Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1982 May;21(5):753–757. doi: 10.1128/aac.21.5.753

In vitro susceptibility of cephalothin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Amikacin and selected new beta-lactam agents.

B T McNamara, R D Meyer, K A Pasiecznik
PMCID: PMC182006  PMID: 6213196

Abstract

Amikacin was evaluated in vitro by agar dilution testing against 148 different clinical isolates of cephalothin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in parallel with cephalothin, cefoxitin, moxalactam, N-formimidoyl thienamycin, ceftriaxone, and cefmenoxime. Cefsulodin was also evaluated against 39 isolates of P. aeruginosa. More than 80% of all isolates tested were also gentamicin resistant, as determined by disk testing. Moxalactam and amikacin had comparable high activities against Proteus species, Escherichia coli, Serratia species, and Providencia species, and both amikacin and N-formimidoyl thienamycin had comparably high activities against the Klebsiella-Enterobacter group. N-Formimidoyl thienamycin was the most active agent against P. aeruginosa, followed by cefsulodin and amikacin.

Full text

PDF
753

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barza M., Tally F. P., Jacobus N. V., Gorbach S. L. In vitro activity of LY127935. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Sep;16(3):287–292. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.3.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauer A. W., Kirby W. M., Sherris J. C., Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 Apr;45(4):493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eickhoff T. C., Ehret J. Comparative in vitro studies of Ro 13-9904, a new cephalosporin derivative. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Mar;19(3):435–442. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.3.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fass R. J. In vitro activity of LY127935. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Oct;16(4):503–509. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.4.503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Finland M. Changing patterns of susceptibility of common bacterial pathogens to antimicrobial agents. Ann Intern Med. 1972 Jun;76(6):1009–1036. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-76-6-1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gaman W., Cates C., Snelling C. F., Lank B., Ronald A. R. Emergence of gentamicin- and carbenicillin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a hospital environment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Mar;9(3):474–480. doi: 10.1128/aac.9.3.474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kahan J. S., Kahan F. M., Goegelman R., Currie S. A., Jackson M., Stapley E. O., Miller T. W., Miller A. K., Hendlin D., Mochales S. Thienamycin, a new beta-lactam antibiotic. I. Discovery, taxonomy, isolation and physical properties. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1979 Jan;32(1):1–12. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.32.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. King A., Shannon K., Phillips I. In vitro antibacterial activity and susceptibility of cefsulodin, an antipseudomonal cephalosporin, to beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Feb;17(2):165–169. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.2.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lewis R. P., Meyer R. D., Kraus L. L. Antibacterial activity of selected beta-lactam and aminoglycoside antibiotics against cephalothin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 May;9(5):780–786. doi: 10.1128/aac.9.5.780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Meyer R. D. Amikacin. Ann Intern Med. 1981 Sep;95(3):328–332. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-95-3-328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Meyer R. D., Lewis R. P., Carmalt E. D., Finegold S. M. Amikacin therapy for serious gram-negative bacillary infections. Ann Intern Med. 1975 Dec;83(6):790–800. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-83-6-790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Meyer R. D., Lewis R. P., Halter J., White M. Gentamicin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Serratia marcescens in a general hospital. Lancet. 1976 Mar 13;1(7959):580–583. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)90370-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Neu H. C., Aswapokee N., Fu K. P., Aswapokee P. Antibacterial activity of a new 1-oxa cephalosporin compared with that of other beta-lactam compounds. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Aug;16(2):141–149. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.2.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Neu H. C., Meropol N. J., Fu K. P. Antibacterial activity of ceftriaxone (Ro 13-9904), a beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Mar;19(3):414–423. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.3.414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stamm J. M., Girolami R. L., Shipkowitz N. L., Bower R. R. Antimicrobial activity of cefmenoxime (SCE-1365). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Mar;19(3):454–460. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.3.454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Toda M., Sato K., Nakazawa H., Inoue M., Mitsuhashi S. Effect of N-formimidoyl thienamycin (MK0787) on beta-lactamases and activity against beta-lactamase-producing strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Nov;18(5):837–838. doi: 10.1128/aac.18.5.837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Trager G. M., White G. W., Zimelis V. M., Panwalker A. P. LY-127935: a novel beta-lactam antibiotic with unusual antibacterial activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Sep;16(3):297–300. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.3.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tsuchiya K., Kondo M., Kida M., Nakao M., Iwahi T., Nishi T., Noji Y., Takeuchi M., Nozaki Y. Cefmenoxime (SCE-1365), a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin: in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Jan;19(1):56–65. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.1.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tsuchiya K., Kondo M., Nagatomo H. SCE-129, antipseudomonal cephalosporin: in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Feb;13(2):137–145. doi: 10.1128/aac.13.2.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Verbist L. Comparison of in vitro activities of eight beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporins against beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Mar;19(3):407–413. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.3.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Weaver S. S., Bodey G. P., LeBlanc B. M. Thienamycin: new beta-lactam antibiotic with potent broad-spectrum activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Apr;15(4):518–521. doi: 10.1128/aac.15.4.518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wise R., Andrews J. M., Bedford K. A. LY127935, a novel oxa-beta-lactam: an in vitro comparison with other beta-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Sep;16(3):341–345. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.3.341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Young L. S., Hewitt W. L. Activity of five aminoglycoside antibiotics in vitro against gram-negative bacilli and Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Dec;4(6):617–625. doi: 10.1128/aac.4.6.617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES