Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Nov 7;270(Suppl 2):S178–S180. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0046

Range limits and parasite prevalence in a freshwater snail.

Robert A Briers 1
PMCID: PMC1809944  PMID: 14667375

Abstract

Geographical range limits are thought to be set by species' physiological or ecological adaptation to abiotic factors, but the importance of biotic factors such as parasitism in determining range limits has not been well explored. In this study the prevalence of trematode parasitism in populations of a freshwater gastropod snail, Lymnaea stagnalis, increased sharply as this species approached its western UK range limit. The likelihood of trematode infection increased with snail size, but high prevalence at the range edge was not a result of interpopulation variation in snail size. Changes in population growth rates resulting from high rates of parasitism at the range edge could contribute to range limitation. The mechanism driving high rates of parasitism at the range edge is not clear, but changes in abiotic factors towards the range limit may influence snail life history and immune response to trematode infection, indirectly altering the prevalence of parasites in marginal host populations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (168.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Lie Kian Joe, Owyang C. K. A field trial to control Trichobilharzia brevis by dispersing eggs of Echinostoma audyi. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1973 Jun;4(2):208–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Loy C., Haas W. Prevalence of cercariae from Lymnaea stagnalis snails in a pond system in Southern Germany. Parasitol Res. 2001 Oct;87(10):878–882. doi: 10.1007/s004360100462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. NASIR P., ERASMUS D. A. A KEY TO THE CERCARIAE FROM BRITISH FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS. J Helminthol. 1964;38:245–268. doi: 10.1017/s0022149x00033824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rigby M. C., Jokela J. Predator avoidance and immune defence: costs and trade-offs in snails. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jan 22;267(1439):171–176. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.0983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sorensen R. E., Minchella D. J. Snail-trematode life history interactions: past trends and future directions. Parasitology. 2001;123 (Suppl):S3–18. doi: 10.1017/s0031182001007843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES