Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1996 Jul;178(14):4208–4215. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.14.4208-4215.1996

Tyrosine 106 of CheY plays an important role in chemotaxis signal transduction in Escherichia coli.

X Zhu 1, C D Amsler 1, K Volz 1, P Matsumura 1
PMCID: PMC178179  PMID: 8763950

Abstract

CheY is the response regulator in the signal transduction pathway of bacterial chemotaxis. Position 106 of CheY is occupied by a conserved aromatic residue (tyrosine or phenylalanine) in the response regulator superfamily. A number of substitutions at position 106 have been made and characterized by both behavioral and biochemical studies. On the basis of the behavioral studies, the phenotypes of the mutants at position 106 can be divided into three categories: (i) hyperactivity, with a tyrosine-to-tryptophan mutation (Y106W) causing increased tumble signaling but impairing chemotaxis; (ii) low-level activity, with a tyrosine-to-phenylalanine change (Y106F) resulting in decreased tumble signaling and chemotaxis; and (iii) no activity, with substitutions such as Y106L, Y106I, Y106V, Y106G, and Y106C resulting in no chemotaxis and a smooth-swimming phenotype. All three types of mutants can be phosphorylated by CheA-phosphate in vitro to a level similar to that of wild-type CheY. Autodephosphorylation rates are similar for all categories of mutants. All mutant proteins displayed less than twofold increased rates compared with wild-type CheY. Binding of the mutant proteins to FliM was similar to that of the wild-type CheY in the CheY-FliM binding assays. The combined results from in vivo behavioral and in vitro biochemical studies suggest that the diverse phenotypes of the Y106 mutants are not due to a variation in phosphorylation or dephosphorylation ability nor in affinity for the switch. With reference to the structures of wild-type CheY and the T871 CheY mutant, our results suggest that rearrangements of the orientation of the tyrosine side chain at position 106 are involved in the signal transduction of CheY. These data also suggest that the binding of phosphoryl-CheY to the flagellar motor is a necessary, but not sufficient, event for signal transduction.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (522.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amsler C. D., Cho M., Matsumura P. Multiple factors underlying the maximum motility of Escherichia coli as cultures enter post-exponential growth. J Bacteriol. 1993 Oct;175(19):6238–6244. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.19.6238-6244.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amsler C. D. Use of computer-assisted motion analysis for quantitative measurements of swimming behavior in peritrichously flagellated bacteria. Anal Biochem. 1996 Mar 1;235(1):20–25. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.0086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bourret R. B., Davagnino J., Simon M. I. The carboxy-terminal portion of the CheA kinase mediates regulation of autophosphorylation by transducer and CheW. J Bacteriol. 1993 Apr;175(7):2097–2101. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.7.2097-2101.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourret R. B., Drake S. K., Chervitz S. A., Simon M. I., Falke J. J. Activation of the phosphosignaling protein CheY. II. Analysis of activated mutants by 19F NMR and protein engineering. J Biol Chem. 1993 Jun 25;268(18):13089–13096. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourret R. B., Hess J. F., Simon M. I. Conserved aspartate residues and phosphorylation in signal transduction by the chemotaxis protein CheY. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jan;87(1):41–45. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Drake S. K., Bourret R. B., Luck L. A., Simon M. I., Falke J. J. Activation of the phosphosignaling protein CheY. I. Analysis of the phosphorylated conformation by 19F NMR and protein engineering. J Biol Chem. 1993 Jun 25;268(18):13081–13088. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ganguli S., Wang H., Matsumura P., Volz K. Uncoupled phosphorylation and activation in bacterial chemotaxis. The 2.1-A structure of a threonine to isoleucine mutant at position 87 of CheY. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jul 21;270(29):17386–17393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gegner J. A., Graham D. R., Roth A. F., Dahlquist F. W. Assembly of an MCP receptor, CheW, and kinase CheA complex in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway. Cell. 1992 Sep 18;70(6):975–982. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90247-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hess J. F., Oosawa K., Kaplan N., Simon M. I. Phosphorylation of three proteins in the signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis. Cell. 1988 Apr 8;53(1):79–87. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90489-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hess J. F., Oosawa K., Matsumura P., Simon M. I. Protein phosphorylation is involved in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Nov;84(21):7609–7613. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.21.7609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hurley J. H., Baase W. A., Matthews B. W. Design and structural analysis of alternative hydrophobic core packing arrangements in bacteriophage T4 lysozyme. J Mol Biol. 1992 Apr 20;224(4):1143–1159. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90475-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kanamaru K., Mizuno T. Signal transduction and osmoregulation in Escherichia coli: a novel mutant of the positive regulator, OmpR, that functions in a phosphorylation-independent manner. J Biochem. 1992 Apr;111(4):425–430. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a123773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Khan S., Macnab R. M., DeFranco A. L., Koshland D. E., Jr Inversion of a behavioral response in bacterial chemotaxis: explanation at the molecular level. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Sep;75(9):4150–4154. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.9.4150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuo S. C., Koshland D. E., Jr Multiple kinetic states for the flagellar motor switch. J Bacteriol. 1989 Nov;171(11):6279–6287. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.11.6279-6287.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuo S. C., Koshland D. E., Jr Roles of cheY and cheZ gene products in controlling flagellar rotation in bacterial chemotaxis of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1987 Mar;169(3):1307–1314. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.3.1307-1314.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu J. D., Parkinson J. S. Genetic evidence for interaction between the CheW and Tsr proteins during chemoreceptor signaling by Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1991 Aug;173(16):4941–4951. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.16.4941-4951.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lukat G. S., Lee B. H., Mottonen J. M., Stock A. M., Stock J. B. Roles of the highly conserved aspartate and lysine residues in the response regulator of bacterial chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 1991 May 5;266(13):8348–8354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Matsumura P., Rydel J. J., Linzmeier R., Vacante D. Overexpression and sequence of the Escherichia coli cheY gene and biochemical activities of the CheY protein. J Bacteriol. 1984 Oct;160(1):36–41. doi: 10.1128/jb.160.1.36-41.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McNally D. F., Matsumura P. Bacterial chemotaxis signaling complexes: formation of a CheA/CheW complex enhances autophosphorylation and affinity for CheY. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jul 15;88(14):6269–6273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.14.6269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mian I. S., Bradwell A. R., Olson A. J. Structure, function and properties of antibody binding sites. J Mol Biol. 1991 Jan 5;217(1):133–151. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90617-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Morrison T. B., Parkinson S. Quantifying radiolabeled macromolecules and small molecules on a single gel. Biotechniques. 1994 Nov;17(5):922–926. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Parkinson J. S., Kofoid E. C. Communication modules in bacterial signaling proteins. Annu Rev Genet. 1992;26:71–112. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.26.120192.000443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ravid S., Matsumura P., Eisenbach M. Restoration of flagellar clockwise rotation in bacterial envelopes by insertion of the chemotaxis protein CheY. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Oct;83(19):7157–7161. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.19.7157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Roman S. J., Meyers M., Volz K., Matsumura P. A chemotactic signaling surface on CheY defined by suppressors of flagellar switch mutations. J Bacteriol. 1992 Oct;174(19):6247–6255. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.19.6247-6255.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Russell C. B., Dahlquist F. W. Exchange of chromosomal and plasmid alleles in Escherichia coli by selection for loss of a dominant antibiotic sensitivity marker. J Bacteriol. 1989 May;171(5):2614–2618. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.5.2614-2618.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sanders D. A., Gillece-Castro B. L., Stock A. M., Burlingame A. L., Koshland D. E., Jr Identification of the site of phosphorylation of the chemotaxis response regulator protein, CheY. J Biol Chem. 1989 Dec 25;264(36):21770–21778. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shirouzu M., Koide H., Fujita-Yoshigaki J., Oshio H., Toyama Y., Yamasaki K., Fuhrman S. A., Villafranca E., Kaziro Y., Yokoyama S. Mutations that abolish the ability of Ha-Ras to associate with Raf-1. Oncogene. 1994 Aug;9(8):2153–2157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shukla D., Matsumura P. Mutations leading to altered CheA binding cluster on a face of CheY. J Biol Chem. 1995 Oct 13;270(41):24414–24419. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.41.24414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stock A. M., Martinez-Hackert E., Rasmussen B. F., West A. H., Stock J. B., Ringe D., Petsko G. A. Structure of the Mg(2+)-bound form of CheY and mechanism of phosphoryl transfer in bacterial chemotaxis. Biochemistry. 1993 Dec 14;32(49):13375–13380. doi: 10.1021/bi00212a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stock A. M., Mottonen J. M., Stock J. B., Schutt C. E. Three-dimensional structure of CheY, the response regulator of bacterial chemotaxis. Nature. 1989 Feb 23;337(6209):745–749. doi: 10.1038/337745a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Volz K., Matsumura P. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli CheY refined at 1.7-A resolution. J Biol Chem. 1991 Aug 15;266(23):15511–15519. doi: 10.2210/pdb3chy/pdb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Volz K. Structural conservation in the CheY superfamily. Biochemistry. 1993 Nov 9;32(44):11741–11753. doi: 10.1021/bi00095a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang H., Matsumura P. Characterization of the CheAS/CheZ complex: a specific interaction resulting in enhanced dephosphorylating activity on CheY-phosphate. Mol Microbiol. 1996 Feb;19(4):695–703. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.393934.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Welch M., Oosawa K., Aizawa S., Eisenbach M. Phosphorylation-dependent binding of a signal molecule to the flagellar switch of bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 1;90(19):8787–8791. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.19.8787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES