Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1997 Mar;179(5):1550–1554. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.5.1550-1554.1997

Nonadaptive mutations occur on the F' episome during adaptive mutation conditions in Escherichia coli.

P L Foster 1
PMCID: PMC178865  PMID: 9045812

Abstract

One of the most studied examples of adaptive mutation is a strain of Escherichia coli, FC40, that cannot utilize lactose (Lac-) but that readily reverts to lactose utilization (Lac+) when lactose is its sole carbon source. Adaptive reversion to Lac+ occurs at a high rate when the Lac- allele is on an F' episome and conjugal functions are expressed. It was previously shown that nonselected mutations on the chromosome did not appear in the Lac- population while episomal Lac+ mutations accumulated, but it remained possible that nonselected mutations might occur on the episome. To investigate this possibility, a second mutational target was created on the Lac- episome by mutation of a Tn1O element, which encodes tetracycline resistance (Tetr), to tetracycline sensitivity (Tets). Reversion rates to Tetr during normal growth and during lactose selection were measured. The results show that nonselected Tetr mutations do accumulate in Lac- cells when those cells are under selection to become Lac+. Thus, reversion to Lac+ in FC40 does not appear to be adaptive in the narrow sense of the word. In addition, the results suggest that during lactose selection, both Lac+ and Tetr mutations are created or preserved by the same recombination-dependent mechanism.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (98.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boyd E. F., Hill C. W., Rich S. M., Hartl D. L. Mosaic structure of plasmids from natural populations of Escherichia coli. Genetics. 1996 Jul;143(3):1091–1100. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.3.1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cairns J., Foster P. L. Adaptive reversion of a frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli. Genetics. 1991 Aug;128(4):695–701. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.4.695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cairns J., Overbaugh J., Miller S. The origin of mutants. Nature. 1988 Sep 8;335(6186):142–145. doi: 10.1038/335142a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Calos M. P., Miller J. H. Genetic and sequence analysis of frameshift mutations induced by ICR-191. J Mol Biol. 1981 Nov 25;153(1):39–64. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90525-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cavalli-Sforza L L, Lederberg J. Isolation of Pre-Adaptive Mutants in Bacteria by Sib Selection. Genetics. 1956 May;41(3):367–381. doi: 10.1093/genetics/41.3.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coulondre C., Miller J. H. Genetic studies of the lac repressor. III. Additional correlation of mutational sites with specific amino acid residues. J Mol Biol. 1977 Dec 15;117(3):525–567. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90056-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cupples C. G., Miller J. H. Effects of amino acid substitutions at the active site in Escherichia coli beta-galactosidase. Genetics. 1988 Nov;120(3):637–644. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.3.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Foster P. L. Adaptive mutation: the uses of adversity. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1993;47:467–504. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.47.100193.002343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Foster P. L., Cairns J. The occurrence of heritable Mu excisions in starving cells of Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 1994 Nov 1;13(21):5240–5244. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06855.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Foster P. L. Population dynamics of a Lac- strain of Escherichia coli during selection for lactose utilization. Genetics. 1994 Oct;138(2):253–261. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.2.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Foster P. L., Trimarchi J. M. Adaptive reversion of a frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli by simple base deletions in homopolymeric runs. Science. 1994 Jul 15;265(5170):407–409. doi: 10.1126/science.8023164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Foster P. L., Trimarchi J. M. Adaptive reversion of an episomal frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli requires conjugal functions but not actual conjugation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jun 6;92(12):5487–5490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.12.5487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Foster P. L., Trimarchi J. M. Conjugation is not required for adaptive reversion of an episomal frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1995 Nov;177(22):6670–6671. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.22.6670-6671.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Foster P. L., Trimarchi J. M., Maurer R. A. Two enzymes, both of which process recombination intermediates, have opposite effects on adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli. Genetics. 1996 Jan;142(1):25–37. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Galitski T., Roth J. R. A search for a general phenomenon of adaptive mutability. Genetics. 1996 Jun;143(2):645–659. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.2.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Galitski T., Roth J. R. Evidence that F plasmid transfer replication underlies apparent adaptive mutation. Science. 1995 Apr 21;268(5209):421–423. doi: 10.1126/science.7716546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hall B. G. Adaptive evolution that requires multiple spontaneous mutations. I. Mutations involving an insertion sequence. Genetics. 1988 Dec;120(4):887–897. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hall B. G. On the specificity of adaptive mutations. Genetics. 1997 Jan;145(1):39–44. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hall B. G. Spectrum of mutations that occur under selective and non-selective conditions in E. coli. Genetica. 1991;84(2):73–76. doi: 10.1007/BF00116545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hall B. G. Spontaneous point mutations that occur more often when advantageous than when neutral. Genetics. 1990 Sep;126(1):5–16. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Harris R. S., Longerich S., Rosenberg S. M. Recombination in adaptive mutation. Science. 1994 Apr 8;264(5156):258–260. doi: 10.1126/science.8146657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Harris R. S., Ross K. J., Rosenberg S. M. Opposing roles of the holliday junction processing systems of Escherichia coli in recombination-dependent adaptive mutation. Genetics. 1996 Mar;142(3):681–691. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.3.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Koob M., Szybalski W. Preparing and using agarose microbeads. Methods Enzymol. 1992;216:13–20. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(92)16004-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lenski R. E., Mittler J. E. The directed mutation controversy and neo-Darwinism. Science. 1993 Jan 8;259(5092):188–194. doi: 10.1126/science.7678468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lloyd R. G., Buckman C. Genetic analysis of the recG locus of Escherichia coli K-12 and of its role in recombination and DNA repair. J Bacteriol. 1991 Feb;173(3):1004–1011. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.3.1004-1011.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Luria S. E., Delbrück M. Mutations of Bacteria from Virus Sensitivity to Virus Resistance. Genetics. 1943 Nov;28(6):491–511. doi: 10.1093/genetics/28.6.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mackay W. J., Han S., Samson L. D. DNA alkylation repair limits spontaneous base substitution mutations in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1994 Jun;176(11):3224–3230. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.11.3224-3230.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Maenhaut-Michel G., Shapiro J. A. The roles of starvation and selective substrates in the emergence of araB-lacZ fusion clones. EMBO J. 1994 Nov 1;13(21):5229–5239. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06854.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Maloy S. R., Nunn W. D. Selection for loss of tetracycline resistance by Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1981 Feb;145(2):1110–1111. doi: 10.1128/jb.145.2.1110-1111.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mandal T. N., Mahdi A. A., Sharples G. J., Lloyd R. G. Resolution of Holliday intermediates in recombination and DNA repair: indirect suppression of ruvA, ruvB, and ruvC mutations. J Bacteriol. 1993 Jul;175(14):4325–4334. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.14.4325-4334.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Miller J. H. Mutagenic specificity of ultraviolet light. J Mol Biol. 1985 Mar 5;182(1):45–65. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90026-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Perkins J. D., Heath J. D., Sharma B. R., Weinstock G. M. SfiI genomic cleavage map of Escherichia coli K-12 strain MG1655. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Mar 11;20(5):1129–1137. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.5.1129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Radicella J. P., Park P. U., Fox M. S. Adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli: a role for conjugation. Science. 1995 Apr 21;268(5209):418–420. doi: 10.1126/science.7716545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rosenberg S. M., Harris R. S., Longerich S., Galloway A. M. Recombination-dependent mutation in non-dividing cells. Mutat Res. 1996 Feb 19;350(1):69–76. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(95)00092-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rosenberg S. M., Longerich S., Gee P., Harris R. S. Adaptive mutation by deletions in small mononucleotide repeats. Science. 1994 Jul 15;265(5170):405–407. doi: 10.1126/science.8023163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stahl F. W. Bacterial genetics. A unicorn in the garden. Nature. 1988 Sep 8;335(6186):112–113. doi: 10.1038/335112a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Steele D. F., Jinks-Robertson S. An examination of adaptive reversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1992 Sep;132(1):9–21. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wertman K. F., Wyman A. R., Botstein D. Host/vector interactions which affect the viability of recombinant phage lambda clones. Gene. 1986;49(2):253–262. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90286-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Whitby M. C., Ryder L., Lloyd R. G. Reverse branch migration of Holliday junctions by RecG protein: a new mechanism for resolution of intermediates in recombination and DNA repair. Cell. 1993 Oct 22;75(2):341–350. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80075-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES