Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1981 May;19(5):798–800. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.5.798

Treatment of gonorrhea: comparison of cefotaxime and penicillin.

M L Simpson, M Y Khan, Y Siddiqui, R P Gruninger, D I Wigren
PMCID: PMC181525  PMID: 6271049

Abstract

Ninety-seven patients with 118 sites infected with Neisseria gonorrhoeae were treated with a single dose of either procaine penicillin G (4.8 x 10(6) U) or cefotoxime (1.0 g) intramuscularly. Only the penicillin group took 1 g of probenecid orally. The numbers of infected sites in each treatment group were as follows: penicillin-urethra, 37; rectum, 9; cervix, 8; and pharynx, 4; cefotaxime-urethra, 42; rectum, 9; cervix, 5; and pharynx, 4. The cure rates in each treatment group were 100%. No adverse reactions were noted in either group. beta-Lactamase-positive N. gonorrhoeae strains were not found. Ninety-five percent of clinical isolates were inhibited by less than or equal to 0.007 micrograms of cefotaxime and less than or equal to 0.25 micrograms of penicillin per ml. In this study cefotaxime was as effective as procaine penicillin in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea.

Full text

PDF
798

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker C. N., Thornsberry C., Jones R. N. In vitro antimicrobial activity of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, moxalactam (LY127935), azlocillin, mezlocillin, and other beta-lactam antibiotics against Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Haemophilus influenzae, including beta-lactamase-producing strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Apr;17(4):757–761. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.4.757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berg S. W., Kilpatrick M. E., Harrison W. O., McCutchan J. A. Cefoxitin as a single-dose treatment for urethritis caused by penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae. N Engl J Med. 1979 Sep 6;301(10):509–511. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197909063011001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fu K. P., Aswapokee P., Ho I., Matthijssen C., Neu H. C. Pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Nov;16(5):592–597. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.5.592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Martin J. E., Jr, Lester A., Price E. V., Schmale J. D. Comparative study of gonococcal susceptibility to penicillin in the United States, 1955-1969. J Infect Dis. 1970 Nov;122(5):459–461. doi: 10.1093/infdis/122.5.459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Murray P. R., Christman J. L., Medoff G. In vitro activity of HR 756, a new cephalosporin, against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Mar;15(3):452–454. doi: 10.1128/aac.15.3.452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Phillips C. W., Aller R. D., Cohen S. N. Penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Lancet. 1976 Oct 30;2(7992):960–960. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)90918-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Siegel M. S., Thompson S. E., Perine P. L., Brown S. T., Reynolds G., Thornsberry C. Treatment of uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis with cefoxitin: comparison with penicillin. Rev Infect Dis. 1979 Jan-Feb;1(1):183–188. doi: 10.1093/clinids/1.1.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES