Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology logoLink to Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology
. 2004 Jun;12(2):63–68. doi: 10.1080/10647440400009839

Experience with routine vaginal pH testing in a family practice setting.

Adriana J Pavletic 1, Stephen E Hawes 1, Jenenne A Geske 1, Kathy Bringe 1, Susan H Polack 1
PMCID: PMC1784594  PMID: 15739819

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite recommendations by Centers for Disease Control and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, pH testing is infrequently performed during the evaluation of vaginitis. Consequently, little information exists on its use in a primary care setting. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe our experience with routine pH testing, particularly the relationship between symptoms, pH and wet-mount microscopy. METHOD: A retrospective chart review was performed on 203 consecutive cases evaluated for vaginitis by wet-mount microscopy. RESULTS: Of the 203 cases, 21 had normal pH and no symptoms and 182 had symptoms, elevated pH or both; 85% of cases had abnormal wet-mount findings, including 75% with clue cells, 14% with Trichomonas vaginalis, 13% with yeast and 14% with mixed infections. Asymptomatic infection was present in 42% of cases with clue cells alone, 44% of cases with Trichomonas vaginalis alone, 38% of all trichomoniasis cases and 33% of cases with mixed infections. Elevated pH was associated with clue cells (p < 0.001), trichomoniasis (p = 0.01) and mixed infections (p = 0.003). Normal pH was associated with negative wet mount (p < 0.001) and to a lesser degree with uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Routine pH testing increased detection of trichomoniasis and bacterial vaginosis by prompting microscopy in a significant proportion of asymptomatic cases.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (74.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amsel R., Totten P. A., Spiegel C. A., Chen K. C., Eschenbach D., Holmes K. K. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med. 1983 Jan;74(1):14–22. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91112-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caillouette J. C., Sharp C. F., Jr, Zimmerman G. J., Roy S. Vaginal pH as a marker for bacterial pathogens and menopausal status. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jun;176(6):1270–1277. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70345-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Egan M. E., Lipsky M. S. Diagnosis of vaginitis. Am Fam Physician. 2000 Sep 1;62(5):1095–1104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eschenbach D. A., Hillier S., Critchlow C., Stevens C., DeRouen T., Holmes K. K. Diagnosis and clinical manifestations of bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Apr;158(4):819–828. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90078-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Faro S. Vaginitis: diagnosis and management. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1996 Mar-Apr;41(2):115–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hellberg D., Nilsson S., Mårdh P. A. The diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis and vaginal flora changes. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2001 Mar;265(1):11–15. doi: 10.1007/s004040000109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nugent R. P., Krohn M. A., Hillier S. L. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Feb;29(2):297–301. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.2.297-301.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Riordan T., Macaulay M. E., James J. M., Leventhall P. A., Morris E. M., Neal B. R., Rowland J., Evans B. M. A prospective study of genital infections in a family-planning clinic. 1. Microbiological findings and their association with vaginal symptoms. Epidemiol Infect. 1990 Feb;104(1):47–53. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800054510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schaaf V. M., Perez-Stable E. J., Borchardt K. The limited value of symptoms and signs in the diagnosis of vaginal infections. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Sep;150(9):1929–1933. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schmidt H., Hansen J. G. A wet smear criterion for bacterial vaginosis. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1994 Dec;12(4):233–238. doi: 10.3109/02813439409029246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schmidt H., Hansen J. G. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by wet mount identification of bacterial morphotypes in vaginal fluid. Int J STD AIDS. 2000 Mar;11(3):150–155. doi: 10.1258/0956462001915589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sobel J. D. Vaginitis in adult women. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1990 Dec;17(4):851–879. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sobel J. D. Vaginitis. N Engl J Med. 1997 Dec 25;337(26):1896–1903. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199712253372607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Thinkhamrop J., Lumbiganon P., Thongkrajai P., Chongsomchai C., Pakarasang M. Vaginal fluid pH as a screening test for vaginitis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999 Aug;66(2):143–148. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(99)00057-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Thomason J. L., Gelbart S. M., Anderson R. J., Walt A. K., Osypowski P. J., Broekhuizen F. F. Statistical evaluation of diagnostic criteria for bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jan;162(1):155–160. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90839-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Thompson D. A., Tsai Y. K., Gilman R. H., Vivar A., Calderon M. Sexually transmitted diseases in a family planning and an antenatal clinic in Peru: limitations of current practices and analysis of the use of potential markers, pH testing, and Whiff testing. Sex Transm Dis. 2000 Aug;27(7):386–392. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200008000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ugwumadu Austin, Manyonda Isaac, Reid Fiona, Hay Phillip. Effect of early oral clindamycin on late miscarriage and preterm delivery in asymptomatic women with abnormal vaginal flora and bacterial vaginosis: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003 Mar 22;361(9362):983–988. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12823-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wiesenfeld H. C., Macio I. The infrequent use of office-based diagnostic tests for vaginitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jul;181(1):39–41. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70433-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES