Skip to main content
British Medical Journal logoLink to British Medical Journal
. 1971 Oct 23;4(5781):219–221. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5781.219

Do Lymphocytes Protect the Rheumatoid Joint?

K D Muirden, Kingsley W Mills
PMCID: PMC1799223  PMID: 5115576

Abstract

The pathology of the synovial membrane in rheumatoid arthritis can be characterized by the prominence of two major features which appear to vary independently of one another. These are synovial lining-cell proliferation and infiltration with inflammatory cells, predominantly lymphocytes. In a series of 42 synovectomies from 36 patients it has been shown that extensive joint damage is associated with a synovial picture of marked lining-cell proliferation and a sparsity of lymphocytes. Cases with heavy lymphocyte infiltration tend to show less damage to articular cartilage and bone despite a similar duration of disease. These results have been compared with the picture in leprosy, where a similar pathological spectrum is associated with changes in cell-mediated immunity necessary for the control of infection.

Full text

PDF
219

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARLAND P., NOVIKOFF A. B., HAMERMAN D. FINE STRUCTURE AND CYTOCHEMISTRY OF THE RHEUMATOID SYNOVIAL MEMBRANE, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO LYSOSOMES. Am J Pathol. 1964 May;44:853–866. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartfeld H. Distribution of rheumatoid factor activity in nonrheumatoid states. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1969 Dec 10;168(1):30–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1969.tb43092.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cross R. M. Hodgkin's disease: histological classification and diagnosis. J Clin Pathol. 1969 Mar;22(2):165–182. doi: 10.1136/jcp.22.2.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamerman D. Cartilage changes in the rheumatoid joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969 May-Jun;64:91–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Perlmann P., Holm G. Cytotoxic effects of lymphoid cells in vitro. Adv Immunol. 1969;11:117–193. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60479-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ridley D. S., Jopling W. H. Classification of leprosy according to immunity. A five-group system. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1966 Jul-Sep;34(3):255–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. SCHMID F. R., COOPER N. S., ZIFF M., McEWEN C. Arteritis in rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Med. 1961 Jan;30:56–83. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(61)90064-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Smith C., Hamerman D. Significance of persistent differences between normal and rheumatoid synovial membrane cells in culture. Arthritis Rheum. 1969 Dec;12(6):639–645. doi: 10.1002/art.1780120612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wemambu S. N., Turk J. L., Waters M. F., Rees R. J. Erythema nodosum leprosum: a clinical manifestation of the arthus phenomenon. Lancet. 1969 Nov 1;2(7627):933–935. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)90592-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. ZVAIFLER N. J. A SPECULATION ON THE PATHOGENESIS OF JOINT INFLAMMATION IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. Arthritis Rheum. 1965 Apr;8:289–293. doi: 10.1002/art.1780080212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES