Skip to main content
PMC home page
Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology logoLink to Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology
. 1998;6(1):18–24. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-0997(1998)6:1<18::AID-IDOG5>3.0.CO;2-3

Cervical ripening with prostaglandin gel and hygroscopic dilators.

J U Hibbard 1, A Shashoua 1, C Adamczyk 1, M Ismail 1
PMCID: PMC1784771  PMID: 9678143

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness and morbidity of adding hygroscopic cervical dilators to prostaglandin gel for cervical ripening and labor induction. STUDY DESIGN: Patients of at least 34 weeks' gestation with a medical indication for induction of labor and with a modified Bishop score of 5 or less were randomized to receive either prostaglandin gel or prostaglandin gel with hygroscopic cervical dilators. Primary outcomes were time to delivery, change in cervical score, and infection. Secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery rate and deliveries before 24 hours of induction. Continuous variables were analyzed by Wilcoxon sum rank test and categorical data by chi-square or Fisher exact test, with P < 0.05 being significant. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were randomized to intracervical prostaglandin alone and 23 patients received intracervical prostaglandin plus hygroscopic dilators. No demographic differences were noted between the groups. After six hours of ripening, the combined group achieved a greater change in Bishop score (3.6 vs. 2.1, P = 0.007) and tended to have a shorter induction time (21.7 vs. 26.4 hours, P = 0.085). The combined therapy group had a higher infection rate than the prostaglandin-only group (59% vs. 12%, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Combining cervical dilators with prostaglandin gel provides more effective cervical ripening and a more rapid induction to delivery interval than prostaglandin alone but with a significant and prohibitive rate of infection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (535.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Atad J., Bornstein J., Calderon I., Petrikovsky B. M., Sorokin Y., Abramovici H. Nonpharmaceutical ripening of the unfavorable cervix and induction of labor by a novel double balloon device. Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jan;77(1):146–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blumenthal P. D., Ramanauskas R. Randomized trial of Dilapan and Laminaria as cervical ripening agents before induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Mar;75(3 Pt 1):365–368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buchanan D., Macer J., Yonekura M. L. Cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 vaginal suppositories. Obstet Gynecol. 1984 May;63(5):659–663. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buttino L. T., Jr, Garite T. J. Intracervical prostaglandin in postdate pregnancy. A randomized trial. J Reprod Med. 1990 Feb;35(2):155–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jagani N., Schulman H., Fleischer A., Mitchell J., Randolph G. Role of the cervix in the induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Jan;59(1):21–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Johnson I. R., Macpherson M. B., Welch C. C., Filshie G. M. A comparison of Lamicel and prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel for cervical ripening before induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Mar 1;151(5):604–607. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90147-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kazzi G. M., Bottoms S. F., Rosen M. G. Efficacy and safety of Laminaria digitata for preinduction ripening of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Oct;60(4):440–443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Laube D. W., Zlatnik F. J., Pitkin R. M. Preinduction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel. Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Jul;68(1):54–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lin A., Kupferminc M., Dooley S. L. A randomized trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion versus laminaria for cervical ripening. Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Oct;86(4 Pt 1):545–549. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00234-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Owen J., Winkler C. L., Harris B. A., Jr, Hauth J. C., Smith M. C. A randomized, double-blind trial of prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Oct;165(4 Pt 1):991–996. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90456-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sanchez-Ramos L., Kaunitz A. M., Connor P. M. Hygroscopic cervical dilators and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized, prospective comparison. J Reprod Med. 1992 Apr;37(4):355–359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sanchez-Ramos L., Kaunitz A. M., Del Valle G. O., Delke I., Schroeder P. A., Briones D. K. Labor induction with the prostaglandin E1 methyl analogue misoprostol versus oxytocin: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Mar;81(3):332–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Trofatter K. F., Jr Effect of preinduction cervical softening with dinoprostone gel on outcome of oxytocin-induced labor. Clin Ther. 1993 Sep-Oct;15(5):838–844. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES