Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1991 Jan;57(1):130–137. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.1.130-137.1991

Methylmercury Decomposition in Sediments and Bacterial Cultures: Involvement of Methanogens and Sulfate Reducers in Oxidative Demethylation

Ronald S Oremland 1,*, Charles W Culbertson 1, Michael R Winfrey 1
PMCID: PMC182673  PMID: 16348388

Abstract

Demethylation of monomethylmercury in freshwater and estuarine sediments and in bacterial cultures was investigated with 14CH3HgI. Under anaerobiosis, results with inhibitors indicated partial involvement of both sulfate reducers and methanogens, the former dominating estuarine sediments, while both were active in freshwaters. Aerobes were the most significant demethylators in estuarine sediments, but were unimportant in freshwater sediments. Products of anaerobic demethylation were mainly 14CO2 as well as lesser amounts of 14CH4. Acetogenic activity resulted in fixation of some 14CO2 produced from 14CH3HgI into acetate. Aerobic demethylation in estuarine sediments produced only 14CH4, while aerobic demethylation in freshwater sediments produced small amounts of both 14CH4 and 14CO2. Two species of Desulfovibrio produced only traces of 14CH4 from 14CH3HgI, while a culture of a methylotrophic methanogen formed traces of 14CO2 and 14CH4 when grown on trimethylamine in the presence of the 14CH3HgI. These results indicate that both aerobes and anaerobes demethylate mercury in sediments, but that either group may dominate in a particular sediment type. Aerobic demethylation in the estuarine sediments appeared to proceed by the previously characterized organomercurial-lyase pathway, because methane was the sole product. However, aerobic demethylation in freshwater sediments as well as anaerobic demethylation in all sediments studied produced primarily carbon dioxide. This indicates the presence of an oxidative pathway, possibly one in which methylmercury serves as an analog of one-carbon substrates.

Full text

PDF
130

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berman M., Chase T., Bartha R. Carbon Flow in Mercury Biomethylation by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Jan;56(1):298–300. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.1.298-300.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boone D. R., Johnson R. L., Liu Y. Diffusion of the Interspecies Electron Carriers H(2) and Formate in Methanogenic Ecosystems and Its Implications in the Measurement of K(m) for H(2) or Formate Uptake. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Jul;55(7):1735–1741. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.7.1735-1741.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Compeau G. C., Bartha R. Effect of salinity on mercury-methylating activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria in estuarine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Feb;53(2):261–265. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.2.261-265.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Compeau G. C., Bartha R. Sulfate-reducing bacteria: principal methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Aug;50(2):498–502. doi: 10.1128/aem.50.2.498-502.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Compeau G., Bartha R. Methylation and demethylation of mercury under controlled redox, pH and salinity conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Dec;48(6):1203–1207. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.6.1203-1207.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Culbertson C. W., Strohmaier F. E., Oremland R. S. Acetylene as a substrate in the development of primordial bacterial communities. Orig Life Evol Biosph. 1988;18(4):397–407. doi: 10.1007/BF01808218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Culbertson C. W., Zehnder A. J., Oremland R. S. Anaerobic oxidation of acetylene by estuarine sediments and enrichment cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Feb;41(2):396–403. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.2.396-403.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kiene R. P., Oremland R. S., Catena A., Miller L. G., Capone D. G. Metabolism of reduced methylated sulfur compounds in anaerobic sediments and by a pure culture of an estuarine methanogen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Nov;52(5):1037–1045. doi: 10.1128/aem.52.5.1037-1045.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Korthals E. T., Winfrey M. R. Seasonal and spatial variations in mercury methylation and demethylation in an oligotrophic lake. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Oct;53(10):2397–2404. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.10.2397-2404.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ljungdahl L. G. The autotrophic pathway of acetate synthesis in acetogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1986;40:415–450. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.40.100186.002215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mara D. D., Williams D. J. The evaluation of media used to enumerate sulphate reducing bacteria. J Appl Bacteriol. 1970 Sep;33(3):543–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1970.tb02232.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Oremland R. S., Hollibaugh J. T., Maest A. S., Presser T. S., Miller L. G., Culbertson C. W. Selenate reduction to elemental selenium by anaerobic bacteria in sediments and culture: biogeochemical significance of a novel, sulfate-independent respiration. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Sep;55(9):2333–2343. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.9.2333-2343.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Oremland R. S., Kiene R. P., Mathrani I., Whiticar M. J., Boone D. R. Description of an estuarine methylotrophic methanogen which grows on dimethyl sulfide. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Apr;55(4):994–1002. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.4.994-1002.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Oremland R. S. Nitrogen fixation dynamics of two diazotrophic communities in mono lake, california. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Mar;56(3):614–622. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.3.614-622.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Oremland R. S., Polcin S. Methanogenesis and sulfate reduction: competitive and noncompetitive substrates in estuarine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Dec;44(6):1270–1276. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.6.1270-1276.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Oremland R. S., Zehr J. P. Formation of methane and carbon dioxide from dimethylselenide in anoxic sediments and by a methanogenic bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Nov;52(5):1031–1036. doi: 10.1128/aem.52.5.1031-1036.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ramlal P. S., Rudd J. W., Hecky R. E. Methods for measuring specific rates of mercury methylation and degradation and their use in determining factors controlling net rates of mercury methylation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Jan;51(1):110–114. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.1.110-114.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ridley W. P., Dizikes L. J., Wood J. M. Biomethylation of toxic elements in the environment. Science. 1977 Jul 22;197(4301):329–332. doi: 10.1126/science.877556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Robinson J. B., Tuovinen O. H. Mechanisms of microbial resistance and detoxification of mercury and organomercury compounds: physiological, biochemical, and genetic analyses. Microbiol Rev. 1984 Jun;48(2):95–124. doi: 10.1128/mr.48.2.95-124.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schottel J., Mandal A., Clark D., Silver S., Hedges R. W. Volatilisation of mercury and organomercurials determined by inducible R-factor systems in enteric bacteria. Nature. 1974 Sep 27;251(5473):335–337. doi: 10.1038/251335a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Smith R. L., Oremland R. S. Anaerobic oxalate degradation: widespread natural occurrence in aquatic sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Jul;46(1):106–113. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.1.106-113.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Spangler W. J., Spigarelli J. L., Rose J. M., Flippin R. S., Miller H. H. Degradation of methylmercury by bacteria isolated from environmental samples. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Apr;25(4):488–493. doi: 10.1128/am.25.4.488-493.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Spangler W. J., Spigarelli J. L., Rose J. M., Miller H. M. Methylmercury: bacterial degradation in lake sediments. Science. 1973 Apr 13;180(4082):192–193. doi: 10.1126/science.180.4082.192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Steffan R. J., Korthals E. T., Winfrey M. R. Effects of acidification on mercury methylation, demethylation, and volatilization in sediments from an acid-susceptible lake. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Aug;54(8):2003–2009. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.8.2003-2009.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Summers A. O. Organization, expression, and evolution of genes for mercury resistance. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1986;40:607–634. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.40.100186.003135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Walsh C. T., Distefano M. D., Moore M. J., Shewchuk L. M., Verdine G. L. Molecular basis of bacterial resistance to organomercurial and inorganic mercuric salts. FASEB J. 1988 Feb;2(2):124–130. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.2.2.3277886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wood J. M., Kennedy F. S., Rosen C. G. Synthesis of methyl-mercury compounds by extracts of a methanogenic bacterium. Nature. 1968 Oct 12;220(5163):173–174. doi: 10.1038/220173a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES