Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2006 Aug 29;115(1):13–19. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9281

The Effects of Components of Fine Particulate Air Pollution on Mortality in California: Results from CALFINE

Bart Ostro 1,, Wen-Ying Feng 2, Rachel Broadwin 1, Shelley Green 1, Michael Lipsett 3
PMCID: PMC1797827  PMID: 17366813

Abstract

Objective

Several epidemiologic studies provide evidence of an association between daily mortality and particulate matter < 2.5 μm in diameter (PM2.5). Little is known, however, about the relative effects of PM2.5 constituents. We examined associations between 19 PM2.5 components and daily mortality in six California counties.

Design

We obtained daily data from 2000 to 2003 on mortality and PM2.5 mass and components, including elemental and organic carbon (EC and OC), nitrates, sulfates, and various metals. We examined associations of PM2.5 and its constituents with daily counts of several mortality categories: all-cause, cardiovascular, respiratory, and mortality age > 65 years. Poisson regressions incorporating natural splines were used to control for time-varying covariates. Effect estimates were determined for each component in each county and then combined using a random-effects model.

Results

PM2.5 mass and several constituents were associated with multiple mortality categories, especially cardiovascular deaths. For example, for a 3-day lag, the latter increased by 1.6, 2.1, 1.6, and 1.5% for PM2.5, EC, OC, and nitrates based on interquartile ranges of 14.6, 0.8, 4.6, and 5.5 μg/m3, respectively. Stronger associations were observed between mortality and additional pollutants, including sulfates and several metals, during the cool season.

Conclusion

This multicounty analysis adds to the growing body of evidence linking PM2.5 with mortality and indicates that excess risks may vary among specific PM2.5 components. Therefore, the use of regression coefficients based on PM2.5 mass may underestimate associations with some PM2.5 components. Also, our findings support the hypothesis that combustion-associated pollutants are particularly important in California.

Keywords: EC, fine particles, mortality, nitrates, OC, particulate matter, PM2.5, species


Particulate matter (PM) air pollution is ubiquitous in the urban environment, representing a heterogeneous mix of solid and liquid particles generated by many different sources. Several recent multicity time-series studies have demonstrated associations between daily mortality and fine PM [i.e., particles < 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5)] (e.g., Laden et al. 2000; Ostro et al. 2006). There is little information, however, about the relative effects of PM2.5 constituents. The National Research Council (NRC) recently highlighted the importance of investigating characteristics and constituents of particles that contribute to their toxicity (NRC 2004). Differential toxicity can have important implications for both the establishment of ambient air quality standards and for more targeted PM control strategies. Specifically, focusing regulations on the most toxic PM2.5 constituents could protect public health at a lower total cost.

Previous time-series analyses indicate that, of the sources of PM, motor vehicle exhaust usually has the strongest associations with all-cause or cardiovascular mortality (Janssen et al. 2002; Laden et al. 2000; Mar et al. 2000). Epidemiologic examinations of specific constituents of PM2.5 also indicate that elemental and organic carbon (EC and OC) and several transition metals are associated with mortality (Burnett et al. 2000; Mar et al. 2000). In California, the ambient particle chemistry, size distributions, and temporal patterns of exposure are different from those in other parts of the United States and Canada (Blanchard 2003). In previous work, we demonstrated associations of daily PM2.5 mass concentrations with total mortality and with several mortality subcategories in nine heavily populated California counties (Ostro et al. 2006). In 2000, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) embarked on a program to systematically collect data on constituents of PM2.5 throughout much of California, providing an opportunity to examine daily measurements of these data in relation to mortality.

In this article, we report the results of our analysis of PM2.5 components and mortality in six counties. For comparison, we also examined associations with PM2.5 in a larger data set that includes nine California counties. The use of multiple cities in our analysis enhances statistical power, reduces the likelihood of spurious results from a single city, and incorporates a broader range of relevant geographic and population characteristics such as climate, background health status, demographics, and economic status.

Data and Methods

Mortality data

We obtained data on daily mortality for all California residents from the California Department of Health Services, Center for Health Statistics (CDHS), for the period for which data on PM2.5 components were collected: 1 January 2000 through 31 December 2003 (CDHS 1999–2003). We also collected mortality data from 1999 to support additional analyses of PM2.5 (CDHS 1999). A death was included only when it occurred in the decedent’s county of residence. Daily counts of total deaths (minus accidents and homicides) were aggregated for all ages. In addition, we determined daily total mortality counts for those > 65 years of age and for deaths from respiratory disease [International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD10; World Health Organization 1993) codes J00–J98] and cardiovascular disease (codes I00–I99).

Pollutant and meteorologic data

We obtained PM2.5 speciation data for the 4-year period 2000 through 2003 from the CARB (CARB 2004). The speciation monitors were part of the State and Local Air Monitoring Stations network, and were filter-based Met One Speciation Air Sampling Systems (Met One Instruments Inc., Grants Pass, OR). We included only counties with ≥ 180 days of observations with PM2.5 species data to ensure sufficient statistical power. Thus, our study of PM2.5 components was limited to deaths occurring in six California counties, which included approximately 8.7 million people, or 25% of the state’s population. Each of the six counties had two monitors measuring PM2.5 components and mass. In three counties (Fresno, Kern, and Riverside), the two monitors were located within four meters of each other in the cities of Fresno, Bakersfield, and Rubidoux, respectively. In the other counties (Sacramento, San Diego, and Santa Clara) the monitors were not co-located. Fresno, Kern, Riverside, and Sacramento Counties reported data every third day, whereas San Diego and Santa Clara Counties reported data every sixth day. For the speciation analyses, the number of observation days available ranged from 243 (San Diego County) to 395 (Sacramento County). The following constituents of PM2.5 were measured as 24-hr averages: EC, OC, nitrates (NO3), sulfates (SO4), aluminum, bromine, calcium, chlorine, copper, iron, potassium, manganese, nickel, lead, sulfur, silicon, titanium, vanadium, and zinc. These PM2.5 components represent multiple sources of PM2.5, including gasoline combustion, diesel exhaust, wood smoke, crustal material, and secondary pollutants, among others.

We also analyzed PM2.5 mass using a larger data set from 1999 through 2003 using all available monitors (including those that did not collect species data) for nine California counties—the same six counties as above plus Contra Costa, Los Angeles, and Orange Counties. The nonspeciated network data were obtained from the CARB (2004). PM2.5 monitors were filter-based samplers (model RAAS2.5–300; Thermo Andersen, Smyrna, GA). From the nonspeciated network, six counties had only one monitor each collecting daily PM2.5 data, whereas Los Angeles, San Diego, and Santa Clara Counties had three, three, and two monitors, respectively.

To allow adjustment for the effect of weather on mortality, we collected daily average temperature and humidity data at meteorologic stations in each of the counties. Hourly temperature data were obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Climatic Data Center (NCDC 2004). All daily mortality, pollutant, and meteorologic data were converted into a SAS database (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and merged by date.

Methods

Counts of daily mortality are non-negative discrete integers representing rare events; such data typically follow a Poisson distribution. Therefore, we used Poisson regression, conditional on the explanatory variables. In the basic analytic approach, we used similar model specifications for each city, including smoothers for time trend and weather using natural splines. The natural spline model is a parametric approach that fits cubic functions joined at knots, which are typically placed evenly throughout the distribution of the variable of concern, such as time. The number of knots used determines the overall smoothness of the fit. Previous analysis has indicated that different spline models generate relatively similar results, although increasing the number of knots generally tends to decrease the estimated effect of pollution [Health Effects Institute (HEI) 2003; Ostro et al. 2006].

The basic regression model included the following time-varying covariates: day of week, smoothing splines of one-day lags of average temperature and humidity [each with 3 degrees of freedom (df)], and a smoothing spline of time with 4 df per year of data. We chose 4 df a priori because this number has been found to control well for seasonal and secular patterns (HEI 2003; Ostro et al. 2006). However, we conducted additional sensitivity analyses to evaluate the impact of alternative df for the smooth of time. In our primary analysis for each pollutant, we examined single-day lags of 0–3 days. Because the species data were only available every third or sixth day, multiday exposure averages could not be constructed. To facilitate comparisons of PM2.5 with its components, PM2.5c was created. PM2.5c was limited to values of PM2.5 mass measured at monitors that also measured PM2.5 components on the same days. Therefore, PM2.5c measurements included data from six counties from 2000 through 2003. To maximize the PM2.5 measurements and our statistical power, we also developed an extended metric for PM2.5 (PM2.5ext) that used both PM2.5c and any other available measurements of PM2.5 from 1999 through 2003 for nine (rather than the original six) California counties.

Regression models were run for each county, and the results were combined in a meta-analysis using a random-effects model (Der Simonian and Laird 1986), although results were fairly similar using a fixed-effects model.

To obtain a daily county pollutant concentration while accounting for missing data, we used the same process as that reported by Wong et al. (2001). For each species, the daily average was developed using the following method: a) calculating the mean value for each monitor across the study period; b) subtracting each monitor’s mean concentration from the nonmissing daily values for that monitor (i.e., centered data); c) calculating the daily mean of the available centered data across all monitors in a given county; and d) by day, adding back the grand mean (the mean of all unadjusted daily values of all of the monitors). On days when no data for a given pollutant were available from any monitor in the county, that day was recorded as missing; no data were imputed. Results generated using this data set involved a tradeoff between the increased sample size and statistical power and the potential effects on measurement error introduced through the use of multiple monitors in different parts of a given county.

Several sensitivity analyses were conducted. First, we examined the potential measurement error created by combining data for each county from multiple monitors with differing numbers of missing values. We created a data set limited to the single monitor within each county with the most (and at least 180) observations for PM2.5 mass and its components. As a second series of sensitivity analyses, we examined the effects of alternative smoothers of time, using either 3 or 6 df for time trend, as opposed to 4 df in the basic model. Third, we examined the effect of alternative specifications of temperature and humidity, using unlagged values for these covariates, as opposed to the 1-day lag used in the basic model. Finally, we stratified the data set by warm (April–September) and cool (October–March) periods to examine potential seasonal influences.

All final results were calculated using R (version 2.1.1; R Development Core Team 2004) for the single-county analyses and Stata (StataCorp 2003) for the meta-analyses. To compare relative impacts based on observed concentrations, the results are presented as the excess risk [i.e., (RR-1) × 100] in daily mortality for the interquartile range (IQR) of the pollutants. The full set of results, including the percent change in mortality per microgram per cubic meter for each component, is available online in the Supplemental Material (http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2006/9281/suppl.pdf).

Results

Table 1 provides descriptive statistics for mortality categories, air quality, and meteorologic data from six counties with species data, as well as the other three counties included in the analysis of PM2.5 mass concentrations only. Mean daily mortality varied from 147 in Los Angeles County to 11 in Kern County. Mean daily PM2.5 concentrations over the study period averaged around 19 μg/m3, and ranged from 13 μg/m3 in Sacramento and Contra Costa Counties to 27 μg/m3 in Riverside County, exceeding the U.S. EPA annual average PM2.5 standard of 15 μg/m3 in six counties, and the California annual average standard of 12 μg/m3 in all nine counties. Table 2 summarizes the data on PM2.5 and its components for the full study period and for the cooler seasons (October–March). Over the four years, there were a total of approximately 1,870 observations across the six counties for most of the species. The largest contributors to PM2.5 were EC (5%), OC (37%), NO3 (28%), and SO4 (10%). Table 3 provides the correlations among the species and PM2.5. Moderate to high correlations (r = 0.4–0.6) were found between PM2.5 and EC, OC, NO3, Br, K, and Zn. More modest correlations (r = 0.2–0.4) were observed between PM2.5 and SO4, Ca, Cu, Fe, Pb, S, Ti, and V.

Table 1.

Mean daily deaths by mortality category and air quality and meteorologic data, by county, 2000–2003.

Contra Costa Fresno Kern Los Angeles Orange Riverside Sacramento San Diego Santa Clara
Mortality category
 All causes 15.7 13.4 11.4 146.7 40.2 28.8 22.0 49.5 21.3
 Cardiovascular disease 6.4 5.8 5.1 66.3 17.8 13.2 9.3 20.3 8.7
 Respiratory disease 1.8 1.5 1.5 15.1 4.3 3.4 2.6 5.5 2.4
 Age > 65 years 12.2 10.1 8.4 108.6 31.8 22.8 16.3 38.8 16.4
County characteristics
 Population (1,000s) 949 799 662 9,519 2,846 1,545 1,223 2,814 1,683
 Mean PM2.5 (μg/m3) 12.8 17.5 19.5 20.8 21.5 27.1 12.6 15.3 13.9
 Mean temperature (°F) 60.1 64.2 65.7 63.8 63.6 65.5 61.8 61.9 59.5
 Mean relative humidity 64.4 56.5 58.2 58.8 71.8 62.6 66.1 75.8 68.3
 Days in species analysis 0 355 281 0 0 279 395 243 317

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics for PM2.5 and species in California counties, 2000–2003.

All-year
Cooler months (Oct–Mar)
Pollutants Obsa Mean (μg/m3) IQR (μg/m3) 95th percentile % Below detection Obsa Mean (μg/m3) IQR (μg/m3)
PM2.5cb 1,878 19.28 14.63 46.91 0.00 844 24.60 21.47
EC 1,879 0.966 0.795 2.57 0.05 842 1.319 1.135
OC 1,879 7.129 4.592 15.91 0.00 842 9.192 6.124
NO3 1,817 5.415 5.524 17.46 0.00 831 7.294 7.985
SO4 1,817 1.908 1.530 5.18 0.00 831 1.483 1.233
Al 1,870 0.044 0.051 0.14 5.45 845 0.036 0.042
Br 1,870 0.004 0.004 0.01 1.76 845 0.005 0.004
Ca 1,870 0.080 0.064 0.20 0.05 845 0.081 0.066
Cl 1,870 0.094 0.069 0.41 2.09 845 0.105 0.083
Cu 1,870 0.007 0.007 0.34 1.34 845 0.008 0.008
Fe 1,870 0.124 0.099 0.26 0.00 845 0.138 0.117
K 1,870 0.117 0.081 0.01 0.00 845 0.135 0.112
Mn 1,870 0.003 0.003 0.01 3.21 845 0.003 0.003
Ni 1,870 0.005 0.003 0.01 2.51 845 0.005 0.003
Pb 1,870 0.004 0.004 1.70 2.83 845 0.005 0.005
S 1,870 0.648 0.499 0.43 0.00 845 0.522 0.434
Si 1,870 0.168 0.151 0.04 0.05 845 0.147 0.132
Ti 1,870 0.009 0.008 47.69 0.32 845 0.008 0.008
V 1,870 0.002 0.003 46.91 5.56 845 0.002 0.002
Zn 1,870 0.012 0.011 2.57 1.82 845 0.018 0.014
PM2.5extc 11,494 18.6 15.1 15.9 0.00 5,777 22.40 19.8
a

Total number of observations (Obs) for analysis across all of the counties.

b

Includes six counties with species data, 2000–2003.

c

Includes all nine counties in Table 1, 1999–2003.

Table 3.

Longitudinal correlations of PM2.5 and its components.

PM2.5ca EC OC NO3 SO4 Al Br Ca Cl Cu Fe K Mn Ni Pb S Si Ti V Zn PM2.5extb
PM2.5ca 1
EC 0.53 1
OC 0.62 0.61 1
NO3 0.65 0.41 0.44 1
SO4 0.32 0.05 0.12 0.35 1
Al 0.02 0.05 0.05 −0.06 0.07 1
Br 0.54 0.41 0.45 0.45 0.36 0.08 1
Ca 0.23 0.27 0.17 0.11 0.19 0.29 0.31 1
Cl 0.15 0.10 0.08 0.08 −0.07 −0.08 0.05 −0.02 1
Cu 0.23 0.29 0.26 0.15 0.10 0.11 0.26 0.23 −0.04 1
Fe 0.38 0.48 0.39 0.23 0.16 0.32 0.41 0.61 −0.01 0.32 1
K 0.52 0.48 0.57 0.34 0.09 0.13 0.41 0.27 0.13 0.26 0.41 1
Mn 0.21 0.24 0.18 0.14 0.13 0.32 0.21 0.28 0.04 0.11 0.39 0.20 1
Ni 0.11 0.08 0.02 0.10 0.16 0.07 0.10 0.21 0.03 0.04 0.20 0.03 0.13 1
Pb 0.27 0.28 0.27 0.22 0.06 0.03 0.23 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.19 0.23 0.13 0.04 1
S 0.35 0.07 0.14 0.36 0.85 0.08 0.38 0.19 −0.05 0.12 0.18 0.12 0.13 0.15 0.08 1
Si 0.16 0.19 0.15 0.05 0.20 0.44 0.28 0.62 −0.15 0.23 0.59 0.25 0.30 0.14 0.06 0.21 1
Ti 0.24 0.28 0.23 0.12 0.19 0.37 0.30 0.54 −0.06 0.26 0.60 0.30 0.33 0.18 0.11 0.20 0.57 1
V 0.20 0.09 0.12 0.21 0.31 0.08 0.21 0.15 0.08 0.06 0.16 0.08 0.15 0.11 0.09 0.31 0.12 0.20 1
Zn 0.51 0.53 0.50 0.45 0.11 −0.01 0.37 0.20 0.15 0.23 0.37 0.45 0.23 0.03 0.31 0.15 0.14 0.20 0.17 1
PM2.5extb 0.85 0.52 0.60 0.64 0.30 0.01 0.52 0.21 0.18 0.24 0.36 0.48 0.20 0.08 0.27 0.34 0.13 0.22 0.23 0.52 1
a

Includes six counties with species data, 2000–2003.

b

Includes all nine counties in Table 1, 1999–2003.

Table 4 provides a summary of the basic meta-analytic results for alternative single-day lags of pollutant concentrations. The results suggest many associations between the pollutants and the mortality end points. Among the pollutants from the speciation network, the strongest associations were observed for PM2.5 mass, EC, NO3, Cl, Cu, Fe, K, Ti, V, and Zn. Adding observations to PM2.5 mass by using data from the nonspeciation counties (so that all nine counties were included) enhanced the statistical power and resulted in observable associations with all four of the mortality categories. When the results by mortality end points were examined, several patterns emerged. All-cause mortality was associated most strongly with Cu and PM2.5ext, with weaker associations also observed with NO3 and Cl. Cardiovascular mortality was associated most strongly with EC, K, Zn and PM2.5 with more modest associations observed with OC, NO3, Fe, and Ti. Respiratory mortality was associated with Cu and Ti, with weaker associations with V, Zn, and PM2.5ext. Finally, for mortality among those > 65 years of age, significant associations were observed with PM2.5, NO3, Cl, K, and Zn.

Table 4.

Summary of statistically significant associations between mortality and alternative pollutant lags (numbers in the table indicate whether single lags of 0–3 days were statistically significant).

All-cause Cardiovascular Respiratory Age > 65 years
PM2.5ca 1*, 3* 3**
EC 3**
OC 3*
NO3 0* 3* 0**
SO4
Al
Br
Ca
Cl 1* 1**
Cu 1** 3**
Fe 2*
K 2** 2*
Mn
Ni
Pb
S
Si
Ti 1*, 2* 3**
V 1*
Zn 3** 1* 1**, 3**
PM2.5extb 0**, 1* 0**, 1** 1*, 2* 0**, 1**

The regression model includes time (4 df/year), 1-day lags of temperature and humidity (3 df), day of week, and pollutant.

a

Includes six counties with species data, 2000–2003.

b

Includes all nine counties in Table 1, 1999–2003.

*

p < 0.10;

**

p < 0.05.

Figure 1 summarizes the quantitative meta-analytic results for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality using single-day lags of selected pollutants (the full set of results is available in the Supplemental Material: http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2006/9281/suppl.pdf). Unlike many time-series studies with continuous daily data, not all lags refer to the same outcome days. Specifically, for PM data collected every third day, lags 0 and 3 will generally refer to the same days (and numbers of deaths per day) except at the ends of the time series. However, for those same PM data, lags 1 and 2 refer to different days with different numbers of deaths. Although this phenomenon holds true for other studies using nondaily PM data, the number of observations used in this analysis is small relative to those in most published studies of PM and mortality. Therefore, the results are somewhat sensitive to the specified lag; however, the findings suggest many associations between the pollutants and mortality end points. For example, for a 3-day lag, cardiovascular mortality increased by 1.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0–3.1] for PM2.5, 2.1% (95% CI, 0.3–3.9) for EC, 1.6% (95% CI, −0.1 to 3.2) for OC, 1.5% (95% CI, −0.2 to 3.3) for nitrates and 2.2% (95% CI, 0.3–4.2) for Zn for IQRs of 14.6, 0.8, 4.6, 5.5, and 0.01 μg/m3, respectively. Most CIs are large due to the relatively low numbers of observations. In comparing the beta coefficients, the percent change in cardiovascular mortality per microgram per cubic meter was much greater for many of the components relative to PM2.5 mass (see Supplemental Material: http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2006/9281/suppl.pdf). For example, the risk per unit of EC, OC, NO3, K, and Zn were several times higher than that of PM2.5 mass.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Excess risk [mean (95% CI)] of mortality per IQR of concentrations. (A) All-cause mortality. (B) Cardiovascular mortality.

*p < 0.10. **p < 0.05.

Table 5 and Figure 2 summarize the cool season–specific results. During the cooler months, there are more associations between the pollutants and mortality than when the entire year is included in the analysis. Except for Al, Br, and Ni, almost all of the pollutants were associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and with daily deaths among those > 65 years of age. In contrast, during the summer months there were few associations, except for K with cardiovascular and respiratory deaths, and Al, Cl, Cu, Pb, Ti, and Zn with respiratory mortality (data not shown). Additional sensitivity analyses indicated that the species results were insensitive to treatment of missing values, alternative df used for the smoothers of time and weather, and different lags for the weather terms in the model specifications (data not shown).

Table 5.

Summary of statistically significant associations between mortality and alternative pollutant lags during October–March, 2000–2003 (numbers in the table indicate whether single lags of 0–3 days were statistically significant).

All-cause Cardiovascular Respiratory Age > 65 years
PM2.5ca 3** 3** 3**
EC 3* 3*
OC 3* 3* 3*
NO3 3* 0*
SO4 0**, 3* 0*, 3** 0**
Al
Br
Ca 1**, 2*, 3* 3*
Cl 1** 1** 1**
Cu 1* 1**
Fe 2*, 3** 3** 3**
K 3** 3**
Mn 2**, 3* 3**
Ni
Pb 3** 3*
S 0*, 3** 3* 0**,3*
Si 1*, 3** 3**
Ti 1**, 2*, 3** 1** 3**
V 1** 3** 1**
Zn 3** 3** 1* 3**
PM2.5extb 0**, 1**, 2**, 3** 0**, 1**, 2**, 3** 0**, 1**, 2**, 3** 0**, 1**, 2**, 3**

The regression model includes time (4 df/year), 1-day lags of temperature and humidity (3 df), day of week, and pollutant.

a

Includes six counties with species data, 2000–2003.

b

Includes all nine counties in Table 1, 1999–2003.

*

p < 0.10;

**

p < 0.05.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Excess risk [mean (95% CI)] of mortality per IQR of concentrations for the cooler months (October–March). (A) All-cause mortality. (B) Cardiovascular mortality.

*p < 0.10; **p < 0.05.

Discussion

In this time-series analysis of PM in California, ambient concentrations of several constituents of fine particles were associated with daily mortality. Specifically, the data suggest consistent associations with EC, OC, NO3, Cu, K, Ti, and Zn, as well as with PM2.5 mass. Stronger associations were observed with mortality for cardiovascular disease and among those > 65 years of age. For cardiovascular mortality, risks associated with the IQRs of EC and Zn were particularly elevated. Comparison of the pollution regression coefficients indicated that, in general, EC and many of the other species that contribute significantly to PM2.5 mass, including OC, NO3, and Zn, all demonstrated higher excess risks than PM2.5 mass. Although this observation may be partly the result of stochastic variability, the associations with mortality were all the more striking given the relatively small number of days with species data in each county (range 243–395), because most time-series studies have > 1,000 days of data (HEI 2003). Increasing the sample size increased the strength of the PM2.5 associations with mortality. With few exceptions, these results were relatively insensitive to alternative treatment of missing values, different smoothers of time, and different lag specifications for meteorologic covariates. Results were somewhat sensitive, however, to the lag day examined. More of the associations were with a 1-day lag, which is fairly consistent with many previous time-series studies of PM < 10 μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM10) and PM2.5 (HEI 2003). Although there is increasing evidence linking PM exposures with cardiovascular pathophysiology (Brook et al. 2004), there is little to justify a priori an appropriate lag structure for the vast majority of PM2.5 constituents. In this analysis, it is unclear whether the associations of mortality with different lags were caused by a) different mechanisms; b) different mortality reference days for lags 1 and 2 versus lags 0 and 3 because the exposure data were not collected on a daily basis (see “Methods”); or c) stochastic variability due to the relatively low number of observations.

We found stronger and more frequent associations between mortality and PM2.5 components during the cooler months, when most (but not all) components have higher concentrations. For example, the warm and cool season averages for PM2.5 were 14 and 24.6 μg/m3, respectively. For EC, OC, and NO3, the cool season averages were roughly twice those of the warm season. These differences represent seasonal variation in sources (e.g., residential wood combustion), particle chemistry and meteorology. For example, Lipsett et al. (1997) reported that during the winter in Santa Clara County, residential wood combustion accounts for as much as 45% of PM 1 0 . Moreover, in the winter months the inversion layers and vertical mixing depths throughout much of the state tend to be much shallower than in warmer months. In addition, the generally mild climate in California in the cooler months may mean that more windows are open, resulting in greater indoor penetration of outdoor pollutants relative to the summer months when air conditioner use is more common.

Becker et al. (2005) reported seasonal variation in the toxicity of PM, based on in vitro analysis of markers of inflammation and oxidative stress, which they hypothesized could be explained by temporal differences in particle composition. In our analysis, evidence of seasonally different effects for a specific PM2.5 species suggests that differences in both composition and exposure patterns may be important. Our findings differ somewhat with the time-series mortality analysis of PM10 in 100 U.S. cities by Peng et al. (2005). That study reported stronger effects during the summer months, based on observations from cities primarily in the Northeast. Their base case region–specific analysis showed a modest warm season effect for the Northwest (which included Northern California) but no season-specific effect for Southern California, the only region that did not show a larger effect in summer in their analysis. However, the latter results appear to be sensitive to the df in the smooth of time and the PM10 lag used. For example, if 3 or 5 df for time smooth or an unlagged PM10 was specified, the effects were larger in the nonsummer months, a result consistent with our findings. In comparison, our results were not affected by use of alternative df for the smooth of time, but were sensitive to the specified lag of pollution.

A few previous studies have examined the associations between some species of PM and daily mortality. For example, Fairley (2003) examined the impacts of NO3, SO4, and coefficient of haze (COH) in Santa Clara County. The latter is highly correlated with EC, and is likely to be a good marker of particulate pollution from motor vehicles, especially diesel exhaust, and from wood smoke. All three PM2.5 constituents were associated with all-cause mortality, whereas NO3 was also associated with cardiovascular mortality. These findings were consistent with those of Hoek (2003) in the Netherlands, where associations with mortality were reported for SO4, NO3, and black smoke. In a study in Buffalo, New York, Gwynn et al. (2000) reported associations of COH, SO4, and hydrogen ion (a measure of aerosol acidity) with total mortality. Ito (2003) failed to find associations of mortality with SO4 or hydrogen ion in Detroit, Michigan, although only limited data for these pollutants were available. In their study of the eight largest Canadian cities, Burnett et al. (2000) examined the impact of 47 separate constituents of PM2.5. Within the fine fraction, SO4, Zn, Ni, and Fe were all associated with mortality, as was COH. NO3, EC, and OC were not measured in the Canadian study. Mar et al. (2000) reported associations between mortality in Phoenix, Arizona, and EC, OC, and K. Finally, in analyses of emergency department visits, Metzger et al. (2004) reported associations of both EC and OC with visits for any cardiovascular disease. Several other studies also examined source-oriented combinations of pollutants. For example, Laden et al. (2000) examined PM2.5 data from the Harvard Six Cities study and categorized the pollutants as motor vehicle exhaust (using Pb as a marker), coal combustion (using selenium), or soil and crustal material (using Si). Generally, both the motor vehicle and coal factors were associated with mortality, with the strongest effect from the former. The crustal material indicator was not associated with mortality. In our full-year analysis, we also found no association with Si; however, associations with mortality were observed during the cooler months. Factor analysis of multiple elements conducted by Mar et al. (2000) in Phoenix suggested associations between cardiovascular mortality and factors relating to three sources: motor vehicle exhaust and resuspended road dust; vegetative burning; and regional SO4.

Our findings are generally consistent with these previous findings—primary and secondary products of fuel combustion (EC, OC, NO3, as well as SO4 in the winter) and other measures of mobile source-related emissions (Cu, Ti, and Zn) exhibit the strongest and most consistent associations with mortality. However, we have not undertaken a formal source apportionment analysis in this paper. Although EC and OC are generally considered markers of fossil fuel combustion, residential wood combustion may also make significant contributions to both of these as well (Lewis et al. 2003; Maykut et al. 2003). A variety of vehicular-associated sources, including fuel combustion, may contribute to particulate metal emissions, including Cu, Ti, Zn, and V (Schauer et al. 2006). For instance, brake wear and lube oil emissions may represent important sources of fine particulate Cu and Zn, though the latter may also be associated with tire dust (Lough et al. 2005; Schauer et al. 2006). Although potassium is a crustal element, it is generally considered a reasonable marker for vegetative burning, including residential wood combustion (Maykut et al. 2003; Watson et al. 2001).

The use of multiple cities increased the statistical power and reduced the likelihood that these results were due to factors associated with one geographic location. The association with mortality of any single substance, however, may be a result, at least in part, of its own toxicity or of exposures to other substances with which it is highly correlated. In future work, we will examine the impact of specific sources through use of source profiles for the six California counties based on chemical mass balance models (Thurston et al. 2005).

It is important to note the limitations of our data. First, the use of a single location for monitoring PM2.5 components in several of the counties is likely to lead to random measurement error and the potential for down-wardly biased effect estimates. Second, because every-day monitoring was not available, we were unable to estimate the impact of cumulative exposures, which tend to generate larger effect estimates than that of a single-day lag (Schwartz 2000). Third, given the numbers of pollutants and end points examined and the relatively low number of observations, it is possible that some of the results may have occurred by chance. Finally, there may be differential measurement error among the components both with respect to spatial variability and indoor/outdoor penetration. For example, Janssen et al. (2005) analyzed the longitudinal correlation of personal and outdoor concentrations of several PM2.5 species in Helsinki, Finland, and Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Correlations were high (0.7–0.9) for EC (using an absorption coefficient) and Zn; moderate (0.55–0.7) for PM2.5, Fe, and K; and low (0.25–0.55) for Ca, Cl, Cu, and Si. The authors suggest that these differences could be a result of both ambient spatial variability and the influence of indoor generation of pollutants.

Our findings add to the growing body of evidence linking PM2.5 with mortality and indicate that excess risks may vary with the specific PM2.5 constituent. The results also support the hypothesis that pollution from motor vehicles and other sources of combustion, including residential wood burning, may be of particular concern. Finally, the use of regression coefficients based only on PM2.5 mass may underestimate the effects of some of its specific components.

Footnotes

Supplemental Material is available online at http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2006/9281/suppl.pdf

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments, J. Kim, and B. Malig for his editorial assistance. The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not represent the policy or position of the State of California or the California Environmental Protection Agency.

References

  1. Becker S, Dailey LA, Soukup JM, Grambow SC, Devlin RB, Huang Y-CT. Seasonal variations in air pollution particle–induced inflammatory mediator release and oxidative stress. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:1032–1038. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blanchard C. 2003. Spatial and temporal characterization of particulate matter. In: Particulate Matter Science for Policy Makers: A NARSTO Assessment (McMurry PH, Shepherd MF, Vickery JS, eds). Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press, 191–231.
  3. Brook RD, Franklin B, Cascio W, Hong Y, Howard G, Lipsett M, et al. Air pollution and cardiovascular disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Expert Panel on Population and Prevention Science of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2004;109:2655–2671. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000128587.30041.C8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burnett RT, Brook JR, Dann T, Delocla C, Philips O, Calmak S, et al. Association between particulate- and gas-phase components of urban air pollution and daily mortality in eight Canadian cities. Inhal Toxicol. 2000;12(suppl 4):15–39. doi: 10.1080/08958370050164851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CARB (California Air Resources Board)
  6. CDHS (California Department of Health Services)
  7. Der Simonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–188. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fairley D. 2003. Mortality and air pollution for Santa Clara County, California, 1989–1996. In: Revised Analyses of Time-Series Studies of Air Pollution and Health. Special Report. Boston:Health Effects Institute, 97–106. Available: http://www.healtheffects.org/Pubs/TimeSeries.pdf
  9. Gwynn RC, Burnett RT, Thurston GD. A time-series analysis of acidic particulate matter and daily mortality and morbidity in the Buffalo, New York, region. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108:125–133. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HEI. http://www.healtheffects.org/Pubs/TimeSeries.pdf
  11. Hoek G. 2003. Daily mortality and air pollution in the Netherlands. In: Revised Analyses of Time-Series Studies of Air Pollution and Health. Special Report. Boston:Health Effects Institute, 133–142. Available: http://www.healtheffects.org/Pubs/TimeSeries.pdf
  12. Ito K. 2003. Associations of particulate matter components with daily mortality and morbidity in Detroit, Michigan. In: Revised Analyses of Time-Series Studies of Air Pollution and Health. Special Report. Boston:Health Effects Institute, 143–156. Available: http://www.healtheffects.org/Pubs/TimeSeries.pdf
  13. Janssen NAH, Lanki T, Hoek G, Vallius M, de Hartog JJ, Van Grieken R, et al. Associations between ambient, personal, and indoor exposure to fine particulate matter constituents in Dutch and Finnish panels of cardiovascular patients. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62:868–877. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.016618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Janssen NAH, Schwartz J, Zanobetti A, Suh H. Air conditioning and source-specific particles as modifiers of the effect of PM10 on hospital admissions for heart and lung disease. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;101:43–49. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0211043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Laden F, Neas LM, Dockery DW, Schwartz J. Association of fine particulate matter from different sources with daily mortality in six U.S. cities. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108:941–947. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lewis CW, Norris GA, Conner TL, Henry RC. Source apportionment of Phoenix PM2.5 aerosol with the Unmix receptor model. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2003;53:325–338. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2003.10466155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lipsett M, Hurley S, Ostro B. Air pollution and emergency room visits for asthma in Santa Clara County, California. Environ Health Perspect. 1997;105:216–222. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lough GC, Schauer JJ, Park JS, Shafer MM, Deminter JT, Weinstein JP. Emissions of metals associated with motor vehicle roadways. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39:826–836. doi: 10.1021/es048715f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mar TF, Norris GA, Koenig JQ, Larson TV. Associations between air pollution and mortality in Phoenix, 1995–1997. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108:347–353. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Maykut NN, Lewtas J, Kim E, Larson TV. Source apportionment of PM2.5 at an urban IMPROVE site in Seattle, Washington. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;15:37:5135–5142. doi: 10.1021/es030370y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Metzger KB, Tolbert PE, Klein M, Peel JL, Franders WD, Mulholland JA, et al. Ambient air pollution and cardiovascular emergency department visits. Epidemiol. 2004;15:46–56. doi: 10.1097/01.EDE.0000101748.28283.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. NCDC (National Climatic Data Center) http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/climateresources.html
  23. NRC (National Research Council)
  24. Ostro B, Broadwin R, Green S, Feng W-Y, Lipsett M. Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in nine California counties: results from CALFINE. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:29–33. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Peng RD, Dominici R, Pastor-Barriuso R, Zeger SL, Samet JM. Seasonal analysis of air pollution and mortality in 100 U.S. cities. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:585–594. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. R Development Core Team. http:/www.R-project.org
  27. Schauer JJ, Lough GC, Shafer MM, Christensen W, Arndt MF, DeMinter JT, Park J-S. http://healtheffects.org/Pubs/Schauer.pdf
  28. Schwartz J. The distributed lag between air pollution and daily deaths. Epidemiology. 2000;11:320–326. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200005000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. StataCorp
  30. Thurston GD, Ito K, Mar T, Christensen WF, Eatough DJ, Henry RC, et al. Workgroup report: workshop on source apportionment of particulate matter health effects—inter-comparison of results and implications. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:1768–1774. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Watson JG, Chow JC, Houck JE. PM2.5 chemical source profiles for vehicle exhaust, vegetative burning, geological material, and coal burning in Northwestern Colorado during 1995. Chemosphere. 2001;43:1141–1151. doi: 10.1016/s0045-6535(00)00171-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. World Health Organization
  33. Wong CM, Ma S, Hedley AJ, Lam TH. Effect of air pollution on daily mortality in Hong Kong. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:335–340. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES