fig. 7F).

The linear dependence of 1/τblock on concentration is consistent with several mechanisms of inhibition, including physical obstruction of the channel pore (open channel block) and stabilization of a new or existing closed state (allosteric block). However, the inhibition of Ihold produced by 100 μm 17α-MeT exhibited a small but significant dependence on voltage, where the block at +60 mV was 88 ± 3% of the block at −60 mV (P = 0.03; n = 4). This observation is not consistent with a mechanism in which 17α-MeT acts to physically obstruct the channel pore, since reversal of ion flux might be expected to disturb such an obstruction even for an uncharged molecule. To differentiate between an open channel block and an allosteric block as the mechanism of AAS inhibition more fully, the effects of 17α-MeT on single channel properties were assessed.

Properties of single channel currents mediated by recombinant α2β3ɛ-subunit-containing receptors

Effects of AAS on open dwell times of spontaneous events

Open channel block mechanisms reduce channel open dwell time by providing an additional non-conducting state beyond normal closing (Sakmann et al. 1980). In contrast, inhibition of channel activity characterized by a decrease in channel frequency with no change in time constants of burst length is consistent with enhanced occurrence of a desensitized state or an allosterically blocked state (Newland & Cull-Candy, 1992). Ideally, an AAS-dependent change in open dwell time could be detected with single channel analysis; however, the mean open times of spontaneous events mediated by α2β3ɛ-subunit-containing receptors were quite brief (Fig. 8A), making a direct single channel assessment of AAS effects on spontaneous events difficult. Consequently, in order to discriminate between an allosteric versus an open channel block mechanism, the effect of a maximally inhibitory concentration of 17α-MeT (100 μm) on spontaneous current noise was examined by spectral analysis.

Noise spectra, both under control conditions and in the presence of 17α-MeT, were well described by two Lorentzian components with time constants of τI= 0.39 ± 0.08 ms (21 ± 3%) and τs= 2.8 ± 0.3 ms (79 ± 3%; Fig. 8C), suggesting that the 0.39 ms component of the noise spectrum reflects the apparent mean channel open time for spontaneously gated receptors. Values of τf are in agreement with the time constant reflecting the brief component of the open dwell distribution (0.388 ± 0.057 ms; 57%) for α1β3ɛ-subunit-containing receptors gated by a low (1 μm) concentration of GABA (Neelands et al. 1999) and the briefest component of the open and burst duration distributions (τ1) we report here for currents elicited by 1 mm GABA from α2β3ɛ-subunit-containing receptors (Table 1).

Table 1.

Open dwell and burst duration characteristics of α2β3ɛ-subunit-containing receptors

17α-MeT (μm) τ1 (ms) τ2 (ms) τ3 (ms) τ4 (ms) 1 2 3 4 Cells Events or bursts
Open dwell components
 0 0.84 5.5 33 83 10  7 4 140 500
 10 0.61 4.0 18 65 18 17 7 74 577
 31.6 0.61 5.2 20 215 52 37 10 0.03 2  4264
 100 0.93 6.2 26 74 4  6352
Burst dwell components
 0 0.58 28 219  27 52 21 4  2974
 10 0.66 27 187  31 45 24 7  3417
 31.6 0.84 10 129  41 36 23 2   947
 100 1.0 8.6 39 16 72 12 4  1411

Responses elicited by exposure to 1 mm GABA in cell-attached patches. Values represent means of 2–7 cells at each concentration. Assessments of the effects of 17α-MeT were made both for apparent open durations and also for burst durations, since bursts are believed to reflect the activity of a single receptor within the patch.

Application of 100 μm 17α-MeT did not induce a significant change in either τf or τs (P = 0.41, n = 5), but did decrease the power of both components, Sf (to −57 ± 7% of control values, P = 0.001) and Ss (to −46 ± 9% of control values, P = 0.007). Exposure to this AAS also decreased the relative proportion of the fast (%Sf) component (to 83 ± 5% of control values, P = 0.03) while increasing the contribution of the slow (%Ss) component (to 105 ± 1% of control values, P = 0.02, n = 5; Fig. 8D). These findings suggest that AAS do not readily interact with the open state of the receptor.

Effects of AAS on apparent dwell times and burst durations of GABA-evoked single channel events

Cell-attached recordings of single channel activity elicited by 1 mm GABA were made in the presence and absence of three concentrations of 17α-MeT (10, 31.6 and 100 μm). Single channel openings appeared in relatively long bursts of activity separated by long periods of inactivity (Table 1 and Fig. 9A). Intraburst open dwell distributions could be described adequately with three exponential components, suggesting three distinct open states (Fig. 9B and E). The distribution for 31.6 μm was better fitted by four components, but the area of the slowest components was 0.03%, accounting for ∼12 unusually long events in approximately 30 min of recording (Table 1). Anabolic androgenic steroids had little if any effect on the time constants of channel open dwell times (Table 1 and Fig. 9E), but did produce a concentration-dependent redistribution of the relative contribution of each component to total channel activity (Table 1 and Fig. 9E). Specifically, 17α-MeT selectively diminished the proportions of the fastest and slowest open dwell times, while causing an increase in the proportion of the intermediate component. As with spectral analysis, this finding is not consistent with an open-channel block mechanism, where it would be predicted that longer events should be preferentially blocked (Colquhoun & Hawkes, 1995), but is consistent with an allosteric mechanism, in which interactions with AAS favour the receptor-occupying conformations from which the channel is more likely to open to the intermediate-duration open state over the longer and shorter open states.

Figure 9. Anabolic androgenic steroid does not alter channel open dwell times, but shortens burst durations.

Figure 9

A, representative single channel openings (downward deflections) that would constitute a burst that were recorded in the cell-attached configuration (Vpip=+80 mV) elicited by 1 mm GABA in the presence and absence of 17α-MeT. B, open dwell distribution histograms from single channel currents evoked by 1 mm GABA with three concentrations of 17α-MeT (10, 31.6 and 100 μm). C, burst dwell duration histograms show a dramatic reduction in length with increasing concentrations of 17α-MeT. D, closed dwell distributions show evidence that a long-lived closed state becomes more frequent at higher concentrations of 17α-MeT. sqrt. frequency, square root of the frequency. E, time constants and associated areas for the exponential components fitted to the open dwell histograms in B. Time constants show very little change with varying concentrations of 17α-MeT, but their relative proportion changes, favouring residence at higher concentrations of 17α-MeT in the state described by the intermediate time constant (τ2; see also Table 1). Note that no data point is shown for dwell times corresponding to τ3 at 100 μm 17α-MeT because these longest events were not detected at this high concentration of the AAS (B and Table 1). F, time constants and associated areas for the exponential components fitted to the burst dwell time histograms in C. Time constants for burst dwell durations show little change with increasing concentrations of 17α-MeT, indicating that changes in burst durations are achieved by general shifts in gating mode favouring the intermediate mode (τ2). G, the change in mean burst duration has an IC50 of 22.512 ± 0.007 μm, suggesting that changes in burst duration can account for a large portion of the inhibitory effect of 17α-MeT on GABA-evoked currents.

The effects of 17α-MeT on bursts of openings were also assessed. As with single channel open dwell times, 17α-MeT did not appreciably alter the time constants of the burst durations, but did promote a concentration-dependent decrease in overall duration with an IC50 of 22.512 ± 0.007 μm (Table 1 and Fig. 9F and G), attenuating the relative contributions of the longest and shortest components while enhancing the intermediate component (Table 1 and Fig. 9C). As with the observed effects of 17α-MeT on open dwell distributions, the effects on burst durations are not consistent with an open channel block mechanism (Colquhoun & Hawkes, 1995), but suggest an allosteric effect in which the AAS may act to trap receptors in a gating mode with intermediate efficacy.

While analysis of closed dwell distributions can be insightful, in multiple-channel patches it can be easily confounded by the occurrence of longer closed dwell times. With this caveat in mind, the allosteric model under consideration suggests that as the concentration of 17α-MeT increases, the number of long closures produced by the steroid should increase in parallel, and examination of the closed dwell distributions supports this assumption (Fig. 9D).

Functional analysis of receptors containing a TM2 point mutation

Structural considerations

The activity of the AAS at the GABAA receptor resembles that of a host of other compounds that have a rather promiscuous relationship with multiple receptor isoforms. Interestingly, a single conserved residue in TM2 of each α-, β- and γ-subunit (Fig. 10A) has been implicated in the activity of a variety of structurally dissimilar compounds, including specific anaesthetics (Belelli et al. 1997, 1999; Jenkins et al. 2001; Krasowski et al. 2001), loreclezole (Wingrove et al. 1994), ethanol (Mihic et al. 1997) and BZs acting at a distinct low-affinity composite site (Walters et al. 2000). It has been suggested that these conserved residues in TM2 do not face the channel pore, but rather face into the membrane, perhaps interfacing with adjacent residues in TM1 and TM3, to form a pocket capable of binding these structurally diverse compounds (Jenkins et al. 2001; Krasowski et al. 2001; Bera et al. 2002), A notable point of sequence divergence in this TM2 pocket between the ɛ-subunit and other receptor subunit isoforms is residue 302 (glycine in ɛ; serine in γ1–3), which has been implicated in regulating gating, the sensitivity of receptor to GABA and control of spontaneous activity (Ueno et al. 2000; Scheller & Forman, 2002; Miko et al. 2004). To test whether this residue is important in conferring the positive modulation by 17α-MeT at α2β3γ2L-receptors versus the negative modulation by this AAS at α2β3ɛ-receptors, AAS modulation was assessed for receptors containing a mutant (G302S) ɛ-subunit.

Figure 10. Potential sites and mechanism of AAS interaction.

Figure 10

A, cartoon illustrates the four proposed transmembrane (TM) domains of a single GABAA receptor subunit and regions believed to form a promiscuous low-affinity site between TM2 and TM3 (blue). An alignment of portions of the TM2 and TM3 regions of the receptor shows conserved residues crucial for the interactions of other allosteric modulators at this putative site in blue along with the homologous residues in GABAA receptor subunits that may play a role in AAS activity. While the exact beginning and end of the transmembrane regions and the nature of the linker region are uncertain, the overlapping brackets (See areas of overlap indicated beneath TM2-Linker-TM3) reflect the possible boundaries in these domains proposed by Bera et al. (2002). The black text reflects the linker proposed by comparisons with the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor structure (Miyazawa et al. (2003). B, GABA elicited concentration-dependent currents from wild-type α2β3ɛ- and mutant α2β3ɛ(G302S)-receptors. Maximal currents were elicited by 125–1000 ms pulses of GABA from 0.1 to 10 mm. For each cell, the Ipeak of each response was normalized to the maximal response for that cell. The response of α2β3ɛ(G302S) to GABA was significantly different from that of wild-type receptors (P = 0.003). See Table 2 for parameters. C, peak GABA-evoked currents were not significantly different between the two types of receptors; however, D shows that spontaneous current flux through the mutant receptors was significantly (P = 0.007) greater than that through wild-type receptors. E, the concentration–response curve of α2β3ɛ(G302S)-receptors was significantly different from that of wild-type receptors (P = 0.007). For purposes of display only, concentration–response curves were normalized to the asymptotes of their respective Hill fits. F, linear regression analysis indicates that the binding rate curves for 17α-MeT to wild-type and α2β3ɛ(G302S)-receptors are significantly different (P = 0.009).

Functional characteristics

Maximal peak current density (Fig. 10B and C) for responses elicited by GABA was not significantly different between α2β3ɛ- and α2β3ɛ(G302S)-receptors; however, the G302S mutation resulted in a small increase in the Hill slope and a left shift for the concentration–response relationship (0.1 μm to 10 mm GABA; P = 0.003). Wild-type and α2β3ɛ(G302S)-receptors were found to activate at the same rate, but α2β3ɛ(G302S)-receptors exhibited diminished desensitization during prolonged applications of GABA. Moreover, spontaneous flux was significantly increased in α2β3ɛ(G302S)-receptors relative to wild-type receptors (P = 0.01; Fig. 10D and E and Table 2). To determine whether the G302S altered the modulation induced by 17α-MeT, the inhibition of spontaneous current by 17α-MeT (0.316–100 μm) was determined as for wild-type receptors. The inhibition of baseline current produced by 100 μm PTX on both the wild-type and mutant receptors was similar (79 ± 4 versus 71 ± 2%, respectively, P = 0.26, n = 8 and 22). However when the effect of 17α-MeT was considered in terms of percentage inhibition of baseline current without normalization, the G302S mutant was significantly less sensitive to inhibition than the wild-type receptor at subsaturating concentrations of the steroid (P = 0.008). After normalization to the peak inhibition produced by 100 μm PTX, the concentration–response curve of α2β3ɛ(G302S) was significantly different from wild-type receptors (P = 0.007), an effect that could be attributed to the mutation producing a right shift in the IC50 for 17α-MeT of ∼1.8-fold (Fig. 10D).

AAS effects on binding rate

To determine whether the observed shift in the sensitivity to 17α-MeT produced by the ɛ(G302S) mutation could be explained in terms of changes in binding of the AAS, the concentration dependence of the blocking and unblocking rate for the spontaneous current was determined at 0.316, 1, 10 and 31.6 μm 17α-MeT. As with the wild-type receptor, the onset of inhibition was fitted as a single exponential (τblock). Wild-type and α2β3ɛ(G302S) receptor blocking curves were significantly different (P = 0.009; Table 2 and Fig. 10F). The dissociation (Kd) rate calculated from the blocking and unbinding rate in the ɛ(G302S) mutant, was diminished 2-fold compared to wild type; consistent with the 1.8-fold left shift in IC50 observed in the concentration–response relationship to 17α-MeT. Thus, it appears that the ɛ(G302S) mutant interferes with 17α-MeT inhibition of spontaneous current by reducing the affinity of the binding site for 17α-MeT. It is possible that if 17α-MeT cannot associate with the open state, the higher apparent spontaneous activity level observed in the ɛ(G302S) mutant might lead to slowed binding because the receptor would spend more time in the steroid-inaccessible open state. To rule out this possibility, the blocking rate of 100 μm PTX was compared at both wild-type and ɛ(G302S)-receptors. Picrotoxin binds preferentially to open receptors; consequently, its blocking rate increases proportionately with the level of channel activation (Dillon et al. 1995). The blocking rate of 100 μm PTX between wild-type and ɛ(G302S)-receptors was not significantly different (P = 0.48), with values of 16 ± 1 s−1 for wild-type receptors (n = 5) and 17 ± 1 s−1 for ɛ(G302S)-receptors (n = 6); likewise, the maximum efficacy of PTX at both receptor types is comparable (see above). From this observation, it seems likely that the shift in equilibrium state occupancy between wild-type and ɛ(G302S)-receptors is insufficient to produce the observed decrease in 17α-MeT binding rates, providing additional evidence for a specific perturbation in the 17α-MeT binding site produced by this point mutation in the TM2 domain.

Discussion

AAS are synthetic derivatives of testosterone originally designed for the treatment of hypogonadal dysfunction in men, initiation of delayed puberty and growth promotion (Basaria et al. 2001; Shahidi, 2001). Although AAS continue to be used clinically, currently most AAS are taken illicitly in patterns that constitute abuse and have been associated with a plethora of untoward physical and behavioural effects (Lukas, 1996; Bahrke et al. 1996, 1998; Franke & Berendonk, 1997; Friedl, 2000). Individuals who self-administer AAS do so at levels that are often greatly in excess of physiological or therapeutic levels of gonadal steroids and current estimates suggest that AAS reach micromolar levels in these subjects (Wu, 1997; Daly et al. 2001). Moreover, chemical modifications made to enhance half-life have also endowed these synthetic compounds with characteristics not evident in testosterone, including the profile of allosteric modulation at the GABAA receptor (for review, see Clark & Henderson, 2003; Clark et al. 2004).

While the AAS and the neurosteroids, especially androgenic compounds such as 3α-diol, share obvious similarities, key structural moieties believed to be critical for neurosteroid modulation are absent in the AAS (Gee et al. 1988; Turner & Simmonds, 1989; Purdy et al. 1990; for review, see Lambert et al. 1995, 2003). Moreover, the AAS and the neurosteroids do not share common subunit dependence with respect to their modulatory abilities (for discussion, see Yang et al. 2002, 2005). The presence of the ɛ-subunit has been shown to confer an unusual pharmacological profile with respect to allosteric modulation by high-affinity BZ site compounds, barbiturates and neurosteroids (Whiting et al. 1997; Thompson et al. 1998, 2002; Davies et al. 1997, 2001; Neelands et al. 1999; Kasparov et al. 2001; Maksay et al. 2003; Irnaten et al. 2002). The goal of the present study was to determine whether inclusion of the ɛ-subunit also conferred an unexpected modulatory profile for the AAS, and the repercussions that expression of this subunit might have with regard to AAS effects on GnRH neurons and neuroendocrine control.

Here we report that the commonly abused AAS 17α-MeT (for review, see Clark & Henderson, 2003) modulates both GABA-evoked and spontaneous currents through recombinant α2β3ɛ-receptors, but does so in a fashion that markedly contrasts with the pattern of modulation for receptors composed of α-, β- and γ- or α-, β- and δ-subunits (Yang et al. 2002, 2005). In brief, while this AAS acts as a positive modulator or is without effect at α1β3γ2L-, α1β3γ1-, α2β3γ2L-, α1β3γ1- and α2β3δ-receptors (Yang et al. 2002, 2005; Clark et al. 2004), it induced negative modulation of recombinant α2β3ɛ-receptors. Significant inhibition of both GABA-evoked (tonic and phasic) and spontaneous activity was evident with 1 μm 17α-MeT, a concentration evident in the CSF of volunteers given moderate and short-term administration of this AAS (Daly et al. 2001), which probably reflects an appreciably lower level than that found high-dose users who chronically and illicitly abuse these steroids. For responses evoked by 1 mm GABA, 1 μm 17α-MeT significantly reduced Ipeak, diminished the 10–90% rise time, accelerated desensitization and slowed recovery in response to paired, brief applications. This concentration of 17α-MeT had no overall effect on macroscopic deactivation, but did significantly increase the percentage of current carried by the intermediate component of decay (τ2), an effect that is consistent with its observed action to selectively increase the proportion of the intermediate single channel open dwell times, and one that became more prominent as the concentration of the AAS was increased above 1 μm (Fig. 9B and C).

Exposure to 17α-MeT also blunted the ability of cells to respond to a rapid train of 1 mm GABA pulses and significantly decreased tonic currents elicited by stationary application of 1 μm GABA. While the subcellular localization of receptors containing the ɛ-subunit has not been determined using immunolocalization approaches, physiological data suggest that ɛ-containing receptors are present in both synaptic and extrasynaptic regions of primary hypothalamic neurons (Sergeeva et al. 2005). With respect to synaptic effects, GnRH neurons are characterized by a high frequency of GABAA receptor-mediated events (Sim et al. 2000; Nunemaker et al. 2003). We show here that 17α-MeT significantly dampened high-frequency responses mediated by recombinant α2β3ɛ-receptors and predict that this AAS would similarly dampen high-frequency synaptic responses in GnRH neurons expressing synaptic ɛ-subunit-containing receptors and thus may interfere with GABAergic control of pulsatile LH release. For tonic currents, the low EC50 of α2β3ɛ-receptors for GABA (∼4 μm) suggests that they would be good candidates to mediate tonic and spillover conductances that are known to play a critical role in determining neuronal input–output relationships (Semyanov et al. 2004). Therefore, unlike δ-subunit-containing receptors, which appear to be solely extrasynaptic, 17α-MeT may have a significant impact in neurons expressing ɛ-subunit-containing receptors via both synaptic and extrasynaptic mechanisms.

Recombinant receptors containing α2-, β3- and ɛ-subunits (ɛ encoded by the human cDNA) also exhibited a PTX-sensitive, bicuculline-insensitive current in the absence of agonist that we attribute to spontaneous opening of these receptors. Assessment of both macroscopic currents and fluctuation analysis provided estimates of Po for these receptors of ∼0.15–0.20. This value is appreciably greater than that estimated for human recombinant α2β1ɛ-receptors (0.04; Wagner et al. 2005) and may reflect differences conferred by the β-subunits. Inhibition of spontaneous current elicited by 17α-MeT was concentration dependent (IC50= 8.7 ± 3 μm) and was characterized by both a slow relaxation of inhibition during exposure to 17α-MeT and a rebound (tail) current following AAS removal. Both the extent of relaxation and the amplitude of the tail current increased with the duration of AAS. These two processes were described by nearly identical time constants, suggesting that they reflect the same population of channels that moves into a blocked state in the presence of the AAS and preferentially rebound into the open state upon its removal.

Further assessment of the temporal characteristics of AAS inhibition, relaxation and rebound at different AAS concentrations suggested that the mechanism of AAS modulation could be consistent with either an open channel or an allosteric mechanism of block. However, the voltage dependence of AAS inhibition of the spontaneous current, in conjunction with results from single channel and fluctuation analyses (that demonstrated that this AAS altered the proportion of channels within a given open dwell or burst distribution without changing the time constants of those distributions), suggest that this AAS does not readily interact with the open state of the receptor. Conversely, our results are consistent with a mechanism of allosteric block.

The observed effects of 17α-MeT on Ipeak, desensitization and deactivation kinetics of GABA-evoked activity suggest an allosteric mechanism in which this AAS interacts with specific conformation(s) of the receptor to generate a stable AAS-bound closed state. For example, the observed effect on desensitization and recovery could be reconciled if the interaction of 17α-MeT with the receptor was more efficient in certain GABA-bound conformations than in the unliganded form of the receptor. In this mechanism, interactions with AAS would be the equivalent of introducing additional desensitized states to the gating of the receptor. Introduction of stable desensitized-like states would be expected to reduce the single channel open probability by shortening burst durations, but not change open dwell time constants.

The mechanism by which we envision the AAS elicit this allosteric block can be encapsulated as follows. In the absence of steroid, most receptors reside in a slowly equilibrating resting state (R), but make occasional forays to the closed state (C) from which they can shuttle rapidly back and forth to the open state (O) several times before transitioning back to state R. This flickering between C and O is the origin of the spontaneous current. When the receptors are exposed to 17α-MeT, which interacts preferentially with state C, they become trapped in the inactive AAS-bound state (B). State B is relatively stable compared to the other states and, in the presence of the AAS, a large number of receptors accumulate there. Initially, most of these receptors come from the rapidly equilibrating states C and O (thus the inhibition develops quickly as receptors in O and C are rapidly depleted), but as these states are depleted, receptors emerge from the slowly equilibrating state R, which can enter the C and O states, transitioning between them, before subsequently moving to the absorbing blocked state as well. This produces the relaxation of peak inhibition. Upon rapid withdrawal of 17α-MeT, receptors are released from state B back to state C. These receptors can then transition to states O or R, but because the rate of entry to state O is ∼3000 times faster than the rate of entry to state R (1300 versus 0.39 s−1), most of the receptors open and close several times before their first sojourn to state R. These rapid activations produce the resurgent current that then decays as receptors percolate back to state R according to 1/τtail. An essential feature of this model is the preferential binding of the steroid to particular closed states. Similar results can be obtained by allowing blocking from state O, but this transition is not supported by experimental data.

With respect to the mechanism of inhibition of GABA-induced currents by 17α-MeT, we note that there are similarities with the effects of the neurosteroid pregnenolone sulphate (PS) on GABA-induced currents (Shen et al. 2000; Akk et al. 2001), but also some notable differences. Specifically, while Akk et al. (2001) found that PS decreased the duration of channel clusters elicited by 1 mm GABA without altering open dwell time constants (apparent mean openings and cluster analysis), they also report no changes in the proportion of openings corresponding to those open duration time constants. In contrast, while 17α-MeT also inhibits GABA-induced currents without altering open or burst duration time constants, it does cause a significant shift in the distribution of openings. This difference underscores the more general conclusion that the AAS and the neurosteroids, while sharing many obvious similarities, are nonetheless distinct modulators of the GABAA receptor. For example, PS induces negative modulation of both γ- and ɛ-subunit-containing receptors (Akk et al. 2001; Maksay et al. 2003), while 17α-MeT is a positive modulator of γ-subunit-containing receptors (Yang et al. 2002, 2005; Clark et al. 2004) and a negative modulator of ɛ-subunit-containing receptors.

That substitution of the ɛ- for a γ-subunit in recombinant α2β3x-receptors can invert modulation induced by 17α-MeT from positive (α2β3γ) to negative (α2β3ɛ) suggests that sequence divergence between these two subunits may be of critical importance in determining the effects of this AAS. Previous studies have implicated residues within the TM2 domain as providing a binding pocket for a wide range of low-affinity allosteric modulators of the GABAA receptor, and we have hypothesized that residues within this site may also be important for AAS modulation (Yang et al. 2002, 2005). To test this hypothesis, we engineered an ɛ-subunit in which residue 302, which is glycine in the ɛ-subunit, was mutated to serine, the amino acid present at the comparable position in the γ-subunits. Effects of 17α-MeT were still inhibitory at these mutant receptors, indicating that this one residue in the ɛ-subunit does not, on its own, determine whether AAS modulation will be positive or negative. The G302S mutation did, however, diminish inhibition by 17α-MeT by decreasing apparent AAS binding (2-fold decrease in Kd) and promoting a 1.8-fold left shift in IC50 in the concentration–response relationship to 17α-MeT. Thus, these data implicate this residue within TM2 as playing an important role in mediating AAS inhibition in ɛ-subunit-containing receptors.

What are the potential physiological ramifications of the profile of AAS modulation of ɛ-subunit-containing receptors, especially as it relates to the known effects of these abused steroids on reproductive behaviours? Expression of the ɛ-subunit is highly restricted in the mammalian brain, with appreciable levels being observed in regions of the forebrain and brainstem that subserve reproductive function in both rodents and primates (Whiting et al. 1997; Davies et al. 1997; Sinkkonen et al. 2000; Heikkilä et al.2001; Moragues et al. 2002, 2003). Particularly intriguing are recent studies that ɛ-subunit expression is enriched in peptidergic neurons of the forebrain and that expression of the ɛ-subunit mRNA is detected in virtually all GnRH-immunoreactive neurons (Moragues et al. 2002, 2003; Sergeeva et al. 2005). These forebrain peptidergic neurons act as the master regulators of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis, with GnRH controlling the pulsatile secretion of LH that is essential for the onset of puberty, the establishment and maintenance of oestrous cyclicity in females and reproductive competence in males (for review, see Ojeda & Urbanski, 1994; Freeman, 1994). GABAergic transmission imparts significant control over GnRH release by modulating the characteristic action potential bursting patterns of these cells (Sim et al. 2000; Nunemaker et al. 2003; Han et al. 2004). Here we show that acutely dissociated GnRH neurons exhibit a PTX-sensitive, bicuculline-insensitive spontaneous current that is inhibited by 1 μm 17α-MeT to an extent that is comparable to that observed for spontaneous currents in HEK293 cells expressing α2β3ɛ-receptors. Furthermore, we show that rapid application of millimolar GABA elicits responses from GnRH neurons with deactivation kinetics comparable to those elicited by rapid application of millimolar GABA to recombinant α2β3ɛ-receptors, and that 1 μm 17α-MeT elicits a small but significant inhibition of these phasic responses as well. Taken together, our results suggest that native GnRH neurons express functional ɛ-subunit-containing receptors and that the AAS 17α-MeT may elicit its inhibitory effects in these primary neurons by selective actions on these receptors. While experiments remain to be performed to determine the role of AAS inhibition of steady state (tonic and spontaneous) versus phasic (synaptic) GABAA receptor-mediated responses in these cells and the impact that such modulation may have on GnRH release, our results support the hypothesis that AAS effects on ɛ-subunit-containing receptors may contribute to the observed effects on reproductive status observed in AAS users.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Stefano Vicini (Georgetown University) for generously providing GABAA receptor cDNAs and Ms Donna Porter (Dartmouth Medical School) for assistance in preparing the ɛ-subunit cDNA mutant. We are indebted to Dr Suzanne Moenter (University of Virginia) for providing us with breeding pairs of the GFP-GnRH transgenic mice. This work was supported by the NIH (DA/NS14137) to L. P. Henderson and partly fulfils the requirements for the PhD for B. L. Jones.

References

  1. Akk G, Bracamontes J, Steinbach JH. Pregnenolone sulfate block of GABAA receptors: mechanism and involvement of a residue in the M2 region of the α subunit. J Physiol. 2001;532:673–684. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0673e.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akk G, Steinbach JH. Low doses of ethanol and a neuroactive steroid positively interact to modulate rat GABAA receptor function. J Physiol. 2003;546:641–646. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.032300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bahrke MS, Yesalis CE, Brower KJ. Anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse and performance-enhancing drugs among adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 1998;7:821–838. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bahrke MS, Yesalis CE, III, Wright JE. Psychological and behavioral effects of endogenous testosterone and anabolic-androgenic steroids. Sports Med. 1996;22:367–390. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199622060-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Basaria S, Wahlstrom JT, Dobs AS. Clinical review 138: Anabolic-androgenic steroid therapy in the treatment of chronic diseases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:5108–5117. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.11.7983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Belelli D, Lambert JJ, Peters JA, Wafford K, Whiting PJ. The interaction of the general anesthetic etomidate with the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor is influenced by a single amino acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:11031–11036. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.20.11031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Belelli D, Pistis I, Peters JA, Lambert JJ. General anaesthetic action at transmitter-gated inhibitory amino acid receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1999;20:496–502. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(99)01405-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bera AK, Chatav M, Akabas MH. GABAA receptor M2–M3 loop secondary structure and changes in accessibility during channel gating. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:43002–43010. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206321200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bronson FH, Nguyen KQ, De La Rosa J. Effect of anabolic steroids on behavior and physiological characteristics of female mice. Physiol Behav. 1996;59:49–55. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(95)02027-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark AS, Henderson LP. Behavioral and physiological responses to anabolic-androgenic steroids. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2003;27:413–436. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(03)00064-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Clark AS, Jones BL, Yang P, Henderson LP. Anabolic androgenic steroids and the brain: novel actions at the GABAA receptor and on GABAA receptor-mediated behaviors. In: Smith SS, editor. Neurosteroid Effects in the Central Nervous System: the Role of the GABAA Receptor. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press LLC; 2004. pp. 119–141. [Google Scholar]
  12. Colquhoun D. Binding, gating, affinity and efficacy: the interpretation of structure-activity relationships for agonists and of the effects of mutating receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 1998;125:924–947. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Colquhoun D, Hawkes AG. Relaxation and fluctuations of membrane currents that flow through drug-operated channels. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1977;199:231–262. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1977.0137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Colquhoun D, Hawkes AG. The principles of the stochastic interpretations of ion-channel mechanisms. In: Sakmann B, Neher E, editors. Single-Channel Recording. 2. New York: Plenum Press; 1995. pp. 397–482. [Google Scholar]
  15. Colquhoun D, Sakmann B. Fast events in single-channel currents activated by acetylcholine and its analogues at the frog muscle end-plate. J Physiol. 1985;369:501–557. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Colquhoun D, Sigworth FJ. Fitting and statistical analysis of single-channel records. In: Sakmann B, Neher E, editors. Single-Channel Recording. 2. New York: Plenum Press; 1995. pp. 483–587. [Google Scholar]
  17. Daly RC, Su TP, Schmidt PJ, Pickar D, Murphy DL, Rubinow DR. Cerebrospinal fluid and behavioral changes after methyltestosterone administration: preliminary findings. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:172–177. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.2.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Davies PA, Hanna MC, Hales TG, Kirkness EF. Insensitivity to anaesthetic agents conferred by a class of GABAA receptor subunit. Nature. 1997;385:820–823. doi: 10.1038/385820a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Davies PA, Kirkness EF, Hales TG. Evidence for the formation of functionally distinct αβγɛ GABAA receptors. J Physiol. 2001;537:101–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0101k.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dillon GH, Im WB, Carter DB, McKinley DD. Enhancement by GABA of the association rate of picrotoxin and tert-butylbicyclophosphorothionate to the rat cloned α1β2γ2 GABAA receptor subtype. Br J Pharmacol. 1995;115:539–545. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb16368.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Franke WW, Berendonk B. Hormonal doping and androgenization of athletes: a secret program of the German Democratic Republic government. Clin Chem. 1997;43:1262–1279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Freeman MC. The neuroendocrine control of the ovarian cycle of the rat. In: Knobil E, Neill JD, editors. The Physiology of Reproduction. Vol. 2. New York: Raven Press Ltd; 1994. pp. 613–658. [Google Scholar]
  23. Friedl KE. Effects of anabolic steroids on physical health. In: Yesalis C, editor. Anabolic Steroids in Sport and Exercise. Champaign, IL, USA: Human Kinetics; 2000. pp. 175–223. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gee KW, Bolger MB, Brinton RE, Coirini H, McEwen BS. Steroid modulation of the chloride ionophore in rat brain: structure-activity requirements, regional dependence and mechanism of action. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988;246:803–812. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gibb AJ, Colquhoun D. Glutamate activation of a single NMDA receptor-channel produces a cluster of channel openings. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1991;243:39–45. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1991.0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gibb AJ, Colquhoun D. Activation of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors by l-glutamate in cells dissociated from adult rat hippocampus. J Physiol. 1992;456:143–179. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Han SK, Todman MG, Herbison AE. Endogenous GABA release inhibits the firing of adult gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons. Endocrinology. 2004;145:495–499. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-1333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Heikkilä AT, Echenko O, Uusi-Oukari M, Sinkkonen ST, Korpi ER. Morphine withdrawal increases expression of GABAA receptor ɛ subunit mRNA in locus coeruleus neurons. Neuroreport. 2001;12:2981–2985. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200109170-00045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Herbison AE, Chapman C, Dyer RG. Role of medial preoptic GABA neurones in regulating luteinising hormone secretion in the ovariectomised rat. Exp Brain Res. 1991;87:345–352. doi: 10.1007/BF00231851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Herbison AE, Fénelon VS. Estrogen regulation of GABAA receptor subunit mRNA expression in preoptic area and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis of female rat brain. J Neurosci. 1995;15:2328–2337. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-03-02328.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Irnaten M, Walwyn WM, Wang J, Venkatesan P, Evans C, Chang KS, Andresen MC, Hales TG, Mendelowitz D. Pentobarbital enhances GABAergic neurotransmission to cardiac parasympathetic neurons, which is prevented by expression of GABAAɛ subunit. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:717–724. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200209000-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jenkins A, Greenblatt EP, Faulkner HJ, Bertaccini E, Light A, Lin A, Andreasen A, Viner A, Trudell JR, Harrison NL. Evidence for a common binding cavity for three general anesthetics within the GABAA receptor. J Neurosci. 2001;21:RC136. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-06-j0002.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jones MV, Westbrook GL. Desensitized states prolong GABAA channel responses to brief agonist pulses. Neuron. 1995;15:181–191. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90075-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jorge JC, McIntyre KL, Henderson LP. The function and the expression of forebrain GABAA receptors change with hormonal state in the adult mouse. J Neurobiol. 2002;50:137–149. doi: 10.1002/neu.10021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kasparov S, Davies KA, Patel UA, Boscan P, Garret M, Paton JF. GABAA receptor ɛ-subunit may confer benzodiazepine insensitivity to the caudal aspect of the nucleus tractus solitarii of the rat. J Physiol. 2001;536:785–796. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00785.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Korn SJ, Horn R. Statistical discrimination of fractal and Markov models of single-channel gating. Biophys J. 1988;54:871–877. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83023-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Krasowski MD, Nishikawa K, Nikolaeva N, Lin A, Harrison NL. Methionine 286 in transmembrane domain 3 of the GABAA receptor β subunit controls a binding cavity for propofol and other alkylphenol general anesthetics. Neuropharmacology. 2001;41:952–964. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(01)00141-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lambert JJ, Belelli D, Hill-Venning C, Peters JA. Neurosteroids and GABAA receptor function. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1995;16:295–303. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)89058-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lambert JJ, Belelli D, Peden DR, Vardy AW, Peters JA. Neurosteroid modulation of GABAA receptors. Prog Neurobiol. 2003;71:67–80. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2003.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lukas SE. CNS effects and abuse liability of anabolic-androgenic steroids. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1996;36:333–357. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.36.040196.002001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. McIntyre KL, Porter DM, Henderson LP. Anabolic androgenic steroids induce age-, sex-, and dose-dependent changes in GABAA receptor subunit mRNAs in the mouse forebrain. Neuropharmacology. 2002;43:634–645. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(02)00154-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Maksay G, Thompson SA, Wafford KA. The pharmacology of spontaneously open α1β3ɛ GABAA receptor-ionophores. Neuropharmacology. 2003;44:994–1002. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(03)00116-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Masonis AE, McCarthy MP. Direct effects of the anabolic/androgenic steroids, stanozolol and 17α-methyltestosterone, on benzodiazepine binding to the γ-aminobutyric acidA receptor. Neurosci Lett. 1995;189:35–38. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(95)11445-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mihic SJ, Ye Q, Wick MJ, Koltchine VV, Krasowski MD, Finn SE, Mascia MP, Valenzuela CF, Hanson KK, Greenblatt EP, Harris RA, Harrison NL. Sites of alcohol and volatile anaesthetic action on GABAA and glycine receptors. Nature. 1997;389:385–389. doi: 10.1038/38738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Miko A, Werby E, Sun H, Healey J, Zhang L. A TM2 residue in the β1 subunit determines spontaneous opening of homomeric and heteromeric γ-aminobutyric acid-gated ion channels. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:22833–22840. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M402577200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Miyazawa A, Fujiyoshi Y, Unwin N. Structure and gating mechanism of the acetylcholine receptor pore. Nature. 2003;423:949–955. doi: 10.1038/nature01748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Moenter SM, DeFazio RA, Pitts GR, Nunemaker CS. Mechanisms underlying episodic gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretions. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2003;24:79–93. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3022(03)00013-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Moragues N, Cioffi P, Tramu G, Garret M. Localisation of GABAA receptor ɛ-subunit in cholinergic and aminergic neurones and evidence for co-distribution with the θ-subunit in rat brain. Neuroscience. 2002;111:657–669. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00033-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Moragues N, Ciofi P, Lafon P, Odessa MF, Tramu G, Garret M. cDNA cloning and expression of a γ-aminobutyric acid A receptor ɛ-subunit in rat brain. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12:4318–4330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Moragues N, Ciofi P, Lafon P, Tramu G, Garret M. GABAA receptor ɛ subunit expression in identified peptidergic neurons of the rat hypothalamus. Brain Res. 2003;967:285–289. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)04270-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Neelands TR, Fisher JL, Bianchi M, Macdonald RL. Spontaneous and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-activated GABAA receptor channels formed by ɛ subunit-containing isoforms. Mol Pharmacol. 1999;55:168–178. doi: 10.1124/mol.55.1.168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Newland CF, Cull-Candy SG. On the mechanism of action of picrotoxin on GABA receptor channels in dissociated sympathetic neurones of the rat. J Physiol. 1992;447:191–213. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp018998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Nunemaker CS, Straume M, DeFazio RA, Moenter SM. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons generate interacting rhythms in multiple time domains. Endocrinology. 2003;144:823–831. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-220585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ojeda SR, Urbanski HF. Puberty in the rat. In: Knobil E, Neill JD, editors. The Physiology of Reproduction. Vol. 2. New York: Raven Press Ltd; 1994. pp. 363–410. [Google Scholar]
  55. Penatti CAA, Porter DM, Jones BL, Henderson LP. Sex-specific differences in the effects of chronic anabolic androgenic steroid treatment on GABAA receptor expression and function in adolescent mice. Neuroscience. 2005;135:533–543. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Pirker S, Schwarzer C, Wieselthaler A, Sieghart W, Sperk G. GABAA receptor immunocytochemical distribution of 13 subunits in the adult rat brain. Neuroscience. 2000;101:815–850. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00442-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Purdy RH, Morrow AL, Blinn JR, Paul SM. Synthesis, metabolism, and pharmacological activity of 3α-hydroxy steroids which potentiate GABA-receptor-mediated chloride uptake in rat cerebral cortical synaptoneurosomes. J Med Chem. 1990;33:1572–1581. doi: 10.1021/jm00168a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Sakmann B, Patlack J, Neher E. Single acetylcholine-activated channels show burst-kinetics in presence of desensitizing concentrations of agonist. Nature. 1980;286:71–73. doi: 10.1038/286071a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Scheller M, Forman SA. Coupled and uncoupled gating and desensitization effects by pore domain mutations in GABAA receptors. J Neurosci. 2002;22:8411–8421. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-19-08411.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Semyanov A, Walker MC, Kullman DM, Silver RA. Tonically active GABAA receptors: modulating gain and maintaining the tone. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27:262–269. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sergeeva OA, Andreeva N, Garret M, Scherer A, Haas HL. Pharmacological properties of GABAA receptors in rat hypothalamic neurons expressing the ɛ-subunit. J Neurosci. 2005;25:88–95. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3209-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Shahidi NT. A review of the chemistry, biological action, and clinical applications of anabolic-androgenic steroids. Clin Ther. 2001;23:1355–1390. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80114-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Shen W, Mennerick S, Covey DF, Zorumski CF. Pregnenolone sulfate modulates inhibitory synaptic transmission by enhancing GABAA receptor desensitization. J Neurosci. 2000;20:3571–3579. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-10-03571.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Sim JA, Skynner MJ, Pape JR, Herbison AE. Late postnatal reorganization of GABAA receptor signalling in native GnRH neurons. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12:3497–3504. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00261.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sinkkonen ST, Hanna MC, Kirkness EF, Korpi ER. GABAA receptor ɛ and θ subunits display unusual structural variation between species and are enriched in the rat locus ceruleus. J Neurosci. 2000;20:3588–3595. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-10-03588.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Spergel DJ, Krüth U, Hanley DF, Sprengel R, Seeburg PH. GABA- and glutamate-activated channels in green fluorescent protein-tagged gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons in transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 1999;19:2037–2050. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-06-02037.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Steinbach JH, Akk G. Modulation of GABAA receptor channel gating by pentobarbital. J Physiol. 2001;537:715–733. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00715.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Stell BM, Brickley SG, Tang CY, Farrant M, Mody I. Neuroactive steroids reduce neuronal excitability by selectively enhancing tonic inhibition mediated by δ subunit-containing GABAA receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:14439–14444. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2435457100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Suter KJ, Song WJ, Sampson TL, Wuarin JP, Saunders JT, Dudek FE, Moenter SM. Genetic targeting of green fluorescent protein to gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons: characterization of whole-cell electrophysiological properties and morphology. Endocrinology. 2000;141:412–419. doi: 10.1210/endo.141.1.7279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Thompson SA, Bonnert TP, Whiting PJ, Wafford KA. Functional characteristics of recombinant human GABAA receptors containing the ɛ-subunit. Toxicol Lett. 1998;100–101:233–238. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(98)00190-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Thompson SA, Wingrove PB, Connelly L, Whiting PJ, Wafford KA. Tracazolate reveals a novel type of allosteric interaction with recombinant γ-aminobutyric acidA receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 2002;61:861–869. doi: 10.1124/mol.61.4.861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Todman MG, Han SK, Herbison AE. Profiling neurotransmitter receptor expression in mouse gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons using green fluorescent protein-promoter transgenics and microarrays. Neuroscience. 2005;132:703–712. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Turner JP, Simmonds MA. Modulation of the GABAA receptor complex by steroids in slices of rat cuneate nucleus. Br J Pharmacol. 1989;96:409–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1989.tb11832.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Ueno S, Lin A, Nikolaeva N, Trudell JR, Mihic SJ, Harris RA, Harrison NL. Tryptophan scanning mutagenesis in TM2 of the GABAA receptor α subunit: effects on channel gating and regulation by ethanol. Br J Pharmacol. 2000;131:296–302. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Wagner DA, Goldschen-Ohm MP, Hales TG, Jones MV. Kinetics and spontaneous open probability conferred by the ɛ subunit of the GABAA receptor. J Neurosci. 2005;25:10462–10468. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1658-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Walters RJ, Hadley SH, Morris KD, Amin J. Benzodiazepines act on GABAA receptors via two distinct and separable mechanisms. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:1274–1281. doi: 10.1038/81800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Wei W, Faria LC, Mody I. Low ethanol concentrations selectively augment the tonic inhibition mediated by σ subunit-containing GABAA receptors in hippocampalneurons. J Neurosci. 2004;24:8379–8382. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2040-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Whiting PJ, Bonnert TP, McKernan RM, Farrar S, Le Bourdelles B, Heavens RP, Smith DW, Hewson L, Rigby MR, Sirinathsinghji DJ, Thompson SA, Wafford KA. Molecular and functional diversity of the expanding GABA-A receptor gene family. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;868:645–653. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb11341.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Whiting PJ, McAllister G, Vassilatis D, Bonnert TP, Heavens RP, Smith DW, Hewson L, O'Donnell R, Rigby MR, Sirinathsinghji DJ, Marshall G, Thompson SA, Wafford KA. Neuronally restricted RNA splicing regulates the expression of a novel GABAA receptor subunit conferring atypical functional properties. J Neurosci. 1997;17:5027–5037. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-13-05027.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Wingrove PB, Wafford KA, Bain C, Whiting PJ. The modulatory action of loreclezole at the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor is determined by a single amino acid in the β2 and β3 subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:4569–4573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Wisden W, Laurie DJ, Monyer H, Seeburg PH. The distribution of 13 GABAA receptor subunit mRNAs in the rat brain. I. Telencephalon, diencephalon, mesencephalon. J Neurosci. 1992;12:1040–1062. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-03-01040.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Wu FC. Endocrine aspects of anabolic steroids. Clin Chem. 1997;43:1289–1292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Yang P, Jones B, Henderson LP. Mechanisms of anabolic androgenic steroid modulation of α1β3γ2L GABAA receptors. Neuropharmacology. 2002;43:619–633. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(02)00155-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Yang P, Jones BL, Henderson LP. Role of the α subunit in the modulation of GABAA receptors by anabolic androgenic steroids. Neuropharmacology. 2005;49:300–316. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES