Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1997 Sep;179(17):5543–5550. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.17.5543-5550.1997

A fragment liberated from the Escherichia coli CheA kinase that blocks stimulatory, but not inhibitory, chemoreceptor signaling.

T B Morrison 1, J S Parkinson 1
PMCID: PMC179427  PMID: 9287011

Abstract

CheA, a cytoplasmic histidine autokinase, in conjunction with the CheW coupling protein, forms stable ternary complexes with the cytoplasmic signaling domains of transmembrane chemoreceptors. These signaling complexes induce chemotactic movements by stimulating or inhibiting CheA autophosphorylation activity in response to chemoeffector stimuli. To explore the mechanisms of CheA control by chemoreceptor signaling complexes, we examined the ability of various CheA fragments to interfere with receptor coupling control of CheA. CheA[250-654], a fragment carrying the catalytic domain and an adjacent C-terminal segment previously implicated in stimulatory control of CheA activity, interfered with the production of clockwise flagellar rotation and with chemotactic ability in wild-type cells. Epistasis tests indicated that CheA[250-654] blocked clockwise rotation by disrupting stimulatory coupling of CheA to receptors. In vitro coupling assays confirmed that a stoichiometric excess of CheA[250-654] fragments could exclude CheA from stimulatory receptor complexes, most likely by competing for CheW binding. However, CheA[250-654] fragments, even in vast excess, did not block receptor-mediated inhibition of CheA, suggesting that CheA[250-654] lacks an inhibitory contact site present in native CheA. This inhibitory target is most likely in the N-terminal P1 domain, which contains His-48, the site of autophosphorylation. These findings suggest a simple allosteric model of CheA control by ternary signaling complexes in which the receptor signaling domain conformationally regulates the interaction between the substrate and catalytic domains of CheA.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (157.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ames P., Parkinson J. S. Constitutively signaling fragments of Tsr, the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor. J Bacteriol. 1994 Oct;176(20):6340–6348. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.20.6340-6348.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ames P., Parkinson J. S. Transmembrane signaling by bacterial chemoreceptors: E. coli transducers with locked signal output. Cell. 1988 Dec 2;55(5):817–826. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90137-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ames P., Yu Y. A., Parkinson J. S. Methylation segments are not required for chemotactic signalling by cytoplasmic fragments of Tsr, the methyl-accepting serine chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1996 Feb;19(4):737–746. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.408930.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barak R., Eisenbach M. Correlation between phosphorylation of the chemotaxis protein CheY and its activity at the flagellar motor. Biochemistry. 1992 Feb 18;31(6):1821–1826. doi: 10.1021/bi00121a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Borkovich K. A., Kaplan N., Hess J. F., Simon M. I. Transmembrane signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis involves ligand-dependent activation of phosphate group transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Feb;86(4):1208–1212. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.4.1208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Borkovich K. A., Simon M. I. Coupling of receptor function to phosphate-transfer reactions in bacterial chemotaxis. Methods Enzymol. 1991;200:205–214. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)00140-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Borkovich K. A., Simon M. I. The dynamics of protein phosphorylation in bacterial chemotaxis. Cell. 1990 Dec 21;63(6):1339–1348. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90429-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bourret R. B., Davagnino J., Simon M. I. The carboxy-terminal portion of the CheA kinase mediates regulation of autophosphorylation by transducer and CheW. J Bacteriol. 1993 Apr;175(7):2097–2101. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.7.2097-2101.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Garzón A., Parkinson J. S. Chemotactic signaling by the P1 phosphorylation domain liberated from the CheA histidine kinase of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1996 Dec;178(23):6752–6758. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.23.6752-6758.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gegner J. A., Dahlquist F. W. Signal transduction in bacteria: CheW forms a reversible complex with the protein kinase CheA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Feb 1;88(3):750–754. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.3.750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gegner J. A., Graham D. R., Roth A. F., Dahlquist F. W. Assembly of an MCP receptor, CheW, and kinase CheA complex in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway. Cell. 1992 Sep 18;70(6):975–982. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90247-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hess J. F., Bourret R. B., Simon M. I. Histidine phosphorylation and phosphoryl group transfer in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature. 1988 Nov 10;336(6195):139–143. doi: 10.1038/336139a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Levit M., Liu Y., Surette M., Stock J. Active site interference and asymmetric activation in the chemotaxis protein histidine kinase CheA. J Biol Chem. 1996 Dec 13;271(50):32057–32063. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.50.32057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Li J., Swanson R. V., Simon M. I., Weis R. M. The response regulators CheB and CheY exhibit competitive binding to the kinase CheA. Biochemistry. 1995 Nov 14;34(45):14626–14636. doi: 10.1021/bi00045a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu J. D., Parkinson J. S. Genetic evidence for interaction between the CheW and Tsr proteins during chemoreceptor signaling by Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1991 Aug;173(16):4941–4951. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.16.4941-4951.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu J. D., Parkinson J. S. Role of CheW protein in coupling membrane receptors to the intracellular signaling system of bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Nov;86(22):8703–8707. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.22.8703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lupas A., Stock J. Phosphorylation of an N-terminal regulatory domain activates the CheB methylesterase in bacterial chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 1989 Oct 15;264(29):17337–17342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Matsumura P., Rydel J. J., Linzmeier R., Vacante D. Overexpression and sequence of the Escherichia coli cheY gene and biochemical activities of the CheY protein. J Bacteriol. 1984 Oct;160(1):36–41. doi: 10.1128/jb.160.1.36-41.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McNally D. F., Matsumura P. Bacterial chemotaxis signaling complexes: formation of a CheA/CheW complex enhances autophosphorylation and affinity for CheY. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jul 15;88(14):6269–6273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.14.6269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Morrison T. B., Parkinson J. S. Liberation of an interaction domain from the phosphotransfer region of CheA, a signaling kinase of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jun 7;91(12):5485–5489. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nagai K., Thøgersen H. C., Luisi B. F. Refolding and crystallographic studies of eukaryotic proteins produced in Escherichia coli. Biochem Soc Trans. 1988 Apr;16(2):108–110. doi: 10.1042/bst0160108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ninfa E. G., Stock A., Mowbray S., Stock J. Reconstitution of the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction system from purified components. J Biol Chem. 1991 May 25;266(15):9764–9770. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Parkinson J. S., Houts S. E. Isolation and behavior of Escherichia coli deletion mutants lacking chemotaxis functions. J Bacteriol. 1982 Jul;151(1):106–113. doi: 10.1128/jb.151.1.106-113.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Parkinson J. S. cheA, cheB, and cheC genes of Escherichia coli and their role in chemotaxis. J Bacteriol. 1976 May;126(2):758–770. doi: 10.1128/jb.126.2.758-770.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Segall J. E., Manson M. D., Berg H. C. Signal processing times in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature. 1982 Apr 29;296(5860):855–857. doi: 10.1038/296855a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Smith R. A., Parkinson J. S. Overlapping genes at the cheA locus of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Sep;77(9):5370–5374. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.9.5370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Surette M. G., Levit M., Liu Y., Lukat G., Ninfa E. G., Ninfa A., Stock J. B. Dimerization is required for the activity of the protein histidine kinase CheA that mediates signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 1996 Jan 12;271(2):939–945. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.2.939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Swanson R. V., Schuster S. C., Simon M. I. Expression of CheA fragments which define domains encoding kinase, phosphotransfer, and CheY binding activities. Biochemistry. 1993 Aug 3;32(30):7623–7629. doi: 10.1021/bi00081a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tawa P., Stewart R. C. Kinetics of CheA autophosphorylation and dephosphorylation reactions. Biochemistry. 1994 Jun 28;33(25):7917–7924. doi: 10.1021/bi00191a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Welch M., Oosawa K., Aizawa S., Eisenbach M. Phosphorylation-dependent binding of a signal molecule to the flagellar switch of bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 1;90(19):8787–8791. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.19.8787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES