Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1999 Aug 31;96(18):10518–10523. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10518

Analysis of population structure of the chestnut blight fungus based on vegetative incompatibility genotypes

Michael G Milgroom *,, Paolo Cortesi
PMCID: PMC17921  PMID: 10468641

Abstract

Vegetative incompatibility is a self/nonself-recognition system in fungi that has often been used for describing phenotypic diversity in fungal populations. A common hypothesis is that vegetative incompatibility polymorphisms are maintained by balancing selection. However, understanding the evolutionary significance of vegetative incompatibility and the factors that maintain these polymorphisms has been limited by a lack of knowledge of the underlying genetics of vegetative compatibility (vc) types. Genotypes of 64 vc types, controlled by six unlinked vegetative incompatibility (vic) loci, have been identified in the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica. By interpreting vc type survey data in terms of vic genotypes, we estimated vic-allele frequencies and analyzed the multilocus genetic structure of 13 populations in Europe and 3 populations in the U.S. European populations have less vc type diversity than the US populations because of a combination of lower vic-allele diversity and limited recombination. Genotypic diversity of 10 populations in Italy correlated to the abundance of sexual structures; however, significant deviations from random mating suggest that either sexual reproduction may not contribute many offspring in these populations or that vic genes (or vic genotypes) are under selection. Most vic-allele frequencies deviated from 0.5, the equilibrium frequency predicted under frequency-dependent selection, providing no evidence for selection acting on these loci.


Vegetative incompatibility (also called heterokaryon or somatic incompatibility) is a self/nonself-recognition system in fungi that has been used extensively to describe fungal population structure and diversity (reviewed in refs. 1 and 2). The extent of polymorphism in vegetative incompatibility phenotypes and the relative ease with which they can be assayed have made these phenotypes popular for studying fungal populations. Nonetheless, the evolutionary significance of vegetative incompatibility and the factors maintaining these polymorphisms remain largely unknown. One hypothesis is that these polymorphisms are maintained by balancing selection because vegetative incompatibility restricts the transmission of parasitic nuclei or deleterious cytoplasmic elements such as viruses, plasmids, or debilitated organelles (36). Testing this hypothesis requires estimates of allele frequencies at vegetative incompatibility (vic) loci (or het, for heterokaryon incompatibility) or studies of vic gene genealogies. This approach has been applied in Neurospora where trans-species polymorphisms and intermediate allele frequencies at one het locus suggest that vegetative incompatibility may be under balancing selection (7).

Population-genetic and evolutionary inferences have been limited in studies of vegetative incompatibility because the genotypes underlying these phenotypes are generally not known. In most ascomycetes, vegetative incompatibility is controlled by allelic interactions in which two individuals are compatible only if they share the same alleles at all vic loci (1, 2, 8). Conversely, individuals are vegetatively incompatible when alleles are different at one or more vic loci. Thus, vegetative incompatibility phenotypes, referred to as vegetative compatibility (vc) types, are genetically defined by the alleles at multiple vic loci, which collectively define the vic genotype. The number of known vic loci varies among species. For example, 17 vic loci have been identified in Podospora anserina, and 11 have been found in Neurospora crassa (reviewed in refs. 1, 2, and 8). In addition, segregation of large numbers of vc types in laboratory crosses has indicated polymorphisms at multiple vic loci in fungi for which detailed genetic analyses have not been done (e.g., ref. 9). Most vic loci have only two alleles, although multiple alleles have been found in some species (10, 11).

The diversity of vc types (vic genotypes) in a population is a function of allelic diversity and recombination among vic loci. Because ascomycetes are haploid, 2k multilocus vic genotypes are possible, given two alleles at each of k polymorphic, unlinked vic loci. Therefore, potential genotypic diversity increases as k and allelic diversity increase. If vic genotypes were known for vc types, estimates of k and allelic diversity would be possible. Furthermore, inferences could be made from vc type survey data about recombination or clonality in natural populations (12, 13). Until recently, there had been no attempt to assign vic genotypes to vc types except for a few laboratory strains. Cortesi and Milgroom (14) determined vic genotypes for 64 (= 26) vc types, controlled by six unlinked vic loci, each with two alleles, in the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica. Because all vc types of C. parasitica reported from Italy and Switzerland (15) are among these 64 vc types, analyses of population structure in these countries are possible simply by converting vc type survey data to vic-allele and -genotype frequencies.

Two questions about the population biology of C. parasitica were addressed with vic genotype data. The first question is, why is vc type diversity lower in Europe than in North America (16, 17)? The two simplest hypotheses are that (i) founder effects resulted in fewer polymorphic vic loci and/or less vic- allele diversity in Europe and (ii) restricted recombination in European populations keeps vic-genotype diversity low. C. parasitica is native to east Asia and was introduced into North America and Europe, most likely from Japan (18). Restriction fragment-length polymorphism diversity in North America is lower than in Asia because of founder effects (19). By chance, introductions also could have resulted in different, and possibly lower, vic-allele diversity in Europe than in North America. Alternatively, vic-genotype diversity may be lower in Europe because of less recombination even if vic-allele diversities are comparable in Europe and North America. C. parasitica can reproduce asexually or sexually either by outcrossing or selfing (20, 21). Analysis of the genetic structure of one population of C. parasitica in Italy by using DNA fingerprinting showed that it is partially clonal, with evidence for some recombination (22). In contrast, populations in the eastern U.S. appear to be closer to panmixis (22, 23). By combining knowledge of vic genotypes and vc type surveys, we can analyze the population structure of additional populations.

The second question we addressed with C. parasitica is whether vic loci are under balancing selection. Hypoviruses in C. parasitica (24) may be exerting frequency-dependent selection on vegetative incompatibility. Hypovirus infection reduces the fitness of C. parasitica, thereby effecting biological control of chestnut blight (2527). More importantly, virus transmission is restricted between vc types (2830), such that rare vc types may have a selective advantage by escaping virus infection. We predict that, if frequency-dependent selection acts on vic genes, allele frequencies should be intermediate, and populations should approach their maximum potential vc type diversities as they approach equilibrium (4, 5).

The objective of this study was to test the following predictions about C. parasitica. (i) vic-allele diversities are lower in Europe than in North America; (ii) populations in Europe deviate from random mating; and (iii) vic alleles are at intermediate frequencies because of frequency-dependent selection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analyses of population structure in Europe were based on vc type survey data from 11 populations in Italy (17) and two in Switzerland (15, 31). At least 46 individuals were sampled in all populations, except for Tonara, Italy, where only 33 were available; larger samples (n > 100) were analyzed in three populations in Italy. In Teano, Italy, we initially sampled 50 individuals (17) but later increased the sample size to 194 (22); vc type data for the expanded sample are presented in this report. Samples from three populations in the U.S. [Depot Hill, NY and Finzel, MD, denoted DU-90 and MD, respectively, in ref. 32, and Bartow, WV (33)] were assayed for vc types (see below). We defined a fungal individual as an isolate from a single chestnut-blight canker. All samples were collected without regard to virus infection. To avoid sampling clones on the same trees (32, 34), we sampled one isolate from each tree in Italy and in West Virginia. In Maryland, 57 isolates were collected from 48 trees; in New York, 60 isolates were collected from 32 trees. Including DNA fingerprint clones from the same trees (32) did not significantly affect any analysis in the present study, therefore, all isolates from Maryland and New York were used.

The vic genotypes for all vc types found in Italy and Switzerland were determined previously (14). We determined the vic genotypes for isolates in the U.S. by testing for vegetative compatibility with the 64 testers from Europe (14). Vegetative-compatibility testing was done by pairing isolates on agar medium amended with bromocresol green pH indicator dye, as described (14, 17). Pairs of isolates that formed a zone of dead cells (barrage) or discoloration in the medium between colonies were considered incompatible. Vegetative incompatibility assayed this way has been shown to correspond to heterokaryon incompatibility (35). Isolates from the U.S. that were compatible with European testers were assumed to have the same vic genotypes. This assumption is based on finding the predicted recombinant vic genotypes in a cross between isolates from Italy and Japan (14), showing that vc types on two continents have the same underlying genetic control. Isolates not compatible with any genotype tester were omitted from further analyses.

Allelic diversity was estimated for each vic locus as ĥ = n(1 − 22)/(n − 1), where is the estimated frequency of allele 1, = 1 − is the estimated frequency of allele 2, and n is the sample size. Mean allelic diversity, Ĥ, is the average of ĥ over all six vic loci. Mean allelic diversities estimated in European populations were compared with Ĥ estimated from U.S. populations by a one-sided Mann–Whitney U test; this test was used instead of a t test because of unequal variances. In addition, allelic diversities were partitioned within and between European populations by estimating GST, the proportion of diversity attributed to differences between populations (36) with corrections for small and unequal sample sizes (37).

Multilocus genetic structure was analyzed by using three different tests. For each population, we estimated (i) the number of vic genotypes (Nvc), (ii) genotypic diversity (Ĝ) (38, 39), and (iii) the index of association (IA), a multilocus measure of gametic disequilibrium (40, 41). These estimates were compared with expectations under the null hypothesis of random mating. Given that the vic loci we examined are unlinked (14), null distributions of vic-genotype frequencies for each population were determined by randomly assigning vic alleles at each locus. Alleles were assigned to each of n individuals based on the observed allele frequencies in each population or by randomly permuting observed alleles at each locus. Loci with allele frequencies <0.05 and >0.95 were not used in these analyses. Estimates for the three parameters were calculated for each of 1,000 randomizations to generate null distributions. Expected Nvc and Ĝ were estimated as the median and mean of the null distributions, respectively. IA was calculated as sk2k2 − 1, where sk2 and σk2 are the observed and expected variances in k, respectively, and k is the number of loci at which a pair of individuals had different alleles. The observed variance in k was calculated for all pairwise comparisons among individuals in a sample (40, 41). The expected variance, σk2, was estimated as the mean from the null distribution of variances calculated for each of 1,000 randomizations. P values were estimated as the proportion of the null distribution that was less than or equal to the observed parameter estimate for Nvc and Ĝ and greater than or equal to sk2 for IA.

To study the reproductive biology of C. parasitica in relation to deviations from random mating, we surveyed 10 populations in Italy for the proportion of chestnut blight cankers with sexual structures (perithecia). Perithecia are easily visible in fungal stromata on chestnut-bark samples with a dissecting microscope. In addition, we tested the mating type of 50 isolates from Zafferana, Italy, because no perithecia were observed in this population. Mating types were determined by making crosses with tester isolates as described (22).

Allele frequencies were tested for differences from 0.5 by calculating 99% confidence intervals: ± 2.58√p̂q̂/n + 1/2n, where 1/2n is a correction for continuity. If the confidence interval did not include 0.5, the frequency was considered different from 0.5 at the 1% level of significance.

RESULTS

We determined vc types of additional isolates in Teano, Italy, and for samples in the U.S. In Teano, we found 8 vc types among 194 isolates, although 6 vc types were rare (Table 1). One vc type, EU-40, had not been found previously in the field in Europe (15). In the U.S., we found 26, 30, and 34 vc types among 57, 59 and 60 isolates from Maryland, West Virginia, and New York, respectively. In the U.S. samples, only 23, 22, and 20 vc types, respectively, were compatible with European testers and could be assigned vic genotypes (Table 1). Therefore, 3, 9, and 23 isolates, respectively, had vc types whose vic genotypes are unknown; these isolates were omitted from further analyses.

Table 1.

Vegetative compatibility type distribution in C. parasitica from Teano, Italy and three populations in the U.S.

EU type* Teano, Italy Finzel, MD Bartow, WV Depot Hill, NY
EU-1 0 1 2 1
EU-2 1 0 0 0
EU-3 0 1 0 8
EU-5 1 2 0 0
EU-7 0 2 1 0
EU-8 0 1 1 0
EU-9 0 0 1 1
EU-10 36 1 8 1
EU-11 1 6 2 2
EU-12 151 2 0 2
EU-13 0 1 2 2
EU-14 1 1 0 2
EU-15 0 3 3 1
EU-17 2 7 3 4
EU-18 0 0 1 1
EU-19 0 0 1 0
EU-21 0 0 0 2
EU-22 0 1 2 0
EU-24 0 1 0 0
EU-25 0 3 0 0
EU-26 0 1 0 0
EU-28 0 9 7 1
EU-32 0 0 0 1
EU-33 0 1 4 2
EU-34 0 1 2 0
EU-35 0 0 1 0
EU-36 0 3 1 1
EU-39 0 1 0 1
EU-40 1 3 1 1
EU-41 0 0 1 0
EU-43 0 0 2 0
EU-45 0 2 0 1
EU-46 0 0 3 0
EU-47 0 0 1 0
EU-51 0 0 0 2
n 194 57 59 60
EU types, no. 8 23 22 20
Non-EU types, no. 0 3 8 14
*

EU nomenclature for vc types was defined by Cortesi et al. (15). 

Allele frequencies at six vic loci were estimated for all populations (Table 2). Seven of 13 European populations had five polymorphic vic loci, whereas the others had fewer. In Europe, vic3 was only polymorphic in two populations in southern Italy (Teano and Cittanova). In contrast, all six vic loci were polymorphic in the three U.S. populations. Mean vic allele diversities ranged from 0.11 to 0.30 in Europe and from 0.36 to 0.38 in the U.S. (Table 2). Allelic diversity in Europe was significantly lower than in the U.S. for all six vic loci (P = 0.005) and when data for vic3 were omitted (P = 0.01). Approximately 35% of the total allelic diversity in Europe was because of differentiation among populations (GST = 0.35, Table 3). Most of the differentiation among populations can be attributed to the populations in southern Italy (Teano, Cittanova, and Zafferana) that have significantly different vc type distributions from the other populations (17). Differentiation among the other 10 European populations was much lower than for all 13 populations (GST = 0.07, Table 3).

Table 2.

Allele frequencies, number of polymorphic loci, and mean allelic diversities at six vic loci in populations of C. parasitica

Population* n vic1
vic2
vic3
vic4
vic6
vic7
Polymorphic
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 loci, no. Ĥ§
Italy
 Donnaz, AO 50 0.00 1.00 0.60 0.40 1.00 0.00 0.08 0.92 0.02 0.98 0.00 1.00 2 0.11
 Crevoladossola, VB 131 0.02 0.98 0.29 0.71 1.00 0.00 0.44 0.56 0.12 0.88 0.06 0.94 4 0.21
 Ponte in Valtellina, SO 46 0.09 0.91 0.59 0.41 1.00 0.00 0.20 0.80 0.09 0.91 0.13 0.87 5 0.22
 Bergamo, BG 158 0.09 0.91 0.50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.18 0.82 0.08 0.92 0.08 0.92 5 0.21
 Pigna, IM 48 0.04 0.96 0.77 0.23 1.00 0.00 0.17 0.83 0.02 0.98 0.02 0.98 2 0.13
 Corniglio, PR 50 0.20 0.80 0.72 0.28 1.00 0.00 0.24 0.76 0.20 0.80 0.20 0.80 5 0.29
 Pomina, FI 50 0.08 0.92 0.60 0.40 1.00 0.00 0.08 0.92 0.14 0.86 0.08 0.92 5 0.19
 Tonara, NU 33 0.15 0.85 0.88 0.12 1.00 0.00 0.09 0.91 0.18 0.82 0.18 0.82 5 0.21
 Teano, CE 194 0.79 0.21 0.99 0.01 0.81 0.19 0.01 0.99 0.99 0.01 0.99 0.01 2 0.12
 Cittanova, RC 50 0.02 0.98 0.24 0.76 0.78 0.22 0.00 1.00 0.24 0.76 0.26 0.74 4 0.25
 Zafferana, CT 50 0.86 0.14 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.86 0.14 0.86 0.14 3 0.12
Switzerland
 Lumino 86 0.06 0.94 0.41 0.59 1.00 0.00 0.56 0.44 0.12 0.88 0.13 0.87 5 0.25
 Gnosca 61 0.16 0.84 0.62 0.38 1.00 0.00 0.34 0.66 0.16 0.84 0.23 0.77 5 0.30
USA
 Finzel, MD 54 0.39 0.61 0.39 0.61 0.78 0.22 0.20 0.80 0.78 0.22 0.87 0.13 6 0.36
 Bartow, WV 50 0.24 0.76 0.42 0.58 0.56 0.44 0.32 0.68 0.76 0.24 0.94 0.06 6 0.38
 Depot Hill, NY 37 0.22 0.78 0.35 0.65 0.76 0.24 0.30 0.70 0.92 0.08 0.57 0.43 6 0.37
*

vc type data are from Cortesi et al. (15, 17), Bissegger et al. (31), and Table 1

vic genotypes were determined for EU types by Cortesi and Milgroom (14); “1” and “2” refer to the two alleles found at each vic locus. 

A locus is considered polymorphic if the frequency of the less common allele is >0.05. 

§

Allelic diversity was calculated for each locus according to Nei (36) as ĥ = n (1 − p̂2 − q̂2)/(n − 1), where p̂ is the frequency of allele 1, q̂ = 1 − p̂ and n is the sample size. Mean diversity (Ĥ) is the average of ĥ over all six loci. 

Underline indicates allele frequencies not significantly different from 0.5 (α = 0.01). 

Table 3.

Gene diversity analysis for six vic loci in European populations of C. parasitica

Locus All 13 European populations
Southern Italian populations omitted
HS HT GST HS HT GST
vic1 0.17 0.32 0.46 0.158 0.163 0.03
vic2 0.36 0.47 0.22 0.435 0.482 0.10
vic3 0.05 0.06 0.17 0.000 0.000
vic4 0.25 0.30 0.17 0.321 0.363 0.12
vic6 0.20 0.37 0.46 0.197 0.200 0.02
vic7 0.20 0.37 0.47 0.191 0.198 0.04
All loci 0.21 0.31 0.35 0.217 0.234 0.07

Gene diversity GST = (HTHS)/HT, where HS is the mean vic allele diversity within subpopulations and HT is the total allelic diversity over all subpopulations (36, 37). 

Analyses of multilocus genetic structure of vic genotypes showed that all populations in Europe deviate significantly from random mating for one or more analyses (Table 4). Only 6 of the 13 European populations had significantly (P < 0.05) fewer vc types present than would be expected for the observed vic-allele frequencies under random mating. However, 10 populations had significantly less genotypic diversity than expected under random mating; 2 more were marginally significant (P < 0.08). Finally, all European populations showed highly significant gametic disequilibrium, as estimated by IA. A notable example of deviation from random expectations is in Teano, where there are two dominant vc types, EU-10 and EU-12 (Table 1), that differ by two vic genes (14). In this sample (n = 194), we found only two isolates in recombinant vc type EU-17 and one isolate in recombinant vc type EU-40. However, 32 and 28 isolates would have been expected in EU-17 and EU-40, respectively, under random mating. In contrast, none of the U.S. populations deviated from random mating for any analysis (Table 4).

Table 4.

Analyses of multilocus population structure in C. parasitica based on vic genotypes

Population n No. of polymorphic loci* No. of vic genotypes (Nvc)
Genotypic diversity (Ĝ)
Index of association (IA)§
Cankers with perithecia
Observed Expected P Ĝobs Ĝexp % P sk2 σk2 IA P n %
Italy
 Donnaz, AO 50 2 4 4 0.757 1.32 2.23 59 <0.001 0.43 0.38 0.14 <0.001 23 77
 Crevoladossola, VB 131 4 10 12 0.126 3.66 4.73 77 0.005 0.94 0.76 0.23 <0.001 46 100
 Ponte in Valtellina,  SO 46 5 8 12 0.028 2.79 4.99 56 0.003 2.08 0.91 1.29 <0.001 86 50
 Bergamo, BG 158 5 16 17 0.500 3.96 4.59 86 0.074 1.14 0.84 0.35 <0.001 49 100
 Pigna, IM 48 2 4 4 0.665 1.79 2.14 83 0.128 0.62 0.43 0.44 <0.001 58 57
 Corniglio, PR 50 5 12 16 0.022 1.56 7.61 20 <0.001 4.94 1.13 3.39 <0.001 25 55
 Pomina, FI 50 5 7 11 0.024 2.99 3.95 76 0.067 1.49 0.81 0.84 <0.001 48 50
 Tonara, NU 33 5 5 10 <0.001 1.69 4.04 42 <0.001 3.00 0.92 2.28 <0.001
 Teano, CE 194 2 4 4 0.593 0.80 2.15 37 <0.001 0.82 0.43 0.89 <0.001 36 77
 Cittanova, RC 50 4 4 12 <0.001 1.68 5.78 29 <0.001 3.50 0.93 2.78 <0.001 20 82
 Zafferana, CT 50 3 2 6 <0.001 0.10 2.28 4 <0.001 1.67 0.55 2.04 <0.001 0 74
Switzerland
 Lumino 86 5 14 16 0.269 4.82 6.56 74 0.010 1.23 0.93 0.32 <0.001
 Gnosca 61 5 15 18 0.109 5.77 9.04 64 0.010 1.63 1.12 0.45 <0.001
U.S.
 Finzel, MD 54 6 23 23 0.525 12.68 13.18 96 0.442 1.47 1.35 0.09 0.132
 Bartow, WV 50 6 22 22 0.503 13.16 14.40 91 0.316 1.42 1.31 0.09 0.073 83 78
 Depot Hill, NY 37 6 19 19 0.575 11.31 12.55 90 0.335 1.27 1.33 −0.04 0.729 83 72
*

A locus was considered polymorphic for these analyses if the frequency of the less common allele was >0.05. 

Number of vic genotypes is based only on polymorphic vic loci (as defined above). 

Genotypic diversity Ĝ was calculated as 1/Σp12, where pi is the frequency of the ith genotype (38, 39). Expected values were estimated as the mean of the null distribution generated from 1,000 randomizations under the assumption of random mating. Percentage of the expected genotypic diversity observed was calculated as 100 × Gobs/Gexp. P values were estimated as the proportion of the null distribution with values of G greater than equal to the observed diversity (see text). 

§

Index of association (IA) was estimated as sk2k2 − 1, where sk2 and σk2 are the observed and expected variances in k, the number of heterozygous loci between pairs of individuals (40, 41). P values were estimated as the proportion of the null distribution with values of sk2 greater than equal to the observed variance (see text). 

Percent of cankers with sexual structures (perithecia) of C. parasitica were determined for 10 populations in Italy. n are the number of canker samples examined. 

No data available for these populations. 

Deviations from random mating could be caused by a number of factors, including limited sexual reproduction. However, we found sexual structures (perithecia) of C. parasitica in 9 of the 10 populations in Italy and in both populations examined in the U.S. (Table 4). Genotypic diversity in Italy was positively correlated (r = 0.66, P = 0.04) to the proportion of individuals (cankers) that had perithecia (Fig. 1); proportions of cankers with perithecia were not significantly associated with IA (r = −0.43, P = 0.22). Only one mating type (MAT-1) was found among 49 isolates from Zafferana where no perithecia were found (one isolate did not mate with either tester), suggesting that sexual reproduction is not possible in this population. Furthermore, Zafferana had the lowest genotypic diversity of any population analyzed (Table 4).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Correlation between genotypic diversity and the proportions of cankers caused by C. parasitica with sexual structures (perithecia) in 10 Italian populations (r = 0.66, P = 0.04).

Most vic-allele frequencies are significantly different from 0.5 (Table 2), the equilibrium frequency expected under frequency-dependent selection. However, six European populations and all three U.S. populations had allele frequencies at vic2 that were not different from 0.5.

DISCUSSION

A combination of lower vic-allele diversity and limited recombination explains the lower vc type diversities observed in European populations of C. parasitica compared with North America. This analysis was possible only because we previously determined vic genotypes for 64 vc types (14), which include all vc types found in Italy and Switzerland (15) and the majority of those found in the U.S. (Table 1). We know of no other fungus for which extensive data are available for vic genotypes. By analyzing vic-allele and -genotype frequencies instead of frequencies of vc types (phenotypes), we could address questions about population structure and the evolution of vegetative incompatibility that were not previously possible from vc type survey data.

Populations of C. parasitica in Europe have fewer polymorphic vic loci and lower vic-allele diversity than populations in the U.S., despite the fact that a substantial number of vc types in the U.S. do not have known vic genotypes. Estimates of vic-allele frequencies in U.S. populations were made with the assumption that omitting vc types with unknown genotypes would not introduce excessive bias. vc types with unknown vic genotypes could be the result of polymorphism at additional vic loci and/or multiple alleles at one of the six known vic loci. If additional polymorphic vic loci are unlinked to known vic loci, then they should not bias allele frequency estimates (assuming random mating). Multiple alleles at one or more of the six known vic loci, however, would cause allelic diversity to be underestimated. Nonetheless, vic-allele diversity was significantly greater in the U.S. than in Europe.

Inferences on the reproductive biology of C. parasitica have been made previously from studies of vc type diversity. Increases in vc type diversity (42, 43) and lack of spatial autocorrelation of vc types between trees (34) have been interpreted as evidence for the prevalence of sexual reproduction in U.S. populations. These conclusions were later corroborated by more detailed analyses of population structure by using DNA fingerprinting, confirming the prevalence of recombination (22, 23). Our studies of vic genotypes now provide an extensive analysis of the multilocus population structure of C. parasitica, showing clearly that recombination is suppressed to some extent in all populations studied in Europe but not in populations in the U.S.

Although 64 vic genotypes were found in laboratory crosses from field isolates collected in Europe (14), only 31 were found in the field (15), suggesting a marked lack of recombination. However, genetic differentiation among populations is another contributing factor, especially because allele vic3-2 was only found in two populations in southern Italy (Table 2). Even if populations were freely recombining, most populations would only be expected to have 16 or fewer vc types for the observed allele frequencies and sample sizes in this study (Table 4). Strong geographic differentiation (GST ≈ 0.35) indicates that little gene flow occurs among subpopulations, at least between southern Italy and subpopulations further north. Alternatively, subdivision could be caused by differences in selection on vic genes in different populations, but a mechanism to explain such selection is not clear. More likely, marked subdivision was caused by founder effects and has persisted because of restricted gene flow.

Sexual structures (perithecia) have been reported previously in populations of C. parasitica in Europe (reviewed in ref. 27) but were not described quantitatively. In this study, we found perithecia in 0–86% of the cankers in 10 populations in Italy; 83% of the cankers in both populations in the U.S. had perithecia. Only one mating type was present in Zafferana, the only population where perithecia were not found. Lack of a second mating type appears to prevent sexual reproduction in this population. Populations in Italy with more perithecia tended to have greater genotypic diversity (Fig. 1). However, C. parasitica may also reproduce asexually, and a significant proportion of perithecia may result from self-fertilization, which produce offspring genetically identical to their parents (20, 21). Both asexual reproduction and selfing can contribute to deviations from random mating.

The biological significance of outcrossed sexual offspring may not be accurately reflected by the occurrence of sexual structures. In theory, it takes relatively little recombination to give a population the appearance of panmixis (4446). Therefore, even if ≈70% of the perithecia in Italy are the result of outcrossing (unpublished results), there should be sufficient recombination to result in panmixis if sexual reproduction is a significant mode of reproduction in these populations.

An alternative explanation for deviations from random mating is that vic genes are under selection. Selection may cause gametic disequilibrium among vic genes if some vc types have greater fitness than others. Hypoviruses are possible selective agents in C. parasitica because infected individuals do not produce perithecia, and asexual sporulation may be nearly completely inhibited (26, 47). vic genes restrict horizontal transmission of viruses between vc types (2830), which could result in frequency-dependent selection where rare vc types are favored compared with more common ones (4, 5). Although we would expect to find intermediate vic-allele frequencies under equilibrium conditions, few observed frequencies were close to 0.5. In N. crassa, Wu et al. (7) found three alleles at the het-c locus, all in roughly equal frequencies within a single population. However, in C. parasitica, allele frequencies do not support the hypothesis of frequency-dependent selection on vic loci.

Rejection of the frequency-dependent-selection hypothesis may have occurred for several reasons. First, vic-allele frequencies may not yet have reached equilibrium since C. parasitica was introduced into Europe and North America ≈60 and 100 years ago, respectively (18, 27). Approximately one generation occurs in C. parasitica per year; therefore, relatively few generations have occurred since introduction. Second, under some conditions, polymorphisms at vic loci may be maintained by selection even though allele frequencies may not reach stable equilibria (4), e.g., stable oscillations of vic-allele frequencies are theoretically possible because of frequency-dependent selection (5). In this situation, a static sample of allele frequencies is not a sufficient test for frequency-dependent selection. However, the period of oscillations may be too long, making empirical observation impractical. A third reason that we might have failed to support the balancing-selection hypothesis is because populations in Europe are partially clonal. In clonal populations, viruses may not necessarily select for intermediate allele frequencies at individual vic loci because the entire vic genotype is under selection as a unit. Selection by viruses could theoretically result in approximately equal vc type frequencies (5), although the uneven vc type distributions observed in Europe do not support this hypothesis (15, 17, 31). Even in European populations with the greatest genotypic diversity (e.g., Swiss populations and Bergamo, Italy)—presumably because of recombination—allele frequencies deviate from 0.5. Furthermore, selection on clones of C. parasitica, independent of selection on vic genotypes, also may alter vic-genotype frequencies by hitchhiking selection.

Alternatively, lack of support for frequency-dependent selection may indicate that selection on vic genes is weak, perhaps because inhibition of virus transmission between individuals by vegetative incompatibility is incomplete (2830). Therefore, viruses may be transmitted between vc types often enough to obviate frequency-dependent selection. Furthermore, predictions that all vic-allele frequencies should be intermediate under frequency-dependent selection may be too simplistic. Alleles at some vic loci have no effect on virus transmission, whereas others have intermediate or strong effects (unpublished data). Interestingly, alleles at vic2 strongly restrict virus transmission in the laboratory (unpublished results) and are found at intermediate frequencies in nine populations (Table 2), suggesting that frequency-dependent selection may be operating at this locus. More detailed analyses of effects of vic genes on virus transmission in the laboratory and the field are needed before the factors affecting vic-gene polymorphisms can be fully understood.

Understanding the dynamic interaction of virus and fungus populations has been a major motivation for undertaking extensive vc type surveys and genetic analysis of vic genotypes in C. parasitica. In particular, it is an open question whether viruses fail to establish in populations with high vc type diversity or whether virus introduction selects for greater vc type diversity, causing viruses to decline because of the reduction in horizontal transmission associated with high vc type diversity (48). The decrease in virus infection in the Dutch elm disease fungus as epidemics progress may be an example of the latter scenario of frequency-dependent selection (49). However, vic alleles in the US are not at intermediate frequencies, as expected under frequency-dependent selection, making it an unlikely explanation for the virtual absence of deleterious hypoviruses in C. parasitica in the U.S. (33, 50) despite repeated introductions for biological control (25). The hypothesis of frequency-dependent selection by viruses on vic genes will require further investigation, perhaps by analyzing trans-species polymorphisms in vic alleles, as in Neurospora (7).

Acknowledgments

We thank J. Anderson, J. Leslie, and R. Marra for helpful comments on earlier drafts and P. Allegra, L. Arredondo, Y.-C. Liu, L. Rancati, S. Senzaqua, and K. Takeuchi for help with vc testing. This research was supported in part by a North Atlantic Treaty Organization Cooperative Research Grant, U.S. Department of Agriculture National Research Initiative Competitive Grant 97-35303-4536, and a fellowship from the National Research Council of Italy, Special Project in Advanced Research for Innovation in Agricultural Systems, to M.G.M.

ABBREVIATION

vc type

vegetative-compatibility type

References

  • 1.Glass N L, Kuldau G A. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1992;30:201–224. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.30.090192.001221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Leslie J F. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1993;31:127–150. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.31.090193.001015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Caten C E. J Gen Microbiol. 1972;72:221–229. doi: 10.1099/00221287-72-2-221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hartl D L, Dempster E R, Brown S W. Genetics. 1975;81:553–569. doi: 10.1093/genetics/81.3.553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nauta M J, Hoekstra R F. Evolution. 1994;48:979–995. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb05287.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Malik M, Vilgalys R. In: Structure and Dynamics of Fungal Populations. Worrall J J, editor. London: Chapman & Hall; 1999. pp. 123–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wu J, Saupe S J, Glass N L. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:12398–12403. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bégueret J, Turcq B, Clavé C. Trends Genet. 1994;10:441–446. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(94)90115-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Milgroom M G, Brasier C M. Mycologia. 1997;89:722–726. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dales R B G, Moorhouse J, Croft J H. Heredity. 1993;70:537–543. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1993.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Saupe S J, Glass N L. Genetics. 1997;146:1299–1309. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.4.1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Anderson J B, Kohn L M. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1995;33:369–391. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.33.090195.002101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Milgroom M G. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1996;34:457–477. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.34.1.457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cortesi P, Milgroom M G. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:2988–2994. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.8.2988-2994.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cortesi P, Rigling D, Heiniger U. Eur J For Path. 1998;28:167–176. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Anagnostakis S L, Hau B, Kranz J. Plant Dis. 1986;70:536–538. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cortesi P, Milgroom M G, Bisiach M. Mycol Res. 1996;100:1087–1093. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Milgroom M G, Wang K, Zhou Y, Lipari S E, Kaneko S. Mycologia. 1996;88:179–190. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Milgroom M G, Lipari S E, Wang K. Mycol Res. 1992;96:1114–1120. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Milgroom M G. Can J Bot. 1995;73, Suppl. 1:S311–S319. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Milgroom M G, Lipari S E, Ennos R A, Liu Y-C. Heredity. 1993;70:385–392. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu Y-C, Cortesi P, Double M L, MacDonald W L, Milgroom M G. Phytopathology. 1996;86:1344–1451. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Milgroom M G, Lipari S E, Powell W A. Genetics. 1992;131:297–306. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.2.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hillman B I, Fulbright D W, Nuss D L, Van Alfen N K. In: Sixth Report of the International Committee for the Taxonomy of Viruses. Murphy F A, Fauquet C M, Bishop D H L, Ghabrial S A, Jarvis A W, Martelli G P, Mayo M P, Summers M D, editors. New York: Springer; 1995. pp. 261–264. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.MacDonald W L, Fulbright D W. Plant Dis. 1991;75:656–661. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nuss D L. Microbiol Rev. 1992;56:561–576. doi: 10.1128/mr.56.4.561-576.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Heiniger U, Rigling D. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1994;32:581–599. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu Y-C, Milgroom M G. Phytopathology. 1996;86:79–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Anagnostakis S L. Mycologia. 1983;75:777–780. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huber D H, Fulbright D W. In: Proceedings of the International Chestnut Conference. Double M L, MacDonald W L, editors. Morgantown: West Virginia Univ. Press; 1994. pp. 15–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bissegger M, Rigling D, Heiniger U. Phytopathology. 1997;87:50–59. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.1.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Milgroom M G, Lipari S E. Mol Ecol. 1995;4:633–642. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00264.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Peever T L, Liu Y-C, Milgroom M G. Phytopathology. 1997;87:1026–1033. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.10.1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Milgroom M G, MacDonald W L, Double M L. Can J Bot. 1991;69:1407–1413. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Huber D H. Ph.D. dissertation. East Lansing: Michigan State University; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nei M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1973;70:3321–3323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nei M, Chesser R K. Ann Hum Genet. 1983;47:253–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1983.tb00993.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hoffman R J. Evolution. 1986;40:357–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00477.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stoddart J A, Taylor J F. Genetics. 1988;118:705–711. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.4.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Brown A D H, Feldman M W, Nevo E. Genetics. 1980;96:523–536. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.2.523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Maynard Smith J, Smith N H, O’Rourke M, Spratt B G. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:4384–4388. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Anagnostakis S L, Kranz J. Phytopathology. 1987;77:751–754. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.MacDonald W L, Double M L. In: Proceedings of the American Chestnut Symposium. MacDonald W L, Cech F C, Luchok J, Smith C, editors. Morgantown: West Virginia Univ. Press; 1978. pp. 103–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Burt A, Carter D A, Koenig G L, White T J, Taylor J W. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:770–773. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.2.770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hudson R R. J Evol Biol. 1994;7:535–548. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Maynard Smith J. J Evol Biol. 1994;7:525–534. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Van Alfen N K, Jaynes R A, Anagnostakis S L, Day P R. Science. 1975;189:890–891. doi: 10.1126/science.189.4206.890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Milgroom M G. In: Structure and Dynamics of Fungal Populations. Worrall J, editor. London: Chapman & Hall; 1999. pp. 283–305. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Brasier C M. Nature (London) 1988;332:538–541. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Enebak S A, MacDonald W L, Hillman B I. Phytopathology. 1994;84:528–534. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES