Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1996 May;178(9):2580–2585. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.9.2580-2585.1996

Specific in vivo protein-protein interactions between Escherichia coli SOS mutagenesis proteins.

P Jonczyk 1, A Nowicka 1
PMCID: PMC177982  PMID: 8626325

Abstract

One of the components of the RecA-LexA-controlled SOS response in Escherichia coli cells is an inducible error-prone DNA replication pathway that results in a substantial increase in the mutation rate. It is believed that error-prone DNA synthesis is performed by a multiprotein complex that is formed by UmuC, UmuD', RecA, and probably DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. It is postulated that the formation of such a complex requires specific interactions between these proteins. We have analyzed the specific protein-protein interactions between UmuC, UmuD, and UmuD' fusion proteins, using a Saccharomyces cerevisiae two-hybrid system. In agreement with previous in vitro data, we have shown that UmuD and UmuD' are able to form both homodimers (UmuD-UmuD and UmuD'-UmuD') and a heterodimer (UmuD-UmuD'). Our data show that UmuC fusion protein is capable of interacting exclusively with UmuD' and not with UmuD. Thus, posttranslational processing of UmuD into UmuD' is a critical step in SOS mutagenesis, enabling only the latter protein to interact with UmuC. Our data seem to indicate that the integrity of the entire UmuC sequence is essential for UmuC-UmuD' heterotypic interaction. Finally, in our studies, we used three different UmuC mutant proteins: UmuC25, UmuC36, and UmuC104. We have found that UmuC25 and UmuC36 are not capable of associating with UmuD'. In contrast, UmuC104 protein interacts with UmuD' protein with an efficiency identical to that of the wild-type protein. We postulate that UmuC104 protein might be defective in interaction with another, unknown protein essential for the SOS mutagenesis pathway.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (243.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bailone A., Sommer S., Knezević J., Dutreix M., Devoret R. A RecA protein mutant deficient in its interaction with the UmuDC complex. Biochimie. 1991 Apr;73(4):479–484. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(91)90115-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Battista J. R., Ohta T., Nohmi T., Sun W., Walker G. C. Dominant negative umuD mutations decreasing RecA-mediated cleavage suggest roles for intact UmuD in modulation of SOS mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Sep;87(18):7190–7194. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.18.7190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blanco M., Herrera G., Collado P., Rebollo J. E., Botella L. M. Influence of RecA protein on induced mutagenesis. Biochimie. 1982 Aug-Sep;64(8-9):633–636. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9084(82)80102-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bridges B. A., Mottershead R. P. Mutagenic DNA repair in Escherichia coli. III. Requirement for a function of DNA polymerase III in ultraviolet-light mutagenesis. Mol Gen Genet. 1976 Feb 27;144(1):53–58. doi: 10.1007/BF00277304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bridges B. A., Woodgate R. Mutagenic repair in Escherichia coli: products of the recA gene and of the umuD and umuC genes act at different steps in UV-induced mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jun;82(12):4193–4197. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.12.4193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burckhardt S. E., Woodgate R., Scheuermann R. H., Echols H. UmuD mutagenesis protein of Escherichia coli: overproduction, purification, and cleavage by RecA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Mar;85(6):1811–1815. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.6.1811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen D. C., Yang B. C., Kuo T. T. One-step transformation of yeast in stationary phase. Curr Genet. 1992 Jan;21(1):83–84. doi: 10.1007/BF00318659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chien C. T., Bartel P. L., Sternglanz R., Fields S. The two-hybrid system: a method to identify and clone genes for proteins that interact with a protein of interest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 1;88(21):9578–9582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Clark J. M. Novel non-templated nucleotide addition reactions catalyzed by procaryotic and eucaryotic DNA polymerases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Oct 25;16(20):9677–9686. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.20.9677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen S., Knoll B. J., Little J. W., Mount D. W. Preferential cleavage of phage lambda repressor monomers by recA protease. Nature. 1981 Nov 12;294(5837):182–184. doi: 10.1038/294182a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dutreix M., Burnett B., Bailone A., Radding C. M., Devoret R. A partially deficient mutant, recA1730, that fails to form normal nucleoprotein filaments. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Apr;232(3):489–497. doi: 10.1007/BF00266254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dutreix M., Moreau P. L., Bailone A., Galibert F., Battista J. R., Walker G. C., Devoret R. New recA mutations that dissociate the various RecA protein activities in Escherichia coli provide evidence for an additional role for RecA protein in UV mutagenesis. J Bacteriol. 1989 May;171(5):2415–2423. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.5.2415-2423.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Echols H., Goodman M. F. Fidelity mechanisms in DNA replication. Annu Rev Biochem. 1991;60:477–511. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.60.070191.002401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Echols H., Goodman M. F. Mutation induced by DNA damage: a many protein affair. Mutat Res. 1990 Sep-Nov;236(2-3):301–311. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(90)90013-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Elledge S. J., Walker G. C. Proteins required for ultraviolet light and chemical mutagenesis. Identification of the products of the umuC locus of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1983 Feb 25;164(2):175–192. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(83)90074-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ennis D. G., Fisher B., Edmiston S., Mount D. W. Dual role for Escherichia coli RecA protein in SOS mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 May;82(10):3325–3329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.10.3325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ennis D. G., Ossanna N., Mount D. W. Genetic separation of Escherichia coli recA functions for SOS mutagenesis and repressor cleavage. J Bacteriol. 1989 May;171(5):2533–2541. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.5.2533-2541.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Estojak J., Brent R., Golemis E. A. Correlation of two-hybrid affinity data with in vitro measurements. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;15(10):5820–5829. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fields S., Song O. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature. 1989 Jul 20;340(6230):245–246. doi: 10.1038/340245a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fields S., Sternglanz R. The two-hybrid system: an assay for protein-protein interactions. Trends Genet. 1994 Aug;10(8):286–292. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90012-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Frank E. G., Hauser J., Levine A. S., Woodgate R. Targeting of the UmuD, UmuD', and MucA' mutagenesis proteins to DNA by RecA protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 1;90(17):8169–8173. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.17.8169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hagensee M. E., Timme T. L., Bryan S. K., Moses R. E. DNA polymerase III of Escherichia coli is required for UV and ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jun;84(12):4195–4199. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.12.4195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hong Y., Levay K., Murphy J. F., Klein P. G., Shaw J. G., Hunt A. G. A potyvirus polymerase interacts with the viral coat protein and VPg in yeast cells. Virology. 1995 Dec 1;214(1):159–166. doi: 10.1006/viro.1995.9944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Horii T., Ogawa T., Nakatani T., Hase T., Matsubara H., Ogawa H. Regulation of SOS functions: purification of E. coli LexA protein and determination of its specific site cleaved by the RecA protein. Cell. 1981 Dec;27(3 Pt 2):515–522. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90393-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kato T., Shinoura Y. Isolation and characterization of mutants of Escherichia coli deficient in induction of mutations by ultraviolet light. Mol Gen Genet. 1977 Nov 14;156(2):121–131. doi: 10.1007/BF00283484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kitagawa Y., Akaboshi E., Shinagawa H., Horii T., Ogawa H., Kato T. Structural analysis of the umu operon required for inducible mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jul;82(13):4336–4340. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.13.4336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Koch W. H., Ennis D. G., Levine A. S., Woodgate R. Escherichia coli umuDC mutants: DNA sequence alterations and UmuD cleavage. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Jun;233(3):443–448. doi: 10.1007/BF00265442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kroeker W. D., Kowalski D., Laskowski M., Sr Mung bean nuclease I. Terminally directed hydrolysis of native DNA. Biochemistry. 1976 Oct 5;15(20):4463–4467. doi: 10.1021/bi00665a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee M. H., Ohta T., Walker G. C. A monocysteine approach for probing the structure and interactions of the UmuD protein. J Bacteriol. 1994 Aug;176(16):4825–4837. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.16.4825-4837.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Little J. W., Edmiston S. H., Pacelli L. Z., Mount D. W. Cleavage of the Escherichia coli lexA protein by the recA protease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jun;77(6):3225–3229. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.6.3225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Little J. W., Mount D. W. The SOS regulatory system of Escherichia coli. Cell. 1982 May;29(1):11–22. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90085-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Little J. W. The SOS regulatory system: control of its state by the level of RecA protease. J Mol Biol. 1983 Jul 15;167(4):791–808. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80111-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Marchuk D., Drumm M., Saulino A., Collins F. S. Construction of T-vectors, a rapid and general system for direct cloning of unmodified PCR products. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Mar 11;19(5):1154–1154. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.5.1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Marsh L., Walker G. C. Cold sensitivity induced by overproduction of UmuDC in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1985 Apr;162(1):155–161. doi: 10.1128/jb.162.1.155-161.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mosteller R. D., Park W., Broek D. Analysis of interaction between Ras and CDC25 guanine nucleotide exchange factor using yeast GAL4 two-hybrid system. Methods Enzymol. 1995;255:135–148. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(95)55017-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nohmi T., Battista J. R., Dodson L. A., Walker G. C. RecA-mediated cleavage activates UmuD for mutagenesis: mechanistic relationship between transcriptional derepression and posttranslational activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Mar;85(6):1816–1820. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.6.1816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nowicka A., Kanabus M., Sledziewska-Gójska E., Ciesla Z. Different UmuC requirements for generation of different kinds of UV-induced mutations in Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet. 1994 Jun 3;243(5):584–592. doi: 10.1007/BF00284207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Perry K. L., Elledge S. J., Mitchell B. B., Marsh L., Walker G. C. umuDC and mucAB operons whose products are required for UV light- and chemical-induced mutagenesis: UmuD, MucA, and LexA proteins share homology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jul;82(13):4331–4335. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.13.4331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Petit M. A., Bedale W., Osipiuk J., Lu C., Rajagopalan M., McInerney P., Goodman M. F., Echols H. Sequential folding of UmuC by the Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone complexes of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1994 Sep 23;269(38):23824–23829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rajagopalan M., Lu C., Woodgate R., O'Donnell M., Goodman M. F., Echols H. Activity of the purified mutagenesis proteins UmuC, UmuD', and RecA in replicative bypass of an abasic DNA lesion by DNA polymerase III. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Nov 15;89(22):10777–10781. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sassanfar M., Roberts J. W. Nature of the SOS-inducing signal in Escherichia coli. The involvement of DNA replication. J Mol Biol. 1990 Mar 5;212(1):79–96. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90306-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Shinagawa H., Iwasaki H., Kato T., Nakata A. RecA protein-dependent cleavage of UmuD protein and SOS mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Mar;85(6):1806–1810. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.6.1806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Shinagawa H., Kato T., Ise T., Makino K., Nakata A. Cloning and characterization of the umu operon responsible for inducible mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Gene. 1983 Aug;23(2):167–174. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(83)90048-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Steinborn G. Uvm mutants of Escherichia coli K12 deficient in UV mutagenesis. I. Isolation of uvm mutants and their phenotypical characterization in DNA repair and mutagenesis. Mol Gen Genet. 1978 Sep 20;165(1):87–93. doi: 10.1007/BF00270380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sweasy J. B., Witkin E. M., Sinha N., Roegner-Maniscalco V. RecA protein of Escherichia coli has a third essential role in SOS mutator activity. J Bacteriol. 1990 Jun;172(6):3030–3036. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.6.3030-3036.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Villani G., Boiteux S., Radman M. Mechanism of ultraviolet-induced mutagenesis: extent and fidelity of in vitro DNA synthesis on irradiated templates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jul;75(7):3037–3041. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.7.3037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Vojtek A. B., Hollenberg S. M., Cooper J. A. Mammalian Ras interacts directly with the serine/threonine kinase Raf. Cell. 1993 Jul 16;74(1):205–214. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90307-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Walker G. C. Mutagenesis and inducible responses to deoxyribonucleic acid damage in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Rev. 1984 Mar;48(1):60–93. doi: 10.1128/mr.48.1.60-93.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Witkin E. M. Ultraviolet mutagenesis and inducible DNA repair in Escherichia coli. Bacteriol Rev. 1976 Dec;40(4):869–907. doi: 10.1128/br.40.4.869-907.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Woodgate R., Ennis D. G. Levels of chromosomally encoded Umu proteins and requirements for in vivo UmuD cleavage. Mol Gen Genet. 1991 Sep;229(1):10–16. doi: 10.1007/BF00264207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Woodgate R., Rajagopalan M., Lu C., Echols H. UmuC mutagenesis protein of Escherichia coli: purification and interaction with UmuD and UmuD'. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Oct;86(19):7301–7305. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.19.7301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Woodgate R., Sedgwick S. G. Mutagenesis induced by bacterial UmuDC proteins and their plasmid homologues. Mol Microbiol. 1992 Aug;6(16):2213–2218. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01397.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Woodgate R., Singh M., Kulaeva O. I., Frank E. G., Levine A. S., Koch W. H. Isolation and characterization of novel plasmid-encoded umuC mutants. J Bacteriol. 1994 Aug;176(16):5011–5021. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.16.5011-5021.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES