Abstract
Inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3methylglutaryl-co-enzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, so-called statins, are used in medical practice because of their lipid-lowering effect and to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease. Recent findings indicate that statins also have anti-inflammatory properties and can modulate the immune response. In vitro, we investigated the effect of atorvastatin on the T cell/macrophage system in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and in the human monocytic cell lines THP-1 and MonoMac6. We monitored neopterin production and tryptophan degradation in PBMC after treatment with 10 µm and 100 µm atorvastatin in the presence or absence of 100 U/ml IFN-γ, 10 µg/ml phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) or 10 µg/ml concanavalin A (ConA) and in monocytic cell lines THP-1 and MonoMac6 with or without stimulation with 100 U/ml IFN-γ or 10 ng/ml to 1 µg/ml lipopolysaccharide (LPS). In stimulated PBMC 100 µm atorvastatin inhibited neopterin formation and tryptophan degradation completely, whereas 10 µm atorvastatin was only partially effective. Also in monocytic cell lines THP-1 and MonoMac6, atorvastatin was able to suppress IFN-γ- and LPS-induced formation of neopterin and degradation of tryptophan. Our data from PBMC agree well with previous investigations that statins inhibit T cell activation within the cellular immune response. In addition we demonstrate that atorvastatin directly inhibits IFN-γ-mediated pathways in monocytic cells, suggesting that both immunoreactivity of T cells and of monocyte-derived macrophages are down-regulated by this statin.
Keywords: IDO, MonoMac6, neopterin, statins, THP-1
Introduction
Statins, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-co-enzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, are used for treatment of hypercholesterolaemia because of their lipid-lowering effects and the resulting decrease in intracellular cholesterol [1,2]. A reduction of cholesterol may influence numerous pathogenic mechanisms such as atherogenesis or thrombosis, and large-scale intervention trials have shown that statin treatment reduces the risk of cardiovascular diseases [3]. In addition to their lipid-lowering properties, statins are able to regulate molecules in vascular biology [4].
Statins also appear to play a role in immunomodulation as they show an immunosuppressive activity, e.g. statins are able to repress the induction of major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II) expression induced by interferon-γ (IFN-γ) [5,6]. In turn, the release of proinflammatory cytokines may also be decreased.
Neopterin, a metabolite of guanosinetriphosphate, is produced in humans and primates by monocyte-derived macrophages (MdM) upon stimulation with IFN-γ. It therefore represents a marker of activated cellular immune system [7]. IFN-γ also induces indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) to convert tryptophan into N-formylkynurenine, which deformylates to kynurenine [8]. Parallel induction of neopterin formation and tryptophan degradation has been demonstrated earlier in monocytic cells and in PBMC [9,10]. The kynurenine to tryptophan ratio (kyn/trp) is usually high during diseases which go along with cellular immune activation due to an increased IDO activity. Thereby, kyn/trp correlates closely with neopterin concentrations in various diseases [11,12].
Among statins, atorvastatin was shown to be probably the best modulator of MHC expression [5]. In this study, we investigated the influence of atorvastatin on effector cells of the cellular immune system by determination of neopterin formation and tryptophan degradation in stimulated PBMC and in monocytic cell lines.
Materials And Methods
Cell culture
PBMC were isolated from whole blood obtained from healthy voluntary blood donors by density centrifugation (Lymphoprep, Nycomed Pharma AS, Oslo, Norway). Cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 (PAA Laboratories, Linz, Austria) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany), 2 mm l-glutamine (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) and 50 µg/ml gentamycin (Bio-Whittaker, Walkersville, MD, USA). THP-1 cells obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA) and MonoMac6 (kindly provided from the Institute of Hygiene, University of Innsbruck) were cultured in completed medium as described above with 0·36 µm mercaptoethanol. Cells were from early passages and were kept for <1·5 months, STR profiling showed identity with original ATTC clones. All cells regularly tested negative for mycoplasma.
For stimulation cells were seeded at a density of 3 × 106/ml and stimulated with IFN-γ (Bioferon, Laupheim, Germany), concanavalin A (ConA, Sigma, Vienna, Austria), phytohaemagglutinin (PHA, Sigma) or lipopolysaccharides (LPS, Sigma) with or without atorvastatin in co-incubation experiments (Sortis®, Atorvastatin-Calcium, Gödecke AG, Berlin, Germany and Pfizer, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Geranylgeranylpyrophosphate (GGPP) and Farnesylpyrophosphate (FPP) were from Sigma.
Sortis was dissolved in RPMI prior to experiments. Incubation period was chosen 24 h for THP-1 and MonoMac6, and 48 h for experiments with PBMC, because maximum neopterin production and tryptophan degradation in monocytic cell lines was reached within 24 h whereas it took 48 h in PBMC. Supernatants were harvested by centrifugation and frozen at −20°C until measured.
Determination of neopterin, tryptophan and kynurenine
Neopterin was determined by ELISA (Brahms, Berlin, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions with a detection limit of 2 nm. Tryptophan and kynurenine were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as described previously [13] using 3-nitro-l-tyrosine as external standard. Kyn/trp was calculated to estimate activity of IDO [13,14].
Statistical analysis
For comparison of grouped data Student's t-test was applied, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated. P-values below 0·05 were considered to indicate significant differences.
Results
Unstimulated PBMC produced an average of 3·6 ± 0·27 nm neopterin when kept in culture for 48 h, addition of atorvastatin to unstimulated cells had no effect on neopterin production (Table 1). Incubation of PBMC with IFN-γ (100 U/ml), ConA or PHA (10 µg/ml) led to an increased production of neopterin. Treatment of stimulated PBMC with 10 µm atorvastatin resulted in a significant down-regulation of neopterin formation; treatment with 100 µm atorvastatin completely blocked neopterin production (Table 1). Viability of cells remained unchanged.
Table 1.
Treatment | Atorvastatin 0 µm | Atorvastatin 10 µm | Atorvastatin 100 µm |
---|---|---|---|
None | 3·6 ± 0·3 | 4·0 ± 0·3 | 3·5 ± 0·4 |
IFN-γ 100 U/ml | 12·6 ± 2·4* | 5·5 ± 0·4† | 4·0 ± 0·6† |
ConA 10 µg/ml | 28·2 ± 4·7* | 14·0 ± 3·0‡ | 4·8 ± 1·6† |
PHA 10 µg/ml | 27·4 ± 2·2* | 16·6 ± 2·0‡ | 4·7 ± 0·2† |
P < 0·001 (compared with unstimulated cells)
P < 0·001,
P < 0·01 (compared with stimulated cells without atorvastatin).
Tryptophan degradation, as measured by a decrease of tryptophan and a parallel increase of kynurenine concentrations (kyn/trp), was increased in stimulated PBMC compared with unstimulated cells (Fig. 1). Atorvastatin inhibited stimulation-induced degradation of tryptophan completely at 100 µm concentration, and at 10 µm concentration it was already partially effective (Fig. 1). Overall, the influence of stimuli ± atorvastatin at different concentrations on tryptophan and kynurenine concentrations was almost predictable by the change of neopterin concentrations. A lowered degradation of tryptophan by atorvastatin was paralleled by decreasing neopterin concentrations and, similarly, a strong correlation existed between neopterin concentrations and kyn/trp in supernatants of PBMC (rs = 0·902, P < 0·001).
Addition of FPP and GGPP to cells did not alter the inhibitory effect of atorvastatin on neopterin production and tryptophan degradation.
In THP-1 cells, significantly enhanced neopterin production (Table 2) as well as tryptophan degradation (Fig. 2) was observed upon treatment with IFN-γ and LPS. The combination of stimuli led to a synergistic effect which was greater than the sum obtained by single stimuli. Addition of 10 µm atorvastatin induced a small decrease of neopterin production and tryptophan degradation, and 100 µm atorvastatin blocked these two activation-induced biochemical pathways. Again, any influence of atorvastatin to decrease tryptophan degradation in stimulated cells was paralleled by decreasing neopterin concentrations, and again a strong correlation existed between neopterin concentrations and kyn/trp in supernatants of THP-1 cells (rs = 0·886, P < 0·001).
Table 2.
Treatment | Atorvastatin 0 µm | Atorvastatin 10 µm | Atorvastatin 100 µm |
---|---|---|---|
None | 2·3 ± 0·1 | 2·3 ± 0·2 | 2·3 ± 0·2 |
IFN-γ 100 U/ml | 4·8 ± 1·2* | 4·3 ± 0·8 | 2·6 ± 0·2‡ |
LPS 1 µg/ml | 3·9 ± 0·5* | 4·0 ± 0·6 | 2·4 ± 0·1‡ |
LPS 10 µg/ml | 3·2 ± 0·5* | 3·4 ± 0·5 | 2·5 ± 0·4‡ |
IFN-γ + LPS 1 µg/ml | 29·2 ± 7·2* | 23·4 ± 6·2§ | 4·1 ± 1·5† |
IFN-γ + LPS 10 µg/ml | 22·1 ± 8·8* | 19·9 ± 7·6 | 3·2 ± 0·7† |
P < 0·001 (compared with unstimulated cells)
P < 0·001 and
P < 0·01
P < 0·05 (compared with stimulated cells without atorvastatin).
Also in MonoMac6 cells, atorvastatin was able to block IFN-γ- and LPS-induced neopterin and tryptophan degradation in a dose-dependent manner (data not shown) similar to that seen in THP-1 cells.
Discussion
Atorvastatin decreases neopterin production and tryptophan degradation in PBMC stimulated with IFN-γ, ConA and PHA and also in the monocytic cell lines THP-1 and MonoMac6 stimulated with IFN-γ and/or LPS in a concentration-dependent manner. Neopterin production and tryptophan degradation were inhibited almost completely by addition of 100 µm atorvastatin, but 10 µm atorvastatin was also effective, this lower concentration being in the same range as the dose achieved during treatment in patients. The same results were obtained when using pure atorvastatin instead of Sortis® tablets (data not shown).
The effect of atorvastatin to reduce neopterin formation and tryptophan degradation in parallel was observed in PBMC but also in the established monocytic cell lines THP-1 and MonoMac6. In PBMC, treatment with atorvastatin most probably influenced macrophage activity by down-regulating T cell activation [5] and thus, production of IFN-γ. The data fit well to available information on statins to slow down T cell response in vitro [6]. In monocytic cell lines, a direct influence of atorvastatin on human monocytic cells stimulated with IFN-γ was observed. It appears that a higher dose of atorvastatin was needed to achieve similar effects in monocytic cell lines compared with PBMC.
Kyn/trp in unstimulated PBMC was reduced by atorvastatin; no such difference was observed for neopterin concentrations. It also appears that baseline levels of kyn/trp and neopterin concentrations are due to stimulation of cells, albeit at a low level, and atorvastatin is able to down-regulate this activity. However, neopterin concentrations measured in control cells were close to the limit of detection of the ELISA used, and the assay may not be sensitive enough to detect a further reduction of neopterin concentrations.
Human MdM produce increased amounts of neopterin upon stimulation with IFN-γ [9,15]. Therefore, measurement of neopterin concentration allows monitoring of the extent of cellular immune activation [7, 16, 17]. Increased neopterin formation coincides with increased production of reactive oxygen species formed by activated MdM and with tryptophan degradation by IDO, both the latter also representing part of the microbicidal armature of MdM [10,18–20]. By decreasing the activation status, statins may counteract oxidative power of activated cells. Reactive oxygen species released by MdM stimulated with IFN-γ potently oxidize nitric oxide (NO) to form peroxynitrite (ONOO−) [21]. Thereby the cytotoxic activity is increased at the expense of vasodilatory NO. Thus, if statins reduce the amounts of oxidizing compounds formed from activated cells, they might reduce the conversion of NO to ONOO−, increasing residual NO. Our data may support the notion that benefits of statins in cardiovascular disorders do not only result from their influence on HMG-CoA reductase and cholesterol biosynthesis; in parallel, vasodilatory effects could be achieved which contribute to further amelioration of atherogenesis [22]. Statins have been found previously to up-regulate NO production in conscious dogs [23].
It is unclear, at which biochemical pathway atorvastatin interferes with immune activation cascades and whether its effects still involve changes related to cholesterol biosynthesis. Statins lead to a decreased synthesis of cholesterol as well as its precursors, including farnesyl- and geranylgeranylpyrophosphate (FPP and GGPP). FPP is essential for membrane attachment and biological activity of small G-proteins from the Ras-family, and GGPP is required for RhoA translocation to cell membranes [23,24]. When adding FPP and GGPP to our test system there was no effect on the inhibitory capacity of atorvastatin observed (data not shown), suggesting no association between inhibited FPP and GGPP production and decreased neopterin formation and tryptophan degradation.
IFN-γ, which is released during cellular immune response, induces IDO to convert tryptophan to kynurenine [8–10]. Kyn/trp is usually high during cellular immune activation because of increased IDO activity and correlates closely with neopterin concentrations in various diseases [11,12]. Interferon-induced IDO activation has been linked to microbicidal effects due to tryptophan deprivation [20]. In mice, tryptophan depletion as a result of IDO activation was found to be required for tolerance induction during pregnancy [25]. Similarly, tryptophan degradation induced by IFN-γ in monocytes/macrophages is capable of inducing T cell unresponsiveness in vitro [26,27]. These observations may explain why enhanced production of IFN-γ and tryptophan degradation by IDO often coincides with acquired immunodeficiency during disease [11,28]. From the data it could be concluded that statins might also be able to improve T cell responsiveness by reducing cytokine-induced tryptophan degradation, and thus statins may represent useful immunmodulators in chronic inflammatory diseases besides atherosclerosis, e.g. autoimmune disorders or neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's dementia [5].
In conclusion, atorvastatin is able to suppress biochemical effects in cytokine-treated monocytes. As well as an influence of statin on the interaction between T cells and monocytes, direct effects on monocytes have also been found.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the by the Austrian Funds ‘Zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung’, project 14154Med and by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Social Affairs and Generations.
References
- 1.Hebert PR, Gaziano JM, Chan KS, Hennekens CH. Cholesterol lowering with statin drugs, risk of stroke, and total mortality. An overview of randomized trials. J Am Med Assoc. 1997;278:313–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Maron DJ, Fazio S, Linton MF. Current perspectives on statins. Circulation. 2000;101:207–23. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.2.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vaughan CJ, Delanty N, Basson CT. Statin therapy and stroke prevention. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2001;16:219–24. doi: 10.1097/00001573-200107000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vaughan CJ, Murphy MB, Buckley BM. Statins do more than just lower cholesterol. Lancet. 1996;348:1079–825. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05190-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kwak B, Mulhaupt F, Myit S, Mach F. Statins as a newly recognized type of immunomodulator. Nature Med. 2000;6:1399–402. doi: 10.1038/82219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Palinski W. Immunomodulation: a new role for statins? Nature Med. 2000;6:1311–2. doi: 10.1038/82107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fuchs D, Weiss G, Wachter H. Neopterin, biochemistry and clinical use as a marker for cellular immune reactions. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1993;101:1–6. doi: 10.1159/000236491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Byrne GI, Lehmann LK, Kirschbaum JG, Borden EC, Lee CM, Brown RR. Induction of tryptophan degradation in vitro and in vivo: a gamma-interferon-stimulated activity. J Interferon Res. 1986;6:389–96. doi: 10.1089/jir.1986.6.389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Werner ER, Werner-Felmayer G, Fuchs D, Hausen A, Reibnegger G, Wachter H. Parallel induction of tetrahydrobiopterin biosynthesis and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity in human cells and cell lines by interferon-gamma. Biochem J. 1989;262:861–6. doi: 10.1042/bj2620861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Weiss G, Murr C, Zoller H, et al. Modulation of neopterin formation and tryptophan degradation by Th1- and Th2-derived cytokines in human monocytic cells. Clin Exp Immunol. 1999;116:435–40. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1999.00910.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Widner B, Ledochowski M, Fuchs D. Interferon-γ-induced tryptophan degradation. neuropsychiatric and immunological consequences. Current Drug Metabolism. 2000;1:193–204. doi: 10.2174/1389200003339063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Widner B, Laich A, Sperner-Unterweger B, Ledochowski M, Fuchs D. Neopterin production, tryptophan degradation and mental depression − what is the link? Brain Behav Immun. 2002;16:590–5. doi: 10.1016/s0889-1591(02)00006-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Widner B, Werner ER, Schennach H, Wachter H, Fuchs D. Simultaneous measurement of serum tryptophan and kynurenine by HPLC. Clin Chem. 1997;43:2424–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fuchs D, Möller AA, Reibnegger G, Stöckle E, Werner ER, Wachter H. Decreased serum tryptophan in patients with HIV-1 infection correlates with increased serum neopterin and with neurologic/psychiatric symptoms. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1990;3:873–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huber C, Batchelor JR, Fuchs D, et al. Immune response-associated production of neopterin − release from macrophages primarily under control of interferon-gamma. J Exp Med. 1984;160:310–6. doi: 10.1084/jem.160.1.310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fuchs D, Hausen A, Reibnegger G, Werner ER, Dierich MP, Wachter H. Neopterin as a marker for activated cell-mediated immunity: application HIV infection. Immunol Today. 1988;9:150–5. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(88)91203-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brew BJ, Dunbar N, Pemberton L, Kaldor J. Predictive markers of AIDS dementia complex: CD4 cell count and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of beta 2-microglobulin and neopterin. J Infect Dis. 1996;174:294–8. doi: 10.1093/infdis/174.2.294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nathan CF. Peroxide and pteridine: a hypothesis on the regulation of macrophage antimicrobial activity by interferon-γ. In: Gresser I, Vilcek J, editors. Interferon. Vol. 7. London: Academic Press; 1986. pp. 125–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Murr C, Fuith LC, Widner B, Wirleitner B, Baier-Bitterlich G, Fuchs D. Increased neopterin concentrations in patients with cancer. indicator of oxidative stress? Anticancer Res. 1999;19:1721–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pfefferkorn ER. Interferon-γ blocks the growth of Toxoplasma ghondii in human fibroblasts by inducing the host cells to degrade tryptophan. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984;81:908–12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.3.908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Squadrito GL, Pryor WA. Oxidative chemistry of nitric oxide: the roles of superoxide, peroxynitrite, and carbon dioxide. Free Radic Biol Med. 1998;25:392–403. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(98)00095-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Elson CE, Peffley DM, Hentosh P, Mo H. Isoprenoid-mediated inhibition of mevalonate synthesis: potential application to cancer. Proc Soc Exp Biol Medical. 1999;221:294–311. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1373.1999.d01-87.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mital S, Zhang X, Zhao G, et al. Simvastatin upregulates coronary vascular endothelial nitric oxide production in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;279:H2649–57. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.279.6.H2649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yoshida Y, Kawata M, Katayama M, Horiuchi H, Kita Y, Takai Y. A geranylgeranyltransferase for rhoA p21 distinct from the farnesyltransferase for ras p21S. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;175:720–8. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(91)91625-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Munn DH, Zhou M, Attwood JT, et al. Prevention of allogeneic fetal rejection by tryptophan catabolism. Science. 1998;281:1191–3. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5380.1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Munn DH, Shafizadeh E, Attwood JT, Bondarev I, Pashine A, Mellor AL. Inhibition of T cell proliferation by macrophage tryptophan catabolism. J Exp Med. 1999;189:1363–72. doi: 10.1084/jem.189.9.1363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mellor AL, Munn DH. Tryptophan catabolism and T cell tolerance: immunosuppression by starvation? Immunol Today. 1999;20:469–73. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5699(99)01520-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Widner B, Weiss G, Fuchs D. Tryptophan degradation to control T cell responses. Immunol Today. 2000;21:250. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5699(00)01616-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]