Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1996 Dec;178(24):7295–7303. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.24.7295-7303.1996

Analysis of the region between amino acids 30 and 42 of intact UmuD by a monocysteine approach.

A Guzzo 1, M H Lee 1, K Oda 1, G C Walker 1
PMCID: PMC178646  PMID: 8955415

Abstract

On the basis of characterizations of a set of UmuD monocysteine derivatives, we had suggested that positions 24, 34, and 44 are closer to the intact UmuD homodimer interface than other positions tested (M. H. Lee, T. Ohta, and G. C. Walker, J. Bacteriol. 176:4825-4837, 1994). Because this region of UmuD also appeared to be important for interactions with RecA, we followed up on our previous study by constructing a second set of monocysteine UmuD derivatives with single cysteine substitutions at positions 30 to 42. We found that like the VC34 mutant, UmuD derivatives with monocysteine substitutions at positions 32 and 35 showed deficiencies in in vivo and in vitro RecA-mediated cleavage as well as in UV mutagenesis, suggesting that the position 32 to 35 region may be important for RecA-mediated cleavage of UmuD. Interestingly, UmuD with monocysteine substitutions at residues 33 and 40 showed a reduction in UV mutagenesis while retaining the ability to be cleaved by RecA in vivo, suggesting a deficiency in the subsequent role of the UmuD' derivatives in mutagenesis. All of the UmuD monocysteine derivatives in the position 30 to 42 series purified indistinguishably from the wild-type protein. The observations that purified proteins of the UmuD derivatives RC37 and IC38 could be disulfide cross-linked quantitatively upon addition of iodine and yet were poorly modified with iodoacetate led us to suggest that the pairs of residues at positions 37 and 38 are extremely close to the UmuD2 homodimer interface. These observations indicate that the structure of the UmuD2 homodimer in solution is very different from the crystal structure of the UmuD'2 homodimer reported by Peat et al. (T. S. Peat, E. G. Frank, J. P. McDonald, A. S. Levine, R. Woodgate, and W. A. Hendrickson, Nature [London] 380:727-730, 1996).

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (336.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bailone A., Sommer S., Knezević J., Devoret R. Substitution of UmuD' for UmuD does not affect SOS mutagenesis. Biochimie. 1991 Apr;73(4):471–478. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(91)90114-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Battista J. R., Ohta T., Nohmi T., Sun W., Walker G. C. Dominant negative umuD mutations decreasing RecA-mediated cleavage suggest roles for intact UmuD in modulation of SOS mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Sep;87(18):7190–7194. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.18.7190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burckhardt S. E., Woodgate R., Scheuermann R. H., Echols H. UmuD mutagenesis protein of Escherichia coli: overproduction, purification, and cleavage by RecA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Mar;85(6):1811–1815. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.6.1811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Craig N. L., Roberts J. W. E. coli recA protein-directed cleavage of phage lambda repressor requires polynucleotide. Nature. 1980 Jan 3;283(5742):26–30. doi: 10.1038/283026a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Elledge S. J., Walker G. C. Proteins required for ultraviolet light and chemical mutagenesis. Identification of the products of the umuC locus of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1983 Feb 25;164(2):175–192. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(83)90074-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Falke J. J., Dernburg A. F., Sternberg D. A., Zalkin N., Milligan D. L., Koshland D. E., Jr Structure of a bacterial sensory receptor. A site-directed sulfhydryl study. J Biol Chem. 1988 Oct 15;263(29):14850–14858. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Falke J. J., Koshland D. E., Jr Global flexibility in a sensory receptor: a site-directed cross-linking approach. Science. 1987 Sep 25;237(4822):1596–1600. doi: 10.1126/science.2820061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Foster P. L., Sullivan A. D. Interactions between epsilon, the proofreading subunit of DNA polymerase III, and proteins involved in the SOS response of Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet. 1988 Nov;214(3):467–473. doi: 10.1007/BF00330482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Frank E. G., Hauser J., Levine A. S., Woodgate R. Targeting of the UmuD, UmuD', and MucA' mutagenesis proteins to DNA by RecA protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 1;90(17):8169–8173. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.17.8169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Freitag N., McEntee K. "Activated"-RecA protein affinity chromatography of LexA repressor and other SOS-regulated proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Nov;86(21):8363–8367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.21.8363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gimble F. S., Sauer R. T. Lambda repressor inactivation: properties of purified ind- proteins in the autodigestion and RecA-mediated cleavage reactions. J Mol Biol. 1986 Nov 5;192(1):39–47. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90462-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gottesman S. Minimizing proteolysis in Escherichia coli: genetic solutions. Methods Enzymol. 1990;185:119–129. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)85013-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hughes R. E., Rice P. A., Steitz T. A., Grindley N. D. Protein-protein interactions directing resolvase site-specific recombination: a structure-function analysis. EMBO J. 1993 Apr;12(4):1447–1458. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05788.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jonczyk P., Nowicka A. Specific in vivo protein-protein interactions between Escherichia coli SOS mutagenesis proteins. J Bacteriol. 1996 May;178(9):2580–2585. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.9.2580-2585.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kato T., Shinoura Y. Isolation and characterization of mutants of Escherichia coli deficient in induction of mutations by ultraviolet light. Mol Gen Genet. 1977 Nov 14;156(2):121–131. doi: 10.1007/BF00283484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee M. H., Ohta T., Walker G. C. A monocysteine approach for probing the structure and interactions of the UmuD protein. J Bacteriol. 1994 Aug;176(16):4825–4837. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.16.4825-4837.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee M. H., Walker G. C. Interactions of Escherichia coli UmuD with activated RecA analyzed by cross-linking UmuD monocysteine derivatives. J Bacteriol. 1996 Dec;178(24):7285–7294. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.24.7285-7294.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lin L. L., Little J. W. Autodigestion and RecA-dependent cleavage of Ind- mutant LexA proteins. J Mol Biol. 1989 Dec 5;210(3):439–452. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90121-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lin L. L., Little J. W. Isolation and characterization of noncleavable (Ind-) mutants of the LexA repressor of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1988 May;170(5):2163–2173. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.5.2163-2173.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Little J. W. Autodigestion of lexA and phage lambda repressors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Mar;81(5):1375–1379. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.5.1375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nohmi T., Battista J. R., Dodson L. A., Walker G. C. RecA-mediated cleavage activates UmuD for mutagenesis: mechanistic relationship between transcriptional derepression and posttranslational activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Mar;85(6):1816–1820. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.6.1816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Peat T. S., Frank E. G., McDonald J. P., Levine A. S., Woodgate R., Hendrickson W. A. Structure of the UmuD' protein and its regulation in response to DNA damage. Nature. 1996 Apr 25;380(6576):727–730. doi: 10.1038/380727a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rajagopalan M., Lu C., Woodgate R., O'Donnell M., Goodman M. F., Echols H. Activity of the purified mutagenesis proteins UmuC, UmuD', and RecA in replicative bypass of an abasic DNA lesion by DNA polymerase III. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Nov 15;89(22):10777–10781. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Roberts J. W., Roberts C. W., Craig N. L. Escherichia coli recA gene product inactivates phage lambda repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Oct;75(10):4714–4718. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.10.4714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sanderson M. R., Freemont P. S., Rice P. A., Goldman A., Hatfull G. F., Grindley N. D., Steitz T. A. The crystal structure of the catalytic domain of the site-specific recombination enzyme gamma delta resolvase at 2.7 A resolution. Cell. 1990 Dec 21;63(6):1323–1329. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90427-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sassanfar M., Roberts J. W. Nature of the SOS-inducing signal in Escherichia coli. The involvement of DNA replication. J Mol Biol. 1990 Mar 5;212(1):79–96. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90306-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shinagawa H., Iwasaki H., Kato T., Nakata A. RecA protein-dependent cleavage of UmuD protein and SOS mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Mar;85(6):1806–1810. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.6.1806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sommer S., Bailone A., Devoret R. The appearance of the UmuD'C protein complex in Escherichia coli switches repair from homologous recombination to SOS mutagenesis. Mol Microbiol. 1993 Dec;10(5):963–971. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb00968.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Steinborn G. Uvm mutants of Escherichia coli K12 deficient in UV mutagenesis. I. Isolation of uvm mutants and their phenotypical characterization in DNA repair and mutagenesis. Mol Gen Genet. 1978 Sep 20;165(1):87–93. doi: 10.1007/BF00270380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tadmor Y., Ascarelli-Goell R., Skaliter R., Livneh Z. Overproduction of the beta subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme reduces UV mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1992 Apr;174(8):2517–2524. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.8.2517-2524.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Trundle D., Cunningham L. W. Iodine oxidation of the sulfhydryl groups of creatine kinase. Biochemistry. 1969 May;8(5):1919–1925. doi: 10.1021/bi00833a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Winans S. C., Elledge S. J., Krueger J. H., Walker G. C. Site-directed insertion and deletion mutagenesis with cloned fragments in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1985 Mar;161(3):1219–1221. doi: 10.1128/jb.161.3.1219-1221.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Woodgate R. Construction of a umuDC operon substitution mutation in Escherichia coli. Mutat Res. 1992 Mar;281(3):221–225. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(92)90012-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Woodgate R., Rajagopalan M., Lu C., Echols H. UmuC mutagenesis protein of Escherichia coli: purification and interaction with UmuD and UmuD'. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Oct;86(19):7301–7305. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.19.7301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES