Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1995 Sep;57(3):727–731.

Certificates of confidentiality: a valuable tool for protecting genetic data.

C L Earley 1, L C Strong 1
PMCID: PMC1801267  PMID: 7668302

Abstract

Protecting the confidentiality of genetic research data is an important aspect of genetic research that has been discussed in various forums. Research data must be protected to prevent discrimination and its use in litigation. The certificate of confidentiality was created to protect the subjects of alcohol- and drug-abuse studies, who may be engaging in illegal activities. As revised in 1988, the certificate protects investigators engaging in other kinds of studies from being compelled to reveal information about subjects. Because the certificate protects information that could damage a subject's financial or social standing or employability, it is an appropriate tool to use to maintain the confidentiality of genetic data. The Department of Health and Human Services issues the certificates; the procedure for applying for a certificate of confidentiality is presented.

Full text

PDF
727

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andrews L. B. Legal aspects of genetic information. Yale J Biol Med. 1991 Jan-Feb;64(1):29–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Angastiniotis M. Management of thalassemia in Cyprus. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1992;28(3):38–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Billings P. R., Kohn M. A., de Cuevas M., Beckwith J., Alper J. S., Natowicz M. R. Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing. Am J Hum Genet. 1992 Mar;50(3):476–482. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brownlee Shannon, Cook Gareth G., Hardigg Viva. Tinkering with destiny: genes and cancer. US News World Rep. 1994 Aug 22;117(8):58-65, 67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cook-Deegan R. M. Social and ethical implications of advances in human genetics. South Med J. 1990 Aug;83(8):879–882. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199008000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gillon R. Genetic counselling, confidentiality, and the medical interests of relatives. J Med Ethics. 1988 Dec;14(4):171–172. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.4.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harper P. S. Insurance and genetic testing. Lancet. 1993 Jan 23;341(8839):224–227. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90080-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kass Nancy E. Participation in pedigree studies and the risk of impeded access to health insurance. IRB. 1993 Sep-Oct;15(5):7–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Modell B. Ethical aspects of genetic screening. Ann Med. 1992 Dec;24(6):549–555. doi: 10.3109/07853899209167009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Reilly P. Rights, privacy, and genetic screening. Yale J Biol Med. 1991 Jan-Feb;64(1):43–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sasse G., Müller H., Chakraborty R., Ott J. Estimating the frequency of nonpaternity in Switzerland. Hum Hered. 1994 Nov-Dec;44(6):337–343. doi: 10.1159/000154241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wertz D. C. Ethical and legal implications of the new genetics: issues for discussion. Soc Sci Med. 1992 Aug;35(4):495–505. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90342-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wulfsberg E. A., Hoffmann D. E., Cohen M. M. Alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency. Impact of genetic discovery on medicine and society. JAMA. 1994 Jan 19;271(3):217–222. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.3.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES