Abstract
Objective
Tumour necrosis factor receptor‐associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) has been associated with several mutations in the TNF receptor super family 1A (TNFRSF1A), including most cysteine substitutions. However, the nature of two substitutions, P46L and R92Q, remains a topic of discussion. The aim of this study was to assess the actual role of these two sequence variations in a series of patients with TRAPS.
Methods
The main clinical data of 89 patients with TRAPS have been prospectively registered on a standard form. 84 patients or members of families with recurrent episodes of inflammatory symptoms spanning a period of more than 6 months and harbouring a TNFRSF1A mutation were studied. Clinical data have been analysed according to the nature of the mutation—P46L, R92Q or others.
Results
P46L is often seen in patients from Maghreb and is associated with a mild phenotype. P46L appears as a polymorphism with a non‐specific role in inflammation. R92Q is associated with a variable phenotype and presents as a low‐penetrance mutation. Interpreting these results will require a comparison with clinical signs and genetic background.
Tumour necrosis factor receptor‐associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) is an autosomal dominant inherited chronic and inflammatory disease, which belongs to the group of auto‐inflammatory syndromes.1,2 This condition was initially described in a family of Irish descent as familial Hibernian fever, but similar findings were later found in families in many other populations.3,4,5 TRAPS is associated with mutations in the gene that encodes tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily 1A (TNFRSF1A) on chromosome 12p13.6,7 Mutations occurred predominantly in exons 2, 3 and 4, encoding the extracellular cysteine‐rich domain (CRD).2,8,9,10,11
Characteristic features include episodes of fever accompanied by abdominal pain, arthralgia, myalgia, rash, conjunctivitis and periorbital oedema.8,12 The phenotype and clinical severity of TRAPS are variable.9,10,13 Some patients develop systemic amyloidosis, up to 15% in some series.14,15,16 To date, more than 60 mutations in the TNFRSF1A gene have been reported among patients with TRAPS. Two frequent mutations, R92Q and P46L, are associated with a variable phenotype and can be observed at a low level in controls. The aim of our study is to assess the actual nature of these sequence variations—mutation or polymorphism—in our series.12,17
Patients and methods
Patients
Our study includes patients referred to the Cochin Hospital Biochemistry and Genetic Molecular Laboratory, Paris, a referral centre for the molecular diagnosis of periodic fever syndromes. Routine molecular diagnosis of TRAPS in this laboratory began in 1999. The main clinical data (age, sex, origin of both parents, consanguinity, family history, age at onset of inflammatory episodes, duration of episodes, organ involvement, frequency of episodes, amyloidosis, acute‐phase response and efficacy of drugs) have been prospectively registered on a standard form for all patients with a suspicion of hereditary periodic fever syndrome.
In our study, we included all patients who presented with clinical signs compatible with the TRAPS phenotype and a mutation in TNFRSF1A. We excluded five patients, four with R92Q and one with P46L substitution, who finally had another definite diagnosis. In the R92Q group, two patients had symptoms typical of Behçet's disease and were reported previously.13 The two others had a CIAS1 mutation (R260W and A439V) with related phenotype (Muckle–Wells and familial cold auto‐inflammatory syndromes). The patient excluded in the P46L group had presented with Crohn's disease long before complications with amyloidosis occurred. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants.
TNFRSF1A mutation detection
Detection of TNFRSF1A mutations was carried out as described previously.13 Briefly, genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood, then mutations were detected through amplification of the TNFRSF1A gene by polymerase chain reaction followed by denaturing high‐performance liquid chromatography scanning.
TNF and soluble TNF receptor
TNF and soluble TNF receptors were measured as previously described.5
Statistical analysis
Unvaried statistical analyses were carried out by using χ2 or Fisher exact tests for nominal variables and Mann–Whitney U test for quantitative variables. We compared the phenotype of P46L and R92Q mutations of patients with known mutations of TRAPS, using Stat View. The level of significance was set at p<0.01.
Results
In all, 84 patients were included in our series. Table 1 gives their main clinical characteristics. We classified patients who presented R92Q, known and P46L mutations into three groups: A, B and C.
Table 1 Main clinical characteristics of patients.
| Mutation characteristics | Total | Group A (R92Q) n (%) | p Value (group A v group B) | Group B (other mutations) n (%) | Group C (P46L) n (%) | p Value (group B v group C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | 84 | 34 | — | 37 | 13 | — |
| Sex | ||||||
| M | 37 | 17 | >0.99 | 16 | 4 | >0.99 |
| F | 47 | 17 | 21 | 9 | ||
| Ethnicity | 56 C | 28 C | 27 C | 1 C | ||
| 16 MA | 3 MA | 4 MA | 9 MA | <0.001 | ||
| 8 ME | 2 ME | >0.99 | 5 ME | 1 ME | ||
| 2 NA | 1 NA | 0 NA | 2 NA | |||
| 1 I | 0 I | 1 I | 0 I | |||
| Fever | 49 | 16 (48) | 0.128 | 26 (72) | 7 (46) | 0.30 |
| Abdominal pain | 45 | 12 (38.7) | 0.028 | 24 (66) | 9 (70) | <0.99 |
| Musculoskeletal involvement* | 44 | 15 (48) | 0.33 | 22 (61) | 7 (54) | 0.745 |
| Cutaneous involvement† | 28 | 11 (35.5) | 0.99 | 13 (36) | 4 (35) | >0.99 |
| Seritis‡ | 23 | 10 (32) | 0.59 | 9 (25) | 4 (35) | 0.96 |
| Neurological involvement§ | 22 | 5 (16) | 0.39 | 10 (27.7) | 7 (54) | 0.172 |
| Transit disorders¶ | 18 | 7 (22.6) | 0.99 | 8 (22.2) | 3 (35) | >0.99 |
| Lymphadenopathy | 14 | 6 (19) | 0.13 | 2 (5) | 6 (46) | 0.003 |
| Rhinolaryngeal involvement** | 9 | 4 (12) | 0.695 | 3 (8.3) | 2 (15.4) | 0.59 |
| Amyloidosis | 8 | 2 (6.4) | 0.27 | 6 (16.6) | 0 (0) | 0.175 |
| Periocular oedema | 8 | 4 (12) | 0.695 | 3 (8.3) | 1 (7.7) | >0.99 |
| Ocular involvement†† | 5 | 2 (6.4) | 0.99 | 3 (8.3) | 0 (0) | 0.652 |
| Mean age at the first episode (years) | 15.705 | 18.91 | 0.01 | 9.72 | 22.4 | 0.179 |
| Mean duration of episodes (days) | 9.055 | 7.43 | 0.01 | 11.03 | 7.58 | 0.125 |
| Frequency of episodes | ||||||
| ⩽1episode/month | 46 | 13 | 0.017 | 27 | 6 | 0.418 |
| >1episode/month | 27 | 15 | 8 | 4 | ||
| Not related | 11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Familial case of TRAPS | 36 | 7 (20.6) | <0.001 | 29 (78.4) | 0 (0) | <0.001 |
| Sporadic case of TRAPS | 48 | 27 | 8 | 13 |
C, Caucasian; I, Indian; MA, Maghrebian; ME, Mediterranean; NA, native African.
*Arthralgia and myalgia; †rash or urticaria or erythema; ‡pleurisy and pericarditis; §headache and aseptic meningitis; ¶constipation or diarrhoea; **pharyngitis; ††conjunctivitis. Comparisons are made between groups A and B, and between groups B and C.
Among the 84 patients selected (47 women and 37 men), 34 (40%), 13 (15.5%) and 37 (44%) patients were genotyped, respectively, for the R92Q, P46L and other known mutations (Y20D, C43Y, T50M, Y106C, C55Y, C30S, G36E, C43R, C43S, L67P, C70Y, R92W, C96Y, Y20H and C30Y).
The main clinical features of TRAPS's disease in the cohort were as follows: fever (58.3%), abdominal pain (53.6%), musculoskeletal involvement (52.4%), skin involvement (33.3%), neurological involvement (26.2%), lymphadenopathy (16.6%), transit disorders (21.4%), seritis (27%), amyloidosis (9.52%), rhinolaryngeal disorders (10.7%), periocular oedema (9.5%) and conjunctivitis (6%). In all, 36 (42.9%) patients had familial TRAPS and 48 (57.1%) were sporadic cases.
In all, 56 (66.6%) patients were Caucasian (Belgian, Czech, French, Armenian, Luxemburgian and Dutch), 16 (19%) were Arabs from Maghreb (Maghreb comprises Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia), 8 (9.5%) were Mediterranean (Jewish Italian, Portuguese and Spanish), 3 (3.5%) were native African and 1 (1.2%) patient was Indian (table 2).
Table 2 Ethnicity.
| Mutations | Caucasian | Maghrebian | Mediterranean | Native African | Indian | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 28 | 3 | 2 | 1 | NR | 34 |
| Group C | 1 | 9 | 1 | 2 | NR | 13 |
| Group B | 27 | 4 | 5 | NR | 1 | 37 |
| Total | 56 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 84 |
NR, not reported.
The mean age at the first episode of fever was 15.7 years, with 9 days as the mean duration of episodes. In all, 46 patients had one episode per month, 27 had two or more episodes per month.
Patients with the P46L TNFRSF1A substitution
The P46L mutation was found in 13 (9 women and 4 men) unrelated patients, including 9 of Maghrebian origin (p<0.001). In all patients, the disease was considered to be sporadic (p<0.001). The mean age at the first episode of fever was 22.4 years, with 7.5 days as the mean duration of the episode. Six patients had one episode a month and four patients had two or more episodes a month. We do not have enough information about the frequency of the episodes for the three remaining patients. We did not find any significant difference between this group and group B, except for lymphadenopathy, which was significantly more frequent in group C (p = 0.003).
In two families, several patients appeared to be affected with inflammatory symptoms. For the first family, the patient genotyped P46L/N was symptomatic and presented with moderate fever, diarrhoea, nodes, aseptic meningitidis, arthralgia and pseudo‐erysipelas. His mother, genotyped N/N, presented with arthralgia, recurrent inflammatory episodes with unknown diagnosis, and his father, genotyped P46L/N, was asymptomatic. In the second family, the patient genotyped P46L/N presented with fever, arthro‐myalgia, urticaria, lymphadenopathy, pharyngeal manifestations and periorbital oedema. His mother was asymptomatic, but genotyped P46L/N. His father and his paternal aunt had N/N genotypes, but the paternal aunt presented flares of fever, pleurisy, arthralgia, pharyngitis and skin manifestations without a known diagnosis.
Patients with the R92Q TNFRSF1A substitution
The R92Q mutation was found in 34 (17 women and 17 men) unrelated patients, including 27 with a sporadic presentation. In all, 28 patients were Caucasians, 3 were Maghrebians, 2 were Mediterraneans and 1 was native African (table 2).
Among the clinical signs of patients with TRAPS carrying a substitution R92Q, abdominal pain was less frequent in the R92Q group than in the known mutations group (p = 0.029). A marked difference was seen in the age of onset and duration of fever in the R92Q group compared with the known mutations group (table 1). We found only five families, including 10 patients, in which segregation occurred to some extent (table 3).
In the first and the second families, penetrance was incomplete because the father in the first family and the mother in the second, genotyped R92Q/N, were asymptomatic. In the fourth family, there was suspicion of incomplete penetrance because the nephew, genotyped R92Q/N, was asymptomatic but the father's genotype was unknown; he had had amyloidosis some years before.
In the fifth family, the patient and his stepbrother, genotyped R92Q/N, were symptomatic. Genotypes of asymptomatic parents were unknown. We found an MEFV heterozygotic V726A mutation both in the father and in the son in the first family. Another MEFV heterozygotic mutation, A744S, was found in the third family, but only in the father.
In another family, R92Q does not seem to segregate with the inflammatory disease. Indeed, the patient genotyped R92Q/R92Q was symptomatic and presented fever and abdominal pain. The patient's mother and brother, genotyped R92Q/N, were asymptomatic, and father and paternal uncle were symptomatic with skin manifestations and fever, genotyped R92Q/N and N/N, respectively.
Laboratory investigations
Acute‐phase response markers, C reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and fibrinogen were increased in all patients during episodes. Plasma TNF and soluble TNF receptor levels were measured during episodes of fever in six patients with known mutations (three patients with T50M, two patients with C30S and one with R92W). In these six patients, TNF levels were high, whereas soluble TNF receptor levels were normal. One patient with R92Q substitution presented a high concentration of TNF and TNF receptors during episodes of fever (table 4).
Table 4 Levels of tumour necrosis factor and tumour necrosis factor receptors 1 and 2 during crisis.
| TNF* (pg/ml) | TNFR1† (ng/ml) | TNFR2‡ (ng/ml) | Mutation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1 | 40 | 1.1 | NR | T50M/N |
| Patient 2 | 29 | 0.4 | NR | T50M/N |
| Patient 3 | 33 | 0.6 | NR | T50M/N |
| Patient 4 | 27 | 0.7 | 1.8 | C30S/N |
| Patient 5 | 24 | 1.2 | NR | R92W |
| Patient 6 | 40 | 0.9 | 4 | C30S/N |
| Patient 7 | 8.8 | 49 | 9.6 | R92Q |
NR, not reported; TNF, tumour necrosis factor; TNFR, tumour necrosis factor receptor.
*TNF during crisis (normal <13 pg/ml); †TNFR1 during crisis (normal 0.8–1.9 ng/ml); ‡TNFR2 during crisis (normal 2–6.6 mg/ml).
Treatments
Among 84 patients selected, 34 had a daily continuous treatment and 5 had a treatment restricted to episodes, including non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, aspirin and morphine chlorhydrate (table 5).
Table 5 Treatments.
| Mutations | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | R92Q | P46L | Other mutations |
| Basic treatment | 11 Colchicine: 4 CE | 6 Colchicine:4 PE | 8 Colchicine:7 NE |
| 4 PE | 2CE | 1 PE | |
| 3 NE | 1 Glucocorticoids + azathioprine or ciclosporin + colchicine | ||
| 1 TNFα inhibitor+ glucocorticoid | 5 Glucocorticoids | ||
| 1 Cyclophosphamide + NSAIDs | |||
| 2 Colchicine + glucocorticoids | |||
| 1 TNFα inhibitor | |||
| Treatment of fever | 2 NSAIDs | 1 Aspirin | 1 NSAID* |
| 1 Morphin chlorhydrate | |||
| Treated or not treated | 14:21 | 8:6 | 18:20 |
| Total | 34 | 14 | 37 |
CE, completely effective; NE, not effective; NSAID, non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs; PE, partially effective; TNFα, tumour necrosis factor α.
*Same patient treated with cyclophosphamide.
In all, 25 patients were treated with colchicine and 4 patients seemingly showed a good response, with total disappearance of fever. No definite difference in efficacy of colchicine was found between the three groups.
Glucocorticoids are able to decrease the severity of symptoms, both acutely and chronically, in most patients. Azathioprine, ciclosporin, cyclophosphamide and TNF inhibitors were tried empirically but were not found to be beneficial; no statistical analysis was carried out.
None of the patients were treated with chlorambucil, intravenous methylprednisolone, immunoglobulins, dapsone, methotrexate or thalidomide.
Discussion
Around 50 mutations in the TNFRSF1A gene have so far been reported to be associated with TRAPS. A large proportion of the mutations observed are substitutions of cysteine residues that are clearly associated with a typical TRAPS phenotype. By contrast, the status of two non‐cysteine substitutions remains a topic of discussion.12,18 In our study, we discussed the specific status of these two specific substitutions.
In our series, the clinical presentation of patients with P46L appeared to be milder, as age at onset was greater, episodes were shorter, amyloidosis was absent, and none of these patients had been treated with corticosteroid and TNF inhibitors. Intriguingly, peripheral lymph nodes were more frequent in these patients during episodes of fever, without other specific manifestations.
We did not find familial cases in the P46L group. Indeed, two patients presented with familial history of recurrent inflammation, but in both families P46L is not segregated with the inflammatory disorder. P46L had been reported previously at a frequency of 2–3% in patients with TRAPS.10,12,18 This frequency is as high as 15.5% in our study. In several control populations, P46L was present at a frequency of around 1%.4,13,19 It was detected in 1 of 170 northern‐European control chromosomes and in 3 of 156 African American control chromosomes, at a combined gene frequency of 1.2%.12 However, the frequency of P46L in other populations seems to be considerably higher. We previously found that in the general population of Arabs from Maghreb, P46L was present with an allele frequency of 2.9%.13 Moreover, in sub‐Saharan African populations, P46L was reported recently with an unexpected allele frequency of 9.8%, suggesting a north‐to‐south gradient.9
It is important to note that the origin of most of our patients with P46L is Maghrebian, a population in which the frequency of this substitution is high. Taking into account all our available data, we believe that in the Maghrebian population, P46L is a polymorphism rather than a mutation.
In group A, the R92Q phenotype seems to be more heterogeneous. In our series, the clinical phenotype appears to be milder compared with group B, as age at onset of episodes is higher and duration of attacks is shorter (p = 0.01 and p = 0.01, respectively). Symptoms associated with episodes seem to be different, as abdominal pain is less frequent during episodes (p = 0.029). Moreover, in this group, some patients presented with recurrent pericarditis or headache with aseptic meningitis as the only clinical symptom. In addition, patients with R92Q require to be treated with steroids or immunosuppressive agents less often. Globally, patients with R92Q thus appear to have a milder phenotype than group B patients.
These results are in agreement with those of Hull et al's9 study, which included 50 patients, with a median age at onset of 23 years in patients with R92Q and of 7 years in patients with other mutations. Clinically, patients with R92Q seem to present with a less typical phenotype than patients with other TNFRS1A mutations. Rashes were generally less typical and ranged from large macular erythematous patches to urticaria‐like lesions. Similarly, not all the symptoms were present to the same degree, and symptoms range in duration from several days to the more typical week‐long episodes.9
We found only two cases of amyloidosis amyloid A in patients with R92Q, with no marked difference in group B. TRAPS mutations that result in cysteine substitutions show a higher probability of developing life‐threatening amyloidosis (24% v 2% for non‐cysteine residue substitutions).9
Most of our patients with R92Q (27/37; 79%) appeared to be sporadic cases. The remaining patients belonged to six families. In five of these families, the penetrance of R92Q appears incomplete. In the last family, R92Q is not segregated with the disease; this may be linked to another gene responsible for the inflammatory disease.
The frequency of R92Q substitution in control populations was estimated at around or below 1%, a frequency compatible with the status of a low‐penetrance mutation.12,13 However, some recent results suggest that R92Q could be implicated in other inflammatory disorders.19,20,21,22,23 In fact, R92Q has been found at a frequency of 5.2% in a cohort of patients with early arthritis and in a series of patients with Behçet's disease; it was markedly associated with extracranial deep vein thrombosis.19,22 In a series of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, R92Q was more frequent in patients with amyloidosis.24
R92Q was reported in a patient with inflammatory panniculitis, without the canonical signs of the TRAPS phenotype.20 All these results would suggest that R92Q is a low‐penetrance mutation associated with the TRAPS phenotype. R92Q is also probably a non‐specific factor in other inflammatory diseases. Its role as a factor favouring secondary amyloidosis and its implication in some vascular processes need to be established by further research.
Interpreting the results of the TNFRSF1A genotype requires a comparison with clinical signs and ethnic background. The frequencies of R92Q and P46L in some populations do not allow us to systematically attribute inflammatory symptoms to these sequence variations. Moreover, the absence of segregation of these sequence variations with the disease in some families suggests the existence of other genes underlying auto‐inflammatory syndromes.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from PHRC AOM97201 and by a grant from the GIS Maladies Rares.
Abbreviations
CRD - cysteine‐rich domain
FMF - familial Mediterranean fever
TNF - tumour necrosis factor
TNFRSF - TNF receptor super family
TRAPS - TNF receptor‐associated periodic syndrome
Footnotes
Competing interests: None declared.
References
- 1.Williamson L M, Hull D, Mehta R, Reeves W G, Robinson B H, Toghill P J. Familial Hibernian fever. Q J Med 198251469–480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.MacDermott M F, Aksentijevitch I, Galon J. Germline mutations in the intracellular domains of the 55 kDa TNF receptor, TNFR1, define a family of dominantly inherited autoinflammatory syndromes. Cell 199997133–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mc Dermott E M, Smillie D M, Powell R J. Clinical spectrum of familial Hibernian fever. Mayo Clin Proc 199772806–817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aganna E, Hammond L, Hawkins P N, Aldea A, McKee S A, van Amstel H K.et al Heterogeneity among patients with tumor necrosis factor receptor‐associated periodic syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2003482632–2644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dode C, Papo T, Fieschi C. A novel missense mutation (C30S) in the gene encoding tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 linked to autosomal‐dominant recerrent fever with localized myositis in a French family. Arthritis Rheum 2000431535–1542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McDermott M F, Ogunkolade B W, McDermott E M, Jones L C, Wan Y, Quane K A.et al Linkage of familial Hibernian fever to chromosome 12p13. Am J Hum Genet 1998621446–1451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mulley J, Saar K, Hewitt G, Rüschendrof F, Phillips H, Colley A.et al Gene localization for autosomal dominant familial periodic fever to 12p13. Am J Hum Genet 199862884–889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Toro J R, Aksentijevich I, Hull K, Dean J, Kastner D L. Tumor necrosis factor receptor‐associated periodic syndrome: a novel syndrome with cutaneous manifestations. Arch Dermatol 20001361487–1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hull K M, Drew E, Aksentijevich I, Singh H K, Wong K, McDermott E M.et al The TNF receptor‐associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS): emerging concepts of an autoinflammatory disorder. Medicine 200281349–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stojanov S. Kastner DL. Familial autoinflammatory diseases: genetics, pathogenesis and treatment, Curr Opin Rheumatol 200517586–599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Naismith J H, Devine T Q, Kohno T, Sprang S R. Structures of the extracellular domain of the type I tumor necrosis factor receptor. Structure 199641251–1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Aksentijevitch I, Galon J, Soares M, Mansfield E, Hull K, Oh H H.et al The tumor‐necrosis‐factor receptor‐associated periodic syndrome: new mutation in TNFRSF1A, ancestral origins, genotype studies, and evidence for further genetic heterogeneity of periodic fevers. Am J Hum Genet 200169301–314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dode C, Andre M, Bienvenu T.et al The enlarging clinical, genetic, and population spectrum of tumor necrosis factor receptor‐associated periodic syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2002462181–2188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fuch P, Strehl S, Dworzak M.et al Autosomal dominant familial Mediterranean fever‐like syndrome with amyloidosis. Mayo Clinic Proc 1987621095–1100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jadoul M, Dodé C, Cosyns J P, Abramowicz D, Georges B, Delpech M.et al Autosomal‐dominant periodic fever with amyloidosis: novel mutation in tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 gene. Kidney 2001591677–1682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Simon A, Dodé C, Van der Meer J W M, Drenth J P H. Familial periodic fever and amyloidosis due to a new mutation in the TNFRSF1A gene. Am J Med 2001110313–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Aganna E, Aksentijevich I, Hitman G A, Kastner D L, Hoepelman A I, Posma F D.et al Tumor necrosis factor receptor‐associated periodic fever syndrome (TRAPS) in Dutch family: evidence for a TNRSF1A mutations with reduced penetrance. Eur J Hum Genet 2001963–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tchernitchko D, Chiminqgi M, Galacteros F, Prehu C, Segbena Y, Coulibaly H.et al Unexpected high frequency of P46L TNFRSF1A allele in sub‐Saharan West African populations. Eur J Hum Genet 200513513–515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jawaheer D, Seldin M F, Amos C I, Chen W V, Shigeta R, Monteiro J.et al A genomewide screen in multiplex rheumatoid arthritis families suggests genetic overlap with other autoimmune diseases. Am J Hum Genet 200168927–936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lamprecht P, Moosig F, Adam‐Klages S, Mrowietz U, Csernok E, Kirrstetter M.et al Small vessel vasculitis and relapsing panniculitis in tumor necrosis factor receptor associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS). Ann Rheum Dis 2004631518–1520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Poirier O, Nicaud V, Gariepy J, Courbon D, Elbaz A, Morrison C.et al Polymorphism R92Q of the tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 gene is associated with myocardial infarction and carotid intima‐media thickness‐the ECTIM, AXA, EVA and GENIC studies. Eur J Hum Genet 200412213–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Amoura Z, Dode C, Hue S, Caillat‐Zucman S, Bahram S, Delpech M.et al Association of R92Q TNFRS1A mutation and extracranial deep vein thrombosis in patients with Behçet's disease. Arthitis Rheum 200552608–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hull K M, Shoham N, Chae J J, Aksentijevich I, Kastner D L. The expending spectrum of systemic autoinflammatory disorders and their rheumatic manifestations. Curr Opin Rheumatol 20031561–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Aganna E, Hawkins P N, Ozen S, Pettersson T, Bybee A, McKee S A.et al Allelic variants in genes associated with hereditary periodic fever syndromes as susceptibility factors for reactive systemic AA amyloidosis. Genes Immun 20045289–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]