Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 May 7;271(Suppl 4):S131–S133. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0144

Evidence that disgust evolved to protect from risk of disease.

Val Curtis 1, Robert Aunger 1, Tamer Rabie 1
PMCID: PMC1810028  PMID: 15252963

Abstract

Disgust is a powerful human emotion that has been little studied until recently. Current theories do not coherently explain the purpose of disgust, nor why a wide range of stimuli can provoke a similar emotional response. Over 40 000 individuals completed a web-based survey using photo stimuli. Images of objects holding a potential disease threat were reported as significantly more disgusting than similar images with little or no disease relevance. This pattern of response was found across all regions of the world. Females reported higher disgust sensitivity than males; there was a constant decline in disgust sensitivity over the life course; and the bodily fluids of strangers were found more disgusting than those of close relatives. These data provide evidence that the human disgust emotion may be an evolved response to objects in the environment that represent threats of infectious disease.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (442.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Curtis V., Biran A. Dirt, disgust, and disease. Is hygiene in our genes? Perspect Biol Med. 2001 Winter;44(1):17–31. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2001.0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davey G. C., McDonald A. S., Hirisave U., Prabhu G. G., Iwawaki S., Jim C. I., Merckelbach H., de Jong P. J., Leung P. W., Reimann B. C. A cross-cultural study of animal fears. Behav Res Ther. 1998 Jul-Aug;36(7-8):735–750. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00059-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fessler Daniel M. T., Arguello Alexander P., Mekdara Jeannette M., Macias Ramon. Disgust sensitivity and meat consumption: a test of an emotivist account of moral vegetarianism. Appetite. 2003 Aug;41(1):31–41. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00037-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Harkins S. W. Geriatric pain. Pain perceptions in the old. Clin Geriatr Med. 1996 Aug;12(3):435–459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mesquita B., Frijda N. H. Cultural variations in emotions: a review. Psychol Bull. 1992 Sep;112(2):179–204. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Phillips M. L., Young A. W., Senior C., Brammer M., Andrew C., Calder A. J., Bullmore E. T., Perrett D. I., Rowland D., Williams S. C. A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust. Nature. 1997 Oct 2;389(6650):495–498. doi: 10.1038/39051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rozin P., Lowery L., Ebert R. Varieties of disgust faces and the structure of disgust. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 May;66(5):870–881. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES