Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Feb 7;271(Suppl 3):S64–S66. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0100

Sinister strategies succeed at the cricket World Cup.

Robert Brooks 1, Luc F Bussière 1, Michael D Jennions 1, John Hunt 1
PMCID: PMC1809987  PMID: 15101421

Abstract

Left-handers occur at unexpectedly high frequencies at top levels of many interactive sports. This may occur either because left-handed contestants are innately superior or because they enjoy a negatively frequency-dependent strategic advantage when rare relative to right-handers. We analysed the batting records from the 2003 cricket World Cup and showed that left-handed batsmen were more successful than right-handers, and that the most successful teams had close to 50% left-handed batsmen. We demonstrate that this was because left-handed batsmen have a strategic advantage over bowlers, and that this advantage is greatest over bowlers that are unaccustomed to bowling to left-handers. This provides a clear mechanism for negative frequency-dependent success of left-handed batsmen. Our results may also support a historical role for negative frequency-dependent success in fights and other contests in the maintenance of left-handedness by natural selection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (81.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barton N. H., Keightley P. D. Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Jan;3(1):11–21. doi: 10.1038/nrg700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Endler J. A. Frequency-dependent predation, crypsis and aposematic coloration. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1988 Jul 6;319(1196):505–523. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1988.0062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Geschwind N., Galaburda A. M. Cerebral lateralization. Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: I. A hypothesis and a program for research. Arch Neurol. 1985 May;42(5):428–459. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1985.04060050026008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grouios G., Tsorbatzoudis H., Alexandris K., Barkoukis V. Do left-handed competitors have an innate superiority in sports? Percept Mot Skills. 2000 Jun;90(3 Pt 2):1273–1282. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.90.3c.1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Raymond M., Pontier D., Dufour A. B., Møller A. P. Frequency-dependent maintenance of left handedness in humans. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Dec 22;263(1377):1627–1633. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wood C. J., Aggleton J. P. Handedness in 'fast ball' sports: do left-handers have an innate advantage? Br J Psychol. 1989 May;80(Pt 2):227–240. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1989.tb02316.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES