Skip to main content
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 2003 Sep;110(1):58–65. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2003.01708.x

Unimpaired dendritic cell functions in MVP/LRP knockout mice

Marieke H Mossink *, Jan de Groot , Arend van Zon *, Erna Fränzel-Luiten *, Martijn Schoester *, George L Scheffer , Pieter Sonneveld *, Rik J Scheper , Erik A C Wiemer *,
PMCID: PMC1783015  PMID: 12941141

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DCs) act as mobile sentinels of the immune system. By stimulating T lymphocytes, DCs are pivotal for the initiation of both T- and B-cell-mediated immune responses. Recently, ribonucleoprotein particles (vaults) were found to be involved in the development and/or function of human DCs. To further investigate the role of vaults in DCs, we examined the effects of disruption of the major vault protein (MVP/LRP) on the development and antigen-presenting capacity of DCs, using our MVP/LRP knockout mouse model. Mononuclear bone marrow cells were isolated from wild-type and knockout mice and stimulated to differentiate to DCs. Like human DCs, the wild-type murine DC cultures strongly expressed MVP/LRP. Nevertheless, the MVP/LRP-deficient DCs developed normally and showed similar expression levels of several DC surface markers. No differences were observed in in vitro studies on the antigen uptake and presenting capacities of the wild-type and MVP/LRP knockout DCs. Moreover, immunization of the MVP/LRP-deficient mice with several T-cell antigens led to responses similar to those observed in the wild-type mice, indicating that the in vivo DC migration and antigen-presentation capacities are intact. Moreover, no differences were observed in the induction of the T cell-dependent humoral responses and orally induced peripheral T-cell tolerance. In conclusion, vaults are not required for primary DC functions. Their abundance in DCs may, however, still reflect basic roles in myeloid cell proliferation and DC development.

Introduction

Dendritic cells (DCs) are a heterogeneous population of antigen-presenting cells (APC) that function as mobile sentinels of the immune system. By stimulating T lymphocytes, DCs are pivotal for the initiation of both T- and B-cell-mediated immune responses (reviewed by Cella et al.1 and Banchereau et al.2). Moreover, by determining the nature of T-cell responses, DCs regulate the T helper 1/ T helper 2 (Th1/Th2) balance3 and play an important role in peripheral T-cell tolerance. Immature DCs reside in non-lymphatic tissues and are characterized by a high capability for antigen uptake and processing. Upon maturation, the cells lose their antigen-uptake ability, whereas major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and costimulatory molecules are upregulated. The cells migrate to the lymphoid organs, an appropriate environment for the activation of antigen-specific T cells.1 Recently, two ATP-dependent transmembrane transporter molecules, Pgp and MRP1, both known for their role in multidrug resistance (MDR), have been identified as mediators in this migration process.4,5 Whereas the role of Pgp in this migration is as yet unclear, MRP1 regulates DC migration by transporting the leukotriene C4 (LTC4). More recently, Schroeijers et al. confirmed the upregulation of Pgp on developing DCs.6 In this study, DCs from different origins, such as peripheral blood monocytes, CD34+ peripheral blood cells and cells from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, were investigated. Interestingly, another possible mediator of drug resistance, the intracellular vault complex, was also found to be strongly upregulated during human DC differentiation. Moreover, addition of major vault protein (MVP)-specific antibodies in the culture medium resulted in decreased viability of the maturated DCs. In addition, these DCs showed decreased expression levels of differentiation and maturation markers, as well as costimulatory molecules.6 Their capacities to induce T-cell proliferation and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) release appeared to be impaired, suggesting that besides Pgp and MRP1, MVP and vaults may also play a role in the survival and functioning of DCs.

Vaults are large ribonucleoprotein particles that are found in the cytoplasm of most eukaryotic cells, as reviewed by Scheffer et al.7 The complex consists of three different proteins of Mr 100 000, 193 000 and 240 000, known as MVP, VPARP and TEP1, respectively, and multiple copies of small, untranslated RNAs of 88–141 bases. The typical shape of the vault complex – a barrel with an invaginated waist and two protruding caps – as well as its constituents, appear to be conserved between species.810

As the MVP, which makes up 70% of the total mass of the complex, was identified as the lung resistance-related protein (LRP),11 many studies on the function of this intriguing particle have focused on a role of vaults in drug resistance. Indeed, in several independent studies, an upregulation of MVP/LRP was observed in drug-resistant cell lines and tumours,1215 and evidence was obtained supporting the view that vaults act by transporting drugs away from their cellular targets.16,17 However, to date a direct involvement of vaults in MDR could not be demonstrated in the MVP/LRP knockout mouse model that we recently generated, despite extensive studies on the sensitivity of the MVP/LRP-deficient animals and cells to various cytostatic drugs.18

Using our MVP/LRP knockout mouse model, we set out to study the role of MVP/LRP and vaults on the development and functioning of DCs in mice. It was hypothesized that putative DC malfunctioning might lead to an impairment of both the T-cell immune responses as well as the T-cell-dependent humoral immune responses. Hence, besides in vitro studies on the development of DCs, we tested the in vivo immune responsiveness of mice deficient for MVP/LRP. As, in humans, a high expression of MVP/LRP is observed in macrophages (Mφ)12 we also examined the migration and function of Mφ derived from the MVP/LRP-deficient mice.

Materials and methods

Animals

MVP/LRP knockout mice were generated, as described previously,18 and housed under conventional conditions at the animal facility of the Erasmus Medical Center. All animals used in this study were of a mixed background of 129/Ola and C57BL/6 strains, backcrossed for one to four generations to C57BL/6. Wild-type littermates were used as controls in all experiments.

Bone marrow-derived DC cultures

Bone marrow-derived DCs were produced essentially as described previously.19 In short, femurs and tibias were isolated from MVP/LRP+/+ and MVP/LRP−/− littermates. The bones were cleaned and crushed using a sterile mortar in DC medium [RPMI-1640 containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin and 0·1 mmβ-mercaptoethanol] in order to extract the cells. Subsequently, the cells were filtered through a 100-µm cell strainer (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and pelleted by centrifugation at 500 g for 10 min. Mononuclear cells were separated from the bone marrow cell suspension by density-gradient centrifugation over lymphoprep 1·077 (Nycomed Pharma AS, Oslo, Norway) for 20 min at 833 g. The deceleration time of the centrifuge was set to 5 min. Cells were seeded at a density of 1·25 × 106 cells in 5 ml of DC medium, complemented with 100 U/ml of granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (PeproTech/Tebu, Le Perray en Yvelines, France) in 25-cm2 bottles and cultured at 37° in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Three days after isolation of the mononuclear cells, an additional 5 ml of DC medium containing GM-CSF was added to the DC culture. Half of the DC medium was refreshed on days 6 and 8, and on this last day, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Escherichia coli (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) was added to the medium at a final concentration of 1 µg/ml. Samples of 1 × 106 cells for Western blot analysis were taken on days 0, 3, 6, 8 and after stimulation overnight with LPS (day 9).

Phenotypic and functional analysis of DC

DC phenotype was determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis using the following monoclonal antibodies (mAbs): anti-CD11c-conjugated fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), anti-MHC class II-conjugated phycoerythrin (PE), biotinylated anti-MHC class II (all purchased from PharMingen, Heidelberg, Germany); anti-CD40–PE, anti-CD80–PE, anti-CD86–PE, anti-CD11b–PE (all obtained from Beckman Coulter, Mijdrecht, the Netherlands); and the early myeloid marker-specific ER-MP58–FITC.20 Cells incubated with biotinylated mAb were washed and stained with streptavidine-Cy-Chrome (PharMingen). To exclude dead cells from the analysis, 40 µg/ml 7-amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD) (Molecular Probes, Leiden, the Netherlands) was added prior to analysis on a FACScan using cellquest software (Becton-Dickinson, Alphen a/d Rijn, the Netherlands).

To test the antigen-uptake capacity of the DCs, 2 × 105 cells were incubated with 10 µl of a 10-mg/ml dextran–FITC solution (Sigma-Aldrich) in a total volume of 100 µl of DC medium. The cells were incubated at 37° for 1 hr. The uptake was stopped by the addition of ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and, after washing, the cells were incubated with anti-MHC class II–PE, as a DC marker, for an additional 30 min on ice. The background uptake of dextran–FITC was determined by incubating the cells at 4° instead of 37°.

Western blot analysis

Cell lysates were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) and the size-fractionated proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose. The membranes were blocked in TBST [50 mm Tris–HCl (pH 7·5), 100 mm NaCl, 0·05% (vol/vol) Tween-20] containing 5% (wt/vol) non-fat dried milk (Bio-Rad, Laboratories, Hercules, CA). MVP/LRP was detected using a rabbit polyclonal antiserum raised against human MVP21 and an anti-rabbit immunoglobulin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Westgrove, PA) as second antibody. Immune complexes were detected using BM chemiluminescence (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) and visualized on Hyperfilm ECL (Amersham-Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). Quantifications were performed using ImageQuaNT, version 3·3 (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).

Allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction

To determine the capacity of the DCs to stimulate T-cell proliferation, splenocytes from BALB/c mice were stimulated with DCs derived from wild-type and MVP/LRP knockout mice with a C57BL/6-129 OLA background.18 Spleen cells were isolated by squeezing the spleens through a wet 100-µm cell strainer (Becton-Dickinson) followed by centrifugation of the cells for 5 min at 558 g. Splenocytes (104 per well) were mixed with DCs in ratios ranging from 20 : 1 to 1280 : 1 (spleen cells/DCs), and seeded in round-bottom 96-well plates in 200 µl of DC medium. After 3–5 days of incubation at 37°, 0·1 µCi/well [3H]thymidine (Amersham, Bucks., UK) was added and the cells were incubated overnight. Cells were transferred to a glass-fibre filter using a filtermate 196 cell harvester (Packard Instruments BV, Groningen, the Netherlands) and the radioactivity retained on the filters was determined by using a topcount microplate scintillation counter (Packard Bioscience). All incubations were performed in quadruplicate.

Mφ migration tests and uptake of dextran–FITC

To isolate Mφs, two wild-type and two MVP/LRP knockout animals were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 1·5 ml of paraffin oil. After 48 hr, the animals were killed and abdominal cavities flushed with 6 ml of Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium (IMDM) (Bio Whittaker, Verviers, Belgium), containing 10% FCS and 50 IU/ml heparin, to harvest the cells. The numbers of cells, reflecting in vivo migration, were counted and the cells were resuspended in 200 µl of IMDM containing 10% heat-inactivated mouse serum. For the in vitro migration test, 0·5 µl of this cell suspension was transferred to a well of a microtitre plate and the cells were allowed to adhere for 30 min. Then, 3 × 25 µl of medium was added slowly to the wells, taking care that the cells remained attached to the plastic. Using an ocular raster, squares containing Mφ were identified and recorded. The migration capacity of the cells was subsequently determined by counting the numbers of cells that had migrated out of these original squares after 24 hr.

To test the capacity of the Mφ to internalize dextran–FITC, 50 µl of the Mφ cell suspension was added to 500 µl of PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 1 mg/ml dextran–FITC. After incubation at 37° (or on ice as a negative control) for 1 hr, the cells were washed with and resuspended in 500 µl of ice-cold PBS containing 1% BSA. The amounts of intracellular dextran–FITC taken up by the cells was determined by analysis on a FACScan.

Sensitization and skin testing to different antigens

For sensitization with keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH) (Perimmune, Seattle, WA), five wild-type and five MVP/LRP-deficient mice were injected with 100 µg of KLH subcutaneously in the right-hind footpads. After 10 days, the animals were challenged with 5 and 10 µg of KLH subcutaneously in the ears. The thickness of the ears was measured before, and 4, 24, 48 and 72 h later. Following essentially the same protocol, 3 days later, all mice were again sensitized, by subcutaneous injection of 50 µg of ovalbumin (OVA) (Sigma-Aldrich) in the left-hind footpads, and skin tested 7 days later by injecting 10 µg of OVA into the right ear. A third sensitization and testing round was carried out with the widely used contact-allergen dinitro-chlorobenzene (DNCB). The animals were sensitized by application of 20 µl of a 1% DNCB solution in EtOH epi-cutaneous (e.c.) on the abdomen. After 4 days, they were challenged with 2 × 10 µl of 0·3% DNCB in EtOH e.c. on the left ear. Swelling of the ears was again measured at 4–72 hr after the challenge.

Oral tolerance test

Six wild-type mice and six MVP/LRP knockout mice were fed three times with 10 mg of OVA on days 1, 3 and 8. Control mice received the same volume (200 µl) of saline. Immunization was performed on day 13, with 50 µg of OVA, which was injected subcutaneously into the footpad. After 7 days, the animals were challenged intra-cutaneous (i.c.) in the ear with 10 µg of OVA. Ear swelling was measured at 4, 24, 48 and 72 hr after the challenge.

Antibody shift

Sera of other groups of six wild-type and six MVP/LRP knockout mice that were immunized (day 0) and challenged (day 10) with KLH, as outlined above, were tested for the production of anti-KLH by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Flat-bottom microtitre plates were coated overnight with 1 µg/well of KLH. Each of the mouse sera was diluted in a three-step dilution series from 1 : 10 to 1 : 21 870 and the anti-KLH in the serum were detected with goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgG1 or IgG2a. As a second antibody, rabbit anti-goat-HRP was used. Between the successive steps, the plates were washed 2 × 15 second in tap water containing 0·05% Tween-20. Bound antibody was detected by a colour reaction using o-phenylenediamine (OPD). After 30 min the reaction was stopped by the addition of 50 µl of 2·5 m H2SO4 and the absorbance (A) at 492 nm was determined.

Results

Phenotypic analysis of MVP/LRP-deficient DCs

Mononuclear cells isolated from total bone marrows from wild-type and MVP/LRP knockout mice were cultured for 9 days, in the presence of GM-CSF, to induce DC differentiation. On day 8, LPS was added to the culture medium as a maturating agent. Routinely, the bone marrow cultures from wild-type and MVP/LRP knockout mice yielded equal amounts of DCs. In order to investigate whether MVP/LRP deficiency might interfere with DC development, mature DCs derived from wild-type and MVP/LRP knockout bone marrow were harvested after overnight stimulation with LPS. By FACScan analysis, the expression of several DC surface markers and costimulatory molecules on the MVP/LRP-deficient cells was determined and compared with the levels on wild-type cells. Overlays of knockout and wild-type FACS histograms are shown in Fig. 1. The cell-surface levels of the DC marker CD11c, the early myeloid marker ER-MP 58,20 the myeloid marker CD11b, MHC class II molecules and the costimulatory molecules CD40 and CD80, were similar in the MVP/LRP knockout and wild-type DCs. One of the costimulatory markers, CD86, was expressed at a slightly lower level on the MVP/LRP knockout DCs. However, the cells were still clearly positive for this marker and the other costimulatory molecules were expressed normally.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Phenotypic analysis of dendritic cells (DCs) derived from wild-type and major vault protein/lung resistance-related protein (MVP/LRP) knockout mouse bone marrow. Expression levels of seven different cell-surface markers on wild-type and MVP/LRP-deficient cells were determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis. Grey plots represent marker expression in DCs derived from wild-type bone marrow, black overlays represent expression in MVP/LRP-deficient DCs. The fluorescence is shown on the x-axis, cell counts are shown on the y-axis. The fluorescence levels were clearly distinguishable from the routinely included negative controls (not shown).

Expression of MVP/LRP during murine DC development

Samples, corresponding to 106 cells, of wild-type total bone marrow, immature DCs and mature DCs, were analysed by Western blotting in order to determine the expression levels of MVP/LRP. As shown in Fig. 2, the expression of MVP/LRP in total bone marrow is relatively low. During differentiation (days 3–8) in cultures with GM-CSF, MVP/LRP became more highly expressed (fourfold compared with unstimulated mononuclear bone marrow cells). Subsequently, like in human DCs,6 LPS stimulation (day 9), seemed to enhance the expression of MVP/LRP even further (6·5-fold compared with the unstimulated mononuclear bone marrow cells). Of note, on day 3 of the differentiation culture, when the numbers of differentiated DCs are still low,19 MVP/LRP was already highly expressed on the cells, suggesting that MVP/LRP expression might be related to processes in early myeloid development.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Major vault protein/lung resistance-related protein (MVP/LRP) expression in dendritic cells (DCs). Total bone marrow was isolated from wild-type mice. The mononuclear cells were isolated and cultured in the presence of granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Samples were taken on days 3, 6, 8 and 9. Protein lysates corresponding to equal numbers of cells (106 cells) were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) and analysed for MVP/LRP expression by Western blotting. Note that on day 8, the DCs were stimulated overnight with lipopolysaccharide (LPS).

DC antigen handling and presentation

DC function was tested by measuring the in vitro dextran-uptake capacity. The internalized dextran–FITC was similar in MVP/LRP+/+ and MVP/LRP−/− DCs (Fig. 3a). Cells incubated with dextran–FITC at 4° (negative controls) showed only low levels of dextran–FITC uptake (Fig. 3a).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Functional analysis of dendritic cells (DCs) derived from wild-type and major vault protein/lung resistance-related protein (MVP/LRP) knockout mouse bone marrow. DCs were incubated with dextran–fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) either at 4° (control) or at 37°. After 1 hr the cells were washed, incubated with anti-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II-conjugated phycoerythrin (PE) as a DC marker, and the amount of DC-associated dextran–FITC was determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis. (a) The left-hand panel depicts background binding of dextran–FITC at 4° to wild-type DCs. Identical results were obtained with MVP/LRP knockout DCs. The right-hand panel depicts the uptake of dextran–FITC at 37° by wild-type (grey plot) and MVP/LRP-deficient (black) DCs. (b) Mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR). Lymphocytes were mixed with wild-type (closed circles) and MVP/LRP-deficient (open squares) DCs. On the x-axis, the ratios of lymphocytes : DCs are indicated on a logarithmic scale. The proliferation of lymphocytes is measured by the incorporation of [3H]thymidine and expressed as counts per minute (c.p.m.) on the y-axis. Depicted are the results from a representative experiment; each data point represents a mean value with one-sided standard deviation (n = 4).

Subsequently, the ability of DCs to induce T-cell proliferation was tested by means of mixed lymphocyte reaction assays. For this, the DCs from wild-type and MVP/LRP knockout bone marrow were mixed with lymphocytes isolated from allogeneic spleens. The induced proliferation of the lymphocytes was measured after 4 days. As evident from Fig. 3(b), the MVP/LRP knockout DCs are perfectly capable of inducing T-cell proliferation. No differences were observed between the proliferation of lymphocytes incubated with wild-type and MVP/LRP knockout DCs.

Mφ migration and function

To explore Mφ migration and the capacity to internalize dextran–FITC from MVP/LRP-deficient mice, two wild-type and two knockout mice were injected with paraffin oil. After 2 days, Mφ were isolated from the peritoneal cavity. As the numbers of Mφ obtained from unstimulated peritoneal cavities never exceed more than 2–3 × 106 cells, we referred to the cells collected after injection of paraffin oil (≈20–30 × 106 cells) as cells migrating from the blood into the peritoneal cavity. Approximately 90% of the collected cells reflect inflammatory cells, of which 80–90% were Mφ, as judged by differential counting of haematoxylin and eosin (H & E)-stained cytospins of these cells. The numbers of cells that had migrated reflect the in vivo migration capacity of the Mφ. As is shown in Table 1, the numbers of Mφ were comparable in wild-type and MVP/LRP knockout mice. Next, in vitro migration assays were performed. Percentages of migrated Mφ were counted 24 hr after seeding and were similar in wild-type and MVP/LRP-deficient cells (Table 1). The capacity to take up dextran–FITC by macropinocytosis or receptor-mediated endocytosis was tested by incubating the isolated Mφ with a dextran–FITC solution and quantification of the internalized material by FACS analysis. Percentages of cells containing dextran are shown in Table 1. The MVP/LRP-deficient Mφ migrate normally and are as capable of taking up FITC-labelled dextran as the wild-type Mφ.

Table 1.

Migration and capacity of macrophages (Mφ) from wild-type and major vault protein/lung resistance-related protein (MVP/LRP) knockout mice to internalize dextran–fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)

Cell number Viability Migration Internalization of dextran–FITC
Wild-type(n = 2) 1·3–2·5 × 107 78–87% 55–64% 17·6–33·5%
Knockout(n = 2) 0·8–2·8 × 107 82–83% 64–70% 15·1–41·4%

Shown are numbers of Mφ isolated from the peritoneal cavity (first column) and the viability of these cells (column 2). Percentage of Mφ that migrated during the in vitro migration experiment are shown in column 3. The last column shows the percentages of Mφ that have taken up dextran–FITC, after an incubation of 1 hr at 37°, as measured by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACScan) analysis.

In vivo immune responses

Although the MVP/LRP-deficient DCs have essentially similar phenotypic characteristics as the wild-type DCs and appear functional in in vitro tests, their in vivo migration from immunization sites to the draining lymph nodes and their subsequent in vivo antigen-presenting capacities might still be affected. In turn, this might lead to impaired T-cell responsiveness. To test this possibility, five wild-type and five knockout animals were immunized with three different antigenic materials well established for their capacity to provoke T-cell-mediated immune responses. After challenging, immune responses were evaluated by measuring the delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions in the challenged ears. While these reactions for the protein antigens KLH and OVA are recognized as reflecting Th1 responses, the contact allergen DNCB may induce both Th1 and Th2 responses. The results of these experiments, as presented in Fig. 4(a), show that the responses to all antigens examined were similar in wild-type and MVP/LRP knockout mice. As expected, the PBS-injected control animals showed low responses. These data suggest that the disruption of MVP/LRP has no significant effects on the development of T-cell-mediated effector functions, as revealed by skin hypersensitivity reactions.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Immune responsiveness of wild-type and major vault protein/lung resistance-related protein (MVP/LRP)-deficient mice immunized with several allergens. (a) In all experiments, five wild-type and five knockout mice were immunized subcutaneously and challenged after 10 [keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH)], 7 [ovalbumin (OVA)] or 4 [dinitro-chlorobenzene (DNCB)] days, in the skin of the ear or limb. Control, wild-type animals were injected with equal volumes of saline. The swelling at the site of the challenge (thickness of the ear/limb minus original thickness) is a measure for the immune responsiveness and is shown on the y-axis. Black bars show the response of wild-type animals, grey bars show the response of MVP/LRP-deficient animals and white bars show saline-injected control animals. Error bars indicate 2 standard deviations (SD) (n = 5). (b) Oral tolerance test to OVA. Six wild-type and six MVP/LRP knockout mice, were administered 3 × 10 mg of OVA intragastrally. Positive controls were administered physiological salt solution. The animals were immunized in one of the limbs, and challenged in the ear. The swelling of the ear is a measure for the immune responsiveness. Black bars show the response of wild-type animals, grey bars show the response of MVP/LRP-deficient animals and white bars show the response of the (wild-type) positive control animals. Error bars indicate 2 SD (n = 5).

Induction of oral tolerance

The expression of MVP/LRP was found to be high in tissues of the gastrointestinal tract.12 This might point to a role of MVP/LRP and vaults in a protective response to food allergens. To examine this option, we fed both wild-type and MVP/LRP knockout mice three times with 10 mg of OVA. Such repeated feeding is known to induce an incapacity of the animals to subsequently develop T-cell-mediated immune responses, reflecting immunological tolerance. When immunization with OVA was attempted, only the positive-control saline-fed animals showed proper immune responses to OVA. MVP/LRP-deficient animals displayed an equally decreased responsiveness to OVA as the wild-type animals (Fig. 4b), proving that induction of oral tolerance in the MVP/LRP knockout mice is unimpaired. Apparently, these mice do not exhibit major defects in food handling.

T-cell-mediated humoral responses

Besides the initiation of primary immune responses, DCs also play a role in the modulation of immune responses by regulation of the Th1/Th2 balance (reviewed by Shortman et al.3), as reflected by the preferential production of distinct antibody isotypes. Possibly, the disruption of MVP/LRP might change the preference for either a Th1 or a Th2 response and, as a consequence, the production of antibody isotypes associated with these responses, e.g. IgG1 versus IgG2a. We therefore investigated the subclasses of the antibodies produced upon immunization with KLH. Sera of KLH-immunized animals were tested by ELISA. The results are shown in Fig. 5. The titres of total IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a are similar in wild-type and knockout animals, suggesting that besides proper T-cell-mediated immunity, also the T-cell-dependent humoral antibody production to KLH is unaffected.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

T-cell-dependent humoral immune responsiveness. Anti-keyhole limpet haemocyanin (anti-KLH) in the serum of KLH-immunized mice. A range of serum dilutions was analysed for total immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgG1 and IgG2a by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), as described in the Materials and methods. The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of six wild-type mice (closed circles), six MVP/LRP-deficient mice (open squares) or three control, saline-injected mice (closed triangles).

Discussion

Recently, Schroeijers et al. reported that MVP/LRP, the major component of the vault complex, is upregulated during the development of human DCs.6 Moreover, the presence of MVP/LRP-specific antibodies, presumably interfering with the function of MVP/LRP or vaults, resulted in reduced expression levels of DC markers and costimulatory molecules, and a decreased capacity to induce T-cell proliferative and IFN-γ-releasing responses. Previously, we reported the generation of an MVP/LRP knockout mouse model,18 in which vault particles are absent. Using this model, we investigated the role of MVP and/or vaults in the maturation and function of DCs. Although MVP/LRP is highly expressed in mature wild-type DC cultures, the loss of this protein did not alter the in vitro development and function of DCs derived from mononuclear bone marrow cells. In addition, in vivo immunization assays showed that neither the T-cell-mediated immune response nor the T-cell-dependent humoral response are affected by the disruption of MVP/LRP, indicating intact antigen presenting and migration capacities of the DCs.

Apparently, the clues for an involvement of MVP/LRP and vaults in DC development and function, as reported previously for human DCs,6 were not further substantiated using the MVP/LRP knockout mouse model. This could point to a fundamental difference between DCs from human and mouse. However, it should be considered that the decreased viability, lower expression of DC markers and reduced antigen-stimulatory capacity reported were observed with DCs cultured in the presence of polyclonal, or pooled monoclonal, anti-MVP/LRP. The lack of effects with individual mAbs was noted to argue against interference with functionally relevant epitopes. Rather, the blockade of DC functions could result from events secondary to the binding of anti-MVP/LRP, e.g. from the aggregation of vault particles.6 The present results, showing that the mere absence of vault particles does not significantly affect phenotypic and functional DC markers, support the latter option. Nevertheless, a role of vaults in DC antigen-presenting functions cannot be fully excluded because the loss of MVP/LRP and vaults might still result in subtle effects beyond the scope of the presently used experimental conditions and assays. Possibly, gene products playing roles in critical cellular functions show redundancy, with other factors compensating for their eventual loss. The latter option is, however, difficult to reconcile with the unique structure of the vault complex and the lack of MVP homologues in the murine genome.10

In aggregate, the functional impact of highly expressed MVP/LRP in mammalian DCs remains unclear. As the high expression levels in DCs have, thus far, primarily been studied in in vitro cultured cells, further analyses of conditional upregulation of MVP/LRP levels in DCs in vivo in human and mouse lymphoid tissues are warranted. In early immuno-histopathological analyses of human lymphoid tissues we noted high levels of MVP/LRP in Mφ-like cells, but not in DCs.12 Given the present results, showing that a lack of vault particles also does not interfere with primary Mφ functions (notably migration), we currently focus on their potential role in controlling cell-division processes. Such a role(s) might fit with recent data on the association of MVP/LRP with the tumour-suppressor factor PTEN,22 as well as with their frequent overexpression in cytostatic drug-resistant tumour cells. The present data reveal that vaults are not required for primary DC functions. Their abundance in DCs may, however, still reflect basic role(s) in myeloid cell proliferation and DC development.

Abbreviations

DC

dendritic cell

DNCB

dinitro-chlorobenzene

FITC

fluorescein isothiocyanate

KLH

keyhole limpet haemocyanin

LRP

lung resistance-related protein

macrophage

MLR

mixed lymphocyte reaction

MRP1

multidrug resistance-associated protein

MVP

major vault protein

OVA

ovalbumin

PE

phycoerythrin

Pgp

P-glycoprotein

Th

T helper

References

  • 1.Cella M, Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A. Origin, maturation and antigen presenting function of dendritic cells. Curr Opin Immunol. 1997;9:10–6. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(97)80153-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Banchereau J, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature. 1998;392:245–52. doi: 10.1038/32588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shortman K, Liu YJ. Mouse and human dendritic cell subtypes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:151–61. doi: 10.1038/nri746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Robbiani DF, Finch RA, Jager D, Muller WA, Sartorelli AC, Randolph GJ. The leukotriene C(4) transporter MRP1 regulates CCL19 (MIP-3beta, ELC)-dependent mobilization of dendritic cells to lymph nodes. Cell. 2000;103:757–68. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00179-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Randolph GJ, Beaulieu S, Pope M, Sugawara I, Hoffman L, Steinman RM, Muller WA. A physiologic function for p-glycoprotein (MDR-1) during the migration of dendritic cells from skin via afferent lymphatic vessels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:6924–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schroeijers AB, Reurs AW, Scheffer GL, et al. Up-regulation of drug resistance-related vaults during dendritic cell development. J Immunol. 2002;168:1572–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.4.1572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Scheffer GL, Schroeijers AB, Izquierdo MA, Wiemer EA, Scheper RJ. Lung resistance-related protein/major vault protein and vaults in multidrug-resistant cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 2000;12:550–6. doi: 10.1097/00001622-200011000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kong LB, Siva AC, Kickhoefer VA, Rome LH, Stewart PL. RNA location and modeling of a WD40 repeat domain within the vault. RNA. 2000;6:890–900. doi: 10.1017/s1355838200000157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kong LB, Siva AC, Rome LH, Stewart PL. Structure of the vault, a ubiquitous cellular component. Structure Fold Des. 1999;7:371–9. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80050-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mossink MH, Van Zon A, Fränzel-Luiten E, Schoester M, Scheffer GL, Scheper RJ, Sonneveld P, Wiemer EAC. The genomic sequence of the murine major vault protein and its promoter. Gene. 2002;294:225–32. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(02)00789-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Scheffer GL, Wijngaard PL, Flens MJ, et al. The drug resistance-related protein LRP is the human major vault protein. Nat Med. 1995;1:578–82. doi: 10.1038/nm0695-578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Izquierdo MA, Scheffer GL, Flens MJ, Giaccone G, Broxterman HJ, Meijer CJ, van der Valk P, Scheper RJ. Broad distribution of the multidrug resistance-related vault lung resistance protein in normal human tissues and tumors. Am J Pathol. 1996;148:877–87. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Scheper RJ, Broxterman HJ, Scheffer GL, et al. Overexpression of a M(r) 110,000 vesicular protein in non-P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance. Cancer Res. 1993;53:1475–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Siva AC, Raval-Fernandes S, Stephen AG, LaFemina MJ, Scheper RJ, Kickhoefer VA, Rome LH. Up-regulation of vaults may be necessary but not sufficient for multidrug resistance. Int J Cancer. 2001;92:195–202. doi: 10.1002/1097-0215(200102)9999:9999<::aid-ijc1168>3.0.co;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kickhoefer VA, Rajavel KS, Scheffer GL, Dalton WS, Scheper RJ, Rome LH. Vaults are up-regulated in multidrug-resistant cancer cell lines. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:8971–4. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.15.8971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kitazono M, Okumura H, Ikeda R, et al. Reversal of LRP-associated drug resistance in colon carcinoma SW-620 cells. Int J Cancer. 2001;91:126–31. doi: 10.1002/1097-0215(20010101)91:1<126::aid-ijc1018>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kitazono M, Sumizawa T, Takebayashi Y, et al. Multidrug resistance and the lung resistance-related protein in human colon carcinoma SW-620 cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1647–53. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.19.1647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mossink MH, Van Zon A, Fränzel-Luiten E, Schoester M, Scheffer GL, Scheper RJ, Sonneveld P, Wiemer EAC. Disruption of the murine major vault protein (MVP/LRP) gene does not induce hypersensitivity to cytostatics. Cancer Res. 2002;62:7298–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lutz MB, Kukutsch N, Ogilvie AL, Rossner S, Koch F, Romani N, Schuler G. An advanced culture method for generating large quantities of highly pure dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow. J Immunol Methods. 1999;223:77–92. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(98)00204-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Leenen PJ, de Bruijn MF, Voerman JS, Campbell PA, van Ewijk W. Markers of mouse macrophage development detected by monoclonal antibodies. J Immunol Methods. 1994;174:5–19. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(94)90005-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schroeijers AB, Siva AC, Scheffer GL, et al. The Mr 193,000 vault protein is up-regulated in multidrug-resistant cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 2000;60:1104–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yu Z, Fotouhi-Aroakani N, Wu L, Maoui M, Wang S, Banville D, Shen S. PTEN associates with the vault particles in HeLa cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:40247–52. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M207608200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES