Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Aug 7;271(Suppl 5):S283–S285. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0160

Female intrasexual competition decreases female facial attractiveness.

Maryanne L Fisher 1
PMCID: PMC1810076  PMID: 15503995

Abstract

Evolutionary theory predicts that female intrasexual competition will occur when males of high genetic quality are considered to be a resource. It is probable that women compete in terms of attractiveness since this is one of the primary criteria used by men when selecting mates. Furthermore, because hormones influence the mate-selection process, they may also mediate competition. One competitive strategy that women use is derogation--any act intended to decrease a rival's perceived value. To investigate intrasexual competition through derogation, the influence of oestrogen on women's ratings of female facial attractiveness was examined. During periods of high oestrogen, competition, and hence derogation, increased, as evidenced by lower ratings of female facial attractiveness. By contrast, oestrogen levels did not significantly affect ratings of male faces. These findings support the theory of female intrasexual competition with respect to attractiveness.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (80.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernstein I. H., Lin T. D., McClellan P. Cross- vs. within-racial judgments of attractiveness. Percept Psychophys. 1982 Dec;32(6):495–503. doi: 10.3758/bf03204202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Geldart S., Maurer D., Henderson H. Effects of the height of the internal features of faces on adults' aesthetic ratings and 5-month-olds' looking times. Perception. 1999;28(7):839–850. doi: 10.1068/p2943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Penton-Voak I. S., Perrett D. I., Castles D. L., Kobayashi T., Burt D. M., Murray L. K., Minamisawa R. Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature. 1999 Jun 24;399(6738):741–742. doi: 10.1038/21557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Schmitt D. P., Buss D. M. Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Jun;70(6):1185–1204. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.6.1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wilson M. I., Daly M., Weghorst S. J. Household composition and the risk of child abuse and neglect. J Biosoc Sci. 1980 Jul;12(3):333–340. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000012876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES