Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Feb 7;271(Suppl 3):S27–S29. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0096

Collision avoidance and a looming sensitive neuron: size matters but biggest is not necessarily best.

F Claire Rind 1, Roger D Santer 1
PMCID: PMC1809999  PMID: 15101410

Abstract

Locusts possess visual neurons that can be uniquely identified in each locust and that respond selectively to looming stimuli, giving the animal a warning of impending collision. It has been suggested that one such neuron, the lobula giant movement detector (LGMD), issues this warning by generating a peak in its response that occurs ca. 25 ms after a looming object reaches a subtense of 17 degrees on the eye. This peak is proposed to be a trigger for escape behaviour. We use both modelling and electrophysiological techniques to show that this early peak in LGMD response is not the 'essential functional variable' used naturally by the locust to trigger escape, but rather results from the unnaturally large stimulus used in the previous experimental work. The natural predators of Locusta in Africa, where the locust evolved, are small birds such as the fiscal shrike Lanius collaris humeralis and the carmine bee-eater Merops nubicus, with pectoral diameters of 40-45 mm (measurements from museum specimens). Locusta in flight are less than 100 mm wing tip to wing tip. When a locust views small approaching objects, the response of the LGMD continues to increase throughout the object's approach and the locust is able to trigger escape behaviours without the LGMD response peaking prior to collision.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (211.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gabbiani F., Krapp H. G., Laurent G. Computation of object approach by a wide-field, motion-sensitive neuron. J Neurosci. 1999 Feb 1;19(3):1122–1141. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-03-01122.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gabbiani F., Mo C., Laurent G. Invariance of angular threshold computation in a wide-field looming-sensitive neuron. J Neurosci. 2001 Jan 1;21(1):314–329. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-01-00314.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gabbiani Fabrizio, Krapp Holger G., Koch Christof, Laurent Gilles. Multiplicative computation in a visual neuron sensitive to looming. Nature. 2002 Nov 21;420(6913):320–324. doi: 10.1038/nature01190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Graham Lyle. How not to get caught. Nat Neurosci. 2002 Dec;5(12):1256–1257. doi: 10.1038/nn1202-1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gray J. R., Lee J. K., Robertson R. M. Activity of descending contralateral movement detector neurons and collision avoidance behaviour in response to head-on visual stimuli in locusts. J Comp Physiol A. 2001 Mar;187(2):115–129. doi: 10.1007/s003590100182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Judge S, Rind F. The locust DCMD, a movement-detecting neurone tightly tuned to collision trajectories. J Exp Biol. 1997;200(Pt 16):2209–2216. doi: 10.1242/jeb.200.16.2209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rind F. C. A chemical synapse between two motion detecting neurones in the locust brain. J Exp Biol. 1984 May;110:143–167. doi: 10.1242/jeb.110.1.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rind F. C., Bramwell D. I. Neural network based on the input organization of an identified neuron signaling impending collision. J Neurophysiol. 1996 Mar;75(3):967–985. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.3.967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rind F. C. Intracellular characterization of neurons in the locust brain signaling impending collision. J Neurophysiol. 1996 Mar;75(3):986–995. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.3.986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rind F. C., Simmons P. J. Local circuit for the computation of object approach by an identified visual neuron in the locust. J Comp Neurol. 1998 Jun 8;395(3):405–415. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rind F. C., Simmons P. J. Orthopteran DCMD neuron: a reevaluation of responses to moving objects. I. Selective responses to approaching objects. J Neurophysiol. 1992 Nov;68(5):1654–1666. doi: 10.1152/jn.1992.68.5.1654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rind F. C., Simmons P. J. Seeing what is coming: building collision-sensitive neurones. Trends Neurosci. 1999 May;22(5):215–220. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01332-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rind F. C., Simmons P. J. Signaling of object approach by the DCMD neuron of the locust. J Neurophysiol. 1997 Feb;77(2):1029–1033. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.2.1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES