Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Feb 7;271(Suppl 3):S61–S63. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0099

The mother-in-law effect.

John Hunt 1, Robert Brooks 1
PMCID: PMC1809983  PMID: 15101420

Abstract

Individuals often derive considerable evolutionary benefit from manipulating others. In the majority of cases, manipulation involves direct interactions between individuals. In the dung beetle, Onthophagus taurus, females mated with large males provide more resources to their offspring. Here, we demonstrate, however, that this may result in manipulation that extends across generations: the care that a mother provides to a developing son influences the parental effort of his mate (the mother's daughter-in-law (DIL)). Maternal care associated with constructing heavier brood masses has previously been shown substantially to influence offspring size, male mating success and female survival and fecundity in this species. The mother-in-law effect that we document here is, however, the ability to produce large sons from relatively lighter brood masses. Our results demonstrate not only that females are able to manipulate the parental effort of DILs that they do not directly encounter, but that provisioning relatively lighter brood masses may have evolutionary benefits that trade off against the considerable benefits of producing heavy brood masses.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (82.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agrawal A. F., Brodie E. D., 3rd, Brown J. Parent-offspring coadaptation and the dual genetic control of maternal care. Science. 2001 Jun 1;292(5522):1710–1712. doi: 10.1126/science.1059910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chapman T. Seminal fluid-mediated fitness traits in Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb) 2001 Nov;87(Pt 5):511–521. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00961.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chippindale A. K., Gibson J. R., Rice W. R. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 30;98(4):1671–1675. doi: 10.1073/pnas.041378098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Francis D., Diorio J., Liu D., Meaney M. J. Nongenomic transmission across generations of maternal behavior and stress responses in the rat. Science. 1999 Nov 5;286(5442):1155–1158. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5442.1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Holland B., Rice W. R. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 27;96(9):5083–5088. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.9.5083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hunt J., Simmons L. W. Maternal and paternal effects on offspring phenotype in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Evolution. 2000 Jun;54(3):936–941. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hunt J., Simmons L. W. Status-dependent selection in the dimorphic beetle Onthophagus taurus. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Dec 7;268(1484):2409–2414. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hunt John, Simmons Leigh W. The genetics of maternal care: direct and indirect genetic effects on phenotype in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 30;99(10):6828–6832. doi: 10.1073/pnas.092676199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kotiaho Janne S., Simmons Leigh W., Hunt John, Tomkins Joseph L. Males influence maternal effects that promote sexual selection: a quantitative genetic experiment with dung beetles Onthophagus taurus. Am Nat. 2003 May 7;161(6):852–859. doi: 10.1086/375173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES