Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 May 7;271(Suppl 4):S156–S159. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0112

Mammalian microevolution in action: adaptive edaphic genomic divergence in blind subterranean mole-rats.

Andrei Polyakov 1, Alex Beharav 1, Aaron Avivi 1, Eviatar Nevo 1
PMCID: PMC1810041  PMID: 15252970

Abstract

Genomic diversity of anonymous regions across the genome, most probably including coding and noncoding amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs), was examined in 20 individuals of the blind mole-rat, Spalax galili, one of four allospecies of the Spalax ehrenbergi superspecies of blind subterranean mole-rats in Israel. We compared 10 individuals from two nearby populations in Upper Galilee, separated by only a few dozen to hundreds of metres and living in two sharply contrasting ecologies: white chalk and rendzina soil with Sarcopterium spinosum and Majorana syriaca versus black volcanic basalt soil with Carlina hispanica-Psorelea bitominosa and Alhagi graecorum plant formations. The microsite tested ranged in an area of less than 10000 m2. Out of 729 AFLP loci, 433 (59.4%) were polymorphic, with 211 soil unique alleles. Genetic polymorphism was significantly higher on the ecologically more xeric and stressful chalky rendzina soil than on the neighbouring mesic basalt soil. This is a remarkable pattern for a mammal that can disperse each generation between tens to hundreds of metres. These results cannot be explained by migration (which causes homogenization) or by chance (which will exclude sharp genomic soil divergence). Natural selection is the only evolutionary adaptive force that can cause genetic divergence across the genome matching the sharp microscale ecological contrast.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (818.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beharav Alex, Nevo Eviatar. Predictive validity of discriminant analysis for genetic data. Genetica. 2003 Nov;119(3):259–267. doi: 10.1023/b:gene.0000003666.33328.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Li You-Chun, Korol Abraham B., Fahima Tzion, Beiles Avigdor, Nevo Eviatar. Microsatellites: genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review. Mol Ecol. 2002 Dec;11(12):2453–2465. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01643.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Nei M. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Dec;70(12):3321–3323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nei M. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. 1978 Jul;89(3):583–590. doi: 10.1093/genetics/89.3.583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nevo E. Evolution of genome-phenome diversity under environmental stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 22;98(11):6233–6240. doi: 10.1073/pnas.101109298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nevo E., Filippucci M. G., Beiles A. Genetic polymorphisms in subterranean mammals (Spalax ehrenbergi superspecies) in the near east revisited: patterns and theory. Heredity (Edinb) 1994 May;72(Pt 5):465–487. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1994.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Vos P., Hogers R., Bleeker M., Reijans M., van de Lee T., Hornes M., Frijters A., Pot J., Peleman J., Kuiper M. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Nov 11;23(21):4407–4414. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.21.4407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES