Skip to main content
Eukaryotic Cell logoLink to Eukaryotic Cell
. 2003 Aug;2(4):664–670. doi: 10.1128/EC.2.4.664-670.2003

Genome-Wide Expression Analyses of Gene Regulation during Early Development of Dictyostelium discoideum

Negin Iranfar 1, Danny Fuller 1, William F Loomis 1,*
PMCID: PMC178357  PMID: 12912885

Abstract

Using genome-wide microarrays, we recognized 172 genes that are highly expressed at one stage or another during multicellular development of Dictyostelium discoideum. When developed in shaken suspension, 125 of these genes were expressed if the cells were treated with cyclic AMP (cAMP) pulses at 6-min intervals between 2 and 6 h of development followed by high levels of exogenous cAMP. In the absence of cAMP treatment, only three genes, carA, gbaB, and pdsA, were consistently expressed. Surprisingly, 14 other genes were induced by cAMP treatment of mutant cells lacking the activatable adenylyl cyclase, ACA. However, these genes were not cAMP induced if both of the developmental adenylyl cyclases, ACA and ACR, were disrupted, showing that they depend on an internal source of cAMP. Constitutive activity of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase PKA was found to bypass the requirement of these genes for adenylyl cyclase and cAMP pulses, demonstrating the critical role of PKA in transducing the cAMP signal to early gene expression. In the absence of constitutive PKA activity, expression of later genes was strictly dependent on ACA in pulsed cells.


Multicellular organisms develop through a series of stages during which the patterns of gene expression are regulated to alter the properties of the cells and generate distinct cell types. These processes can be clearly recognized during development of the social amoeba Dictyostelium even though multicellularity is achieved by aggregation of vegetative cells to give the multicellular forms (5, 15, 19). During the first 10 h following the initiation of development, previously solitary amoebae acquire the ability to signal each other by secreting cyclic AMP (cAMP) and respond chemotactically to form mounds containing up to 105 cells. Definition of the genetic program that underlies these and subsequent developmental changes can benefit from genome-wide expression analyses with wild-type and mutant strains. Characterization of a large number of developmentally regulated cDNAs by the Japanese EST (expressed sequence tag) Project (28) has made it possible to recognize patterns of temporal and cell-type-specific expression of many developmentally regulated genes by use of microarrays (14, 25, 38). Microarrays not only expand the number of genes analyzed but also allow direct, quantitative comparisons between different genes.

A considerable number of genes are known to be expressed at high rates soon after the initiation of development (17, 20, 23, 26, 27, 29, 30). These include the genes for the cAMP receptor (carA), for the Gα subunit that couples the receptor to adenylyl cyclase (gpaB), for the activatable adenylyl cyclase (acaA), and for the secreted and internal cAMP phosphodiesterases (pdsA and regA) (3, 11, 29, 34). The products of these genes function together with preexisting proteins to generate an oscillatory network that relays extracellular cAMP signals and regulates the levels of cAMP both inside and outside the cells (12, 18, 21). As the cells aggregate in chemotactic fields, they stick to each other in an EDTA-resistant manner as the consequence of expressing the genes, csaA and lagC, that encode the surface proteins gp80 and gp150, respectively (13, 40).

It has been known for some time that cells will express many developmental genes while suspended in buffer if they are given pulses of 30 nM cAMP at 6-min periods for several hours followed by high concentrations of cAMP to mimic conditions encountered on solid supports (17, 23, 26, 27, 30). Under these conditions, the cells are spatially homogeneous and can be expected to express developmental genes more synchronously than when developing on solid supports where there are local differences in cell density. Moreover, the effects of cAMP pulses on gene expression can be directly addressed. We compared the expression profiles in cells developing on solid supports with those in cells incubated in suspension with or without the addition of cAMP pulses. We found that most of the genes that are strongly expressed during the aggregation and mound stages of development are normally expressed in cells incubated in buffer and given cAMP pulses.

Three genes, car1, gbaB, and pdsA, have been shown to be expressed in suspension-developed cells even in the absence of cAMP signaling (10, 17, 23, 26, 27). Their products allow cells to respond to cAMP and regulate its exogenous levels. Surprisingly, these were the only cAMP pulse-independent genes recognized out of 6,345 targets carried on the microarrays.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Growth, development, and preparation of RNA.

Strains AX4 (wild type), GP6 (acaA), TL149 (acaA acrA), and TL130 (acaA acrA pkaCoe) were grown axenically in HL5 medium and collected while in exponential growth (2, 29, 37). Strain GP6 was generated by homologous recombination in the acaA locus of AX3-derived strain JH10 and was the kind gift of Peter Devreotes. Strain TL149 was the kind gift of Fredrick Soderbom, who used homologous recombination to delete acrA from strain GP6. Strain AK631 (acaA pkaCoe) was provided by Adam Kuspa.

For development on solid supports, cells were collected, washed, and deposited on nitrocellulose filters on buffer-saturated pads and allowed to develop synchronously at 22°C (37). Cells were scraped off the filters at 2-h intervals into deionized water, pelleted, and dissolved in Trizol reagent (Gibco/BRL), and total RNA was prepared.

For development in suspension, exponentially growing cells were collected, washed, and resuspended in 100 ml of 20 mM Na+ K+ phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) at a concentration of 107 cells/ml and rapidly shaken at 125 rpm on a rotary shaker. To simulate normal signaling, cells were given pulses of 30 nM cAMP at 6-min periods from 2 to 6 h followed by addition of 300 μM cAMP at 2-h intervals (30). At each time point, 5 × 107 cells were collected, pelleted, and dissolved in Trizol reagent (Gibco/BRL) for preparation of RNA.

Preparation of microarrays.

Corning slides were microarrayed with 6,345 cDNA and genomic targets by using a Molecular Dynamics GenIII robot in the BioGEM facility as previously described (14). Inserts from 5,655 cDNA were generously provided by the Japanese EST Project (28). A list of the genes is available online (http://www.biology.ucsd.edu/loomis-cgi/microarray/paper2.html). All genes referred to in this study were sequence verified.

Expression analyses.

Probes were prepared from total RNA collected at 2-h intervals as well as from time-averaged reference RNA as previously described (14). Superscript II DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) was used to incorporate either Cy5- or Cy3-conjugated dCTP (Amersham, St. Louis, Mo.) into DNA. Following incubation at 42°C for 3 h, unincorporated dyes were removed using Microcon-30 columns (Millipore, Burlington, Mass.) with three washes with 450 μl of Tris-EDTA buffer before drying and resuspension in 5× SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate)-0.3% sodium dodecyl sulfate-25% formamide. Labeled probes were mixed and hybridized at 42°C to the microarrays for 6 to 12 h. Dyes for the sample and reference probes were interchanged in different experiments. Protocols are available online (http://www.biology.ucsd.edu/loomis-cgi/microarray/index.html).

Probed microarrays were analyzed in an Axon Genepix 4000B scanner, and the measurements were processed with the associated software. Total Cy3 signal was normalized to total Cy5 signal after background subtraction to allow independent slides to be compared. The ratios of Cy3 to Cy5 for individual genes were then calculated. Each sample was hybridized to two or more microarrays. Each developmental time course was repeated at least twice. Mean values were used for subsequent analyses and are available online (http://www.biology.ucsd.edu/loomis-cgi/microarray/paper2.html). Values were normalized to 1 at the start of each experiment.

Statistical analyses.

The median and standard deviation of the time course values for each target were analyzed by a curve-fitting algorithm to extract the times of onset and cessation of transcription (31). The goodness of fit was measured by the statistic s = Σ[E(t) − A(t)]2/Σ[E(t) − 1]2, where E is the ratio of the background-adjusted fluorescence of the time sample (Cy3) to that of the reference sample (Cy5) normalized so that the mean expression level of each gene throughout development is unity and A is the abundance of the gene transcript at time t. Since the denominator of the statistic is a measure of temporal variation found experimentally, s is a measure of how much of that variation can be accounted for by the kinetic equation. The statistical significance (P value) of the s statistic for each gene was calculated by permuting the expression pattern 1,000 times and calculating the fraction of permutations whose s statistic is less than that of the experimental pattern. Genes with good statistics that showed an increase of at least fivefold during development were K-means clustered into five groups that were consistently color coded. Averages of the clusters were normalized to the time of initiation of development (t = 0).

RESULTS

Expression profiles during multicellular morphogenesis and in suspension.

To characterize a large proportion of the genome, we arrayed 5,655 targets from cDNAs provided by the Japanese EST Project together with 690 targets previously chosen from specific genes (14, 28). Exponentially growing cells of wild-type strain AX4 were developed on filter supports, and samples were collected every 2 h. Fluorescently labeled copies were generated from RNA of each time sample and compared to labeled copies generated from time-averaged reference RNA prepared by pooling samples from different stages in development as previously described (14). Signals at 5,279 of the 6,345 targets either decreased or failed to increase significantly during development. These were mostly vegetative genes that are shut off during development. Values for each individual gene throughout development are available in supplemental materials found online (http://www.biology.ucsd.edu/loomis-cgi/microarray/paper2.html).

We have focused on genes that give at least a fivefold-higher signal at one stage or another during filter development of wild-type cells. Many of these genes are represented by several targets giving good reproducibility. A nonredundant set of 172 developmental genes clustered into five groups on the basis of their temporal profiles (Fig. 1A.). A cluster of 24 genes started to accumulate immediately after the initiation of development, another cluster of 42 genes started to be expressed at 4 h, another with 23 genes accumulated after 6 h, and two clusters started to accumulate at 8 h. Expression profiles for genes in the first four clusters were similar in cells incubated in buffer to which cAMP pulses were added for 6 h followed by high levels of cAMP (Fig. 1B). Many of the genes in the fifth cluster that were expressed after 8 h of development failed to be expressed in cells treated with cAMP in suspension, suggesting that they require intercellular signals in addition to cAMP.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Developmental expression of gene clusters. Wild-type cells of strain AX4 growing exponentially in axenic medium were developed on buffer-saturated filters (A); in suspension at a concentration of 107cells/ml in phosphate buffer, to which pulses of 30 nM cAMP were added at 6-min intervals from 2 to 6 h followed by addition of 300 μM cAMP at 2-h intervals (B); or in suspension without cAMP treatment (C). Genes that accumulated at least fivefold during development were K-means clustered, and the averages of each cluster are presented. The number of genes in each cluster ranged from 23 to 42, and the cluster profiles are indicated by consistent colors. Values for each target are available in the online supplemental materials (see the text).

In all, we found 125 targets that gave robust developmental signals in cells developed in suspension and treated with cAMP. In the absence of cAMP treatment, very few genes were expressed (Fig. 1C).

Expression profiles of early genes.

The expression profiles for 18 genes (Table 1) that started to accumulate within the first 2 h of development in suspension are shown in Fig. 2. Except for carA, which encodes the high-affinity cAMP receptor, most of these genes were expressed at reduced or insignificant levels unless the cells were treated with cAMP pulses (Fig. 2A and B). When developed in suspension, the cells were at sufficiently high density that accumulation of cAMP could result in autonomous signaling after a few hours (12). Therefore, we analyzed a mutant strain, GP6, lacking the cAMP activatable adenylyl cyclase, ACA.

TABLE 1.

Early developmental genes

Genea Product or function GenBank accession no.b
Pulse independent
    carA cAMP receptor 167683
    gpaB Gα2 167794
    pdsA cAMP phosphodiesterase 862416
Pulse dependent
    acaA Adenylyl cyclase 167658
    csaA Adhesion protein gp80 167803
    cbpA Calcium binding protein 577004
    cbpB Calcium binding protein 1322367
    cbpD Calcium binding protein 9864389
    cbpF Calcium binding protein 4336199
    cbpG Calcium binding protein 15375419
    SSL579 CbpB related 5181123
    dia-2 Growth to differentiation 3983657
    pgmA Phosphoglucomutase 1408295
    lagC gp150 adhesion protein 5161855
    lagC2 gp150 related 5834504
    lagC2-like Unknown 4883221
    SLD188 Unknown 4882207
    SSG481 Unknown 3218777
a

Expression of pulse-independent genes was initiated within the first 2 h of development and was not dependent on exogenous cAMP pulses. Expression of pulse-dependent genes was initiated 2 h later in cells developed in suspension but only if they were given pulses of 30 nM cAMP at 6-min intervals.

b

The GenInfo Identifier (GI) sequence identification numbers are given.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Expression profiles of early genes. Wild-type AX4 cells (A and B) and acaA null cells (C and D) were developed in suspension without addition of cAMP (A and C) or with treatment with pulses of 30 nM cAMP between 2 and 6 h followed by addition of 300 μM cAMP (B and D). Genes that increased threefold or more in acaA cells developed in suspension in the absence of cAMP pulses were considered pulse independent (Table 1). Those that increased only in cAMP-treated cells were considered pulse dependent (Table 1). Values for each target are available in the online supplemental materials. Bar graphs of the expression profiles here and in Fig. 4 represent the average change (n-fold), with colors as follows: blue (<2-fold), yellow (2- to 4-fold), tan (4- to 6-fold), brown (6- to 8-fold), reddish brown (8- to 10-fold), and red (>10-fold). Profiles that had only a single point above threefold are presented in blue.

In the absence of cAMP treatment, only four genes, carA, gpaB, pdsA, and cbpB, were expressed in cells lacking ACA (Fig. 2C). Three of these genes, carA, gpaB, and pdsA, have been previously shown to be expressed in cells developed in suspension in the absence of cAMP and at higher levels when the cells were treated with cAMP pulses (10, 17, 23, 26, 27). cbpB is unlikely to be a pulse-independent gene since it did not significantly accumulate in unpulsed wild-type cells (Fig. 2A).

Treatment of acaA null cells with pulses of cAMP resulted in expression of all of the early pulse-dependent genes, except for acaA, which is mutated in these cells (Fig. 2D). cAMP induction of these genes is somewhat surprising since the signal transduction pathway leading from exogenous cAMP to alteration in the transcriptional pattern is thought to be mediated by PKA following stimulation by a rise in internal cAMP (4, 21, 32, 39). Yet these acaA cells lack the major source of internal cAMP, the adenylyl cyclase ACA that is coupled to the cAMP receptor.

Genes that were expressed later in wild-type cells while suspended in buffer and treated with cAMP pulses failed to be expressed in pulsed acaA cells (Fig. 3). Expression of these late genes appears to depend on activation of ACA to generate high levels of cAMP within the cells.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Expression profiles of late genes. Cells of wild-type strain AX4 (A) and strain GP6 (acaA) (B) were developed in suspension with the addition of cAMP pulses. Developmental genes of the nonredundant set that were not expressed in pulsed acaA cells were monitored. Values for each target are available in the online supplemental materials.

Role of the minor adenylyl cyclase ACR.

The induction of early genes by cAMP in cells lacking ACA suggests that other signal transduction pathways may be stimulated upon ligand binding to CAR1. One such pathway involves a MAP kinase cascade that leads to the rapid activation of the MAP kinase ERK2 (24, 33). Mutant strains lacking ERK2 fail to accumulate cAMP and so are unable to aggregate. However, this phenotype can be suppressed by mutations in the gene encoding the internal cAMP phosphodiesterase, RegA (22; A. Kuspa, personal communication). These cells accumulate high levels of cAMP and are able to form aggregates by accretion. Thus, it appears that when ERK2 is activated by external cAMP binding to CAR1, RegA is inhibited and cAMP can accumulate to levels that activate PKA. However, there must be a source of cAMP other than ACA since at least 14 genes are activated by exogenous cAMP pulses in acaA null cells.

There is a minor adenylyl cyclase activity in vegetative cells that could be the source of cAMP (16, 35). To test the hypothesis that this adenylyl cyclase is necessary for pulse induction when ACA is missing, we characterized suspension-developed cells of a strain in which both adenylyl cyclase genes, acaA and acrA, are disrupted. As shown in Fig. 4, the early pulse-independent genes were expressed with or without cAMP pulses but none of the pulse-dependent genes were expressed at significant rates even when the double mutant cells were treated with cAMP. Thus, internal cAMP appears to be required for expression of these genes. Characterization of a strain in which only acrA is missing showed that either ACA or ACR is sufficient since all early genes were expressed in pulsed acrA null cells (see the supplementary materials available online).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Expression profiles in mutant cells lacking both adenylyl cyclases. Cells of strain TL149 (acaA acrA) (A and B) and of strain TL130 (acaA acrA pkaCoe) (C and D) were developed in suspension without addition of cAMP (A and C) or with treatment with pulses of 30 nM cAMP between 2 and 6 h followed by addition of 300 μM cAMP (B and D). Values for each target are available in the online supplemental materials. For an explanation of the colors used, see the legend to Fig. 2.

Constitutive PKA activity bypasses the requirement for internal cAMP.

If increases in the internal levels of cAMP regulate gene expression by stimulating PKA activity, then constitutive PKA activity should be sufficient for full expression independently of cAMP synthesis. The catalytic subunit of PKA is inhibited when associated with its regulatory subunit but is activated when cAMP binds to the regulatory subunit. However, when the catalytic subunit outnumbers the regulatory subunit, some of the PKA activity would be expected to be cAMP independent and constitutive (1). We disrupted acrA in strain AK631, in which acaA is disrupted and actin 15/pkaC is carried in a multicopy vector. The resulting strain, TL130, was shown to have high levels of PKA activity that was independent of cAMP (2). Early genes, both pulse independent and pulse dependent, were fully expressed in both unpulsed and pulsed cells of this acaA acrA pkaCoe strain that is unable to synthesize cAMP in response to exogenous cAMP pulses. As expected, acaA was not expressed since it is mutated in this strain. It appears that constitutive PKA activity is sufficient for expression of these genes.

DISCUSSION

Previous Northern analyses of carA and gbaB have indicated that these genes are expressed at basal levels in the absence of cAMP pulsing and at a higher rate when exposed to cAMP pulses (17, 23, 26, 27). Results from the microarray analyses confirmed these observations but showed that pulsing resulted only in a modest two- or threefold increase in accumulation of these mRNAs (Fig. 2 and 4). Even when one or both of the developmental adenylyl cyclases were disrupted, the pulse-independent genes were expressed within the first few hours of development.

When development is induced by shifting the cells to a nonnutrient environment, carA and gbaB mRNAs start to accumulate immediately such that their products, the cAMP receptor CAR1 and the trimeric G protein subunit Gα2 that couples it to activation of ACA, are rapidly synthesized. The cells then become responsive to cAMP and express these genes as well as pulse-dependent genes at high levels. The only other pulse-independent gene that was recognized on the microarrays, pdsA, encodes the extracellular cAMP phosphodiesterase. Previous studies have shown that transcription of pdsA is regulated by three independent cis-acting regions. The distal promoter is activated in the first few hours of development in a pulse-independent manner (10). Rapid synthesis of the phosphodiesterase allows the cells to keep the extracellular levels of cAMP within bounds as they start to produce cAMP pulses. Strains carrying null mutations in either carA or gpaB fail to generate cAMP pulses or show any signs of aggregation when developed on solid supports (29). Likewise, strains carrying null mutations in pdsA fail to show chemotactic movement (36).

A set of pulse-induced genes was coordinately expressed starting at 2 h of development such that their mRNAs reached high levels by 6 h of development. Most of them declined thereafter when the levels of exogenous cAMP were raised. These genes were induced by cAMP pulses even in cells lacking the cAMP-stimulated adenylyl cyclase, ACA (Fig. 2D). Later genes were not expressed in acaA null cells (Fig. 3), suggesting that they depend on the high internal levels that ACA can generate.

acaA is expressed rapidly in pulsed cells and leads to a high rate of cAMP synthesis during the aggregation stage. Another pulse-induced gene, csaA, has previously been shown to be cAMP regulated (9). It encodes the cell adhesion glycoprotein gp80. There are five pulse-induced genes that encode calcium binding proteins, cbpA, cbpB, cbpD, cbpF, and cbpG; cbpB becomes enriched in prespore cells while cbpD becomes enriched in prestalk cells (14). Although cbpB was expressed in unpulsed acaA cells, it was not expressed in unpulsed wild-type AX4 or acaA acrA double mutants and so is unlikely to be a pulse-independent gene. Loss of cbpA results in aberrant aggregation, further indicating a role for calcium regulation in early development (7). SSL579 encodes a protein related to CbpB and other calcium binding proteins and has four EF-hand domains.

dia-2 encodes a protein of unknown function which is essential for normal aggregation (6). pgmA encodes phosphoglucomutase, which plays a role in rapid breakdown of glycogen during early development (19). Three members of the lagC family are pulse-induced genes. The product of lagC, gp150, is a surface glycoprotein which makes cells mutually adhesive at the mound stage and is necessary for later gene expression (8, 40). lagC2 encodes a protein which is 55% identical to LagC and may play a similar role. Two novel genes from the EST collection, SLD188 and SSG481, were found to be expressed in pulsed wild-type and acaA null cells (Table 1).

The signal transduction pathway leading from CAR1 ligand binding to activation of these genes appears to require a source of internal cAMP to activate PKA. Only when both acaA and acrA were disrupted did cAMP pulses fail to induce these genes (Fig. 4). While the stimulation of ACA upon ligand binding to CAR1 is well defined, it has not previously been realized that ACR is able to generate sufficient cAMP for PKA activation in pulsed cells. A model accounting for the kinetic interactions of these components following a pulse of exogenous cAMP is given in Fig. 5. Ligand binding to CAR1 leads to GTP replacement of Gα2-bound GDP and dissociation of the trimeric G protein. In wild-type cells, the βγ subunits lead to activation of ACA while the Gα2 subunit leads to activation of the MAP kinase ERK2 (4). If ERK2 results in the inhibition of the internal phosphodiesterase, cAMP can build up and activate PKA. It has been proposed that PKA activity indirectly leads to inhibition of ERK2 and the reactivation of RegA (4, 18, 21). Even in the absence of ACA, this model can account for the activation of PKA in cells treated with exogenous pulses of cAMP.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Model of the signal transduction pathway affecting expression of pulse-dependent genes. (Modified from reference 21.) When cAMP binds to the surface receptor CAR1, both the adenylyl cyclase ACA and ERK2 are activated. cAMP accumulates as the consequence of inhibition of the phosphodiesterase RegA and stimulates PKA activity, which is necessary for induction of pulse-dependent genes. PKA subsequently inhibits ERK2, and RegA is reactivated, thereby terminating the response to the original cAMP pulse. In the absence of ACA activity (indicated by a cross), the minor adenylyl cyclase generates sufficient cAMP to activate PKA.

On a longer time scale, expression of pulse-independent genes within the first few hours following initiation of development can be seen to prepare the cells for expression of pulse-dependent genes. Entrainment of pulse production among cells ensures that they will be coordinated for subsequent differentiation (12, 18). At least one pulse-dependent gene, lagC, is necessary for progression through subsequent developmental stages (8; our unpublished data). Strains carrying lagC null mutations form only loose aggregates and fail to express postaggregation marker genes even when treated with cAMP. Other pulse-dependent genes may also play critical roles in the temporal sequence of gene expression. Genome-wide expression analyses can uncover previously unsuspected genes within coordinately controlled groups and focus attention on their physiological roles. The newly recognized developmentally regulated genes behaved in a consistent manner in the different strains under various experimental conditions and provide robust markers for the early stages of development. It will be interesting to define later groups on the basis of genome-wide expression profiles in strains lacking specific gene products and determine the networks that interconnect them.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the Japanese EST Project for supplying inserts of cDNA clones and the BioGEM facility of the University of California, San Diego for arraying them. We thank Nicolas Buchler for statistical analyses.

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (GM60447 and GM62350) and the National Science Foundation Biocomplexity Program.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Anjard, C., S. Pinaud, R. R. Kay, and C. D. Reymond. 1992. Overexpression of DdPK2 protein kinase causes rapid development and affects the intracellular cAMP pathway of Dictyostelium discoideum. Development 115:785-790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anjard, C., F. Soderbom, and W. F. Loomis. 2001. Requirements for the adenylyl cyclases in the development of Dictyostelium. Development 128:3649-3654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Aubry, L., and R. Firtel. 1999. Integration of signaling networks that regulate Dictyostelium differentiation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 15:469-517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aubry, L., M. Maeda, R. Insall, P. N. Devreotes, and R. A. Firtel. 1997. The Dictyostelium mitogen-activated protein kinase ERK2 is regulated by Ras and cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) and mediates PKA function. J. Biol. Chem. 272:3883-3886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bonner, J. T. 1967. The cellular slime molds, 2nd ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
  • 6.Chae, S. C., Y. Inazu, A. Amagai, and Y. Maeda. 1998. Underexpression of a novel gene, dia2, impairs the transition of Dictyostelium cells from growth to differentiation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 252:278-283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dharamsi, A., D. Tessarolo, B. Coukell, and J. Pun. 2000. CBP1 associates with the Dictyostelium cytoskeleton and is important for normal cell aggregation under certain developmental conditions. Exp. Cell Res. 258:298-309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dynes, J. L., A. M. Clark, G. Shaulsky, A. Kuspa, W. F. Loomis, and R. A. Firtel. 1994. LagC is required for cell-cell interactions that are essential for cell-type differentiation in Dictyostelium. Genes Dev. 8:948-958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Faix, J., G. Gerisch, and A. A. Noegel. 1992. Overexpression of the csA cell adhesion molecule under its own cAMP-regulated promoter impairs morphogenesis in Dictyostelium. J. Cell Sci. 102:203-214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Faure, M., J. Franke, A. L. Hall, G. J. Podgorski, and R. H. Kessin. 1990. The cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase gene of Dictyostelium discoideum contains three promoters specific for growth, aggregation, and late development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:1921-1930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Franke, J., M. Faure, L. Wu, A. L. Hall, G. J. Podgorski, and R. H. Kessin. 1991. Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase of Dictyostelium discoideum and its glycoprotein inhibitor: structure and expression of their genes. Dev. Genet. 12:104-112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gerisch, G., D. Malchow, W. Roos, and U. Wick. 1979. Oscillations of cyclic nucleotide concentrations in relation to the excitability of Dictyostelium cells. J. Exp. Biol. 81:33-47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Harloff, C., G. Gerisch, and A. A. Noegel. 1989. Selective elimination of the contact site A protein of Dictyostelium discoideum by gene disruption. Genes Dev. 3:2011-2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Iranfar, N., D. Fuller, R. Sasik, T. Hwa, M. Laub, and W. F. Loomis. 2001. Expression patterns of cell-type-specific genes in Dictyostelium. Mol. Biol. Cell 12:2590-2600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kessin, R. H. 2001. Dictyostelium: evolution, cell biology, and the development of multicellularity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • 16.Kim, H. J., W. T. Chang, M. Meima, J. D. Gross, and P. Schaap. 1998. A novel adenylyl cyclase detected in rapidly developing mutants of Dictyostelium. J. Biol. Chem. 273:30859-30862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kumagai, A., M. Pupillo, R. Gundersen, R. Miake-Lye, P. N. Devreotes, and R. A. Firtel. 1989. Regulation and function of G alpha protein subunits in Dictyostelium. Cell 57:265-275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Laub, M. T., and W. F. Loomis. 1998. A molecular network that produces spontaneous oscillations in excitable cells of Dictyostelium. Mol. Biol. Cell 9:3521-3532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Loomis, W. F. 1975. Dictyostelium discoideum: a developmental system. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
  • 20.Loomis, W. F. 1996. Genetic networks that regulate development in Dictyostelium cells. Microbiol. Rev. 60:135-150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Loomis, W. F. 1998. Role of PKA in the timing of developmental events in Dictyostelium cells. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:684-694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Loomis, W. F., G. Shaulsky, and A. Kuspa. 1998. Molecular networks that regulate development, p. 201-211. In D. Beysens and G. Forgacs (ed.), Dynamical systems in physics and biology. Springer-Verlag, Paris, France.
  • 23.Louis, J. M., C. L. Saxe III, and A. R. Kimmel. 1993. Two transmembrane signaling mechanisms control expression of the cAMP receptor gene CAR1 during Dictyostelium development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:5969-5973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Maeda, M., L. Aubry, R. Insall, C. Gaskins, P. N. Devreotes, and R. A. Firtel. 1996. Seven helix chemoattractant receptors transiently stimulate mitogen-activated protein kinase in Dictyostelium: role of heterotrimeric G proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 271:3351-3354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Maeda, M., H. Sakamoto, N. Iranfar, D. Fuller, T. Maruo, S. Ogihara, T. Morio, H. Urushihara, Y. Tanaka, and W. F. Loomis. 2003. Changing patterns of gene expression in prestalk cell subtypes of Dictyostelium recognized by in situ hybridization with genes from microarray analyses. Eukaryot. Cell 2:627-637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mann, S. K., and R. A. Firtel. 1989. Two-phase regulatory pathway controls cAMP receptor-mediated expression of early genes in Dictyostelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:1924-1928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mann, S. K., and R. A. Firtel. 1987. Cyclic AMP regulation of early gene expression in Dictyostelium discoideum: mediation via the cell surface cyclic AMP receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:458-469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Morio, T., H. Urushihara, T. Saito, Y. Ugawa, H. Mizuno, M. Yoshida, R. Yoshino, B. N. Mitra, M. Pi, T. Sato, K. Takemoto, H. Yasukawa, J. Williams, M. Maeda, I. Takeuchi, H. Ochiai, and Y. Tanaka. 1998. The Dictyostelium developmental cDNA project: generation and analysis of expressed sequence tags from the first-finger stage of development. DNA Res. 5:335-340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Parent, C. A., and P. N. Devreotes. 1996. Molecular genetics of signal transduction in Dictyostelium. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65:411-440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pitt, G. S., R. Brandt, K. C. Lin, P. N. Devreotes, and P. Schaap. 1993. Extracellular cAMP is sufficient to restore developmental gene expression and morphogenesis in Dictyostelium cells lacking the aggregation adenylyl cyclase (ACA). Genes Dev. 7:2172-2180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sasik, R., N. Iranfar, T. Hwa, and W. F. Loomis. 2002. Extracting transcriptional events from temporal gene expression patterns during Dictyostelium development. Bioinformatics 18:61-66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schulkes, C., and P. Schaap. 1995. cAMP-dependent protein kinase activity is essential for preaggregative gene expression in Dictyostelium. FEBS Lett. 368:381-384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Segall, J. E., A. Kuspa, G. Shaulsky, M. Ecke, M. Maeda, C. Gaskins, R. A. Firtel, and W. F. Loomis. 1995. A MAP kinase necessary for receptor-mediated activation of adenylyl cyclase in Dictyostelium. J. Cell Biol. 128:405-413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shaulsky, G., D. Fuller, and W. F. Loomis. 1998. A cAMP-phosphodiesterase controls PKA-dependent differentiation. Development 125:691-699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Soderbom, F., C. Anjard, N. Iranfar, D. Fuller, and W. F. Loomis. 1999. An adenylyl cyclase that functions during late development of Dictyostelium. Development 126:5463-5471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sucgang, R., C. J. Weijer, F. Siegert, J. Franke, and R. H. Kessin. 1997. Null mutations of the Dictyostelium cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase gene block chemotactic cell movement in developing aggregates. Dev. Biol. 192:181-192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sussman, M. 1987. Cultivation and synchronous morphogenesis of Dictyostelium under controlled experimental conditions. Methods Cell Biol. 28:9-29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Van Driessche, N., C. Shaw, M. Katoh, T. Morio, R. Sucgang, M. Ibarra, H. Kuwayama, T. Saito, H. Urushihara, M. Maeda, I. Takeuchi, H. Ochiai, W. Eaton, J. Tollett, J. Halter, A. Kuspa, Y. Tanaka, and G. Shaulsky. 2002. A transcriptional profile of multicellular development in Dictyostelium discoideum. Development 129:1543-1552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang, B., and A. Kuspa. 1997. Dictyostelium development in the absence of cAMP. Science 277:251-254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang, J., L. S. Hou, D. Awrey, W. F. Loomis, R. A. Firtel, and C. H. Siu. 2000. The membrane glycoprotein gp150 is encoded by the lagC gene and mediates cell-cell adhesion by heterophilic binding during Dictyostelium development. Dev. Biol. 227:734-745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Eukaryotic Cell are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES