Skip to main content
British Medical Journal logoLink to British Medical Journal
. 1972 Jun 17;2(5815):673–676. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5815.673

Double-blind Trial to Compare Ampicillin, Cephalexin, Co-trimoxazole, and Trimethoprim in Treatment of Urinary Infection

W Brumfitt, Rita Pursell
PMCID: PMC1788903  PMID: 4555654

Abstract

In order to test their value in urinary infection a double-blind trial was carried out using ampicillin, cephalexin, trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole), and trimethoprim. Eighty-three courses of treatment were given to hospital patients, 149 to pregnant women, and 107 to patients with dysuria and frequency seen in domiciliary practice. Thus infections of varying severity in defined groups of patients caused by organisms with different antibiotic sensitivities were treated.

Analysis of the overall results (339 courses) was compared with those from the individual groups and considerable variation in response was found. In domiciliary infections and bacteriuria in pregnancy trimethoprim alone proved to be at least as effective as the other three compounds and caused fewer than half the number of side effects. In the hospital patients co-trimoxazole was superior to trimethoprim.

The overall results for ampicillin and cephalexin were similar although cephalexin proved to be inferior in treating symptomatic domiciliary infections.

Full text

PDF
673

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brumfitt W., Percival A. Laboratory control of antibiotic therapy in urinary tract infection. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1967 Sep 27;145(2):329–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1967.tb50230.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Darrell J. H., Garrod L. P., Waterworth P. M. Trimethoprim: laboratory and clinical studies. J Clin Pathol. 1968 Mar;21(2):202–209. doi: 10.1136/jcp.21.2.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lacey R. W., Bruten D. M., Gillespie W. A., Lewis E. L. Trimethoprim-resistant coliforms. Lancet. 1972 Feb 19;1(7747):409–410. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)90857-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Norden C. W., Kass E. H. Bacteriuria of pregnancy--a critical appraisal. Annu Rev Med. 1968;19:431–470. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.19.020168.002243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Reeves D. S., Faiers M. C., Pursell R. E., Brumfitt W. Trimethoprim--sulphamethoxazole: comparative study in urinary infection in hospital. Br Med J. 1969 Mar 1;1(5643):541–544. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5643.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES