Skip to main content
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 2007 Jan 6;27(5):1881–1888. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01122-06

Hepatic De Novo Lipogenesis Is Present in Liver-Specific ACC1-Deficient Mice

Naomoto Harada 1, Zenjun Oda 1, Yoshikazu Hara 2, Koji Fujinami 2, Mayumi Okawa 1, Katsuya Ohbuchi 2, Mari Yonemoto 2, Yuika Ikeda 2, Kenji Ohwaki 2, Katsumi Aragane 1, Yoshitaka Tamai 1, Jun Kusunoki 2,*
PMCID: PMC1820479  PMID: 17210641

Abstract

Acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) carboxylase (ACC) catalyzes carboxylation of acetyl-CoA to form malonyl-CoA. In mammals, two isozymes exist with distinct physiological roles: cytosolic ACC1 participates in de novo lipogenesis (DNL), and mitochondrial ACC2 is involved in negative regulation of mitochondrial β-oxidation. Since systemic ACC1 null mice were embryonic lethal, to clarify the physiological role of ACC1 in hepatic DNL, we generated the liver-specific ACC1 null mouse by crossbreeding of an Acc1lox(ex46) mouse, in which exon 46 of Acc1 was flanked by two loxP sequences and the liver-specific Cre transgenic mouse. In liver-specific ACC1 null mice, neither hepatic Acc1 mRNA nor protein was detected. However, to compensate for ACC1 function, hepatic ACC2 protein and activity were induced 1.4 and 2.2 times, respectively. Surprisingly, hepatic DNL and malonyl-CoA were maintained at the same physiological levels as in wild-type mice. Furthermore, hepatic DNL was completely inhibited by an ACC1/2 dual inhibitor, 5-tetradecyloxyl-2-furancarboxylic acid. These results strongly demonstrate that malonyl-CoA from ACC2 can access fatty acid synthase and become the substrate for the DNL pathway under the unphysiological circumstances that result with ACC1 disruption. Therefore, there does not appear to be strict compartmentalization of malonyl-CoA from either of the ACC isozymes in the liver.


Acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) carboxylase (ACC) catalyzes the carboxylation of acetyl-CoA to form malonyl-CoA, which is a key molecule in the control of intracellular fatty acid metabolism (13, 16, 27). ACC has two major isozymes that have different physiological roles based on their distinct subcellular distributions (2). A cytosolic enzyme, ACC1 (ACCα; molecular mass, 265 kDa), supplies malonyl-CoA to fatty acid synthase (FAS) and is committed to de novo lipogenesis (DNL) in many tissues via subsequent nutritional and hormonal regulation (3, 16, 27). In contrast, ACC2 (ACCβ; molecular mass, 280 kDa) is anchored to the mitochondrial surface via a unique N-terminal domain that includes 20 hydrophobic amino acids (1, 2). ACC2 produces malonyl-CoA on the mitochondrial surface. It is well known that malonyl-CoA is a potent endogenous inhibitor of carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 (CPT-1), which is also located on the mitochondrial surface (21, 26). Thus, ACC2 indirectly prevents the influx of fatty acids into the mitochondria and their subsequent β-oxidation (4).

ACC1 is ubiquitously expressed in many tissues, but higher levels occur in lipogenic tissues, including the liver and adipose tissue (8). In fact, in animals, Acc1 gene expression and ACC activity are markedly induced either by high carbohydrate feeding or hyperinsulinemia in animals and result in increases in adiposity, lipoprotein secretion, and hepatic fat content (16). It is expected that ACC1 blockade should reduce flux through the DNL pathway in lipogenic tissues and thus reduce adiposity, lipoprotein secretion, and fatty liver (11, 23). It is therefore plausible that ACC1 inhibitors have a therapeutic potential for the treatment of obesity, hyperlipidemia, and fatty liver. We attempted to validate this concept by studying the consequences of genetic disruption of the Acc1 gene in mice, but homozygous systemic deficiency of ACC1 was fatal to the fetus. Our observation is consistent with a recent report by Abu-Elheiga et al., who showed that Acc1 gene disruption was lethal in the mouse embryo stage (5). Therefore, we generated a mutant mouse lacking ACC1 specifically in the liver by using the Cre/loxP system (28). We then studied the physiological role of ACC1 in the DNL pathway of the liver, which is one of the major lipogenic tissues.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Construction of targeting vectors.

The Acc1 gene was isolated by screening of a 129/Sv mouse genomic library (Stratagene) with a 589-bp rat cDNA probe that was prepared by PCR with 25 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min using the following primers: ACC1-rF1 (5′-TACCCATTGCACTGTTTGTG-3′) and ACC1-rR1 (5′-CTGGGAACATTCCCGCAAGCCA-3′). A 0.5-kb SalI-BanI fragment, including most of the carboxyltransferase domain of Acc1, was inserted into the SalI site between two loxP sequences in ploxP3NeopA (Kurabo). For the short and long arms of the homology, 9-kb NcoI-SalI and 1.2-kb NdeI-NcoI fragments were used, respectively. A PGK-DT-a cassette was used for negative selection. G418-resistant embryonic stem (ES) clones were screened by PCR with 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min using the following primers: ACC1-F1 (5′-AGGTCTGAAGAGGAGTTTACGTCCA-3′) and ACC1-R9 (5′-TCAGGCTAGCACATGAAGATGCTAC-3′). The targeted allele [Acc1lox(ex46)] was confirmed by Southern hybridization using an NcoI-EcoRI fragment (probe A), as shown in Fig. 1A. Both wild-type and null alleles (Acc1Δex46) for Acc1 were identified by PCR with 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min using the following primers: ACC1-ΔF7 (5′-GAACTCCTCAAAACAAATCCCCAGA-3′) and ACC1-ΔR8 (5′-ACCCCTCTCAAGGTATACAGAGAAC-3′). The null allele was verified by Southern hybridization using an XhoI-SalI fragment (probe B), as shown in Fig. 1A.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Conditional deletion of a carboxyltransferase domain of the Acc1 gene by the Cre/loxP system. A. Schematic of the targeting strategy. The structures are shown for ACC1 protein, the wild-type allele, the targeting vector pAcc1-lox(ex46), targeted allele Acc1lox(ex46), and the Cre-recombined allele (Acc1Δex46). The ATP- and biotin-binding domains (ATP-BD and Biotin-BD) are shown as striped boxes, whereas the carboxyltransferase domain in exons 46 and 47 is shown as a red box. The exon numbers are shown as the protein-coding exon numbers. The PGK-neo-bpA and PGK-DT-a cassettes are shown as open boxes. The positions of Southern hybridization probes A and B, which detect EcoRI and BglII fragments, respectively, are also shown. Restriction enzyme sites are the following: B, BamHI; E, EcoRI; N, NcoI; Nd, NdeI; and S, SalI. B. Southern blot analysis of homologous recombination in the targeted ES cell clones. The EcoRI-digested DNA fragments from the parental ES cell line RW4 and targeted ES clones (A9, A22, A33, B2, and B17) were hybridized with probe A. Arrows indicate wild-type (WT; 10 kb) and targeted (Lox; 5.4 kb) alleles. C. Southern blot analysis of the intercross offspring of Acc1+/lox(ex46) heterozygotes. The EcoRI-digested tail DNA from each mouse was hybridized with probe A. The determined genotypes are shown on the bottom.

Generation of transgenic animals.

An ES cell line (RW4) was obtained from Genome Systems Inc., cultured, and electroporated with the targeting vector prepared as described above. Homologous recombinant clones were selected with G418, confirmed by Southern blot analysis (Fig. 1B), and then injected into C57BL/6J blastocysts. Germ line-transmitted chimeras obtained as previously described (24) were crossbred with C57BL/6J females, and then the resulting heterozygous offspring [Acc1+/lox(ex46)] (N1) were interbred. As shown in Fig. 1C, the number of wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous mutant mice that were born reflected the Mendelian ratio.

To generate systemic ACC1 null mice (N2), TgEIIa-cre transgenic mice (Jackson Laboratory) (17) were crossbred with Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) mice (N1). To generate liver-specific ACC1 null mice (N2), the Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) mice (N1) were crossbred with TgFabpl-cre mice, which were generated as previously described (12) and then backcrossed to C57BL/6J for six generations (N6). All of the mice that were born were maintained under standard animal housing conditions with a 12-h light/dark cycle (light phase, 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.; dark phase, 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) and were fed ad libitum with a regular chow diet (CE-2; CLEA Japan) or a high-sucrose diet (HSD) containing 67% sucrose, 8% cellulose, 20% casein, 0.2% choline bitartrate, 3.5% mineral mix, and 0.3% dl-methionine (Oriental Yeast). All mice were sacrificed during the diurnal period for analyses (10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., fed state). All animal procedures were done in compliance with National Institutes of Health guidelines and were approved by the Banyu Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis.

Total RNA was purified from livers using Isogen (Wako Pure Chemical Industries) and RNeasy (QIAGEN). The cDNA was synthesized from 0.5 μg of DNase I-treated total RNA using a SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen) and random hexamer primers (Invitrogen). The following primers and probes were used: mACACA-CBX-253F (5′-GCAGCCCTGGGCACAG-3′), mACACA-CBX-319R (5′-GGGAATACCCGTGGGAGTAGTT-3′), and mACACA-CBX-293T (5′-ACCTGGCTCTGCCAACTACCACGG-3′) for Acc1; ACC2m-F (5′-ACAGAGATTT CACCGTTGCGT-3′), ACC2m-R (5′-CGCAGCGATGCCATTGT-3′), and ACC2m-TaM (5′-ACTCGCTTTGGAGGCAACAGGGTCAT-3′) for Acc2; mMD.1422-F (5′-CCTCATGGTCAACTACCGCTACT-3′), mMD.1422-R (5′-CTTGGAGCCCAGGTAGGAGAT-3′), and mMD.1422-1 (5′-CCTGGAGGAGACAGGCCCCAACA-3′) for Mcd; and betaActin.vol2.F (5′-AGGTCATCACTATTGGCAACGA-3′), betaActin.vol2.R (5′-CACAGGATTCCATACCCAAGAAG-3′), and betaActin.vol2.T (5′-ATGCCCTGAGGCTCTTTTCCAGCCTT-3′) for β-actin. Real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) contained, in a final volume of 10 μl, 0.5 ng of cDNA, 900 nM of the forward and reverse primers for Acc1, Acc2, or Mcd, 250 nM of probe for Acc1, Acc2, or Mcd labeled with 6-carboxyfluorescein dye, 70 nM of the forward and reverse primers for β-actin, 200 nM of probe for β-actin labeled with VIC dye, and 5 μl of 2× TaqMan UMM. The reaction was done in a 384-well optical reaction plate using the PRISM 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Expression data were normalized to the β-actin expression level.

Western immunoblot analysis.

Polyclonal antibodies against ACC1 and ACC2 were prepared by immunizing rabbits with polypeptides SPPQSPTFPEAGHTSLYD and PVKNWMKRRVGPYRRCYF, respectively. Polyclonal anti-MCD antibody was kindly provided by Taro Akiyama from Merck Research Laboratories (Rahway, NJ). The following procedures were carried out on ice or at 4°C. Mouse tissue sample was homogenized with 10 volumes of 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5) containing 225 mM mannitol, 75 mM sucrose, 0.05 mM EDTA, and protease inhibitors (phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, aprotinin, pepstatin, leupeptin, and antipain). The homogenate was centrifuged at 48,000 × g for 30 min, and then the resulting supernatant was recentrifuged at 70,000 × g for 60 min to obtain the cytosol fraction. The protein content in the cytosol fraction was determined using a commercial protein assay kit (Bio-Rad). The cytosol fraction was resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and characterized by each antibody coupled with the ECL detection system (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp.).

De novo lipogenesis.

DNL activity was determined by the incorporation of [14C]acetate into the lipids (15).

For the liver slices, the liver was taken from mice that had been anesthetized with isoflurane (Escain; Merck Hoei). The incubation medium consisted of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) and 0.5 mM [1-14C]sodium acetate (final concentrations, 29.6 MBq/mmol and 2.11 GBq/mmol; GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp.) and was aerated with 5% CO2-95% O2 gas for at least 20 min prior to use. The liver slices (approximately 20 to 25 mg) were incubated with the incubation medium for 90 min at 37°C. After the incubation period, the liver slices were heated with ethanolic KOH for 1 h at 70°C, and nonsaponified lipids were removed with petroleum ether (30).

For the primary hepatocyte analysis, mouse primary hepatocytes were prepared as previously described (31) and cultured overnight in culture media consisting of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone), 100 nM insulin (human recombinant; Novo Nordisk), and 100 nM dexamethasone (Sigma). The hepatocytes were incubated in the culture media containing 74 KBq/ml [2-14C]sodium acetate (2.07 GBq/mmol; GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp.) for 1 h and then lysed with 1 N NaOH solution.

The resulting aqueous sample solutions obtained either from the liver slices or the hepatocytes were acidified, and then the lipids were extracted with petroleum ether. Radioactivity in the lipid fraction was counted with a liquid scintillation counter (Tri-Carb 2500; Perkin-Elmer).

FAO.

Hepatic fatty acid oxidation (FAO) was determined by the liberation of 3H2O from [3H]palmitic acid according to a procedure described previously (14), with minor modifications to accommodate for the fact that liver samples were used. The reaction mixture was Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer containing 74 KBq/ml 9,10(n)-[3H]palmitic acid (1.96 TBq/mmol; GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp.) and 4% bovine serum albumin (fatty acid free; Wako Pure Chemical Industries), which was aerated with 5% CO2-95% O2 gas for at least 20 min prior to use. Liver slices (approximately 10 mg) were incubated with the reaction mixture for 1 h at 30°C. After the incubation period, a 2 M KCl-HCl solution was added to the reaction mixture to stop the reaction. The resulting mixture was washed with CHCl3-methanol (2:1) to remove the lipids, including the undesired radioactive materials. The radioactivity of the aqueous phase was counted with a liquid scintillation counter (Tri-Carb 2500; Perkin-Elmer).

Hepatic triglyceride content.

Total lipids in the liver were extracted by the procedure described by Folch et al. (10). After drying under nitrogen flow, the extracts were dissolved in isopropanol, and the sample triglyceride (TG) content was determined enzymatically using a commercial assay kit (Determiner L TG II; Kyowa Medex).

Malonyl-CoA content.

Livers (50 to 100 mg) were homogenized with 10% trichloroacetic acid on ice. After centrifugation, the supernatant was applied to a water-preconditioned Sep-Pak C18 cartridge (Waters). The cartridge was washed with 50 mM KH2PO4, and then malonyl-CoA was eluted with 50 mM KH2PO4 containing 20% methanol. Malonyl-CoA was determined by incorporation of [3H]acetyl-CoA into the palmitic acid in the presence of FAS enzyme as described previously (22).

ACC2 activity.

The cytosol fraction prepared as described above in the Western immunoblot analysis section was mixed with an equal volume of 70% ammonium sulfate solution, stirred for 30 min at 4°C, and then centrifuged at 25,000 × g for 30 min. The resulting precipitate was dissolved in buffer A (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 5% glycerol) and then stirred with SoftLink Sort Release Avidin Resin (Promega) overnight at 4°C. After the avidin resin was washed with buffer A, the ACC fraction was eluted with 5 mM biotin in buffer A. Subsequently the anti-ACC2 antibody and protein A agarose (Upstate) were added to the ACC fraction. The resulting mixture was stirred for 3 h at 4°C and then centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 5 s. The resulting resin was washed with phosphate-buffered saline and then suspended in buffer A. ACC activity in the suspension (ACC2 fraction) was measured by fixation of 14CO2 as described previously (32).

Blood chemistry.

Plasma levels of free fatty acids, TGs, glucose, phospholipids, total cholesterol, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and 3-hydroxybutyric acid were measured using standard commercial assay kits.

Statistical analysis.

All data are shown as means ± standard errors of the means. Statistical differences between groups were examined using Student's t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Generation of systemic ACC1 null mice.

At first, we tried to generate ACC1 null mice to study the impact of the systemic disruption of ACC1 in mice. The Acc1Δex46 allele was generated by crossing Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) mice with a transgenic mouse line (TgEIIa-cre) expressing Cre recombinase in the early mouse embryo under the control of the adenovirus EIIa promoter. The genotype of the offspring was confirmed by Southern blot hybridization analysis (see Fig. S1A in the supplemental material). Since neither native nor short truncated mutant ACC1 protein was expressed from the Acc1Δex46 allele (see Discussion), we designated heterozygous mutant mice Acc1+/−. When Acc1+/− mice were interbred, wild-type and Acc1+/− pups were born in a 1:2 ratio, and both genotypes grew normally (see the table in the supplemental material). In contrast, no Acc1−/− pups were born, indicating that genetic disruption of Acc1 was lethal to the embryo. To determine at what stage the genetic disruption was lethal, embryos from heterozygous intercrosses were examined at 3.5 to 9.5 days postcoitum (dpc) and were genotyped using PCR (see Fig. S1B and the table in the supplemental material). At 3.5 dpc (preimplantation) and 6.5 dpc, all genotypes, including Acc1−/− embryos, were present with a Mendelian ratio. However, at 7.5 dpc, Acc1−/− embryos showed an apparent morphological abnormality and were much smaller in size than their control littermates (see Fig. S1C in the supplemental material). Since ACC1 is a cytosolic enzyme that supplies malonyl-CoA to the FAS enzyme and is committed to DNL in many tissues (16), our data indicate that fatty acid (FA) derived from this pathway is essential in the early stage of embryonic development. Very recently, Abu-Elheiga et al. reported the same results showing that disruption of Acc1 was lethal to mouse embryos (5). In addition, Fasn (fatty acid synthase) knockout (KO) mice have also been reported to not survive the embryonic stage (9). Hence, the DNL pathway can be considered to be the sole source of FA and is essential in the early stage of embryonic development.

With quantitative real-time PCR, substantial expression levels of Acc1 mRNAs were confirmed in wild-type embryos at 7.5 dpc (approximately 20% of the level in the adult liver). However, Acc2 mRNA levels were nearly undetectable (see Fig. S1D in the supplemental material), indicating that ACC1 is the sole isozyme committed to the DNL pathway in this stage.

Generation of liver-specific ACC1 null mice.

The Acc1 gene was specifically disrupted in the liver by crossbreeding Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) mice and Fabpl-cre transgenic mice (12), which express Cre specifically in the liver. On Southern hybridization analysis, the recombined KO allele in the liver sample was found to be either from Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) TgFabpl-cre or Acc1+/lox(ex46) TgFabpl-cre mice but not from Acc1+/+ TgFabpl-cre or other mice harboring no Fabpl-cre transgenic allele (Fig. 2A). The recombined KO allele was not detected in the tail sample of any animal group, suggesting that ACC1 was not disrupted in other tissues (data not shown). Quantitative real-time PCR analysis showed that the Acc1 mRNA level was decreased by more than 95% in the livers from Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) TgFabpl-cre mice and by approximately 50% in the livers from Acc1+/lox(ex46) TgFabpl-cre mice compared to wild-type mice (Fig. 2B). Consistent with these results, Western blot analysis showed that ACC1 protein was not detected in the livers obtained from Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) TgFabpl-cre mice (Fig. 2C). Moreover, it was confirmed that the Acc1 mRNA level was not decreased in other tissues from Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) TgFabpl-cre mice, e.g., brain, lung, heart, stomach, small intestine, large intestine, spleen, kidney, white adipose tissue, skin, muscle, and testis (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material), indicating that liver-specific disruption of Acc1 had been successfully achieved. Interestingly, the hepatic Acc1 mRNA level in Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) WT and Acc1+/lox(ex46) WT mice was lower than in wild-type mice (Fig. 2B), suggesting that this mutant allele [Acc1lox(ex46)] is hypomorphic in the absence of Cre-mediated recombination.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Conditional KO of the Acc1 gene in liver. A. Southern blot analysis of the liver DNA from the wild-type (+/+), Acc1+/lox(ex46) (+/L), and Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) (L/L) mice with or without the Fabpl-cre transgenic allele. The BglII-digested DNA fragments were hybridized with probe B. Arrows indicate targeted (Lox; 4.5 kb), wild-type (WT; 1.8 kb), and recombined (KO; 1.4 kb) alleles. B. Relative amount of hepatic Acc1 mRNA in each genotype (n = 3). The Acc1 expression level was measured by quantitative real-time PCR analysis, normalized with the endogenous β-actin mRNA level, and is shown as an amount relative to that in the wild-type mice. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. C. Western blot analysis of hepatic ACC1 protein. Total protein was loaded on gradient (3% to 8%) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel (50 μg/lane) and detected with anti-ACC1 antibody (Ab).

Phenotypes in liver-specific ACC1 null mice on chow diet.

In the present study, 9-week-old male and female Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) TgFabpl-cre (referred to as “Acc1 cKO” in this section) mice and two control groups of littermate mice, Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) WT (Acc1-lox) and Acc1+/+ WT (WT), were used. Acc1 cKO mice grew normally and looked normal. Their livers also appeared normal at necropsy. Blood chemistry data showed that no abnormalities were present in Acc1 cKO mice (Table 1). The plasma aspartate aminotransferase level was slightly but significantly increased in male Acc1-lox and Acc1 cKO mice compared with WT mice. However, this increased level was considered to be within the normal range based on our background data and on the fact that this finding was not reproducible (data not shown).

TABLE 1.

Body weight and blood chemistrya

Gender and cell type BW (g) FFA (μEq/liter) TG (mg/dl) Glu (mg/dl) PL (mg/dl) TC (mg/dl) LDH (IU/liter) AST (IU/liter) ALT (IU/liter) 3-HBA (μmol/liter)
Male
    WT 24.9 ± 1.0 327.8 ± 75.6 66.6 ± 5.8 220.6 ± 11.5 143.0 ± 7.2 71.2 ± 4.9 77.6 ± 3.7 30.2 ± 0.7 19.6 ± 1.1 172.4 ± 10.9
    Lox 24.9 ± 0.3 435.0 ± 49.6 52.8 ± 11.8 228.5 ± 21.2 141.0 ± 5.8 70.0 ± 4.2 93.5 ± 18.0 38.8 ± 3.4* 25.0 ± 4.1 166.0 ± 37.4
    cKO 24.5 ± 0.4 313.2 ± 69.7 82.0 ± 22.2 230.4 ± 27.1 131.2 ± 7.0 57.8 ± 5.1 130.4 ± 39.0 47.4 ± 6.0* 30.2 ± 5.0 194.0 ± 18.8
Female
    WT 20.6 ± 0.3 437.0 ± 45.5 66.8 ± 14.5 193.6 ± 9.5 130.6 ± 12.5 64.8 ± 7.9 72.0 ± 4.8 38.6 ± 3.2 18.0 ± 1.3 194.6 ± 35.5
    Lox 20.8 ± 0.4 351.2 ± 81.7 49.8 ± 15.2 237.8 ± 13.3* 132.6 ± 3.6 64.0 ± 2.2 77.0 ± 2.5 38.0 ± 3.4 18.8 ± 1.4 168.2 ± 18.8
    cKO 20.0 ± 0.4 282.2 ± 55.5 38.6 ± 10.2 214.4 ± 12.7 138.6 ± 6.4 70.4 ± 4.8 80.2 ± 1.0 40.0 ± 1.3 20.8 ± 2.3 182.4 ± 25.0
a

WT, Acc1+/+ WT; Lox, Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) WT; cKO, Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) TgFabpl-cre; BW, body weight; FFA, free fatty acids; TG, triglyceride; Glu, glucose; PL, phospholipids, TC, total cholesterol; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; 3-HBA, 3-hydroxybutyric acid. *, P < 0.05 compared to WT. Data are expressed as average results ± standard errors (n = 4 to 5).

Next, we evaluated whether the genetic disruption of Acc1 results in a decrease of hepatic DNL activity. Surprisingly, hepatic DNL activity in Acc1 cKO mice was almost comparable to that seen in Acc1-lox or WT mice (Fig. 3A). The hepatic TG content in Acc1 cKO mice tended to be reduced, but not significantly (Fig. 3B). To determine the reason why hepatic DNL was not changed in Acc1 cKO mice, we measured both the Acc1 and Acc2 mRNA levels in the liver using quantitative real-time PCR. As expected, hepatic Acc1 mRNA levels were decreased by 98% in Acc1 cKO mice compared to WT mice (Fig. 3C). In contrast, hepatic Acc2 mRNA levels were increased by 2.6 times in Acc1 cKO mice compared to WT mice (Fig. 3C). Consistently, ACC2 protein level determined by Western blot analysis was 1.4 times higher in Acc1 cKO mice (Fig. 4A and B). Also, ACC activity in the ACC2 fraction obtained by immunoprecipitation with anti-ACC2 antibody was 2.2 times higher in Acc1 cKO mice (Fig. 4D). This indicates that ACC2 was induced to compensate for the genetic disruption of Acc1. The hepatic mRNA levels of Mcd (malonyl-CoA decarboxylase [MCD]), which catalyzes malonyl-CoA degradation (6, 25), were the same in the three genotypes (Fig. 3D). In agreement with this, the hepatic MCD protein level determined by Western blot analysis was almost the same for Acc1-lox and Acc1 cKO mice (Fig. 4A and C).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Key parameters related to the DNL pathway in the liver. (A) DNL and (B) TG levels in the livers obtained from Acc1+/+ WT (+/+:WT; black column; n = 10), Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) WT (lox/lox:WT; gray column; n = 9), and Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) TgFabpl-cre (lox/lox:cre; open column; n = 10) mice. (C) Relative Acc1 (black column) and Acc2 (open column) and (D) Mcd mRNA levels in the livers obtained from +/+:WT (n = 10), lox/lox:WT (n = 9), and lox/lox:cre (n = 10) mice. ***, P < 0.001 compared with +/+:WT (for Acc1); #, P < 0.05; ###, P < 0.001 compared with +/+:WT (for Acc2). (E) Malonyl-CoA level in the livers obtained from +/+:WT (black column; n = 5) and lox/lox:cre (open column; n = 6) mice fed with a normal chow diet or fasted for 16 h. ##, P < 0.01 for fed versus fasted groups within the same genotype. (F) FAO in the livers obtained from +/+:WT (black column; n = 10), lox/lox:WT (gray column; n = 9), and lox/lox:cre (open column; n = 11) mice. Each column represents average results ± standard errors.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

ACC2 and MCD levels in the liver from Acc1-lox and Acc1 cKO mice. (A) Immunoblot images of ACC2 and MCD proteins. Quantification of immunoblot images of ACC2 (B) and MCD (C) proteins in the liver from Acc1-lox (gray column; n = 4) and Acc1 cKO (open column; n = 4). (D) ACC2 activity in the liver from Acc1-lox (gray column; n = 4) and Acc1 cKO (open column; n = 4). Each column represents average results ± standard errors. **, P < 0.01.

To obtain further insights into Acc1 cKO mice, we prepared additional samples from each genotype for further analysis of the malonyl-CoA level and the FAO in the liver. Again, there was no significant difference in either the hepatic DNL or the TG content among the genotypes, and compensatory induction of Acc2 mRNA was again observed (data not shown). As expected, hepatic malonyl-CoA levels were not significantly different between wild-type and Acc1 cKO mice in both fed (wild type, 3.3 ± 0.6 versus Acc1 cKO; 2.4 ± 0.6 nmol/g) and fasted states (wild type, 0.4 ± 0.2 versus Acc1 cKO; 0.5 ± 0.2 nmol/g) (Fig. 3E). Liver FAO was the same in the three genotypes (Fig. 3F), despite the fact that Acc2 mRNA was increased in Acc1 cKO mice.

De novo lipogenesis in primary hepatocytes isolated from liver-specific ACC1 null mice.

In order to confirm whether malonyl-CoA was derived from ACC activity, we prepared primary hepatocytes from Acc1 cKO mice to study the effect of 5-(tetradecyloxyl)-2-furancarboxylic acid (TOFA), an ACC1 and ACC2 inhibitor, on DNL activity in the hepatocytes (20). As shown in Fig. 5, TOFA inhibited DNL activity in a dose-dependent manner and completely inhibited the activity at 10 μM, indicating that most of the malonyl-CoA that was present in the hepatocytes was derived from ACC activity.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Inhibitory effect of TOFA on DNL in primary hepatocytes isolated from Acc1 cKO mice. Primary hepatocytes prepared from Acc1 cKO mice were incubated with TOFA (10 nM ∼ 10 μM). Each symbol represents the average of two or three triplicate experiments and is shown as a percentage of control DNL activity.

Effect of a high-sucrose diet on liver TG and de novo lipogenesis in liver-specific ACC1 null mice.

Ten-week-old male Acc1 cKO [Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) TgFabpl-cre] and Acc1-lox [Acc1lox(ex46)/lox(ex46) WT] mice were fed with a high-sucrose diet (HSD) (67% sucrose) for 3 days. Liver TG content and DNL in the HSD-fed Acc1-lox mice were 1.4 and 4.2 times higher, respectively, than those in the Acc1-lox mice fed with a regular chow diet (data not shown). Liver TG content in the HSD-fed Acc1 cKO mice was decreased by approximately 70% compared to that in the HSD-fed Acc1-lox mice (Fig. 6A). Liver DNL in the HSD-fed Acc1 cKO mice was slightly decreased by approximately 25%, in contrast to that in the HSD-fed Acc1-lox mice (Fig. 6B), but was still 3.2 times higher than that in Acc1-lox mice with the regular chow diet (data not shown).

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

Liver TG (A) and DNL (B) in Acc1-lox and Acc1 cKO mice on HSD. Acc1-lox (black column; n = 6) and Acc1 cKO mice (gray column; n = 4) were fed with HSD for 3 days. Each column represents average results ± standard errors.

DISCUSSION

Since Acc1 knockout mice do not survive the embryonic stage, we generated an Acc1-lox mouse, in which exon 46 of the Acc1 gene was flanked by two loxP sequences to generate Acc1 conditional knockout mice. We then crossbred the Acc1-lox mice with liver-type fatty acid binding protein (Fabpl)-cre transgenic mice (12) to generate liver-specific ACC1 null mice.

On quantitative real-time PCR analysis, the expression of Acc1 mRNA from the Acc1lox(ex46) allele was approximately half of that from the wild-type allele (Fig. 2B); this suggests that this mutant allele was hypomorphic, possibly due to the interference of gene expression by the insertion of the PGK-neo cassette into intron 46 (18).

If exon 46 was removed by Cre-mediated recombination, splicing from exon 45 to exon 47 would generate a stop codon within exon 47, leading to the production of a short truncated mutant ACC1 protein (calculated molecular mass, 219 kDa). However, Western blot analysis showed that neither native nor the supposed mutant ACC1 protein was detected in the liver samples obtained from the liver-specific ACC1 null mice (Fig. 2C). Since the anti-ACC1 antibody that was used here is supposed to recognize amino acid residues 1258 to 1275, which are encoded in exon 30 of ACC1 protein, it is likely that the mutant ACC1 protein would have been detected by the antibody if it were present. Hence, this suggests that, by the deletion of exon 46, which generates a null mutant allele, the mutant ACC1 protein is eventually not produced. More importantly, by using the above method, we successfully generated liver-specific ACC1 null mice.

It is believed that ACC1 is solely committed to DNL in many tissues, including the liver, and is under nutritional and hormonal regulation (16, 23). On the other hand, the mitochondrial type of ACC isozyme (2), ACC2, produces malonyl-CoA, which is known to be a potent endogenous inhibitor of carnitine palmitoyl transferase-1 (CPT-1) on the mitochondrial surface (21, 26). Since CPT-1, which is also located on the mitochondrial surface, uptakes long-chain fatty acyl-CoA into the mitochondria and facilitates subsequent FAO, it is thought that ACC2 negatively controls mitochondrial FAO (4, 27). In addition, it has been suggested that malonyl-CoA synthesized by ACC2 cannot access the FAS enzyme and cannot be committed to DNL due to the strict compartmentalization of malonyl-CoA derived from either ACC1 or ACC2 (4, 5). Therefore, liver-specific ACC1 null mice should lose hepatic DNL activity. However, unexpectedly, our present study demonstrated that hepatic DNL in liver-specific ACC1 null mice was almost at the same level as in WT mice (Fig. 3A). This finding strongly indicates that ACC1 is not the essential enzyme for DNL in the mouse liver.

Based on the findings in Acc2 KO mice, it has been suggested that most hepatic malonyl-CoA is derived from ACC1 and that malonyl-CoA from ACC2 is almost negligible in the mouse liver (4). Therefore, with ACC1 disruption, the hepatic malonyl-CoA level should have been negligible. However, in the present study, hepatic malonyl-CoA was only slightly decreased (the difference was not statistically significant), and the level was almost the same among genotypes both in the fed and the fasted state (Fig. 3E). Furthermore, quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed that hepatic Acc2 mRNA was induced by approximately 2.6 times as a compensatory mechanism to hepatic Acc1 knockout (Fig. 3C). ACC2 protein and activity were consistently increased by approximately 1.4 and 2.2 times, respectively, in the liver of liver-specific ACC1 null mice (Fig. 4A, B, and D). Therefore, it is likely that this compensatory induction of ACC2 can produce a large amount of malonyl-CoA to maintain a physiological level of malonyl-CoA in liver lacking the ACC1 enzyme. In addition, since the levels of malonyl-CoA decarboxylase (MCD) protein and Mcd mRNA were found to be the same among the genotypes (Fig. 3D and 4A and C), it is unlikely that MCD, which is a key regulator of the intracellular malonyl-CoA level (6, 25), is a major contributor in the regulation of hepatic malonyl-CoA levels in ACC1-disrupted livers.

Quite strikingly, DNL activity was completely inhibited by TOFA, an inhibitor for both ACC1 and ACC2 (20), in primary hepatocytes isolated from liver-specific ACC1 null mice (Fig. 5). This finding strongly indicates that malonyl-CoA derived from ACC2 can access the FAS enzyme and is involved in the hepatic DNL pathway in the ACC1-disrupted liver. Recently, an alternative splice form of Acc2, which lacks approximately 200 N-terminal amino acids, including the sequence responsible for binding to the mitochondrial outer membrane, was reported (7). It has been suggested that the splice variant is localized in the cytosol and is committed to DNL. However, since the Acc2 variant was almost undetectable on quantitative RT-PCR analysis in the liver sample from either liver-specific ACC1 null or WT mice (data not shown), it is less likely that the variant contributes to the hepatic malonyl-CoA levels seen in liver-specific ACC1 null mice.

Given these results, it is strongly suggested that ACC2 is induced as a compensatory mechanism due to ACC1 disruption to maintain physiological levels of malonyl-CoA in the liver. More importantly, our findings demonstrate that malonyl-CoA from ACC2 not only inhibits CPT-1 activity on the mitochondrial surface but also can access the FAS enzyme in the ACC1-disrupted liver.

In the present study, hepatic TG content tended to be lower in liver-specific ACC1 null mice than in WT mice (Fig. 3B). Very recently, Mao et al. reported that liver-specific ACC1 knockout mice are resistant to an HSD (58.45% sucrose)-induced hepatic steatosis (19). Taken together, it seems that the liver lacking ACC1 cannot handle excess amounts of carbohydrate ingestion. To confirm this point, a further study was conducted in liver-specific ACC1 knockout mice fed with an HSD (67% sucrose). As shown in Fig. 6A, in contrast to littermate control mice, hepatic TG content was decreased by approximately 70% in liver-specific ACC1 knockout mice (no statistical significance), suggesting that compensatory induced hepatic ACC2 cannot fully cover physiological function of hepatic ACC1 responding to dietary nutrition. However, hepatic DNLs in both genotypes were not so different (Fig. 6B). One likely reason to explain this discrepancy between hepatic TG and DNL data could be a timing of hepatic DNL measurement. We measured diurnal hepatic DNL activity, which is supposed to be much lower than nocturnal hepatic DNL activity. In contrast to littermate control mice, nocturnal hepatic DNL induction may be limited and much smaller in liver-specific ACC1 knockout mouse. This potential limitation of hepatic DNL induction in liver lacking ACC1 may also limit hepatic TG accumulation induced by carbohydrate ingestion.

Abu-Elheiga et al. have proposed that there are two distinct malonyl-CoA pools for ACC1 and ACC2 in the cell: one in the cytosol, and one in the mitochondria (4, 5). They have also hypothesized that the two pools are strictly compartmentalized from each other, since (i) there is distinct intracellular localization of each isozyme; (ii) hepatic FAO was higher in Acc2 KO mice despite the fact that the hepatic malonyl-CoA level was the same in Acc2 KO and wild-type mice in the fasted state; and (iii) ACC2 did not correct for ACC1 function in Acc1 KO embryos, leading to lethal damage. However, our data strongly indicate that the malonyl-CoA pool for ACC2 is not strictly compartmentalized in the hepatocyte of liver-specific ACC1 null mice. At this point, there is no clear explanation for the discrepancy between findings of Abu-Elheiga et al. and ours. However, it is possible that, under physiological conditions, the malonyl-CoA derived from either ACC1 or ACC2 does not mix, and that each one is committed to its distinct physiological role (DNL or FAO). However, under these particular unphysiological conditions, it is likely that there is no strict compartmentalization, at least for ACC2. Recently, supporting data has been published by Savage et al. (29). According to their findings in hepatic ACC1 and/or ACC2 knockdown rats using antisense oligonucleotides, each ACC isozyme knockdown led to a 1.5- to 2-fold increase of the hepatic FAO rate. Moreover, knockdown of both ACCs led to an ∼4-fold increase in the hepatic FAO rate in the rats. These observations also imply that malonyl-CoA from ACC1 can access CPT-1 and control mitochondrial FAO. On the other hand, since Acc1 KO is lethal in the embryonic stage, it must be that malonyl-CoA derived from ACC2 does not compensate for DNL activity to make the FA that is required for embryonal development. However, it seems that this is not due to the strict compartmentalization of the two isozymes but that it is due to a lack of ACC2 expression in the early stage of embryonic development. Indeed, Acc2 mRNA was not detected in wild-type mouse embryos at 7.5 dpc by quantitative RT-PCR analysis (see Fig. S1D in the supplemental material). Interestingly, liver development was not affected by hepatic ACC1 protein disruption in mice despite the fact that ACC2 is thought not to exist at this stage of liver development: Acc2 mRNA was undetectable in livers isolated from wild-type mouse embryos at 13.5 dpc (data not shown). It could be that, at this stage, adequate amounts of FA are supplied by the mother. Further studies will be required to fill the gap between findings of Abu-Elheiga et al. and ours. It may be that an unknown enzyme having ACC activity contributes to this compensatory increase of malonyl-CoA levels that was observed in the present study.

It is believed that malonyl-CoA synthesized by ACC2 negatively regulates FAO by inhibiting CPT-1 (21, 26). In the present study, an almost physiological level of malonyl-CoA was found due to the presence of ACC2 in the liver of liver-specific ACC1 null mice (Fig. 3E). This excess amount of malonyl-CoA ought to have suppressed the basal FAO rate in the mitochondria, because all malonyl-CoA in the mitochondria is supposed to be of ACC2 origin. However, hepatic FAO and serum ketone body levels were comparable in both genotypes (Fig. 3F; Table 1). These data imply that the mitochondrial malonyl-CoA pool was not excessively large and did not reach levels that would suppress FAO, indicating that FAO is physiologically and normally controlled even with increased ACC2 expression. This also suggests that the unnecessary and excess malonyl-CoA produced by ACC2 that was observed in this study can fill the cytosol pool for malonyl-CoA and eventually participates in DNL to generate FA.

In conclusion, we succeeded in generating liver-specific ACC1 null mice with livers that appeared normal and developed normally. Although hepatic ACC1 protein was absent, hepatic DNL and malonyl-CoA levels were normal in liver-specific ACC1 null mice. In addition, hepatic DNL was completely inhibited by an ACC1/2 inhibitor, TOFA. Furthermore, hepatic Acc2 mRNA, protein, and activity were up-regulated in the liver-specific ACC1 null mice. These results strongly indicate that malonyl-CoA synthesized by ACC2 is involved not only in mitochondrial FAO but also in the cytosolic DNL pathway and can adapt to unphysiological conditions due to ACC1 disruption. The findings of the present study should have an impact on the current views regarding malonyl-CoA compartmentalization in the cell. In addition, our data partially support a concept that hepatic ACC1 blockade will reduce flux through the DNL pathway, causing reduced lipoprotein secretion and decreased fatty liver (23). However, since hepatic ACC2 can partially cover ACC1 function as a backup system, tachyphylaxis should be alarmed by the chronic and selective blockade of hepatic ACC1. Blocking both ACC1 and ACC2 may avoid this potential tachyphylaxis and may be more efficacious to improve hepatic steatosis.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]

Acknowledgments

We thank Yasuko Muramatsu for excellent technical assistance, Jun Suzuki and Yoshiki Itoh for constructive criticism, Akio Kanatani for reviewing the manuscript and offering helpful suggestions, and Toshiyuki Takahashi for synthesizing and providing TOFA (all belong to the Banyu Tsukuba Research Institute). Also we are grateful to Taro Akiyama at Merck Research Laboratories (Rahway, NJ) for providing anti-MCD antibody.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 6 January 2007.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://mcb.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abu-Elheiga, L., D. B. Almarza-Ortega, A. Baldini, and S. J. Wakil. 1997. Human acetyl-CoA carboxylase 2. Molecular cloning, characterization, chromosomal mapping, and evidence for two isoforms. J. Biol. Chem. 272:10669-10677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abu-Elheiga, L., W. R. Brinkley, L. Zhong, S. S. Chirala, G. Woldegiorgis, and S. J. Wakil. 2000. The subcellular localization of acetyl-CoA carboxylase 2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:1444-1449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Abu-Elheiga, L., A. Jayakumar, A. Baldini, S. S. Chirala, and S. J. Wakil. 1995. Human acetyl-CoA carboxylase: characterization, molecular cloning, and evidence for two isoforms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:4011-4015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Abu-Elheiga, L., M. M. Matzuk, K. A. Abo-Hashema, and S. J. Wakil. 2001. Continuous fatty acid oxidation and reduced fat storage in mice lacking acetyl-CoA carboxylase 2. Science 291:2613-2616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Abu-Elheiga, L., M. M. Matzuk, P. Kordari, W. Oh, T. Shaikenov, Z. Gu, and S. J. Wakil. 2005. Mutant mice lacking acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 are embryonically lethal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:12011-12016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.An, J., D. M. Muoio, M. Shiota, Y. Fujimoto, G. W. Cline, G. I. Shulman, T. R. Koves, R. Stevens, D. Millington, and C. B. Newgard. 2004. Hepatic expression of malonyl-CoA decarboxylase reverses muscle, liver and whole-animal insulin resistance. Nat. Med. 10:268-274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Barber, M. C., N. T. Price, and M. T. Travers. 2005. Structure and regulation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase genes of metazoa. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1733:1-28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bianchi, A., J. L. Evans, A. J. Iverson, A. C. Nordlund, T. D. Watts, and L. A. Witters. 1990. Identification of an isozymic form of acetyl-CoA carboxylase. J. Biol. Chem. 265:1502-1509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chirala, S. S., H. Chang, M. Matzuk, L. Abu-Elheiga, J. Mao, K. Mahon, M. Finegold, and S. J. Wakil. 2003. Fatty acid synthesis is essential in embryonic development: fatty acid synthase null mutants and most of the heterozygotes die in utero. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:6358-6363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Folch, J., M. Lees, and G. H. Sloane Stanley. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 226:497-509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ha, J., and K. H. Kim. 1994. Inhibition of fatty acid synthesis by expression of an acetyl-CoA carboxylase-specific ribozyme gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:9951-9955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Harada, N., Y. Tamai, T. Ishikawa, B. Sauer, K. Takaku, M. Oshima, and M. M. Taketo. 1999. Intestinal polyposis in mice with a dominant stable mutation of the beta-catenin gene. EMBO J. 18:5931-5942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hardie, D. G. 1989. Regulation of fatty acid synthesis via phosphorylation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase. Prog. Lipid Res. 28:117-146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ibrahimi, A., A. Bonen, W. D. Blinn, T. Hajri, X. Li, K. Zhong, R. Cameron, and N. A. Abumrad. 1999. Muscle-specific overexpression of FAT/CD36 enhances fatty acid oxidation by contracting muscle, reduces plasma triglycerides and fatty acids, and increases plasma glucose and insulin. J. Biol. Chem. 274:26761-26766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jamdar, S. C. 1978. Glycerolipid biosynthesis in rat adipose tissue. Influence of adipose-cell size and site of adipose tissue on triacylglycerol formation in lean and obese rats. Biochem. J. 170:153-160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim, K. H. 1997. Regulation of mammalian acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 17:77-99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lakso, M., J. G. Pichel, J. R. Gorman, B. Sauer, Y. Okamoto, E. Lee, F. W. Alt, and H. Westphal. 1996. Efficient in vivo manipulation of mouse genomic sequences at the zygote stage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:5860-5865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lewandoski, M. 2001. Conditional control of gene expression in the mouse. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2:743-755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mao, J., F. J. Demayo, H. Li, L. Abu-Elheiga, Z. Gu, T. E. Shaikenov, P. Kordari, S. S. Chirala, W. C. Heird, and S. J. Wakil. 2006. Liver-specific deletion of acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 reduces hepatic triglyceride accumulation without affecting glucose homeostasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:8552-8557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McCune, S. A., and R. A. Harris. 1979. Mechanism responsible for 5- (tetradecyloxy)-2-furoic acid inhibition of hepatic lipogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 254:10095-10101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McGarry, J. D., G. F. Leatherman, and D. W. Foster. 1978. Carnitine palmitoyltransferase I. The site of inhibition of hepatic fatty acid oxidation by malonyl-CoA. J. Biol. Chem. 253:4128-4136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McGarry, J. D., M. J. Stark, and D. W. Foster. 1978. Hepatic malonyl-CoA levels of fed, fasted and diabetic rats as measured using a simple radioisotopic assay. J. Biol. Chem. 253:8291-8293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Munday, M. R., and C. J. Hemingway. 1999. The regulation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase-a potential target for the action of hypolipidemic agents. Adv. Enzyme Regul. 39:205-234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Oshima, M., H. Oshima, K. Kitagawa, M. Kobayashi, C. Itakura, and M. Taketo. 1995. Loss of Apc heterozygosity and abnormal tissue building in nascent intestinal polyps in mice carrying a truncated Apc gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:4482-4486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Park, H., V. K. Kaushik, S. Constant, M. Prentki, E. Przybytkowski, N. B. Ruderman, and A. K. Saha. 2002. Coordinate regulation of malonyl-CoA decarboxylase, sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase, and acetyl-CoA carboxylase by AMP-activated protein kinase in rat tissues in response to exercise. J. Biol. Chem. 277:32571-32577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Prip-Buus, C., J. P. Pegorier, P. H. Duee, C. Kohl, and J. Girard. 1990. Evidence that the sensitivity of carnitine palmitoyltransferase I to inhibition by malonyl-CoA is an important site of regulation of hepatic fatty acid oxidation in the fetal and newborn rabbit. Perinatal development and effects of pancreatic hormones in cultured rabbit hepatocytes. Biochem. J. 269:409-415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ruderman, N. B., A. K. Saha, D. Vavvas, and L. A. Witters. 1999. Malonyl-CoA, fuel sensing, and insulin resistance. Am. J. Physiol. 276:E1-E18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sauer, B. 1993. Manipulation of transgenes by site-specific recombination: use of Cre recombinase. Methods Enzymol. 225:890-900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Savage, D. B., C. S. Choi, V. T. Samuel, Z. X. Liu, D. Zhang, A. Wang, X. M. Zhang, G. W. Cline, X. X. Yu, J. G. Geisler, S. Bhanot, B. P. Monia, and G. I. Shulman. 2006. Reversal of diet-induced hepatic steatosis and hepatic insulin resistance by antisense oligonucleotide inhibitors of acetyl-CoA carboxylases 1 and 2. J. Clin. Investig. 116:817-824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stansbie, D., R. W. Brownsey, M. Crettaz, and R. M. Denton. 1976. Acute effects in vivo of anti-insulin serum on rates of fatty acid synthesis and activities of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase and pyruvate dehydrogenase in liver and epididymal adipose tissue of fed rats. Biochem. J. 160:413-416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Swift, L. L., M. H. Farkas, A. S. Major, K. Valyi-Nagy, M. F. Linton, and S. Fazio. 2001. A recycling pathway for resecretion of internalized apolipoprotein E in liver cells. J. Biol. Chem. 276:22965-22970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tanabe, T., S. Nakanishi, T. Hashimoto, H. Ogiwara, J. Nikawa, and S. Numa. 1981. Acetyl-CoA carboxylase from rat liver. Methods Enzymol. 71:5-16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Supplemental material]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES