Skip to main content
Clinical and Experimental Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Experimental Immunology
. 2006 Sep 1;145(3):480–484. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2006.03172.x

Association of interferon-γ and interleukin 10 genotypes and serum levels with partial clinical remission in type 1 diabetes

B Z Alizadeh ¶,‡,, P Hanifi-Moghaddam ¶,§,, P Eerligh , A R van der Slik , H Kolb §, A V Kharagjitsingh ¶¶,*, A M Pereira Arias ¶,*, M Ronkainen ***,*, M Knip , R Bonfanti **,*, E Bonifacio **, D Devendra ††,*, T Wilkin ††, M J Giphart , B P C Koeleman ¶,‡, R Nolsøe ‡‡,*, T Mandrup Poulsen ‡‡,§§, N C Schloot §, B O Roep
PMCID: PMC1809698  PMID: 16907917

Abstract

We studied whether serum interferon (IFN)-γ or interleukin (IL)-10 levels and their corresponding functional polymorphic genotypes are associated with partial remission of type 1 diabetes (T1D). A multi-centre study was undertaken in patients with newly diagnosed T1D and matched controls. T1D patients were followed for 3 months and characterized for remission status. Partial clinical remission was defined as a daily insulin dose ≤ 0·38 units/kg/24 h with an HbA1c ≤ 7·5%. Thirty-three patients and 32 controls were phenotyped for serum concentrations of IFN-γ and IL-10 and genotyped for functional polymorphisms of the IFN-γ and IL-10 genes. Sixteen of 25 informative patients (63%) remitted. Serum IFN-γ concentrations were significantly decreased in remitters but increased in non-remitters compared to controls, and did not change over time in any group. IFN-γ genotypes corresponded with serum levels in controls and non-remitters, but not in remitters who displayed the lowest serum IFN-γ levels despite more often carrying high-producing IFN-γ genotypes. Neither the frequency of IL-10 genotypes nor serum IL-10 concentration differed between patients and controls. The combination of high-producing IFN-γ genotype together with low serum IFN-γ concentration at the time of diagnosis provided a strong positive predictive value for remission. Serum IFN-γ concentrations predicted by genotype and observed serum levels were discordant in remitters, suggestive of regulation overruling genetic predisposition. Although high-producing genotypes were less frequent in remitters, they were predictive of remission in combination with low serum IFN-γ levels. These data imply that remission is partially immune-mediated and involves regulation of IFN-γ transcription.

Keywords: clinical remission, disease marker, IFN-γ, IL-10, prediction, type 1 diabetes

Introduction

Clinical remission occurs in 50% of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D); it is distinguished by a temporary increase in endogenous insulin secretion and a reduction of exogenous insulin usage, while maintaining normoglycaemia [1,2]. Pathologically, remission may reflect a resolution of islet inflammation [1]. Although several factors such as age, gender, islet antibodies and immune modulation are associated with clinical remission [1,35], the underlying immune regulatory mechanisms are unclear. An approach to identify factors associated with remission is to investigate the determinants of inflammatory responses involved in T1D, which may also influence remission. Th1-like immune responses, which predispose to T1D, are characterized by production of interferon (IFN)-γ [6,7]. Conversely, interleukin (IL)-10 suppresses the Th1-like immune response and plays a regulatory role in T1D [8]. We therefore studied whether IFN-γ or IL-10 serum levels in combination with the corresponding genotypes (IFN-γ and IL-10, respectively) are associated with clinical remission of T1D.

Subjects and methods

Participants

This investigation was nested within the European Multi-centre Remission (REM) Trial aimed at unravelling the determinants of partial clinical remission in T1D. The medical ethical committees of the participating centres approved the study and informed consent was obtained from the participants. The German and Danish cohorts had DNA samples available to be characterized for candidate genes involved in inflammatory responses, and were thus included in this study. Patients were diagnosed with T1D according to World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Diabetes Association criteria and included 3–7 days after diagnosis and initiation of insulin therapy. At the time that a patient was newly diagnosed and enrolled in the study, an age- and gender-matched unrelated volunteer from the same residential area was recruited. Participants were Caucasoid without a history of acute allergies, infections or anti-inflammatory medication. The baseline examination took place at the time of diagnosis in patients, and at the first visit in controls. The participants were re-examined at the end of a follow-up period of 3 months by the same study physician using a standardized questionnaire and checklist. Partial clinical remission was defined as having an HbA1c value ≤ 7·5% and an insulin requirement ≤ 0·38 U/kg/24 h. The remission status remained undetermined for eight patients of the 33 patients studied, owing to incomplete clinical information (n = 3) or loss to follow-up (n = 5). Thirty-one controls were included in the study.

Measurements

Standardized blood sampling was performed in fasting subjects. Serum levels of IFN-γ and IL-10 were measured by double-sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay as described [9]. The IFN-γ gene contains a CA-microsatellite repeat in the first intron associated with IFN-γ secretion levels in vitro [10]. This marker has five variants defined by the number of CA repeats (i.e. 11 repeats for allele one, 12 for allele two (designated allele 116), 13 for allele three, 14 for allele four and 15 repeat for allele five) [10] and participants were genotyped as described [11]. Genotyping was successful for all controls and 31 patients. IFN-γ genotypes were grouped as non-carriers (presented as X/X), heterozygous (X/116) and homozygous (116/116) for the 116 low-producing allele [10]. A CA-microsatellite in the promoter of IL-10 associated with circulating levels of IL-10 [12] was genotyped in participants. This marker has five allelic variants designed as alleles 194, 196, 198, 200 and 202. IL-10 genotypes were grouped as homozygous, heterozygous and non-carriers for the IL-10 196 high-producing allele. The genotype frequencies of both genes were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.

Data analysis

Patients were analysed as one group or divided into remitters and non-remitters. χ2, Fisher's exact, Student's t, analysis of variance (anova) and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to compare frequencies and means. Logistic and generalized linear regression analyses were used to estimate and compare the age adjusted mean and the corresponding standard errors of IFN-γ concentrations among the groups. In view of the relation between partial remission and genotype and serum IFN-γ levels, we assessed the positive predictive values (PPV) of these markers separately or combined for remission as described [13]. PPV refers to proportion of remitters among the patients who possessed the ‘marker’. Here, the word ‘marker’ refers to low levels of serum INF-γ, IFN-γ genotypes or their combinations. All the analyses were performed in stata version 8·0 software for Windows (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Sixteen patients of 25 with complete clinical data (63%) developed partial remission during the follow-up period (Table 1). Remitters were older than non-remitters (mean age 34·3 ± standard error (s.e.) 1·6 versus 26·3 ± 2·8 years, P = 0·02) and controls (30·2 ± 1·2 years, P = 0·04; Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline and genotypic characteristics of the study population.

Patients

Controls Overall Non-Remitters Remitters
Numbers 31 33 9 16
German/Danish nationality (n) 15/16 17/16 4/5 8/8
Female gender (%) 32·3 36·4 55·6 37·5
Age (years) 30·2 ± 1·2 31·6 ± 1·3 26·3 ± 2·8 34·3 ± 1·6
Body mass index (kg/m2) 23·0 ± 0·5 24·0 ± 0·9 21·5 ± 0·6 23·5 ± 0·9
HBA1C (%) 5·3 ± 0·1 11·5 ± 0·3 12·6 ± 0·8 11·1 ± 0·4
Prevalence of IFN-γ genotypes (%)* n = 31 n = 31 n = 9 n = 15
 116 homozygotes 12·9 25·8 33·3 20·0
 116 heterozygotes 48·4 45·2 55·6 46·7
 Non-carriers of 116 38·7 29·0 11·1 33·3
Prevalence of IL-10 genotypes (%)
 196 homozygotes 38·1 54·8 66·7 46·7
 196 heterozygotes 51·6 38·7 22·2 46·7
 Non-carriers of 196 9·7 6·4 11·1 6·6

Values represent means ± standard error.

Remitting patients compared to those without remission: P < 0·05

patients with remission compared to controls: P < 0·05

patients compared to controls: P < 0·05.

*

Combination of alleles of the CA repeat marker in intron 1 of the IFN-γ gene. The observed genotypes were grouped according to the presence of the 116 allele.

Overall, serum IFN-γ levels were not significantly different between controls (15·0 ± 4·4 pg/ml) and all patients (13·1 ± 4·2 pg/ml) at the first visit (Table 1; Fig. 1). However, serum IFN-γ concentrations were significantly lower in remitting patients compared to non-remitters or controls (5·7 ± 5·2 versus 22·9 ± 7·1 (P = 0·04) and 15·4 ± 4·4 (P = 0·02) pg/ml, respectively; Fig. 1), whereas non-remitters had significantly increased IFN-γ concentrations compared to controls (P = 0·05). We assessed the functionality of the IFN-γ polymorphism, i.e. relationship to serum IFN-γ levels with respect to remission. Among controls, homozygous people had lower serum concentrations of IFN-γ (5·8 ± 1·4 pg/ml, n = 4) compared to those heterozygous (12·7 ± 2·4 pg/ml, P = 0·02, n = 15) or non-carriers of the IFN-γ 116 allele (24·0 ± 11·5 pg/ml, P = 0·04, n = 12), confirming the functionality of this polymorphism. The same trend was observed in non-remitters (8·9 ± 2·1 pg/ml, n = 3; 12·9 ± 6·9 pg/ml, n = 5; and 98·1 pg/ml, n = 1, in patients homozygous, heterozygous or non-carrier of the 116 allele, respectively). In contrast, remitters did not show the same trend as observed in controls and non-remitters. Remarkably, remitters not carrying the 116 allele had lower or equal levels of IFN-γ compared to remitters heterozygous or homozygous for this allele (4·6 ± 1·2 pg/ml, n = 3; versus 8·6 ± 2·3 pg/ml, n = 7; and 4·4 ± 0·8 pg/ml, n = 5, respectively). These observations may imply that regulatory factors in the disease course overrule the IFN-γ genotype effects in remitters. Combinations of IFN-γ genotype status and serum levels were analysed as predictive surrogates for partial clinical remission. Eleven of 16 remitters versus five of nine non-remitters had a low serum IFN-γ level, indicating a PPV of 68·8% for partial remission. PPV for partial remission increased to 83·3% for being carriers of the high-producing IFN-γ genotypes. When IFN-γ genotype status and serum levels were combined, PPV increased to 100% for co-occurrence of being carriers of the high-producing IFN-γ genotypes together with discrepant low circulating concentrations of IFN-γ, as four of 16 remitters versus none of the non-remitters had this condition.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Levels of serum interferon (INF)-γ in remission of type 1 diabetes. The error bars represent s.e. *P < 0·05 remitters or non-remitters compared to controls; ♯P < 0·05 remitters compared to non-remitters.

In controls (n = 31), IL-10 levels were generally low (Table 1). All four patients with increased serum IL-10 levels were homozygous for the IL-10 196 allele, but remission status was distributed randomly among patients, i.e. two patients were non-remitters, one was a remitter and one had an undetermined remission status. In patients with low IL-10 levels, three (27·3%) of 11 non-carriers, and four (40·0%) of 10 patients homozygous for the 196 allele remitted (exact P = 0·6). Taken together, our observations suggest that IL-10 genotypes and serum levels may not have a strong impact on the course of disease in this cohort.

Discussion

In the present study, we provide evidence for immunological surrogates for clinical remission. Genetic predisposition to differential levels of serum IFN-γ was discordant in remitters, but concordant in non-remitters and controls. This discrepancy marked remission and was not associated with IL-10 abnormalities.

Our patients did not display lower serum levels of IFN-γ compared to controls. However, separating patients according to their remission status yielded strong distinction based on circulating IFN-γ concentrations, with remitters showing decreased levels compared to controls. This is in line with experiments in NOD mice showing low levels of IFN-γ, in parallel with high IL-10 levels, linked to T cell-mediated suppression [14,15]. Remarkably in our study, low serum IFN-γ concentrations among remitters were consistently accompanied by low IL-10 levels, reflecting a low inflammatory phenotype of the combined cytokines that is consistent with our hypothesis. We propose that genetic predisposition to high IFN-γ production in combination with a discrepantly low serum IFN-γ concentration, independently of IL-10, may predict partial clinical remission in T1D.

Next, we hypothesized that IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine could suppress islet autoimmunity, thereby reducing the need for exogenous insulin and predisposing to clinical partial remission. However, neither serum IL-10 levels nor genotype frequencies differed between remitters, non-remitters and controls confirming previous reports [16,17]. The patients with high IL-10 production carried the high-producing IL-10 genotype, but these patients were distributed equally among remitters and non-remitters. Taken together, our data suggest that circulating IL-10 or the corresponding genotypes or their combination play a limited role in T1D and hardly contribute to the disease heterogeneity.

Our study has some limitations. A major concern is the small number of subjects limiting the statistical power. An observer-related bias is unlikely, as the experiments and genotyping were performed blindly to remission status. To accommodate multiple-testing, we focused on a priori specified immunological candidate markers. These were adjusted for age as a previously identified factor in clinical remission, as we have shown previously that cytokines are useful to predict the individual autoantibody status in patients with newly diagnosed T1D [9]. Finally, the definition of full clinical remission is open for debate. We chose to study partial clinical remission instead of complete remission, using the definition applied previously to the cyclosporin intervention trial [18].

In conclusion, we demonstrated that IFN-γ genotypes in combination with serum IFN-γ concentrations are strong predictors of partial clinical remission in patients with newly diagnosed T1D. Our data imply that the immune status in combination with genetic predisposition contributes to partial clinical remission. Our results may prove useful to categorize patients participating in immune intervention trials into subjects as liable to clinical remission or to rapid disease progression.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the European Union (PL963363: DiabMarker − Surrogate end-points for future intervention trials in individuals at risk for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus) and the Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation (97·137), the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International (JDRF) (2001·10·004) and Novo Nordisk A/S. We are grateful to Alexandra Zhernakova and Alfons Bardoel for IFN-γ and IL-10 genotyping.

References

  • 1.Hramiak IM, Dupre J, Finegood DT. Determinants of clinical remission in recent-onset IDDM. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:125–32. doi: 10.2337/diacare.16.1.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Martin S, Pawlowski B, Greulich B, Ziegler AG, Mandrup-Poulsen T, Mahon J. Natural course of remission in IDDM during 1st yr after diagnosis. Diabetes Care. 1992;15:66–74. doi: 10.2337/diacare.15.1.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Keymeulen B, Vandemeulebroucke E, Ziegler AG, et al. Insulin needs after CD3-antibody therapy in new-onset type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2598–608. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Herold KC, Hagopian W, Auger JA, et al. Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody in new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1692–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hoppu S, Harkonen T, Ronkainen MS, et al. IA-2 antibody isotypes and epitope specificity during the prediabetic process in children with HLA-conferred susceptibility to type I diabetes. Clin Exp Immunol. 2006;144:59–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2006.03033.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Atkinson MA, Maclaren NK. The pathogenesis of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1428–36. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199411243312107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Arif S, Tree TI, Astill TP, et al. Autoreactive T cell responses show proinflammatory polarization in diabetes but a regulatory phenotype in health. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:451–63. doi: 10.1172/JCI19585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kallmann BA, Lampeter EF, Hanifi-Moghaddam P, Hawa M, Leslie RD, Kolb H. Cytokine secretion patterns in twins discordant for Type I diabetes. Diabetologia. 1999;42:1080–5. doi: 10.1007/s001250051274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hanifi-Moghaddam P, Schloot NC, Kappler S, Seissler J, Kolb H. An association of autoantibody status and serum cytokine levels in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2003;52:1137–42. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.5.1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pravica V, Asderakis A, Perrey C, Hajeer A, Sinnott PJ, Hutchinson IV. In vitro production of IFN-gamma correlates with CA repeat polymorphism in the human IFN-gamma gene. Eur J Immunogenet. 1999;26:1–3. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2370.1999.00122.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eerligh P, Koeleman BP, Dudbridge F, Jan Bruining G, Roep BO, Giphart MJ. Functional genetic polymorphisms in cytokines and metabolic genes as additional genetic markers for susceptibility to develop type 1 diabetes. Genes Immun. 2004;5:36–40. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gibson AW, Edberg JC, Wu J, Westendorp RG, Huizinga TW, Kimberly RP. Novel single nucleotide polymorphisms in the distal IL-10 promoter affect IL-10 production and enhance the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 2001;166:3915–22. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.6.3915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Khoury MJ, Newill CA, Chase GA. Epidemiologic evaluation of screening for risk factors: application to genetic screening. Am J Public Health. 1985;75:1204–8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.10.1204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schloot NC, Hanifi-Moghaddam P, Goebel C, et al. Serum IFN-gamma and IL-10 levels are associated with disease progression in non-obese diabetic mice. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2002;18:64–70. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cardell SL. The natural killer T lymphocyte: a player in the complex regulation of autoimmune diabetes in non-obese diabetic mice. Clin Exp Immunol. 2006;143:194–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02942.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ide A, Kawasaki E, Abiru N, et al. Genetic association between interleukin-10 gene promoter region polymorphisms and type 1 diabetes age-at-onset. Hum Immunol. 2002;63:690–5. doi: 10.1016/s0198-8859(02)00417-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Urcelay E, Santiago JL, de la Calle H, et al. Interleukin-10 polymorphisms in Spanish type 1 diabetes patients. Genes Immun. 2004;5:306–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Feutren G, Papoz L, Assan R, et al. Cyclosporin increases the rate and length of remissions in insulin-dependent diabetes of recent onset. Results of a multicentre double-blind trial. Lancet. 1986;2:119–24. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91943-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Experimental Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES