Abstract
One hundred and thirty-five college-age women with acute urinary tract infections caused by gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae were treated by random allocation with either nalidixic acid (NA), 1 g every 6 h for 7 days, or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ), 160/800 mg every 12 h for 10 days. The clinical and bacteriological cure rates were 98.0% in each group on the last day of therapy. At 1 and 4 week posttherapy, both the clinical and bacteriological cure rates for NA declined to 90.0 and 74.0% respectively; for TMP/SMZ, they declined to 93.0 and 72.0% respectively. By 4 weeks posttherapy, 96.0% of the TMP/SMZ group and 93.0% of the NA group had remained free of the initial urinary pathogens. Neither drug was associated with emergence of resistant bacterial mutants in urine. The antibody-coated bacteria tested (ACBT) localized 31.5% of the infections of the kidney and 67.7% to the bladder. Upper tract symptoms did not correlate with the presence of a positive ACBT. The response to therapy was similar for the two regimens regardless of ACBT results. After treatment, the emergence of resistant Enterobacteriaceae in fecal flora was 1.1% in the NA group and 2.3% in the TMP/SMZ group. The incidences of drug reactions were 7.0% with NA and 6.3% and TMP/SMZ.
Full text
PDF






Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bauer A. W., Kirby W. M., Sherris J. C., Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 Apr;45(4):493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bognár S., Binder L., Szalka A. Post-therapeutic levels of antimicrobial drugs in faeces. Acta Microbiol Acad Sci Hung. 1975;22(3):271–274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown P. C., Donaghy M. C., Dootson P. H., Titcombe D. H., MacLaren D. M. Sulphadimidine and nalidixic acid therapy in urinary-tract infections in general practice. Practitioner. 1971 Dec;207(242):819–826. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brumfitt W., Pursell R. Double-blind trial to compare ampicillin, cephalexin, co-trimoxazole, and trimethoprim in treatment of urinary infection. Br Med J. 1972 Jun 17;2(5815):673–676. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5815.673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruun J. N., Mulholland S. G. Antibiotic sensitivity of isolates from nosocomial and community-acquired urinary tract infections. Urology. 1973 May;1(5):409–413. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(73)90369-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CUTLER S. J., EDERER F. Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis. 1958 Dec;8(6):699–712. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cederberg A., Denneberg T., Ekberg M., Juhlin I. Nalidixic acid in urinary tract infections with particular reference to the emergence of resistance. Scand J Infect Dis. 1974;6(3):259–264. doi: 10.3109/inf.1974.6.issue-3.09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cosgrove M. D., Morrow J. W. Ampicillin versus trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole in chronic urinary tract infection. J Urol. 1974 May;111(5):670–672. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)60042-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Datta N., Faiers M. C., Reeves D. S., Brumfitt W., Orskov F., Orskov I. R Factors in Escherichia coli in faeces after oral chemotherapy in general practice. Lancet. 1971 Feb 13;1(7694):312–315. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(71)91042-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fennell R. S., Luengnaruemitchai M., Iravani A., Garin E. H., Walker R. D., Richard G. A. Urinary tract infections in children: effect of short course antibiotic therapy on recurrence rate in children with previous infections. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1980 Feb;19(2):121–124. doi: 10.1177/000992288001900206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillespie W. A., Sellin M. A., Gill P., Stephens M., Tuckwell L. A., Hilton A. L. Urinary tract infection in young women, with special reference to Staphylococcus saprophyticus. J Clin Pathol. 1978 Apr;31(4):348–350. doi: 10.1136/jcp.31.4.348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harding G. K., Marrie T. J., Ronald A. R., Hoban S., Muir P. Urinary tract infection localization in women. JAMA. 1978 Sep 8;240(11):1147–1151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harrison L. H., Cox C. E. Bacteriologic and pharmacodynamic aspects of nalidixic acid. J Urol. 1970 Dec;104(6):903–913. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JAMESON R. M. TISSUE CONCENTRATION OF NALIDIXIC ACID IN CHRONIC PYELONEPHRITIS. Br Med J. 1965 Sep 11;2(5462):621–622. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5462.621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones S. R., Smith J. W., Sanford J. P. Localization of urinary-tract infections by detection of antibody-coated bacteria in urine sediment. N Engl J Med. 1974 Mar 14;290(11):591–593. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197403142901103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jordan P. A., Iravani A., Richard G. A., Baer H. Urinary tract infection caused by Staphylococcus saprophyticus. J Infect Dis. 1980 Oct;142(4):510–515. doi: 10.1093/infdis/142.4.510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keys T. F. Antimicrobials commonly used for urinary tract infection: sulfonamides, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, nitrofurantoin, nalidixic acid. Mayo Clin Proc. 1977 Nov;52(11):680–682. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koch U. J., Schumann K. P., Küchler R., Kewitz H. Efficacy of trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole and the combination of both in acute urinary tract infection. Clinical and pharmacokinetical studies. Chemotherapy. 1973;19(5):314–321. doi: 10.1159/000221470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madsen S. T. Trimethoprim + sulphamethoxazole in urinary tract infections. A double blind trial. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1973;7(2):184–186. doi: 10.3109/00365597309133700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McAllister T. A., Alexander J. G., Dulake C., Percival A., Boyce J. M., Wormald P. J. Multicentric study of sensitivities of urinary tract pathogens. Postgrad Med J. 1971 Sep;47(Suppl):7–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ronald A. R., Turck M., Petersdorf R. G. A critical evaluation of nalidixic acid in urinary-tract infections. N Engl J Med. 1966 Nov 17;275(20):1081–1089. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196611172752001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SLEET R. A., GRAY W., CALDER M., MURDOCH J. M. TREATMENT OF URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS WITH NALIDIXIC ACID. A CLINICAL TRIAL. Chemotherapy. 1964;27:137–141. doi: 10.1159/000220304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith J. W., Jones S. R., Kaijser B. Significance of antibody-coated bacteria in urinary sediment in experimental pyelonephritis. J Infect Dis. 1977 Apr;135(4):577–581. doi: 10.1093/infdis/135.4.577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stamey T. A., Bragonje J. Resistance to nalidixic acid. A misconception due to underdosage. JAMA. 1976 Oct 18;236(16):1857–1860. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stamey T. A., Nemoy N. J., Higgins M. The clinical use of nalidixic acid. A review and some observations. Invest Urol. 1969 May;6(6):582–592. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stamey T. A., Timothy M., Millar M., Mihara G. Recurrent urinary infections in adult women. The role of introital enterobacteria. Calif Med. 1971 Jul;115(1):1–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- TURCK M., PETERSDORF R. G. The epidemiology of nonenteric Escherichia coli infections: prevalence of serological groups. J Clin Invest. 1962 Sep;41:1760–1765. doi: 10.1172/JCI104635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas V., Shelokov A., Forland M. Antibody-coated bacteria in the urine and the site of urinary-tract infection. N Engl J Med. 1974 Mar 14;290(11):588–590. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197403142901102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toivonen S., Pentikäinen P., Leirisalo M., Pyörälä K. Comparison of ampicillin and nalidixic acid in the treatment of urinary tract infections caused by E. coli. Acta Med Scand. 1974 Mar;195(3):181–184. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1974.tb08120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
