Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Dec 7;271(Suppl 6):S399–S401. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0195

Sex-biased predation by polecats influences the mating system of frogs.

Thierry Lodé 1, Marie-Jeanne Holveck 1, David Lesbarrères 1, Alain Pagano 1
PMCID: PMC1810108  PMID: 15801586

Abstract

In agile frogs, Rana dalmatina, an increase in male-biased operational sex ratio and in male abundance results in the emergence of alternative male mating behaviour in the form of searching. As a consequence, females are coerced into mating with multiple males, which in turn increases the level of conflict between the sexes. Selective predation on males by the European polecat, Mustela putorius, decreases the occurrence of polyandry. In ponds visited by polecats, the sex ratio is less male biased than in ponds where polecats are absent. As a result most males call to attract females and fewer males actively search for females. Females are able to choose between calling males and mate with a single male. Thus, predation by polecats is found to influence sex ratio, male abundance and sexual conflict in a frog mating system, restricting the opportunity for multiple mating.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (80.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clutton-Brock T. H., Vincent A. C. Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature. 1991 May 2;351(6321):58–60. doi: 10.1038/351058a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gavrilets S., Arnqvist G., Friberg U. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Mar 7;268(1466):531–539. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jennions M. D., Petrie M. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):21–64. doi: 10.1017/s0006323199005423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lodé Thierry, Lesbarrères David. Multiple paternity in Rana dalmatina, a monogamous territorial breeding anuran. Naturwissenschaften. 2003 Dec 17;91(1):44–47. doi: 10.1007/s00114-003-0491-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Roberts JD, Standish RJ, Byrne PG, Doughty P. Synchronous polyandry and multiple paternity in the frog Crinia georgiana (Anura: Myobatrachidae). Anim Behav. 1999 Mar;57(3):721–726. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Roberts JD, Standish RJ, Byrne PG, Doughty P. Synchronous polyandry and multiple paternity in the frog Crinia georgiana (Anura: Myobatrachidae). Anim Behav. 1999 Mar;57(3):721–726. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. d'Orgeix C. A., Turner B. J. Multiple paternity in the red-eyed treefrog Agalychnis callidryas (Cope). Mol Ecol. 1995 Aug;4(4):505–508. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00245.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data file
15801586supp.pdf (76.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES