Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1981 Oct;20(4):553–555. doi: 10.1128/aac.20.4.553

Susceptibility of Gram-Positive Cocci to Various Antibiotics, Including Cefotaxime, Moxalactam, and N-Formimidoyl Thienamycin

Charles E Cherubin 1, Michael L Corrado 2, Marcelino F Sierra 3, Myles E Gombert 2, Michael Shulman 1
PMCID: PMC181744  PMID: 6282200

Abstract

The activities of cefotaxime, moxalactam, MK 0787 (N-formimidoyl thienamycin), ampicillin, oxacillin, vancomycin, and clindamycin were compared against gram-positive cocci. MK 0787 was the most active and moxalactam was the least active of these drugs, except against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, where vancomycin was most active, and penicillin-resistant pneumococci, where cefotaxime was more active.

Full text

PDF
553

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barza M., Tally F. P., Jacobus N. V., Gorbach S. L. In vitro activity of LY127935. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Sep;16(3):287–292. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.3.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Corrado M. L., Landesman S. H., Cherubin C. E. Influence of inoculum size on activity of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, moxalactam, piperacillin, and N-formimidoyl thienamycin (MK0787) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Dec;18(6):893–896. doi: 10.1128/aac.18.6.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Neu H. C., Aswapokee N., Fu K. P., Aswapokee P. Antibacterial activity of a new 1-oxa cephalosporin compared with that of other beta-lactam compounds. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Aug;16(2):141–149. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.2.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. RANTZ L. A., RANDALL E. Use of autoclaved extracts of hemolytic streptococci for serological grouping. Stanford Med Bull. 1955 May;13(2):290–291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tally F. P., Jacobus N. V., Gorbach S. L. In vitro activity of thienamycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Sep;14(3):436–438. doi: 10.1128/aac.14.3.436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Verbist L., Verhaegen J. In vitro activity of Ro 13-9904, a new beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Feb;19(2):222–225. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.2.222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wise R., Rollason T., Logan M., Andrews J. M., Bedford K. A. HR 756, a highly active cephalosporin: comparison with cefazolin and carbenicillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Dec;14(6):807–811. doi: 10.1128/aac.14.6.807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES