Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Nov 7;270(Suppl 2):S216–S219. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0068

Subtle manipulation of egg sex ratio in birds.

Kathryn E Arnold 1, Richard Griffiths 1, David J Stevens 1, Kate J Orr 1, Aileen Adam 1, David C Houston 1
PMCID: PMC1809935  PMID: 14667387

Abstract

Mothers are predicted to overproduce male or female eggs when the relative fitness gains from one sex are higher and outweigh the costs of manipulation. However, in birds such biases are often difficult to distinguish from differential embryo or chick mortality. Using a molecular technique to identify the sex of early embryos, we aim to determine the effect of maternal nutrition on zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) egg sex ratios after 2 days of incubation, which is as close to conception as is currently possible. We found no overall bias in the sex ratio of eggs laid and sex did not differ with relative laying order under any diet regime. However, mothers on a low-quality diet did produce a female bias in small clutches and a slight male bias in large clutches. On a high-quality diet, mothers produced a male bias in small clutches and a female bias in large clutches. Those on a standard diet produced a roughly even sex ratio, irrespective of clutch size. These observed biases in egg sex are partly in line with predictions that, in this species, daughters suffer disproportionately from poor rearing conditions. Thus, when relatively malnourished, mothers should only rear daughters in small broods and vice versa. Sex-ratio patterns in this species therefore appear to be subtle.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (79.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Badyaev Alexander V., Hill Geoffrey E., Beck Michelle L., Dervan Anne A., Duckworth Renee A., McGraw Kevin J., Nolan Paul M., Whittingham Linda A. Sex-biased hatching order and adaptive population divergence in a passerine bird. Science. 2002 Jan 11;295(5553):316–318. doi: 10.1126/science.1066651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Griffiths R., Double M. C., Orr K., Dawson R. J. A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol. 1998 Aug;7(8):1071–1075. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00389.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kilner R. Primary and secondary sex ratio manipulation by zebra finches. Anim Behav. 1998 Jul;56(1):155–164. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nager R. G., Monaghan P., Griffiths R., Houston D. C., Dawson R. Experimental demonstration that offspring sex ratio varies with maternal condition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jan 19;96(2):570–573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.2.570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  6. Trivers R. L., Willard D. E. Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science. 1973 Jan 5;179(4068):90–92. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4068.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Whittingham L. A., Dunn P. O. Offspring sex ratios in tree swallows: females in better condition produce more sons. Mol Ecol. 2000 Aug;9(8):1123–1129. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00980.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES