Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1985 Oct;28(4):548–551. doi: 10.1128/aac.28.4.548

Comparative trial of rifampin-doxycycline versus tetracycline-streptomycin in the therapy of human brucellosis.

J Ariza, F Gudiol, R Pallarés, G Rufí, P Fernández-Viladrich
PMCID: PMC180303  PMID: 4073878

Abstract

In an attempt to compare the efficacy of rifampin-doxycycline with tetracycline-streptomycin for the treatment of human brucellosis, we administered both combinations for a 30-day period, similar to the period recommended by the World Health Organization in a prospective, randomized trial. Forty-six patients were included in the final study (36 men and 10 women); 41 had blood cultures positive for Brucella melitensis. The 28 patients in group A received tetracycline hydrochloride at doses of 0.5 g every 6 h or doxycycline at 100 mg every 12 h for 30 days plus 1 g of streptomycin a day for 21 days. The 18 patients in group B received rifampin at 15 mg/kg per day in a single morning dose plus 100 mg of doxycycline every 12 h for 30 days. For patients with focal disease from both groups, therapy was prolonged to 45 days. All patients underwent rigorous clinical and bacteriological long-term follow-up. There were no therapeutic failures in either group, and the defervescence period was similar for both groups (3.1 days for group A, 2.6 days for group B). Two patients (7.1%) from group A had relapses, as did seven (38.8%) from group B (P = 0.024), and blood cultures again became positive for B. melitensis in all of them. In both groups treatment was generally well tolerated. The results strongly suggest that the rifampin-doxycycline combination is a less efficacious mode of therapy for brucellosis to prevent relapses than is the classical tetracycline-streptomycin combination when both are administered for 30 days. A more prolonged period of administration of the rifampin-doxycycline combination may be required to obtain the same low relapse rate as that achieved with the classical tetracycline-streptomycin treatment.

Full text

PDF
548

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ariza J. Tratamiento antimicrobiano actual de la brucelosis. Med Clin (Barc) 1983 Dec 10;81(19):870–876. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertrand A., Jonquet O. Traitement antibiotique de la brucellose. Sem Hop. 1982 Feb 4;58(5):281–283. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertrand A., Roux J., Janbon F., Jourdan J., Jonquet O. Traitement de la brucellose par la rifampicine. Résultats préliminaires. Nouv Presse Med. 1979 Nov 12;8(44):3635–3639. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Corbel M. J. Determination of the in vitro sensitivity of Brucella strains to rifampicin. Br Vet J. 1976 May-Jun;132(3):266–275. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1935(17)34686-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FOZ A., GARRIGA S. Relation entre la fixation du complément et les anticorps in complets (test de Coombs) dans la brucellose humaine. Rev Immunol Ther Antimicrob. 1954;18(4):288–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Feiz J. M., Sabbaghian H., Sohrabi F. A comparative study of therapeutic agents used for treatment of acute brucellosis. Br J Clin Pract. 1973 Nov;27(11):410–413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hall W. H., Manion R. E. In vitro susceptibility of Brucella to various antibiotics. Appl Microbiol. 1970 Oct;20(4):600–604. doi: 10.1128/am.20.4.600-604.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Llorens-Terol J., Busquets R. M. Brucellosis treated with rifampicin. Arch Dis Child. 1980 Jun;55(6):486–488. doi: 10.1136/adc.55.6.486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lobo M. C., Mandell G. L. The effect of antibiotics on Escherichia coli ingested by macrophages. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1973 Mar;142(3):1048–1050. doi: 10.3181/00379727-142-37173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MAGILL G. B., KILLOUGH J. H. Oxytetracycline-streptomycin therapy in brucellosis due to Brucella melitensis. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1953 Feb;91(2):204–211. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1953.00240140064005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Morgan W. J., MacKinnon D. J., Lawson J. R., Cullen G. A. The rose bengal plate agglutination test in the diagnosis of brucellosis. Vet Rec. 1969 Dec 6;85(23):636–641. doi: 10.1136/vr.85.23.636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Philippon A. M., Plommet M. G., Kazmierczak A., Marly J. L., Nevot P. A. Rifampin in the treatment of experimental brucellosis in mice and guinea pigs. J Infect Dis. 1977 Oct;136(4):481–488. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. RUIZ CASTANEDA M. Laboratory diagnosis of brucellosis in man. Bull World Health Organ. 1961;24:73–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES