Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Nov 7;270(Suppl 2):S133–S135. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0056

The paradox of the parasites: implications for biological invasion.

John M Drake 1
PMCID: PMC1809948  PMID: 14667361

Abstract

The enemy-release hypothesis for biological invasions supposes that invasive species may be more successful in their introduced ranges than in their native ranges owing to the absence of coevolved natural enemies. Recent studies supporting this hypothesis have found that introduced plants and animals are less parasitized in their introduced ranges than in their native ranges. Expanding on this theory, I hypothesize that the role of enemy release may differ among the introduction, establishment and spread phases of an invasion. I present a simple model indicating that parasite release is unlikely to greatly affect the chance of establishment in populations with and without an immune subpopulation. The specific numerical relationship between the number of individuals introduced and the chance of establishment depends on a relationship between virulence, here conceptualized as the chance for the extinction of a lineage, and the fraction of the population infected at introduction. These results support the idea of a 'filter effect' in which different biological processes regulate the different phases of an invasion.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (132.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Kolar C. S., Lodge D. M. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Apr 1;16(4):199–204. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02101-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. May R. M., Anderson R. M. Parasite-host coevolution. Parasitology. 1990;100 (Suppl):S89–101. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000073042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mitchell Charles E., Power Alison G. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature. 2003 Feb 6;421(6923):625–627. doi: 10.1038/nature01317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Richter-Dyn N., Goel N. S. On the extinction of a colonizing species. Theor Popul Biol. 1972 Dec;3(4):406–433. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(72)90014-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Torchin Mark E., Lafferty Kevin D., Dobson Andrew P., McKenzie Valerie J., Kuris Armand M. Introduced species and their missing parasites. Nature. 2003 Feb 6;421(6923):628–630. doi: 10.1038/nature01346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tourchin M. E., Lafferty K. D., Kuris A. M. Parasites and marine invasions. Parasitology. 2002;124 (Suppl):S137–S151. doi: 10.1017/s0031182002001506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES