Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1984 Oct;26(4):485–488. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.4.485

Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to new beta-lactamase-resistant beta-lactams.

A J Godfrey, L E Bryan
PMCID: PMC179949  PMID: 6440472

Abstract

An isogenic set of mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, altered in permeability or permeability plus constitutive production of beta-lactamase, was examined for susceptibility to newer beta-lactam antibiotics. Kinetic data on the chromosomal beta-lactamase and susceptibility studies for the test beta-lactams indicate that permeability was the major mechanism of resistance to the poorly hydrolyzed and nonhydrolyzed antibiotics, e.g., carbenicillin, moxalactam, and cefsulodin. An exception was cefotaxime, with a low Km and a low Vmax, which had reduced efficacy in the permeability mutant and was further affected by the constitutive beta-lactamase. In this case, since the Vmax was low, a nonhydrolytic barrier may provide the additional reduction in susceptibility.

Full text

PDF
485

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beckwith D. G., Jahre J. A. Role of a cefoxitin-inducible beta-lactamase in a case of breakthrough bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Oct;12(4):517–520. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.4.517-520.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryan L. E., Kwan S., Godfrey A. J. Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants with altered control of chromosomal beta-lactamase to piperacillin, ceftazidime, and cefsulodin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Mar;25(3):382–384. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.3.382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Darveau R. P., Hancock R. E. Procedure for isolation of bacterial lipopolysaccharides from both smooth and rough Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella typhimurium strains. J Bacteriol. 1983 Aug;155(2):831–838. doi: 10.1128/jb.155.2.831-838.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gillett A. P. Antibiotics against Pseudomonas. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1982 Feb;9 (Suppl B):41–48. doi: 10.1093/jac/9.suppl_b.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Godfrey A. J., Bryan L. E. Mutation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa specifying reduced affinity for penicillin G. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Feb;21(2):216–223. doi: 10.1128/aac.21.2.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Godfrey A. J., Bryan L. E., Rabin H. R. beta-Lactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa with modified penicillin-binding proteins emerging during cystic fibrosis treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 May;19(5):705–711. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.5.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Godfrey A. J., Hatlelid L., Bryan L. E. Correlation between lipopolysaccharide structure and permeability resistance in beta-lactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Aug;26(2):181–186. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.2.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gootz T. D., Sanders C. C., Goering R. V. Resistance to cefamandole: derepression of beta-lactamases by cefoxitin and mutation in Enterobacter cloacae. J Infect Dis. 1982 Jul;146(1):34–42. doi: 10.1093/infdis/146.1.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Leive L. The barrier function of the gram-negative envelope. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1974 May 10;235(0):109–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb43261.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nicas T. I., Hancock R. E. Pseudomonas aeruginosa outer membrane permeability: isolation of a porin protein F-deficient mutant. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):281–285. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.281-285.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nikaido H., Nakae T. The outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. Adv Microb Physiol. 1979;20:163–250. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60208-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. O'Callaghan C. H., Muggleton P. W., Ross G. W. Effects of beta-lactamase from gram-negative organisms on cephalosporins and penicillins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda) 1968;8:57–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Preheim L. C., Penn R. G., Sanders C. C., Goering R. V., Giger D. K. Emergence of resistance to beta-lactam and aminoglycoside antibiotics during moxalactam therapy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Dec;22(6):1037–1041. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.6.1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Richmond M. H., Sykes R. B. The beta-lactamases of gram-negative bacteria and their possible physiological role. Adv Microb Physiol. 1973;9:31–88. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60376-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ross G. W., O'Callaghan C. H. Beta-lactamase assays. Methods Enzymol. 1975;43:69–85. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(75)43081-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sanders C. C. Novel resistance selected by the new expanded-spectrum cephalosporins: a concern. J Infect Dis. 1983 Mar;147(3):585–589. doi: 10.1093/infdis/147.3.585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sanders C. C., Sanders W. E., Jr Emergence of resistance during therapy with the newer beta-lactam antibiotics: role of inducible beta-lactamases and implications for the future. Rev Infect Dis. 1983 Jul-Aug;5(4):639–648. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.4.639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sanders C. C., Sanders W. E., Jr, Goering R. V. In vitro antagonism of beta-lactam antibiotics by cefoxitin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Jun;21(6):968–975. doi: 10.1128/aac.21.6.968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Then R. L., Angehrn P. Trapping of nonhydrolyzable cephalosporins by cephalosporinases in Enterobacter cloacae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a possible resistance mechanism. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 May;21(5):711–717. doi: 10.1128/aac.21.5.711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. VOGEL H. J., BONNER D. M. Acetylornithinase of Escherichia coli: partial purification and some properties. J Biol Chem. 1956 Jan;218(1):97–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yoshimura F., Nikaido H. Permeability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa outer membrane to hydrophilic solutes. J Bacteriol. 1982 Nov;152(2):636–642. doi: 10.1128/jb.152.2.636-642.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zimmermann W. Penetration of beta-lactam antibiotics into their target enzymes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of a highly sensitive mutant with its parent strain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Jul;18(1):94–100. doi: 10.1128/aac.18.1.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zimmermann W., Rosselet A. Function of the outer membrane of Escherichia coli as a permeability barrier to beta-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Sep;12(3):368–372. doi: 10.1128/aac.12.3.368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES