Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 2006 Jul 1;574(Pt 1):2. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.113407

Queer channels in hippocampal basket cells: h-current without sag

Dominique Debanne 1,2, Philippe Gastrein 1,2,3, Emilie Campanac 1,2
PMCID: PMC1817797  PMID: 16709628

Hyperpolarization-activated cationic currents (Ih) observed in the heart and the brain, have puzzled physiologists since their initial discovery 25 years ago. Unlike most voltage-gated channels, Ih channels (or h-channels) are activated by hyperpolarizing voltage steps to potentials more negative than −60 mV but are not inactivating. Their reversal potential near −30 mV imposes a depolarizing current near the resting membrane potential. Thus, h-channels control the resting membrane potential and the input resistance. Their presence is typically signalled in current clamp records by a depolarizing deflection (also termed ‘sag’) in response to hyperpolarizing pulses of current. These channels oppose not only hyperpolarizations but also depolarizations via their slow deactivation. As a result the h-current has also been designated If for ‘funny’ or IQ for ‘queer’. A family of four mammalian genes encoding the Hyperpolarization-activated and Cyclic Nucleotide-gated cationic subunits (HCN1–4), which in the form of tetramers build h-channels, has been identified, making it now possible to address the physiological role of Ih at the molecular level. The targeting of HCN channels is controlled by Trip8b, a Rab-interacting brain-specific protein (Santoro et al. 2004). h-Channels are encountered at high density in the apical dendrites of CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons. They largely determine the integration of incoming synaptic signals and accelerate the kinetics of dendritic EPSPs (Magee, 2000). h-Channels contribute to several forms of activity-dependent regulation of intrinsic excitability in the context of learning, memory and epilepsy. Their number and/or properties have been shown to be regulated by synaptic or network activity. They are not only present in principal cortical neurons, but have also been reported in a subset of GABAergic interneurons (Maccaferri & McBain, 1996; Lupica et al. 2001). However, h-current was thought to be absent in many neuronal types since in these neurons, the depolarizing sag (the hallmark of neurons expressing Ih) was not observed upon injection of hyperpolarizing current pulses.

In this issue of The Journal of Physiology, Aponte et al. (2006) show that the absence of depolarizing sag is not a sufficient criterion to conclude that h-channels are lacking. Another recent study came to the same conclusion in thalamic GABAergic interneurons where h-channel activity was masked by a prominent leak K+ conductance (Rateau & Ropert, 2006). Thus, these studies invite us to re-examine the presence and the function of Ih in neurons in which the electrophysiological signature of Ih has not been identified. The study of Aponte and coworkers shows that heteromeric HCN1/2 channels shape the integrative properties and the synaptic output of hippocampal basket cells (BCs), a subtype of fast-spiking GABAergic interneurons that inhibit the perisomatic region of principal cells and control the number of active cells and the timing of their discharge. This study shows that h-channels contribute to the low input resistance and the fast apparent membrane time constant of BCs. In fact, the remarkably fast kinetics of EPSPs in BCs may not only result from the opening of rapidly gated AMPA-type glutamate receptors and the K+ channel-mediated shaping of the potential, but could also be due to h-channels. Moreover, h-channels clamp the interneurons at a subthreshold potential, setting them in a ready-to-fire state. BCs are not only very fast integrative neurons but are also fast and precise signalling devices (Jonas et al. 2004). At their output side, the fast-kinetics of Na+ and K+ channels allow them to generate action potentials at frequencies of several hundred hertz under physiological conditions. Very high rates of axonal firing may lead to the hyperpolarization of the axon as a result of intra-axonal accumulation of Na+ ions. Aponte et al. (2006) showed that h-channels are present in the axon and indeed set axonal excitability. Thus, h-channels may stabilize the axonal membrane potential and may preserve the presynaptic action potential waveform. Similarly, h-channels may also clamp the potential of the presynaptic terminal in a ready-to-release mode via the potential-dependent modulation of background calcium levels (Awatramani et al. 2005). Although non-specific effects cannot be ruled out, this mechanism might account for the observed presynaptic inhibitory effect of the h-channel blocker ZD7288.

Aponte et al.'s paper adds new fuel to the burning question of the role of h-channels in the axon and the presynaptic terminal, but several key issues remain to be addressed with direct recording from the axon and the terminal (Southan et al. 2000). It will be important to determine whether the biophysical properties of Ih are identical in the different neuronal compartments (i.e. somato-dendritic regions, axons and presynaptic terminals) and to understand how neurotransmitter release might be controlled by h-channels in the presynaptic terminal.

References

  1. Aponte Y, Lien C-C, Reisinger E, Jonas P. J Physiol. 2006;574:229–243. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.104042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Awatramani GB, Price GD, Trussell LO. Neuron. 2005;48:109–121. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jonas P, Bischofberger J, Fricker D, Miles R. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27:30–40. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2003.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lupica CR, Bell JA, Hoffman AF, Watson PL. J Neurophysiol. 2001;86:261–268. doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.1.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Maccaferri G, McBain CJ. J Physiol. 1996;497:119–130. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Magee JC. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000;1:181–190. doi: 10.1038/35044552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rateau, Ropert N. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95:3073–3085. doi: 10.1152/jn.00922.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Santoro B, Wainger BJ, Siegelbaum SA. J Neurosci. 2004;24:10750–10762. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3300-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Southan AP, Morris NP, Stephens GJ, Robertson B. J Physiol. 2000;526:91–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00091.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES