Abstract
The Suzuki-Miyaura-type cross-coupling reaction of potassium alkyltrifluoroborates with various alkenyl bromides in the presence of 10 mol % of PdCl2(dppf)·CH2Cl2 and 3.0 equiv of Cs2CO3 in aqueous toluene at 80 °C provided the desired compounds in 49–95% yields. A variety of functional groups in the potassium alkyltrifluoroborates were tolerated under the basic conditions.
1. Introduction
The discovery of carbon-carbon bond-forming reactions using palladium catalysts is important to the development of synthetic organic chemistry.1 Among the various methods, the Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reaction has many advantages for the formation of new carbon-carbon bonds such as mild reaction conditions, high regio- and stereoselectivity, and tolerance of many functional groups. Additionally, this reaction is an environmentally sound reaction.2 Moreover, organoboron compounds are commercially available and readily prepared from the corresponding alkene and/or alkyne via transmetalation or hydroboration reactions.
Most of the previous studies of palladium-catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reactions have been performed with halide- and triflate-substituted alkenes and arenes as the electrophiles, and boronic acids or boronate esters with sp- or sp2-hybridized carbons as the nucleophiles. In contrast, carbon-carbon bond-forming reactions of sp3-hybridized organoborons, which possess β-hydrogens, have been restricted and are rather uncommon due to β-hydride elimination from the generated alkylpalladium intermediate.1-3
In 1986 and 1989, Miyaura and coworkers reported the coupling of alkylboron compounds with various organic halides using a catalytic amount of PdCl2(dppf)·CH2Cl2 in the presence of base, such as K3PO4, K2CO3, and NaOH.3 To date, these coupling reactions using alkyl moieties in Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reactions have proven to be among the more useful methods for the synthesis of natural products and other biologically active compounds.4 However, boronic acids and boronate esters used in carbon-carbon bond coupling reactions possess many limitations, such as difficulties in purification, uncertain stoichiometry, high costs, and in some cases, instability to air and moisture.
Recently, organotrifluoroborate reagents have attracted considerable interest as useful intermediates for Suzuki-Miyaura-type cross-coupling reactions because they are air- and moisture-stable crystalline solids.5 Moreover, the potassium organotrifluoroborates show greater nucleophilicity than that of the corresponding organoboranes and boronic acid derivatives.6 Our research group has previously investigated the cross-coupling of various organotrifluoroborate derivatives, including alkyltrifluoroborates.5a Additionally, we have explored novel syntheses of functionalized organotrifluoroborates to expand their chemistry through direct epoxidation,7 cis-dihydroxylation,8 nucleophilic substitution,9 and 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions.10 In this paper, we report the results of palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions with various alkenyl bromides and potassium alkyltrifluoroborates to forge (C)sp2–(C)sp3 bonds.
2. Result and discussion
Initially we examined the Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reaction of 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one with potassium 6-(benzoyloxy)hexylt rifluoroborate (1) to determine the optimal conditions in the presence of several different palladium(0) precatalysts and 3.0 equiv of base (Table 1).
Table 1.
Optimization of reaction conditions for the formation of 2a
|
| Entry | Catalyst/ligand (10 mol %) | Solvent (v/v = 3/1) | Time (h) | Yield (%)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pd(PPh3)4 | toluene/H2O | 24 | 13 |
| 2c | Pd(OAc)2/2PCy3 | toluene/H2O | 7 | 41 |
| 3 | PdCl2(dppf)·CH2Cl2 | toluene/H2O | 7 | 74 |
| 4d | PdCl2(dppf)·CH2Cl2 | toluene/H2O | 24 | 68 |
| 5 | PdCl2(dppf)·CH2Cl2 | THF/H2O | 7 | 13 |
| 6 | PdCl2(dppf)·CH2Cl2 | toluene/pH 9 | 7 | 62 |
| 7e | PdCl2(dppf)·CH2Cl2 | toluene/H2O | 7 | 39 |
All reactions were carried out using 0.10 mmol of 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one and 0.11 mmol of alkyltrifluoroborate (1).
Yields are given for isolated products.
4 mol % of Pd(OAc)2 and 8 mol % of PCy3 were used.
Reaction was performed with 5 mol % of PdCl2(dppf)2·CH2Cl2.
3 equiv of K2CO3 was used as a base.
A number of different palladium catalysts, such as Pd(PPh3)4, Pd(OAc)2/2PCy3, and PdCl2(dppf)·CH2Cl2, were screened for their effectiveness in accomplishing the cross-coupling reaction (Table 1, entries 1-3), and it was found that PdCl2(dppf)·CH2Cl2 provided the fastest reaction time and the highest isolated yield (Table 1, entry 3). It was observed that a decrease in the catalyst loading from 10 mol % to 5 mol % under the same conditions resulted in a dramatic increase in reaction times and a slightly decreased product yield (Table 1, entries 3 and 4). In the study of various reaction medium, a mixed solvent system composed of toluene/H2O(v/v = 3/1) was confirmed to be the optimal solvent, whereas toluene/pH 9.0 buffer solution and especially THF/H2O showed lower reaction rates and isolated yields during the same reaction times (Table 1, entries 3, 5, and 6). Interestingly, the reaction rate, yield, and purity of compound 2 were improved with higher concentration (0.1 mmol/0.8 mL, data not shown). Also, when K2CO3 was used as a base instead of Cs2CO3, the product yield declined (Table 1, entry 7).
Using our optimized conditions, we were able to perform the Suzuki-Miyaura-type cross-coupling reaction of various alkenyl bromides with potassium 6-(benzoyloxy)hexyltrifluoroborate (1) and 3-(benzoyloxy)propyltrifluoroborate (3) in the presence of 10 mol % PdCl2(dppf)·CH2Cl2 and 3.0 equiv of Cs2CO3 in aqueous toluene at 80 °C. The results are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.
Cross-coupling of various alkenyl bromides with potassium 6-(benzoyloxy)hexyltrifluoroborate (1) and 3-(benzoyloxy)propyltrifluoroborate (3)a
|
| Entry | Alkenyl bromide | Reaction time (h) | Product | Isolated yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |
7 | |
74 (78)b |
| 2 | |
3 | |
93 |
| 3 | |
2 | |
78 |
| 4 | |
5 | |
82 |
| 5 | |
12 | |
69c |
| 6d | |
3 | |
54 |
| 7 | |
3 | |
91 |
All reactions were carried out with 0.1 mmol of alkenyl bromide and 0.12 mmol of potassium alkyltrifluoroborate.
This reaction was performed on 1.0 mmol scale.
28% (5.9 mg) of 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one as the starting material was recovered.
Purity of commercial a-bromostyrene was 90%.
The cross-coupling reactions of enones and enals containing an alkenyl bromide (Table 2, entries 1 and 5) required longer reaction times. From previous studies of cross-coupling reactions with potassium organotrifluoroborates, the silylated alcohol group was known to be stable under the reaction conditions in the presence of a fluoride counterion (Table 2, entry 3).11a When α-bromostyrene was used, although the reaction proceeded quickly, the product 8 was obtained only in 54% yield (Table 2, entry 6). Interestingly, 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-butene and triphenylethenyl bromide, though sterically hindered, reacted quickly with accompanying high yields (Table 2, entries 2 and 7).
Next, we proceeded to examine the Suzuki-Miyaura-type cross-coupling reactions of various potassium alkyltrifluoroborates with alkenyl bromides (1) under the same reaction conditions, the results of which are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3.
Cross-coupling reaction of 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one with various potassium alkyltrifluoroborates
|
| Entry | R–BF3K | Reaction time (h) | Product | Isolated yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |
4 | |
83 |
| 2 | |
8 | |
95 |
| 3 | |
8 | |
53 |
| 4 | |
7 | |
86a |
| 5 | |
22 | |
69 |
| 6 | |
11 | |
87 |
| 7 | |
18 | |
49 |
| 8 | |
16 | |
94 |
| 9 | |
18 | |
63 |
| 36 | ||||
| 10 | |
9 | |
92 |
| 11 | |
12 | |
41 (90)b |
1.6 mg (9%) of 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one as the starting material was recovered.
The reaction was carried out with 10 mol % of Pd(PPh3)4 instead of PdCl2(dppf)2·CH2Cl2.
The majority of the potassium alkyltrifluoroborates were easily prepared according to previous literature protocols.8-15 However, the methyl ester 16 was obtained from potassium trans-1-hex-5-enoic acid trifluoroborate methyl ester in excellent yield via hydrogenation with hydrogen gas in the presence of Pd/C catalyst.
As shown in Table 3, all alkyltrifluoroborates gave rise to the corresponding products in moderate yields. The coupling reaction of potassium ethyltrifluoroborate (10) led to the corresponding target compound 21 in 83% yield. Also, a high yield (95%) was obtained for the coupling reaction of trimethylsilylmethyltrifluoroborate with alkenyl bromide 1. Interestingly, increasing the carbon chain length of alkyltrifluoroborates extended the reaction time and resulted in a lower yield (Table 3, entry 3).
As expected, the coupling reactions can tolerate a variety of functional groups such as silyl, nitrile, halide, and carbonyl groups present in the alkyltrifluoroborate despite the use of aqueous basic conditions (Table 3, entries 2 and 4-6). However, when alkyltrifluoroborate 16 containing an ester functionality was used following the same conditions for 18 h, a low yield (49%) was obtained (Table 3, entry 7). Presumably, this is due to the fact that the prolonged reaction time under basic conditions induced the saponification of the ester group. The reaction yield of the coupling with the dihydroxy alkyltrifluoroborate 17 was not significantly influenced by the unprotected alcohols (Table 3, entry 8).
Interestingly, when potassium 4-phenylbutyltrifluoroborate (18) was used as the coupling partner, the desired product 29 and by-product 30 were obtained in 63% and 36% yields, respectively (Table 3, entry 9). Although the reaction mechanism for generating by-product 30 has not been confirmed, the product appears to form as a result of a series of β-hydride elimination/reinsertion processes. The coupling of a secondary alkyl carbon center was surprising, because concerted efforts to achieve this previously had uniformly failed.12 A similar process transpired with potassium 2-phenylethyltrifluoroborate (19), wherein the secondary carbon coupling product 31 was isolated in 92% yield (Table 3, entry 10).
Although in the cross-coupling reaction of the thioalkyltrifluoroborate 20 the desired compound 32 was obtained in only 41% yield, we could successfully obtain a 90% yield by changing the catalyst from 10 mol % PdCl2(dppf)·CH2Cl2 to 10 mol % Pd(PPh3)4 (Table 3, entry 11). We are unaware of other instances where such β-hydride elimination/reinsertion processes have been reported in this context.
3. Conclusion
In summary, we have developed the Suzuki-Miyaura-type cross-coupling reactions between sp2-hybridized alkenyl bromide s and sp3-hybridized alkyltrifluoroborates in good yields. Potassium alkyltrifluoroborates were easily prepared by transmetalation, hydroboration, and hydrogenation of the corresponding alkenyltrifluoroborates. Also, we confirmed that these coupling reactions can tolerate a variety of functional groups under the optimized conditions. On the other hand, we observed that under the same conditions, the coupling reactions with 2-phenylethyl- and 4-phenylbutyltrifluoroborates generated the secondary coupling compounds 30 and 31.
4. Experimental
4.1. General considerations
1H-, 13C-, and 19F-NMR spectra were recorded at 500.39, 125.82, and 470.79 MHz, respectively. 19F-NMR chemical shifts were referenced to external CFCl3 (0.0 ppm). 11B-NMR spectra at 128.4 MHz were obtained on a spectrometer equipped with the appropriate decoupling accessories. All 11B-chemical shifts were referenced to external BF3·OEt2 (0.0 ppm) with a negative sign indicating an upfield shift. Mass spectra of potassium organotrifluoroborates were performed using negative ion electrospray at the mass spectrometry facilities at the University of Pennsylvania. Toluene and H2O were distilled and degassed under argon. Commercially available reagents were used without further purification.
4.2. Preparation of potassium alkyltrifluoroborates
4.2.1. Potassium (6-benzoyloxy)hexyltrifluoroborate (1)
This organotrifluoroborate 1 was prepared according to the literature procedure.12
4.2.2. Potassium (3-benzoyloxy)propyltrifluoroborate (3)
This organotrifluoroborate 3 was prepared according to the literature procedure.13
4.2.3. Potassium ethyltrifluoroborate (10)
This organotrifluoroborate 10 was prepared according to the literature procedure.11d
4.2.4. Potassium (trimethylsilyl)methyltrifluoroborate (11)
This organotrifluoroborate 11 was prepared according to the literature procedure.13
4.2.5. Potassium octyltrifluoroborate (12)
This organotrifluoroborate 12 was prepared according to the literature procedure.12
4.2.6. Potassium 5-cyanopentyltrifluoroborate (13)
This organotrifluoroborate 13 was prepared according to the literature procedure.9
4.2.7. Potassium 5-bromopentyltrifluoroborate (14)
This organotrifluoroborate 14 was prepared according to the literature procedure.9
4.2.8. Potassium (5-oxo)hexyltrifluoroborate (15)
This organotrifluoroborate 15 was prepared according to the literature procedure.12
4.2.9. Potassium methyl 6-(trifluoroborato)hexanoate (16)
To a solution of potassium trans-1-hex-5-enoic acid trifluoroborate methyl ester14 (234 mg, 1 mmol) in MeOH (10 mL) was added 10% Pd/C (23 mg, 10 wt % of substrate). The reaction mixture was vigorously stirred at room temperature under ordinary hydrogen pressure (balloon). After 10 h, the reaction mixture was filtered off using Celite and then the solvent was removed under high vacuum. The crude solid was purified by dissolving in a minimal amount of dry acetone (1 mL) and precipitating with ether (15 mL) to obtain the desired pure compound 16 as a white solid (234 mg, 99% yield). mp = 183–185 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Acetone-d6) δ 3.59 (s, 3H), 2.23 (t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 1.54 (m, 2H), 1.25 (m, 4H), 0.12 (br s, 2H, CH2-BF3K). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.5, 50.4, 33.7, 32.8, 25.2, missing B-CH2. 19F (470.8 MHz, Acetone-d6) δ −141.4. 11B (128.4 MHz, Acetone-d6) δ 5.80. FT-IR (neat) ν 2921, 1737, 1438, 1264, 1068, 960, 883 cm−1. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd. for C7H13BF3O2 [M-K+]− 197.0961, found 197.0952.
4.2.10. Potassium 3,4-dihydroxybutyltrifluoroborate (17)
This organotrifluoroborate 17 was prepared according to the literature procedure.8
4.2.11. Potassium 4-phenylbutyltrifluoroborate (18)
To a solution of 4-phenyl-1-butene (660 mg, 5 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was added a solution of HBBr2·SMe2 (1 M in CH2Cl2, 5 mL, 5 mmol) at room temperature. The resulting suspension was stirred at 40 °C for 15 h and then allowed to cool to room temperature. The mixture was cooled further to 0 °C, and H2O (5 mL) and ether (10 mL) were slowly added. After the suspension was stirred for 30 min, the solvent was evaporated. The residual solids were dissolved in ether (20 mL), and KHF2 (1.2 g, 15 mmol) was added followed by the addition of H2O (1 mL) over 1 h. After 30 min, all the solvent was removal under high vacuum. The resulting white solid was purified by dissolving in a minimal amount of dry acetone (5 mL) and precipitating with ether (25 mL) to obtain the desired pure compound 18 as a white solid (504 mg, 42% yield). mp > 250 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Acetone-d6) δ 7.23–7.09 (m, 5H), 2.55 (t, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz), 1.56 (m, 2H), 1.33 (m, 2H), 0.20 (m, 2H, -CH2-BF3K). 13C NMR (125. 8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 143.7, 128.3, 128.0, 125.1, 36.2, 35.7, 25.4, missing B-CH2. 19F (470.8 MHz, Acetone-d6) δ −141.3. 11B (128.4 MHz, Acetone-d6) δ 5.80. FT-IR (neat) ν 2917, 2849, 1453, 1344, 1291, 1212, 1095, 1038, 936, 846, 742, 696 cm−1. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd. for C10H13BF3 [M-K+]− 201.1062, found 201.1060.
4.2.12. Potassium 2-phenylethyltrifluoroborate (19)
This organotrifluoroborate 19 was prepared according to the literature procedure.12,15
4.2.13. Potassium 3-phenylsulfenylpropyltrifluoroborate (20)
This organotrifluoroborate 20 was prepared according to the literature procedure.13
4.3. Cross-coupling reactions
4.3.1. General procedure
To a 10×75 mm test tube was added the potassium alkyltrifluoroborate (0.11 mmol), Cs2CO3 (97.8 mg, 0.3 mmol), PdCl2(dppf)·CH2Cl2 (8.2 mg, 0.01 mmol), and alkenyl bromide (0.1 mmol) with a stirring bar. The reaction mixture was purged with N2. Degassed toluene (0.6 mL) and H2O (0.2 mL) were added and the mixture was heated in an oil bath at 80 °C. The reaction was monitored by TLC. After the alkenyl bromide was totally consumed, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and was diluted with ethyl acetate (2 mL). The organic layer was filtered through a small amount of silica gel and evaporated under reduced pressure to give the crude product. The pure product was isolated by preparation TLC (500 μm).
4.3.2. 6-(2-Methyl-5-oxo-cyclopent-1-enyl)hexyl benzoate (2)
The title compound was obtained as a colorless oil (22.1 mg, 74% yield) using 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one and potassium (6-benzoyloxy)hexyltrifluoroborate (1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.04 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.55 (t, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz), 7.44 (t, 2H, J = 7.4 Hz), 4.30 (t, 2H, J = 6.7 Hz), 2.48 (m, 2H), 2.35 (m, 2H), 2.18 (t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz), 2.04 (s, 3H), 1.76 (m, 2H), 1.48–1.32 (m, 6H). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 209.6, 170.0, 166.6, 140.5, 132.8, 130.5, 129.5, 128.3, 65.0, 34.3, 31.5, 29.2, 28.6, 28.2, 25.9, 22.9, 17.2. FT-IR (neat) ν 2933, 2857, 1717, 1697, 1646, 1451, 1385, 1274, 1113, 712 cm−1. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd. for C19H25O3[M+H]+ 301.1804, found 301.1804.
4.3.3. 7,8-Dimethylnon-7-enyl benzoate (4)
The title compound was obtained as a colorless oil (25.5 mg, 93% yield) using 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-butene and potassium (6-benzoyloxy)hexyltrifluoroborate (1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.04 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.54 (t, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz), 7.43 (t, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz), 4.31 (t, 2H, J = 6.7 Hz), 2.02 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz), 1.77 (m, 2H), 1.63 (s, 6H), 1.62 (s, 3H), 1.45 (m, 2H), 1.38-1.34 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl ) δ 167.0, 133.1, 130.9, 129.9, 128.7, 128.2, 124.2, 65.5, 34.7, 29.6, 29.1, 28.5, 26.4, 20.9, 20.5, 18.7. FT-IR (neat) ν 2927, 2857, 1721, 1602, 1451, 1385, 1372, 1274, 1114, 1070, 1026, 710 cm−. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C18H26O2 [M]+ 274.1933, found 274.1933.
4.3.4. (Z)-12-(tert-Butyldimethylsilyloxy)dodec-7-enyl benzoate (5)
The title compound was obtained as a colorless oil (32.7 mg, 78% yield) using ((Z)-6-bromohex-5-enyloxy)(tert-butyl)dimethylsilane and potassium (6-benzoyloxy)hexyltrifluoroborate (1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.04 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.54 (t, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz), 7.44 (t, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz), 5.35 (m, 2H), 4.31 (t, 2H, J = 6.7 Hz), 3.60 (t, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz), 2.03 (m, 4H), 1.76 (m, 2H), 1.52 (m, 2H), 1.45 (m, 2H), 1.37 (m, 6H), 0.88 (s, 9H), 0.04 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.7, 132.8, 130.5, 129.8, 129.5, 128.3, 65.1, 63.1, 33.3, 32.5, 29.6, 28.9, 28.7, 28.2, 27.1, 27.0, 26.0, 25.3, 18.3, −5.2. FT-IR (neat) ν 2930, 2857, 1722, 1452, 1387, 1273, 1255, 1109, 836, 775, 710 cm−. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C25H43O3Si [M+H]+ 419.2981, found 419.2991.
4.3.5. 4-Cyclohexylidenebutyl benzoate (6)
The title compound was obtained as a pale yellow oil (21.2 mg, 82% yield) using bromomethylenecyclohexane and potassium (3-benzoyloxy)propyltrifluoroborate (3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.05 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.55 (t, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz), 7.43 (t, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz), 5.10 (t, 1H, J = 7.1 Hz), 4.31 (t, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz), 2.15 (q, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 2.11 (m, 2H), 2.07 (m, 2H), 1.80 (p, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz), 1.52-1.46 (m, 6H). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.7, 140.9, 132.8, 130.5, 129.5, 128.3, 119.7, 64.5, 37.2, 29.0, 28.6, 27.8, 26.9, 23.4. FT-IR (neat) ν 2927, 2852, 1720, 1450, 1273, 1115, 1069, 1026, 710 cm−1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C17H23O2 [M+H]+ 259.1698, found 259.1706.
4.3.6. (E)-4-Formyl-5-phenylpent-4-enyl benzoate (7)
The title compound was obtained as a pale yellow oil (20.2 mg, 95% yield) using α-bromocinnamaldehyde and potassium (3-benzoyloxy)propyltrifluoroborate (3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.58 (s, 1H), 8.04 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.57 (t, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz), 7.50 (m, 2H), 7.44 (t, 2H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.34 (m, 3H), 7.29 (s, 1H), 4.37 (t, 2H, J = 6.1 Hz), 2.75 (t, 2H, J = 7.9 Hz), 1.99 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 195.4, 166.5, 150.5, 141.9, 134.6, 132.9, 130.3, 129.7, 129.6, 128.8, 128.3, 64.6, 27.3, 21.6, missing 1C. FT-IR (neat) ν 3061, 2956, 1718, 1680, 1624, 1451, 1377, 1274, 1156, 1115, 1070, 1026, 754, 712, 698 cm−1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C19H19O3 [M+H]+ 295.1334, found 295.1337.
4.3.7. 4-Phenylpent-4-enyl benzoate (8)
The title compound was obtained as a colorless oil (14.4 mg, 54% yield) using α-bromostyrene and potassium (3-benzoyloxy)propyltrifluoroborate (3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.04 (d, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.54 (t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.43 (m, 4H), 7.33 (t, 2H, J = 8 Hz), 7.25 (t, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz), 5.32 (s, 1H), 5.11 (s, 1H), 4.34 (t, 2H, J = 6.5 Hz), 2.68 (t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 1.94 (p, 2H, J = 6.7 Hz). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.6, 147.2, 140.8, 132.8, 130.4, 129.5, 128.4, 128.3, 127.5, 126.1, 113.0, 64.3, 31.7, 27.2. FT-IR (neat) ν 3059, 2955, 1718, 1601, 1493, 1451, 1314, 1274, 1115, 1070, 1026, 900, 778, 710 cm−1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C18H19O2 [M+H]+ 267.1385, found 267.1372.
4.3.8. 4,5,5-Triphenylpent-4-enyl benzoate (9)
The title compound was obtained as a white solid (38.1 mg, 91% yield) using bromotriphenylethylene and potassium (3-benzoyloxy)propyltrifluoroborate (3). mp = 89–91 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.91 (d, 2H, J = 7.4 Hz), 7.54 (t, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz), 7.40 (t, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.29-7.20 (m, 5H), 7.18–7.11 (m, 5H), 7.00 (m, 3H), 6.88 (m, 2H), 4.19 (t, 2H, J = 6.3 Hz), 2.63 (m, 2H), 1.80 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.5, 143.2, 142.6, 141.8, 140.2, 139.4, 132.8, 130.6, 130.3, 129.6 (2C), 129.3, 128.3, 128.2, 128.0, 127.4, 126.6, 126.4, 125.9, 64.7, 32.5, 28.0. FT-IR (neat) ν 3055, 3020, 2957, 1718, 1599, 1491, 1451, 1443, 1314, 1274, 1117, 1070, 1027, 910, 763, 700 cm−1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C30H26O2 [M]+ 418.1933, found 418.1932.
4.3.9. 2-Ethyl-3-methylcyclopent-2-enone (21)
The title compound was obtained as a colorless oil (10.3 mg, 83% yield) using 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one and potassium ethyltrifluoroborate (10). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.48 (m, 2H), 2.36 (m, 2H), 2.19 (q, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz), 2.05 (s, 3H), 0.97 (t, 3H, J = 7.6 Hz). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 209.6, 169.6, 142.0, 34.4, 31.5, 17.0, 16.2, 12.9. FT-IR (neat) ν 2966, 2928, 1697, 1646, 1443, 1385, 1348, 1178, 1056, 935 cm−1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C8H12O [M]+ 124.0888, found 124.0895.
4.3.10. 3-Methyl-2-[(trimethylsilyl)methyl]cyclopent-2-enone (22)
The title compound was obtained as a colorless oil (17.3 mg, 93% yield) using 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one and potassium (trimethylsilyl)methyltrifluoroborate (11). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.46 (m, 2H), 2.34 (m, 2H), 1.97 (s, 3H), 1.60 (s, 2H), −0.03 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 209.2, 165.6, 138.6, 34.1, 31.4, 17.7, 13.3, −1.0. FT-IR (neat) ν 2954, 2913, 1697, 1441, 1409, 1383, 1329, 1248, 1181, 1161, 1068, 841, 694 cm−1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C10H18OSi [M]+ 182.1127, found 182.1132.
4.3.11. 3-Methyl -2-octylcyclopent-2-enone (23)
The title compound was obtained as a pale yellow oil (11.1 mg, 53% yield) using 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one and potassium octyltrifluoroborate (12). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.48 (m, 2H), 2.35 (m, 2H), 2.16 (t, 2H, J = 7.4 Hz), 2.04 (s, 3H), 1.35 (m, 2H), 1.26 (m, 10H), 0.87 (t, 3H, J = 6.7 Hz). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 209.7, 170.2, 140.8, 34.3, 31.8, 31.5, 29.6, 29.4, 29.2, 28.4, 23.0, 22.6, 17.2, 14.1. FT-IR (neat) ν 2925, 2855, 1701, 1648, 1442, 1385, 1339, 1177, 1073 cm−1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C14H25O [M+H]+ 209.1905, found 209.1903.
4.3.12. 6-(2-Methyl-5-oxocyclopent-1-enyl)hexanenitrile (24)
The title compound was obtained as a pale yellow oil (16.5 mg, 95% yield) using 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one and potassium 5-cyanopentyltrifluoroborate (13). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.50 (m, 2H), 2.36 (m, 2H), 2.33 (t, 2H, J = 7.1 Hz), 2.19 (m, 2H), 2.05 (s, 3H), 1.66 (m, 2H), 1.43 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 209.9, 170.7, 140.4, 120.0, 34.6, 31.9, 28.8, 27.7, 25.5, 23.0, 17.6, 17.4. FT-IR (neat) ν 2935, 2860, 2244, 1694, 1644, 1442, 1386, 1340, 1178, 1076 cm−1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C12H18NO [M+H]+ 192.1388, found 192.1387.
4.3.13. 2-(5-Bromopentyl)-3-methylcyclopent-2-enone (25)
The title compound was obtained as a colorless oil (17 mg, 69% yield) using 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one and potassium 5-bromopentyltrifluoroborate (14). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.39 (t, 2H, J = 6.7 Hz), 2.49 (m, 2H), 2.36 (m, 2H), 2.18 (m, 2H), 2.05 (s, 3H), 1.87 (m, 2H), 1.41 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 209.7, 170.3, 140.3, 34.3, 33.8, 32.5, 31.5, 28.0, 27.4, 22.8, 17.2. FT-IR (neat) ν 2934, 2858, 1697, 1645, 1439, 1385, 1299, 1177, 1073, 938 cm−1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C11H18OBr [M+H]+ 245.0541, found 245.0529.
4.3.14. 3-Methyl-2-(5-oxohexyl)cyclopent-2-enone (26)
The title compound was obtained as a yellow oil (16.8 mg, 87% yield) using 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one and potassium (5-oxo)hexyltrifluoroborate (15). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.49 (m, 2H), 2.43 (t, 2H, J = 7.4 Hz), 2.36 (m, 2H), 2.18 (t, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz), 2.12 (s, 3H), 2.05 (s, 3H), 1.54 (p, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz), 1.38 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 209.7, 209.0, 170.5, 140.1, 43.4, 34.3, 31.5, 29.9, 27.7, 23.6, 22.7, 17.2. FT-IR (neat) ν 2932, 2860, 1711, 1696, 1644, 1441, 1385, 1359, 1178, 1072 cm−1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C12H18O2 [M]+ 194.1307, found 194.1306.
4.3.15. Methyl 6-(2-methyl-5-oxocyclopent-1-enyl)hexanoate (27)
The title compound was obtained as a pale yellow oil (14.1 mg, 63% yield) using 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one and potassium methyl 6-(trifluoroborato)hexanoate (16). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.66 (s, 3H), 2.49 (m, 2H), 2.35 (m, 2H), 2.29 (t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 2.16 (t, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 2.04 (s, 3H), 1.62 (p, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz), 1.38 (m, 2H), 1.30 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 209.7, 174.2, 170.2, 140.4, 51.4, 34.3, 34.0, 31.7, 29.1, 28.0, 24.7, 22.8, 17.2. FT-IR (neat) ν 2931, 2858, 1736, 1697, 1644, 1437, 1385, 1175 cm−1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C13H20O3 [M]+ 224.1412, found 224.1405.
4.3.16. 2-(3,4-Dihydroxybutyl)-3-methylcyclopent-2-enone (28)
The title compound was obtained as a brown oil (17.3 mg, 94% yield) using 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one and potassium 3,4-dihydroxybutyltrifluoroborate (17). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.78 (br s, 1H, −OH), 3.55 (m, 1H), 3.45 (m, 2H), 2.54 (m, 2H), 2.41 (m, 2H), 2.38 –2.30 (m, 2H), 2.09 (s, 3H), 1.53 (m, 1H), 1.40 (m, 1H), missing −OH. 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 211.5, 172.7, 139.9, 70.4, 66.6, 34.2, 31.8, 31.7, 18.3, 17.2. FT-IR (neat) ν 3400, 2922, 1680, 1637, 1439, 1388, 1348, 1179, 1047, 865 cm−1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C10H17O3 [M+H]+ 185.1178, found 185.1171.
4.3.17. 3-Methyl-2-(4-phenylbutyl)cyclopent-2-enone (29)
The title compound was obtained as a colorless oil (14.4 mg, 63% yield) using 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one and potassium 4-phenylbutyltrifluoroborate (18). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.26 (m, 2H), 7.15 (m, 3H), 2.60 (t, 2H, J = 7.7 Hz), 2.46 (m, 2H), 2.35 (m, 2H), 2.20 (t, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz), 2.02 (s, 3H), 1.58 (m, 2H), 1.42 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 209.7, 170.2, 142.6, 140.5, 128.4, 128.2, 125.6, 35.7, 34.3, 31.5, 31.4, 28.0, 22.8, 17.2. FT-IR (neat) ν 2956, 2928, 2870, 1694, 1631, 1493, 1451, 1381, 1332, 1175, 748, 700 cm−1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C16H21O [M+H]+ 229.1592, found 229.1603.
4.3.18. 3-Methyl-2-(1-phenylbutyl)cyclopent-2-enone (30)
The title compound was obtained as a colorless oil (8.4 mg, 36% yield) using 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one and potassium 4-phenylbutyltrifluoroborate (18). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.33 (m, 2H), 7.25 (m, 2H), 7.17 (m, 1H), 3.80 (t, 1H, J = 7.4), 2.46 (m, 2H), 2.33 (m, 2H), 2.13–2.01 (s and m, 5H), 1.23 (m, 2H), 0.90 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 209.1, 170.9, 143.7, 142.2, 128.2, 128.0, 126.0, 41.5, 34.4, 34.0, 31.9, 21.4, 17.6, 14.0. FT-IR (neat) ν 3025, 2930, 2856, 1697, 1644, 1495, 1441, 1385, 1348, 1177, 1073, 748, 699 cm−1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C16H20O [M]+ 228.1514, found 228.1518.
4.3.19. 3-Methyl-2-(1-phenylethyl)cyclopent-2-enone (31)
The title compound was obtained as a colorless oil (18.5 mg, 92% yield) using 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one and potassium 2-phenylethyltrifluoroborate (19). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.28 (m, 4H), 7.17 (m, 1H), 4.05 (q, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz), 2.46 (m, 2H), 2.35 (m, 2H), 1.94 (s, 3H), 1.54 (d, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 208.9, 170.5, 144.2, 143.6, 128.2, 127.3, 125.9, 34.5, 34.3, 31.9, 17.7, missing 1C. FT-IR (neat) ν 3026, 2966, 2916, 1694, 1634, 1494, 1450, 1382, 1332, 1297, 1259, 1174, 1093, 1024, 942, 767, 700 cm−1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C14H16O [M]+ 200.1201, found 200.1194.
4.3.20. 3-Methyl-2-[3-(phenylthio)propyl]cyclopent-2-enone. (32)
The title compound was obtained as a yellow oil (22.2 mg, 90% yield) using 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one and potassium 3-phenylsulfenylpropyltrifluoroborate (20). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.32–7.17 (m, 4H), 7.15 (m, 1H), 2.87 (t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 2.48 (m, 2H), 2.35 (m, 2H), 2.32 (t, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz), 2.03 (s, 3H), 1.73 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 209.4, 170.9, 139.5, 136.5, 129.1, 12 8.8, 125.8, 34.3, 33.3, 31.6, 27.5, 22.0, 17.2. FT-IR (neat) ν 2916, 1694, 1645, 1480, 1438, 1384, 1302, 1261, 1178, 1075, 740, 691 cm−1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd. for C15H18OS [M]+ 246.1078, found 246.1083.
4.3.21. Reaction on 1.0 mmol scale for the preparati on of 6-(2-methyl-5-oxo-cyclopent-1-enyl)hexyl benzoate (2)
To a 10 mL round-bottom flask was added the potassium (6-benzoyloxy)hexyltrifluoroboarte (1) (343 mg, 1.1 mmol), Cs2CO3 (978 mg, 3.0 mmol), PdCl2(dppf)·CH2Cl2 (82 mg, 0.1 mmol), and 2-bromo-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one (175 mg, 1.0 mmol) with a stirring bar. The reaction mixture was purged with N2. Degassed toluene (4 mL) and H2O (1.4 mL) were added and the mixture was heated in an oil bath at 80 °C. The reaction was monitored by TLC. After 7 h, when the reaction was complete, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and extracted with ethyl acetate (3×5 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried, filtered, and then the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (eluting with hexane/EtOAc = 5/2) to obtain the desired compound 2 (233 mg, 78% yield).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Korea Research Foundation Grant funded by the Korean Government (MOEHRD) (KRF-2005-214-C00170). We thank the National Institutes of Health (GM35249), Mer ck Research Laboratories, Johnson Matthey and Amgen for their generous support.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errorsmaybe discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.(a) Tsuji J. Palladium Reagents and Catalysts. Wiley and Sons; Chichester: 1995. [Google Scholar]; (b) Negishi E, editor. Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis. Wiley-Interscience; New York: 2002. [Google Scholar]; (c) Miyaura N, editor. Cross-Coupling Reactions: A Practical Guide. Springer; Berlin: 2002. [Google Scholar]; (d) de Meijere A, Diederich F, editors. Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions. Wiley-VCH; New York: 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Miyaura N, Suzuki A. Chem. Rev. 1995;95:2457–2483. [Google Scholar]; (b) Suzuki A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999;576:147–168. [Google Scholar]; (c) Kotha S, Lahiri K, Kashinath D. Tetrahedron. 2002;58:9633–9695. [Google Scholar]; (d) Suzuki A, Brown HC. Organic Syntheses via Boranes. Vol. 3. Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc.; Milwaukee: 2003. [Google Scholar]; (e) Suzuki A. Proc. Jpn. Acad., Ser. B. 2004;80:359–371. [Google Scholar]; (f) Suzuki A. Chem. Commun. 2005:4759–4763. doi: 10.1039/b507375h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Netherton MR, Dai C, Neuschütz K, Fu GC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:10099–10100. doi: 10.1021/ja011306o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Kirchhoff JH, Dai C, Fu GC. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002;41:1945–1947. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Littke AF, Fu GC. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002;41:4176–4211. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20021115)41:22<4176::AID-ANIE4176>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Miyaura N, Ishiyama T, Ishikawa M, Suzuki A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986;27:6369–6372. [Google Scholar]; (b) Miyaura N, Ishiyama T, Sasaki H, Ishikawa M, Satoh M, Suzuki A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989;111:314–321. [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Chemler SR, Trauner D, Danishefsky SJ. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001;40:4544–4568. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20011217)40:24<4544::aid-anie4544>3.0.co;2-n. and references therein. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nicolaou KC, Bulger PG, Sarlah D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005;44:4442–4489. doi: 10.1002/anie.200500368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.(a) Molander GA, Figueroa R. Aldrichimica Acta. 2005;38:49–56. [Google Scholar]; (b) Darses S, Genêt J–P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003:4313–4327. [Google Scholar]; (c) Vedejs E, Chapman RW, Fields SC, Lin S, Schrimpf MR. J. Org. Chem. 1995;60:3020–3027. [Google Scholar]; (d) Vedejs E, Fields SC, Hayashi R, Hitchcock SR, Powell DR, Schrimpf MR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:2460–2470. [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Batey RA, MacKay DB, Santhakumar V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:5075–5076. [Google Scholar]; (b) Batey RA, Thadani AN, Smil DV. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999;40:4289–4292. [Google Scholar]; (c) Batey RA, Thadani AN, Smil DV. Org. Lett. 1999;1:1683–1686. [Google Scholar]; (d) Batey RA, Thadani AN, Smil DV, Lough AJ. Synthesis. 2000:990–998. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Molander GA, Ribagorda M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:11148–11149. doi: 10.1021/ja0351140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Molander GA, Figueroa R. Org. Lett. 2006;8:75–78. doi: 10.1021/ol052549e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Molander GA, Ham J. Org. Lett. 2006;8:2031–2034. doi: 10.1021/ol060375a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Molander GA, Ham J. Org. Lett. 2006;8:2767–2770. doi: 10.1021/ol060826r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.(a) Molander GA, Felix LA. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70:3950–3956. doi: 10.1021/jo050286w. For recent papers, see the following. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Molander GA, Figueroa R. Org. Lett. 2006;8:75–78. doi: 10.1021/ol052549e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Molander GA, Sommers EM, Baker SR. J. Org. Chem. 2006;71:1563–1568. doi: 10.1021/jo052201x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Molander GA, Yokoyama Y. J. Org. Chem. 2006;71:2493–2498. doi: 10.1021/jo052636k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Molander GA, Fumagalli T. J. Org. Chem. 2006;71:5743–5747. doi: 10.1021/jo0608366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Molander GA, Ito T. Org. Lett. 2001;3:393–396. doi: 10.1021/ol006896u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Molander GA, Yun C–S, Ribagorda M, Biolatto B. J. Org. Chem. 2003;68:5534–5539. doi: 10.1021/jo0343331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Molander GA, Bernardi CR. J. Org. Chem. 2002;67:8424–8429. doi: 10.1021/jo026236y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Akiba K, Iseki Y, Wada M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982;23:429–432. [Google Scholar]
