Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1984 Oct;26(4):601–603. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.4.601

Evaluation of two broth disk methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobes.

A G Helstad, M A Hutchinson, W P Amos, T A Kurzynski
PMCID: PMC179975  PMID: 6517551

Abstract

We evaluated the aerobic thioglycolate broth disk and the vaspar overlay broth disk methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of 144 strains of anaerobes. For penicillin, carbenicillin, chloramphenicol, and metrionidazale, both broth disk methods yielded at least 95% agreement with results obtained by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards reference agar dilution procedure. For cefoxitin and clindamycin, the agreement was ca. 90%. Overall, the aerobic thioglycolate broth disk and vaspar overlay broth disk methods yielded agreements of 93.3 and 93%, respectively, with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards method.

Full text

PDF
601

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bawdon R. E., Rozmiej E., Palchaudhuri S., Krakowiak J. Variability in the susceptibility pattern of Bacteroides fragilis in four Detroit area hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Nov;16(5):664–666. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.5.664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bourgault A. M., Harkness J. L., Rosenblatt J. E. Clinical usefulness of susceptibility testing of anaerobes. Arch Intern Med. 1978 Dec;138(12):1825–1827. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown W. J., Waatti P. E. Susceptibility testing of clinically isolated anaerobic bacteria by an agar dilution technique. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Apr;17(4):629–635. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.4.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kurzynski T. A., Yrios J. W., Helstad A. G., Field C. R. Aerobically incubated thioglycolate broth disk method for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Oct;10(4):727–732. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.4.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Marrie T. J., Haldane E. V., Swantee C. A., Kerr E. A. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to nine antimicrobial agents and demonstration of decreased susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens to penicillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Jan;19(1):51–55. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rosenblatt J. E., Murray P. R., Sonnenwirth A. C., Joyce J. L. Comparison of anaerobic susceptibility results obtained by different methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Mar;15(3):351–355. doi: 10.1128/aac.15.3.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. West S. E., Wilkins T. D. Vaspar broth-disk procedure for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Feb;17(2):288–291. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.2.288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wilkins T. D., Chalgren S. Medium for use in antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Dec;10(6):926–928. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.6.926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wilkins T. D., Thiel T. Modified broth-disk method for testing the antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Mar;3(3):350–356. doi: 10.1128/aac.3.3.350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES