Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1981 Jul;20(1):66–70. doi: 10.1128/aac.20.1.66

Quantitative susceptibility test methods in major United States medical centers.

P R Murray, J H Jorgensen
PMCID: PMC181634  PMID: 7283416

Abstract

To assess the current trend toward performance of routine quantitative susceptibility test methods, we surveyed microbiology laboratories in 41 major U.S. medical centers. Agar dilution and microdilution tests were used primarily by those laboratories routinely performing numerous minimal inhibitory concentration tests and few or no minimal bactericidal concentration tests. Macrotube dilution tests were used by laboratories performing relatively few minimal inhibitory concentration tests, but routinely performing minimal bactericidal concentration tests. Major methodological variations were reported by the surveyed laboratories and including: (i) preparation and storage of antimicrobial solutions, (ii) standardization and concentration of the test inoculum, (iii) interpretation of minimal inhibitory concentration endpoints, and (iv) determination of the antibiotic concentration required to be bactericidal. The results of this survey indicate that significant variations in test methods exist, even though quantitative susceptibility tests are commonly used.

Full text

PDF
66

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BRANCH A., STARKEY D. H., POWER E. E. DIVERSIFICATIONS IN THE TUBE DILUTION TEST FOR ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY OF MICROORGANISMS. Appl Microbiol. 1965 May;13:469–472. doi: 10.1128/am.13.3.469-472.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry A. L., Lasner R. A. In-vitro methods for determining minimal lethal concentrations of antimicrobial agents. Am J Clin Pathol. 1979 Jan;71(1):88–92. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/71.1.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauer A. W., Kirby W. M., Sherris J. C., Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 Apr;45(4):493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fass R. J., Barnishan J. Effect of divalent cation concentrations on the antibiotic susceptibilities of nonfermenters other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Oct;16(4):434–438. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.4.434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MacLowry J. D., Jaqua M. J., Selepak S. T. Detailed methodology and implementation of a semiautomated serial dilution microtechnique for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Appl Microbiol. 1970 Jul;20(1):46–53. doi: 10.1128/am.20.1.46-53.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McMaster P. R., Robertson E. A., Witebsky F. G., MacLowry J. D. Evaluation of a dispensing instrument (Dynatech MIC-2000) for preparing microtiter antibiotic plates and testing their potency during storage. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 May;13(5):842–844. doi: 10.1128/aac.13.5.842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pearson R. D., Steigbigel R. T., Davis H. T., Chapman S. W. Method of reliable determination of minimal lethal antibiotic concentrations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Nov;18(5):699–708. doi: 10.1128/aac.18.5.699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Reller L. B., Schoenknecht F. D., Kenny M. A., Sherris J. C. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: selection of a control strain and criteria for magnesium and calcium content in media. J Infect Dis. 1974 Nov;130(5):454–463. doi: 10.1093/infdis/130.5.454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES