Abstract
The in vitro activity of cefoperazone against 32 strains of bacteria of the Bacteroides fragilis group was determined on four media by using a variety of test parameters. Lower mean minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were obtained on Mueller-Hinton blood agar and supplemented brain heart infusion agar than were obtained on brucella laked blood agar or Wilkins-Chalgren agar. Higher MICs were obtained with 6-h inocula than with 24-h inocula, and slightly higher MICs were obtained with tests read at 48 as compared with 24 h. Conducting tests in an anaerobic glove box had little effect. The greatest differences in mean MICs were seen with inoculum densities of 10(4) and 10(5) colony-forming units.
Full text
PDF


Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Borobio M. V., Aznar J., Jimenez R., Garcia F., Perea E. J. Comparative in vitro activity of 1-oxa-beta-lactam (LY127935) and cefoperazone with other beta-lactam antibiotics against anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Feb;17(2):129–131. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.2.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown J. E., Del Bene V. E., Collins C. D. In vitro activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin, moxalactam, and other new beta-lactam agents against Bacteroides fragilis: contribution of beta-lactamase to resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Feb;19(2):248–252. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.2.248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corrado M. L., Landesman S. H., Cherubin C. E. Influence of inoculum size on activity of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, moxalactam, piperacillin, and N-formimidoyl thienamycin (MK0787) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Dec;18(6):893–896. doi: 10.1128/aac.18.6.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu K. P., Neu H. C. Antibacterial activity of ceftizoxime, a beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Apr;17(4):583–590. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.4.583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobus N. V., Tally F. P., Barza M., Gorbach S. L. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to cefoperazone and other beta-lactam antibiotics. Clin Ther. 1980;3(Spec Issue):34–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones R. N., Fuchs P. C., Barry A. L., Gavan T. L., Sommers H. M., Gerlach E. H. Cefoperazone (T-1551), a new semisynthetic cephalosporin: comparison with cephalothin and gentamicin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Apr;17(4):743–749. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.4.743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaye D., Kobasa W., Kaye K. Susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria to cefoperazone and other antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Jun;17(6):957–960. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.6.957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matsubara N., Minami S., Muraoka T., Saikawa I., Mitsuhashi S. In vitro antibacterial activity of cefoperazone (T-1551), a new semisynthetic cephalosporin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Dec;16(6):731–735. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.6.731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neu H. C., Fu K. P., Aswapokee N., Aswapokee P., Kung K. Comparative activity and beta-lactamase stability of cefoperazone, a piperazine cephalosporin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Aug;16(2):150–157. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.2.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tally F. P., Jacobus N. V., Bartlett J. G., Gorbach S. L. Susceptibility of anaerobes to cefoxitin and other cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Feb;7(2):128–132. doi: 10.1128/aac.7.2.128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
