Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology logoLink to Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology
. 1998;6(1):30–37. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-0997(1998)6:1<30::AID-IDOG7>3.0.CO;2-B

Incidental appendectomy--yes or no? A retrospective case study and review of the literature.

T E Snyder 1, J R Selanders 1
PMCID: PMC1784768  PMID: 9678145

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective review of appendectomies performed at the University of Kansas Medical Center between January 1, 1989, and January 1, 1994, was conducted. In addition, the literature evaluating effectiveness of incidental appendectomy in preventing future operation and morbidity from appendicitis was reviewed. The results of the two reviews were analyzed to formulate guidelines for the appropriateness of performing incidental appendectomy in association with other operative procedures. METHOD: A retrospective review of results of appendectomies performed in 460 patients at the University of Kansas Medical Center with analysis of operative findings, pathology of the removed appendix and operative complications was performed. These results were compared with those of a systematic review of the literature utilizing a Medline search relating to the subject of incidental appendix removal. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-one incidental appendectomies were performed in this study of 460 patients (60%). The procedure was most commonly performed with total abdominal hysterectomy (56%), followed by oophorectomy (15%) and exploratory laparotomy (11%). Morbidity was minimal at all ages. Microscopic pathology was found in 25% of the cases. CONCLUSION: The data from the current survey and literature review support incidental removal of the appendix in the young patient (< 35 years old). In patients 35-50 years old the literature is controversial, and the patient's clinical condition and judgment of the operating surgeon should determine whether incidental appendectomy should be performed. However, routine incidental appendectomy cannot be justified in patients greater than age 50.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (675.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Addiss D. G., Shaffer N., Fowler B. S., Tauxe R. V. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Nov;132(5):910–925. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borgstein P. J., Gordijn R. V., Eijsbouts Q. A., Cuesta M. A. Acute appendicitis--a clear-cut case in men, a guessing game in young women. A prospective study on the role of laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1997 Sep;11(9):923–927. doi: 10.1007/s004649900488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fisher K. S., Ross D. S. Guidelines for therapeutic decision in incidental appendectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 Jul;171(1):95–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MCVAY J. R., Jr THE APPENDIX IN RELATION TO NEOPLASTIC DISEASE. Cancer. 1964 Jul;17:929–937. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196407)17:7<929::aid-cncr2820170713>3.0.co;2-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Melcher D. H. Appendicectomy with abdominal hysterectomy. Lancet. 1971 Apr 17;1(7703):810–811. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(71)91262-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Moertel C. G., Nobrega F. T., Elveback L. R., Wentz J. R. A prospective study of appendectomy and predisposition to cancer. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974 Apr;138(4):549–553. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Morris D. M., Coker D. D., Coleman J. J., Wiernik P. H., Elias E. G. Effect of incidental appendectomy on the development of wound infection in patients undergoing staging laparotomy for Hodgkin's disease. Am J Surg. 1987 Feb;153(2):226–229. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(87)90820-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nockerts S. R., Detmer D. E., Fryback D. G. Incidental appendectomy in the elderly? No. Surgery. 1980 Aug;88(2):301–306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. O'Malley V. P., Finch D. R., Powley P. H. Wound sepsis after cholecystectomy. Influence of incidental appendectomy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1986 Aug;8(4):435–437. doi: 10.1097/00004836-198608000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pollock A. V., Evans M. Wound sepsis after cholecystectomy: effect of incidental appendicectomy. Br Med J. 1977 Jan 1;1(6052):20–22. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6052.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shumake L. B. Right inguinal herniorrhaphy and incidental appendectomy. Am Surg. 1971 May;37(5):310–311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Silvert M. A., Meares E. M., Jr Rationale of incidental appendectomy. Urology. 1976 Feb;7(2):129–134. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(76)90298-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Strom P. R., Turkleson M. L., Stone H. H. Safety of incidental appendectomy. Am J Surg. 1983 Jun;145(6):819–822. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(83)90150-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sugimoto T., Edwards D. Incidence and costs of incidental appendectomy as a preventive measure. Am J Public Health. 1987 Apr;77(4):471–475. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.4.471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Voitk A. J., Lowry J. B. Is incidental appendectomy a safe practice? Can J Surg. 1988 Nov;31(6):448–451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Warren J. L., Penberthy L. T., Addiss D. G., McBean A. M. Appendectomy incidental to cholecystectomy among elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 Sep;177(3):288–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Waters E. G. Elective appendectomy with abdominal and pelvic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Nov;50(5):511–517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wilson E. A., Dilts P. V., Jr, Simpson T. J. Appendectomy incidental to postpartum sterilization procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973 May 1;116(1):76–81. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(73)90887-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wolff B. G. Current status of incidental surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Apr;38(4):435–441. doi: 10.1007/BF02054237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES