Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Dec 7;271(Suppl 6):S444–S447. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0215

Directional sexual selection on chroma and within-pattern colour contrast in Labeotropheus fuelleborni.

Michael J Pauers 1, Jeffrey S McKinnon 1, Timothy J Ehlinger 1
PMCID: PMC1810103  PMID: 15801599

Abstract

Speciation via intersexual selection on male nuptial colour pattern is thought to have been a major force in promoting the explosive speciation of African haplochromine cichlids, yet there is very little direct empirical evidence of directional preferences within populations. In this study, we used objective spectrophotometry and analyses based on visual physiology to determine whether females of the Katale population of Labeotropheus fuelleborni, a Lake Malawi haplochromine, prefer males that have higher chroma and more within-pattern colour contrast. In paired male preference tests, female Katale L. fuelleborni showed increasing preferences for males with more relatively saturated colours on their flanks. They also showed increasing preferences for males with relatively higher contrast levels among flank elements. This is the first empirical evidence, to our knowledge, for male colour as a directionally sexually selected trait within a haplochromine cichlid population.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (108.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boughman J. W. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature. 2001 Jun 21;411(6840):944–948. doi: 10.1038/35082064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brooks R., Endler J. A. Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection. Evolution. 2001 Aug;55(8):1644–1655. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00684.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carleton K. L., Hárosi F. I., Kocher T. D. Visual pigments of African cichlid fishes: evidence for ultraviolet vision from microspectrophotometry and DNA sequences. Vision Res. 2000;40(8):879–890. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00238-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carleton K. L., Kocher T. D. Cone opsin genes of african cichlid fishes: tuning spectral sensitivity by differential gene expression. Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Aug;18(8):1540–1550. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Endler J. A. Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions. Vision Res. 1991;31(3):587–608. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90109-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hausmann Franziska, Arnold Kathryn E., Marshall N. Justin, Owens Ian P. F. Ultraviolet signals in birds are special. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jan 7;270(1510):61–67. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pearn S. M., Bennett A. T., Cuthill I. C. Ultraviolet vision, fluorescence and mate choice in a parrot, the budgerigar Melopsittacus undulatus. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 7;268(1482):2273–2279. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data file
15801599supp.pdf (257.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES