Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Aug 7;271(Suppl 5):S378–S381. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0196

Novel phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic brevicipitine and scaphiophrynine toads as revealed by sequences from the nuclear Rag-1 gene.

Arie van der Meijden 1, Miguel Vences 1, Axel Meyer 1
PMCID: PMC1810054  PMID: 15504023

Abstract

Owing to a general paucity of characters and an apparently high level of homoplasy, the systematics of frogs have remained disputed. A phylogeny based on the single-copy nuclear Rag-1 gene revealed unexpected placements of scaphiophrynine and brevicipitine toads. The former have usually been considered as sister group to all other extant microhylids or are even classified as a separate family. Their basal position among microhylids was weakly indicated in our analysis; but they clearly are part of a strongly supported clade composed of representatives from five other microhylid subfamilies. By contrast, the brevicipitines, a group that hitherto was unanimously considered to belong to the Microhylidae, were highly divergent and placed as a sister group to the arthroleptoid clade. These novel phylogenetic placements are best reflected by a classificatory status of the Scaphiophryninae as a subfamily of the Microhylidae, whereas the brevicipitines may merit recognition as a distinct family. Our findings seem to corroborate a high degree of morphological homoplasy in frogs and suggest that even highly derived morphological states, such as the hydrostatic tongue of microhylids, hemisotids and brevicipitines, may be subject to convergent evolution, parallelism or character reversal.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (143.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barnes W. M. PCR amplification of up to 35-kb DNA with high fidelity and high yield from lambda bacteriophage templates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 15;91(6):2216–2220. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.6.2216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Biju S. D., Bossuyt Franky. New frog family from India reveals an ancient biogeographical link with the Seychelles. Nature. 2003 Oct 16;425(6959):711–714. doi: 10.1038/nature02019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bossuyt F., Milinkovitch M. C. Convergent adaptive radiations in Madagascan and Asian ranid frogs reveal covariation between larval and adult traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jun 6;97(12):6585–6590. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.12.6585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Feller A. E., Hedges S. B. Molecular evidence for the early history of living amphibians. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1998 Jun;9(3):509–516. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Huelsenbeck J. P., Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 2001 Aug;17(8):754–755. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Meyers Jay J., O'Reilly James C., Monroy Jenna A., Nishikawa Kiisa C. Mechanism of tongue protraction in microhylid frogs. J Exp Biol. 2004 Jan;207(Pt 1):21–31. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Posada D., Crandall K. A. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):817–818. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Vences Miguel, Vieites David R., Glaw Frank, Brinkmann Henner, Kosuch Joachim, Veith Michael, Meyer Axel. Multiple overseas dispersal in amphibians. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Dec 7;270(1532):2435–2442. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES