Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1997 Feb;179(4):1051–1058. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.4.1051-1058.1997

Critical base pairs and amino acid residues for protein-DNA interaction between the TyrR protein and tyrP operator of Escherichia coli.

J S Hwang 1, J Yang 1, A J Pittard 1
PMCID: PMC178797  PMID: 9023183

Abstract

In Escherichia coli K-12, the repression of tyrP requires the binding of the TyrR protein to the operator in the presence of coeffectors, tyrosine and ATP. This operator contains two 22-bp palindromic sequences which are termed TyrR boxes. Methylation, uracil, and ethylation interference experiments were used to identify the important sites in the TyrR boxes that make contacts with the TyrR protein. Methylation interference studies demonstrated that guanines at positions +8, -5, and -8 of the strong TyrR box and positions +8, -4, and -8 of the weak box are close to the TyrR protein. Uracil interference revealed that strong van der Waals contacts are made by the thymines at position -7 and +5 of the top strands of both strong and weak boxes and that weaker contacts are made by the thymines at positions +7 (strong box) and -5 and +7 (weak box) of the bottom strand. In addition, ethylation interference suggested that the phosphate backbone contacts are located at the end and central regions of the palindrome. These findings are supported by our results derived from studies of symmetrical mutations of the tyrP strong box. Overall, the results confirm the critical importance of the invariant (G x C)(C x G)8 base pairs for TyrR recognition and also indicate that interactions with (T x A)(A x T)7 are of major importance. In contrast, mutations in other positions result in weaker effects on the binding affinity of TyrR protein, indicating that these positions play a lesser role in TyrR protein recognition. Alanine scanning of both helices of the putative helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif of TyrR protein has identified those amino acids whose side chains play an essential role in protein structure and DNA binding.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andrews A. E., Dickson B., Lawley B., Cobbett C., Pittard A. J. Importance of the position of TYR R boxes for repression and activation of the tyrP and aroF genes in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1991 Aug;173(16):5079–5085. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.16.5079-5085.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews A. E., Lawley B., Pittard A. J. Mutational analysis of repression and activation of the tyrP gene in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1991 Aug;173(16):5068–5078. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.16.5068-5078.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey M., Hagmar P., Millar D. P., Davidson B. E., Tong G., Haralambidis J., Sawyer W. H. Interaction between the Escherichia coli Regulatory protein TyrR and DNA: a fluorescence footprinting study. Biochemistry. 1995 Dec 5;34(48):15802–15812. doi: 10.1021/bi00048a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baseggio N., Davies W. D., Davidson B. E. Identification of the promoter, operator, and 5' and 3' ends of the mRNA of the Escherichia coli K-12 gene aroG. J Bacteriol. 1990 May;172(5):2547–2557. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.5.2547-2557.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumeister R., Helbl V., Hillen W. Contacts between Tet repressor and tet operator revealed by new recognition specificities of single amino acid replacement mutants. J Mol Biol. 1992 Aug 20;226(4):1257–1270. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)91065-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brennan R. G., Matthews B. W. The helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif. J Biol Chem. 1989 Feb 5;264(4):1903–1906. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bushman F. D., Anderson J. E., Harrison S. C., Ptashne M. Ethylation interference and X-ray crystallography identify similar interactions between 434 repressor and operator. Nature. 1985 Aug 15;316(6029):651–653. doi: 10.1038/316651a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chye M. L., Pittard J. Transcription control of the aroP gene in Escherichia coli K-12: analysis of operator mutants. J Bacteriol. 1987 Jan;169(1):386–393. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.1.386-393.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cobbett C. S., Delbridge M. L. Regulatory mutants of the aroF-tyrA operon of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1987 Jun;169(6):2500–2506. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.6.2500-2506.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cui J., Somerville R. L. The TyrR protein of Escherichia coli, analysis by limited proteolysis of domain structure and ligand-mediated conformational changes. J Biol Chem. 1993 Mar 5;268(7):5040–5047. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Garner C. C., Herrmann K. M. Operator mutations of the Escherichia coli aroF gene. J Biol Chem. 1985 Mar 25;260(6):3820–3825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Harrison S. C., Aggarwal A. K. DNA recognition by proteins with the helix-turn-helix motif. Annu Rev Biochem. 1990;59:933–969. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.004441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Heuer C., Hillen W. Tet repressor-tet operator contacts probed by operator DNA-modification interference studies. J Mol Biol. 1988 Aug 5;202(3):407–415. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90274-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kasian P. A., Davidson B. E., Pittard J. Molecular analysis of the promoter operator region of the Escherichia coli K-12 tyrP gene. J Bacteriol. 1986 Aug;167(2):556–561. doi: 10.1128/jb.167.2.556-561.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kieny M. P., Lathe R., Lecocq J. P. New versatile cloning and sequencing vectors based on bacteriophage M13. Gene. 1983 Dec;26(1):91–99. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(83)90039-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lawley B., Fujita N., Ishihama A., Pittard A. J. The TyrR protein of Escherichia coli is a class I transcription activator. J Bacteriol. 1995 Jan;177(1):238–241. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.1.238-241.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MONOD J., COHEN-BAZIRE G., COHN M. Sur la biosynthèse de la beta-galactosidase (lactase) chez Escherichia coli; la spécificité de l'induction. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1951 Nov;7(4):585–599. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(51)90072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Majumdar A., Adhya S. Effect of ethylation of operator-phosphates on Gal repressor binding. DNA contortion by repressor. J Mol Biol. 1989 Jul 20;208(2):217–223. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90383-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Maxam A. M., Gilbert W. Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages. Methods Enzymol. 1980;65(1):499–560. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(80)65059-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Messing J. New M13 vectors for cloning. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:20–78. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01005-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mondragón A., Harrison S. C. The phage 434 Cro/OR1 complex at 2.5 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1991 May 20;219(2):321–334. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90568-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nelson H. C., Sauer R. T. Lambda repressor mutations that increase the affinity and specificity of operator binding. Cell. 1985 Sep;42(2):549–558. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90112-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Norrander J., Kempe T., Messing J. Construction of improved M13 vectors using oligodeoxynucleotide-directed mutagenesis. Gene. 1983 Dec;26(1):101–106. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(83)90040-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pabo C. O., Sauer R. T. Transcription factors: structural families and principles of DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:1053–1095. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.005201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pittard A. J., Davidson B. E. TyrR protein of Escherichia coli and its role as repressor and activator. Mol Microbiol. 1991 Jul;5(7):1585–1592. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb01904.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Praszkier J., Wilson I. W., Pittard A. J. Mutations affecting translational coupling between the rep genes of an IncB miniplasmid. J Bacteriol. 1992 Apr;174(7):2376–2383. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.7.2376-2383.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pu W. T., Struhl K. Uracil interference, a rapid and general method for defining protein-DNA interactions involving the 5-methyl group of thymines: the GCN4-DNA complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Feb 25;20(4):771–775. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.4.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sarsero J. P., Wookey P. J., Pittard A. J. Regulation of expression of the Escherichia coli K-12 mtr gene by TyrR protein and Trp repressor. J Bacteriol. 1991 Jul;173(13):4133–4143. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.13.4133-4143.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sauer R. T., Yocum R. R., Doolittle R. F., Lewis M., Pabo C. O. Homology among DNA-binding proteins suggests use of a conserved super-secondary structure. Nature. 1982 Jul 29;298(5873):447–451. doi: 10.1038/298447a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schultz S. C., Shields G. C., Steitz T. A. Crystal structure of a CAP-DNA complex: the DNA is bent by 90 degrees. Science. 1991 Aug 30;253(5023):1001–1007. doi: 10.1126/science.1653449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schumacher M. A., Choi K. Y., Zalkin H., Brennan R. G. Crystal structure of LacI member, PurR, bound to DNA: minor groove binding by alpha helices. Science. 1994 Nov 4;266(5186):763–770. doi: 10.1126/science.7973627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Singer B. All oxygens in nucleic acids react with carcinogenic ethylating agents. Nature. 1976 Nov 25;264(5584):333–339. doi: 10.1038/264333a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vandeyar M. A., Weiner M. P., Hutton C. J., Batt C. A. A simple and rapid method for the selection of oligodeoxynucleotide-directed mutants. Gene. 1988 May 15;65(1):129–133. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90425-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Weber I. T., Steitz T. A. Structure of a complex of catabolite gene activator protein and cyclic AMP refined at 2.5 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1987 Nov 20;198(2):311–326. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90315-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Whipp M. J., Pittard A. J. Regulation of aromatic amino acid transport systems in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1977 Nov;132(2):453–461. doi: 10.1128/jb.132.2.453-461.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wilson T. J., Maroudas P., Howlett G. J., Davidson B. E. Ligand-induced self-association of the Escherichia coli regulatory protein TyrR. J Mol Biol. 1994 May 6;238(3):309–318. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yang J., Camakaris H., Pittard A. J. Further genetic analysis of the activation function of the TyrR regulatory protein of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1996 Feb;178(4):1120–1125. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.4.1120-1125.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Yang J., Ganesan S., Sarsero J., Pittard A. J. A genetic analysis of various functions of the TyrR protein of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1993 Mar;175(6):1767–1776. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.6.1767-1776.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yang J., Pittard J. Molecular analysis of the regulatory region of the Escherichia coli K-12 tyrB gene. J Bacteriol. 1987 Oct;169(10):4710–4715. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.10.4710-4715.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES