Abstract
The role of male-female interactions in the divergence of postmating-prezygotic reproductive traits has recently focused on sexual conflict as the selective force. While an association between mating costs and benefits suggests that antagonistic interactions may be important, a mosaic of processes may actually mediate the evolutionary dynamics of postmating-prezygotic interactions. Our study examines the ecological relevance of mating effects on females. We test this critical but often overlooked assumption in desert Drosophila, where the species' ecology provides a framework for evaluating the evolutionary implications of such mating consequences. We show that mating has a profound impact on an ecologically critical character--desiccation resistance. To explore what selective factors might underlie the observed population differences in mating effects, we test whether trends in the data match predictions based on the species' ecology. While these preliminary data are consistent with the expectation that the mating benefits are positively correlated with environmental conditions, further examination reveals an additional unanticipated association with the reproductive environment. This unexpected association challenges existing assumptions regarding the forces driving divergence of traits involved in mating.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (85.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Chapman T., Liddle L. F., Kalb J. M., Wolfner M. F., Partridge L. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature. 1995 Jan 19;373(6511):241–244. doi: 10.1038/373241a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Civetta A., Singh R. S. High divergence of reproductive tract proteins and their association with postzygotic reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis group species. J Mol Evol. 1995 Dec;41(6):1085–1095. doi: 10.1007/BF00173190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emlen D. J. Costs and the diversification of exaggerated animal structures. Science. 2001 Feb 23;291(5508):1534–1536. doi: 10.1126/science.1056607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holland B., Rice W. R. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 27;96(9):5083–5088. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.9.5083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knowles L. L., Markow T. A. Sexually antagonistic coevolution of a postmating-prezygotic reproductive character in desert Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 10;98(15):8692–8696. doi: 10.1073/pnas.151123998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kurdziel Josepha P., Knowles L. Lacey. The mechanisms of morph determination in the amphipod Jassa: implications for the evolution of alternative male phenotypes. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 7;269(1502):1749–1754. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Partridge L., Hurst L. D. Sex and conflict. Science. 1998 Sep 25;281(5385):2003–2008. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5385.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swanson W. J., Clark A. G., Waldrip-Dail H. M., Wolfner M. F., Aquadro C. F. Evolutionary EST analysis identifies rapidly evolving male reproductive proteins in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jun 12;98(13):7375–7379. doi: 10.1073/pnas.131568198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolfner M. F. The gifts that keep on giving: physiological functions and evolutionary dynamics of male seminal proteins in Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb) 2002 Feb;88(2):85–93. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.