Abstract
This is a preliminary report of a co-operative study of 1,203 episodes of acute myocardial infarction in men under 70 years in four centres in the south west of England. The mortality at 28 days was 15%. A comparison is made between home care by the family doctor and hospital treatment initially in an intensive care unit: 343 cases were allocated at random. The randomized groups do not differ significantly in composition with respect to age; past history of angina, infarction, or hypertension; or hypotension when first examined. The mortality rates of the random groups are similar for home and hospital treatment. The group sent electively to hospital contained a higher proportion of initially hypotensive patients whose prognosis was bad wherever treated; those who were not hypotensive fared rather worse in hospital.
For some patients with acute myocardial infarction seen by their general practitioner home care is ethically justified, and the need for general admission to hospital should be reconsidered.
Full text
PDF![334](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/1798627/790d5dfe5845/brmedj02660-0026.png)
![335](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/1798627/e3dd68e7ba03/brmedj02660-0027.png)
![336](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/1798627/cdb54473ea86/brmedj02660-0028.png)
![337](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/1798627/dab13b16b08d/brmedj02660-0029.png)
![338](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/1798627/ab1efdf2cabc/brmedj02660-0030.png)
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Fry J. Acute myocardial infarction. The pre-hospital phase. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1968 Aug 17;98(33):1210–1212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawrie D. M., Greenwood T. W., Goddard M., Harvey A. C., Donald K. W., Julian D. G., Oliver M. F. A coronary-care unit in the routine management of acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1967 Jul 15;2(7507):109–114. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)92959-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lown B., Fakhro A. M., Hood W. B., Jr, Thorn G. W. The coronary care unit. New perspectives and directions. JAMA. 1967 Jan 16;199(3):188–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nichols J. B. Myocardial infarction in general practice. Practitioner. 1968 May;200(199):700–701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Norris R. M., Brandt P. W., Caughey D. E., Lee A. J., Scott P. J. A new coronary prognostic index. Lancet. 1969 Feb 8;1(7589):274–278. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)91035-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pentecost B. L., Mayne N. M. Results of a general hospital coronary care service. Br Med J. 1968 Mar 30;1(5595):830–833. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5595.830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sleet R. A. Report of 24 cases of myocardial infarction treated at home. Br Med J. 1968 Dec 14;4(5632):675–677. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5632.675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas M., Jewitt D. E., Shillingford J. P. Analysis of 150 patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to an intensive care and study unit. Br Med J. 1968 Mar 30;1(5595):787–790. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5595.787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]