Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Aug 7;271(Suppl 5):S350–S352. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0189

Growth hormone transgenic salmon pay for growth potential with increased predation mortality.

L Fredrik Sundström 1, Mare Lõhmus 1, Jörgen I Johnsson 1, Robert H Devlin 1
PMCID: PMC1810071  PMID: 15504015

Abstract

Recent advances in gene technology have been applied to create fast-growing transgenic fish, which are of great commercial interest owing to their potential to shorten production cycles and increase food production. However, there is growing concern and speculation over the impact that escaped growth hormone (GH)-transgenic fish may have on the natural environment. To predict these risks it is crucial to obtain empirical data on the relative fitness of transgenic and non-transgenic fish under nature-like conditions. Using landscaped stream aquaria with live food and predators, we show that the predation mortality of newly hatched GH-transgenic coho salmon fry (Oncorhynchus kisutch) is much higher than in non-transgenic conspecifics, and that this difference is amplified when food abundance decreases. The growth rate of transgenic and non-transgenic fish is similar at high food levels, whereas transgenic fish grow more slowly than non-transgenic fish when food abundance is reduced. Our results suggest that the fitness of young GH-transgenic coho salmon in the wild will be determined by both predation pressure and food availability.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (102.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abrahams MV, Sutterlin A. The foraging and antipredator behaviour of growth-enhanced transgenic Atlantic salmon. Anim Behav. 1999 Nov;58(5):933–942. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dunham RA, Chitmanat C, Nichols A, Argue B, Powers DA, Chen TT. Predator Avoidance of Transgenic Channel Catfish Containing Salmonid Growth Hormone Genes. Mar Biotechnol (NY) 1999 Nov;1(6):545–551. doi: 10.1007/pl00011809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fleming I. A., Hindar K., Mjølnerød I. B., Jonsson B., Balstad T., Lamberg A. Lifetime success and interactions of farm salmon invading a native population. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Aug 7;267(1452):1517–1523. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McGinnity Philip, Prodöhl Paulo, Ferguson Andy, Hynes Rosaleen, Maoiléidigh Niall O., Baker Natalie, Cotter Deirdre, O'Hea Brendan, Cooke Declan, Rogan Ger. Fitness reduction and potential extinction of wild populations of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, as a result of interactions with escaped farm salmon. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Dec 7;270(1532):2443–2450. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Muir William M., Howard Richard D. Assessment of possible ecological risks and hazards of transgenic fish with implications for other sexually reproducing organisms. Transgenic Res. 2002 Apr;11(2):101–114. doi: 10.1023/a:1015203812200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Reichhardt T. Will souped up salmon sink or swim? Nature. 2000 Jul 6;406(6791):10–12. doi: 10.1038/35017657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stokstad Erik. Transgenic species. Engineered fish: friend or foe of the environment? Science. 2002 Sep 13;297(5588):1797–1799. doi: 10.1126/science.297.5588.1797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES