Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1981 Jun;19(6):972–979. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.6.972

Effects of Low Penicillin Concentrations on Cell Morphology and on Peptidoglycan and Protein Synthesis in a Tolerant Streptococcus Strain

Myron Mychajlonka 1
PMCID: PMC181594  PMID: 7271278

Abstract

Rates of protein and peptidoglycan synthesis were determined by pulse-labeling techniques before and after treatment of exponentially growing cultures of Streptococcus mutans FA-1 with a number of concentrations of penicillin G (0.05, 0.1, 0.3, and 0.4 μg/ml). These penicillin concentrations were all less than that required to saturate the specific penicillin-binding sites present on the surface of this organism (0.5 μg/ml), but were all greater than and, in fact, were multiples of the minimum inhibitory concentration (0.02 μg/ml). Low concentrations of penicillin G (2.5× the minimum inhibitory concentration) immediately halted the exponential increase in the rate of peptidoglycan synthesis normally expected as the result of cell multiplication, but allowed the rate of peptidoglycan synthesis occurring at the time of penicillin addition to be maintained for almost 1 h. An increased penicillin concentration (5× the minimum inhibitory concentration) allowed the rate of peptidoglycan synthesis occurring at the time of penicillin addition to be maintained for a shorter length of time (~0.67 h). Still greater penicillin concentrations caused an immediate inhibition of the peptidoglycan synthetic rate. The effect of penicillin on the rate of protein synthesis was similar, although less pronounced. Samples were taken for scanning electron microscopy immediately before and after 3 h of treatment with a low (2.5× the minimum inhibitory concentration) concentration of penicillin. The surface areas and volumes of the cells in these samples were calculated from the electron micrographs by using computer reconstruction techniques. From the frequency distributions of surface area, the plots of surface area to volume ratio as a function of surface area, and the pulse-labeling data mentioned previously, low, growth-inhibitory concentrations (2.5× the minimum inhibitory concentration) of penicillin are proposed (i) to inhibit the constriction of the division septum, (ii) to prevent the establishment or maturation of new envelope growth sites, and (iii) to have no immediate effects on the synthesis of cell wall peptidoglycan already in progress at the time of penicillin addition.

Full text

PDF
972

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blumberg P. M., Strominger J. L. Interaction of penicillin with the bacterial cell: penicillin-binding proteins and penicillin-sensitive enzymes. Bacteriol Rev. 1974 Sep;38(3):291–335. doi: 10.1128/br.38.3.291-335.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown C. A., Perkins H. R. In vitro synthesis of peptidoglycan by beta-lactam-sensitive and -resistant strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: effects of beta-lactam and other antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Jul;16(1):28–36. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.1.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Daneo-Moore L., Terleckyj B., Shockman G. D. Analysis of growth rate in sucrose-supplemented cultures of Streptococcus mutans. Infect Immun. 1975 Nov;12(5):1195–1205. doi: 10.1128/iai.12.5.1195-1205.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edelstein E. M., Rosenzweig M. S., Daneo-Moore L., Higgins M. L. Unit cell hypothesis for Streptococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol. 1980 Jul;143(1):499–505. doi: 10.1128/jb.143.1.499-505.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gusnard D., Kirschner R. H. Cell and organelle shrinkage during preparation for scanning electron microscopy: effects of fixation, dehydration and critical point drying. J Microsc. 1977 May;110(1):51–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1977.tb00012.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hammes W. P. Biosynthesis of peptidoglycan in Gaffkya homari. The mode of action of penicillin G and mecillinam. Eur J Biochem. 1976 Nov 1;70(1):107–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1976.tb10961.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Higgins M. L., McDowell T. D., Sleytr U. B., Mychajlonka M., Shockman G. D. Effects of penicillin on macromolecular synthesis and surface growth of a tolerant streptococcus as studied by computer reconstruction methods. J Bacteriol. 1980 Dec;144(3):1168–1173. doi: 10.1128/jb.144.3.1168-1173.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Higgins M. L., Shockman G. D. Study of cycle of cell wall assembly in Streptococcus faecalis by three-dimensional reconstructions of thin sections of cells. J Bacteriol. 1976 Sep;127(3):1346–1358. doi: 10.1128/jb.127.3.1346-1358.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hinks R. P., Daneo-Moore L., Shockman G. D. Relationship between cellular autolytic activity, peptidoglycan synthesis, septation, and the cell cycle in synchronized populations of Streptococcus faecium. J Bacteriol. 1978 Jun;134(3):1074–1080. doi: 10.1128/jb.134.3.1074-1080.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Klein R. D., Luginbuhl G. H. Ampicillin-induced morphological alterations of Haemophilus influenzae type b. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Mar;11(3):559–562. doi: 10.1128/aac.11.3.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mychajlonka M., McDowell T. D., Shockman G. D. Conservation of cell wall peptidoglycan by strains of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguis. Infect Immun. 1980 Apr;28(1):65–73. doi: 10.1128/iai.28.1.65-73.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mychajlonka M., McDowell T. D., Shockman G. D. Inhibition of peptidoglycan, ribonucleic acid, and protein synthesis in tolerant strains of Streptococcus mutans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Apr;17(4):572–582. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.4.572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Parks L. C., Shockman G. D., Higgins M. L. Growth of Streptococcus mutans protoplasts is not inhibited by penicillin. J Bacteriol. 1980 Sep;143(3):1491–1497. doi: 10.1128/jb.143.3.1491-1497.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shockman G. D., Daneo-Moore L., Cornett J. B., Mychajlonka M. Does penicillin kill bacteria?. Rev Infect Dis. 1979 Sep-Oct;1(5):787–796. doi: 10.1093/clinids/1.5.787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shockman G. D., Daneo-Moore L., Higgins M. L. Problems of cell wall and membrane growth, enlargement, and division. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1974 May 10;235(0):161–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb43265.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shockman G. D. Symposium on the fine structure and replication of bacteria and their parts. IV. Unbalanced cell-wall synthesis: autolysis and cell-wall thickening. Bacteriol Rev. 1965 Sep;29(3):345–358. doi: 10.1128/br.29.3.345-358.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shungu D. L., Cornett J. B., Shockman G. D. Morphological and physiological study of autolytic-defective Streptococcus faecium strains. J Bacteriol. 1979 May;138(2):598–608. doi: 10.1128/jb.138.2.598-608.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Terleckyj B., Willett N. P., Shockman G. D. Growth of several cariogenic strains of oral streptococci in a chemically defined medium. Infect Immun. 1975 Apr;11(4):649–655. doi: 10.1128/iai.11.4.649-655.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tipper D. J. Mode of action of beta-lactam antibiotics. Rev Infect Dis. 1979 Jan-Feb;1(1):39–54. doi: 10.1093/clinids/1.1.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tomasz A. From penicillin-binding proteins to the lysis and death of bacteria: a 1979 view. Rev Infect Dis. 1979 May-Jun;1(3):434–467. doi: 10.1093/clinids/1.3.434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES