Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1996 Aug;178(15):4651–4660. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.15.4651-4660.1996

Mutational analysis of a transmembrane segment in a bacterial chemoreceptor.

J W Baumgartner 1, G L Hazelbauer 1
PMCID: PMC178236  PMID: 8755897

Abstract

Trg is a member of a family of receptors that mediates chemotaxis by Escherichia coli. Its transmembrane domain is a loose four-helix bundle consisting of two helices from each of the two identical subunits. This domain mediates transmembrane signaling through a conformational change in which the second transmembrane segment (TM2) is thought to move relative to TM1, but mutational analysis of TM2 by cysteine scanning had identified only a few positions at which substitutions perturbed function or induced signaling. Thus, we performed mutational analysis by random mutagenesis and screening. Among 42 single-residue substitutions in TM2 that detectably altered function, 16 had drastic effects on receptor activity. These substitutions defined a helical face of TM2. This functionally important surface was directed into the protein interior of the transmembrane domain, where TM2 faces the helices or the other subunit. The functionally perturbing substitutions did not appear to cause general disruption of receptor structure but rather had more specific effects, altering aspects of transmembrane signaling. An in vivo assay of signaling identified some substitutions that reduced and others that induced signaling. These two classes were distributed along adjacent helical faces in a pattern that strongly supports the notion that conformational signaling involves movement between TM2 and TM1 and that signaling is optimal when stable interactions are maintained across the interface between the homologous helices in the transmembrane domain. Our mutational analysis also revealed a striking tolerance of the chemoreceptor for substitutions, including charged residues, usually considered to be disruptive of transmembrane segments.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (374.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ames P., Chen J., Wolff C., Parkinson J. S. Structure-function studies of bacterial chemosensors. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1988;53(Pt 1):59–65. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1988.053.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ames P., Parkinson J. S. Transmembrane signaling by bacterial chemoreceptors: E. coli transducers with locked signal output. Cell. 1988 Dec 2;55(5):817–826. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90137-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bourret R. B., Borkovich K. A., Simon M. I. Signal transduction pathways involving protein phosphorylation in prokaryotes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1991;60:401–441. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.60.070191.002153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowie J. U., Pakula A. A., Simon M. I. The three-dimensional structure of the aspartate receptor from Escherichia coli. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1995 Mar 1;51(Pt 2):145–154. doi: 10.1107/S0907444994010498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chervitz S. A., Falke J. J. Lock on/off disulfides identify the transmembrane signaling helix of the aspartate receptor. J Biol Chem. 1995 Oct 13;270(41):24043–24053. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.41.24043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chervitz S. A., Falke J. J. Molecular mechanism of transmembrane signaling by the aspartate receptor: a model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Mar 19;93(6):2545–2550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.6.2545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chervitz S. A., Lin C. M., Falke J. J. Transmembrane signaling by the aspartate receptor: engineered disulfides reveal static regions of the subunit interface. Biochemistry. 1995 Aug 1;34(30):9722–9733. doi: 10.1021/bi00030a010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Danielson M. A., Biemann H. P., Koshland D. E., Jr, Falke J. J. Attractant- and disulfide-induced conformational changes in the ligand binding domain of the chemotaxis aspartate receptor: a 19F NMR study. Biochemistry. 1994 May 24;33(20):6100–6109. doi: 10.1021/bi00186a009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Derbyshire K. M., Salvo J. J., Grindley N. D. A simple and efficient procedure for saturation mutagenesis using mixed oligodeoxynucleotides. Gene. 1986;46(2-3):145–152. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90398-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hazelbauer G. L., Engström P. Parallel pathways for transduction of chemotactic signals in Escherichia coli. Nature. 1980 Jan 3;283(5742):98–100. doi: 10.1038/283098a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hazelbauer G. L., Park C., Nowlin D. M. Adaptational "crosstalk" and the crucial role of methylation in chemotactic migration by Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Mar;86(5):1448–1452. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.5.1448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Henderson R., Baldwin J. M., Ceska T. A., Zemlin F., Beckmann E., Downing K. H. Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high-resolution electron cryo-microscopy. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jun 20;213(4):899–929. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80271-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jeffery C. J., Koshland D. E., Jr A single hydrophobic to hydrophobic substitution in the transmembrane domain impairs aspartate receptor function. Biochemistry. 1994 Mar 29;33(12):3457–3463. doi: 10.1021/bi00178a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kunkel T. A., Roberts J. D., Zakour R. A. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Methods Enzymol. 1987;154:367–382. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)54085-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee G. F., Burrows G. G., Lebert M. R., Dutton D. P., Hazelbauer G. L. Deducing the organization of a transmembrane domain by disulfide cross-linking. The bacterial chemoreceptor Trg. J Biol Chem. 1994 Nov 25;269(47):29920–29927. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee G. F., Dutton D. P., Hazelbauer G. L. Identification of functionally important helical faces in transmembrane segments by scanning mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jun 6;92(12):5416–5420. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.12.5416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee G. F., Hazelbauer G. L. Quantitative approaches to utilizing mutational analysis and disulfide crosslinking for modeling a transmembrane domain. Protein Sci. 1995 Jun;4(6):1100–1107. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee G. F., Lebert M. R., Lilly A. A., Hazelbauer G. L. Transmembrane signaling characterized in bacterial chemoreceptors by using sulfhydryl cross-linking in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Apr 11;92(8):3391–3395. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Maruyama I. N., Mikawa Y. G., Maruyama H. I. A model for transmembrane signalling by the aspartate receptor based on random-cassette mutagenesis and site-directed disulfide cross-linking. J Mol Biol. 1995 Nov 3;253(4):530–546. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Messing J. New M13 vectors for cloning. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:20–78. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01005-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Milburn M. V., Privé G. G., Milligan D. L., Scott W. G., Yeh J., Jancarik J., Koshland D. E., Jr, Kim S. H. Three-dimensional structures of the ligand-binding domain of the bacterial aspartate receptor with and without a ligand. Science. 1991 Nov 29;254(5036):1342–1347. doi: 10.1126/science.1660187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Milligan D. L., Koshland D. E., Jr Intrasubunit signal transduction by the aspartate chemoreceptor. Science. 1991 Dec 13;254(5038):1651–1654. doi: 10.1126/science.1661030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Milligan D. L., Koshland D. E., Jr Site-directed cross-linking. Establishing the dimeric structure of the aspartate receptor of bacterial chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 1988 May 5;263(13):6268–6275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ner S. S., Goodin D. B., Smith M. A simple and efficient procedure for generating random point mutations and for codon replacements using mixed oligodeoxynucleotides. DNA. 1988 Mar;7(2):127–134. doi: 10.1089/dna.1988.7.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nowlin D. M., Bollinger J., Hazelbauer G. L. Sites of covalent modification in Trg, a sensory transducer of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1987 May 5;262(13):6039–6045. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Oosawa K., Simon M. Analysis of mutations in the transmembrane region of the aspartate chemoreceptor in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Sep;83(18):6930–6934. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.18.6930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ordal G. W., Adler J. Isolation and complementation of mutants in galactose taxis and transport. J Bacteriol. 1974 Feb;117(2):509–516. doi: 10.1128/jb.117.2.509-516.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pakula A. A., Simon M. I. Determination of transmembrane protein structure by disulfide cross-linking: the Escherichia coli Tar receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 May 1;89(9):4144–4148. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.9.4144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Park C., Hazelbauer G. L. Mutation plus amplification of a transducer gene disrupts general chemotactic behavior in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1986 Dec;168(3):1378–1383. doi: 10.1128/jb.168.3.1378-1383.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Park C., Hazelbauer G. L. Mutations specifically affecting ligand interaction of the Trg chemosensory transducer. J Bacteriol. 1986 Jul;167(1):101–109. doi: 10.1128/jb.167.1.101-109.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Parkinson J. S. Signal transduction schemes of bacteria. Cell. 1993 Jun 4;73(5):857–871. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90267-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yaghmai R., Hazelbauer G. L. Ligand occupancy mimicked by single residue substitutions in a receptor: transmembrane signaling induced by mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 1;89(17):7890–7894. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.7890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yaghmai R., Hazelbauer G. L. Strategies for differential sensory responses mediated through the same transmembrane receptor. EMBO J. 1993 May;12(5):1897–1905. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05838.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yeh J. I., Biemann H. P., Pandit J., Koshland D. E., Kim S. H. The three-dimensional structure of the ligand-binding domain of a wild-type bacterial chemotaxis receptor. Structural comparison to the cross-linked mutant forms and conformational changes upon ligand binding. J Biol Chem. 1993 May 5;268(13):9787–9792. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES